Oklahoma County jury convicts 19-year-old man in 2023 State Fair shooting
A 19-year-old man has been convicted on an assault charge as a result of his involvement in a shooting at the Oklahoma State Fair in 2023.
Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna announced the May 8, 2025, conviction of Canaan Jenkins of assault and battery with a deadly weapon. The conviction comes more than a year-and-a-half after he fired his weapon during a fight outside the Bennett Event Center on Sept. 23, 2023.
Jaelen Frazier was shot and treated for three weeks in the hospital before his release, a news release said. Officers located Jenkins, who was 17 years old at the time, after receiving a description of the shooter and the direction he fled after the shooting. Jenkins eventually admitted to the shooting, and told officers it was in self-defense, according to the release.
The Oklahoma County jury recommended a sentence of eight years time served in prison, but formal sentencing will take place June 30, 2025. The punishment for assault and battery with a deadly weapon ranges from zero years to life.
Jenkins also entered a blind plea of guilty for a conjoint robbery that took place the day before the shooting. He will also be sentenced for that conviction on June 30, with a minimum sentence of five years and a maximum of 50 years.
"DA Behenna would like to thank the jury for their time and thoughtful consideration during the trial, as well as the police who thoroughly investigated this case and the prosecutors and staff who prepared the case for trial," the release said.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Oklahoma State Fair 2023 shooting: 19-year-old found guilty of assault
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Vision of Government: Members Only
'No MAGA left behind.' So read the tweet sent by Donald Trump's pardon attorney, Ed Martin, following the president's pardon of former Culpeper County, Virginia, Sheriff Scott Jenkins. Jenkins was convicted by a jury in December and sentenced to 10 years for what the lead prosecutor, Zachary T. Lee, characterized as a 'cash-for-badges' scheme in which Jenkins received $75,000 in exchange for appointing local business leaders as auxiliary deputy sheriffs. It was about as cut-and-dry a case of bribery as one might conjure up. Yet Martin's tweet made clear that, however obvious Jenkins's violations of the public trust may have been, he possessed the one asset that exempted him from justice: He's a made man in Magaland. Jenkins has been a consistent and vocal supporter of Donald Trump, who posted on Truth Social that the sheriff was 'a victim of an overzealous Biden Department of Justice, and doesn't deserve to spend a single day in jail.' Naturally, there's no evidence that Jenkins was in any way a victim of prosecutorial malfeasance, but there is ample evidence that the pardon criteria followed by the Trump administration are based primarily on one thing: loyalty—demonstrated either through one's actions (including the commission of crimes on the president's behalf) or, alternatively, by paying a high enough price to demonstrate fealty. Elizabeth Fago, the mother of tax cheat Paul Walczak, did both—ponying up $1 million to attend a Trump dinner. She was also careful to note on her application for her son's clemency that she'd raised millions of dollars for Trump's campaign, while reminding them, too, of her efforts to publish the addiction diary of Joe Biden's daughter Ashley. Walczak got his pardon. So have many others for whom Trump has expressed support—not because they were innocent, because overwhelmingly they were no such thing, but because they're either MAGA members or tapped to join the club. Stewart Rhodes, leader of the Oath Keepers, had been sentenced to 18 years for his planning of the January 6 Capitol assault. He's free after Trump commuted that sentence, much to the horror of Rhodes's ex-wife Tasha Adams, who has accused him of being a serial domestic abuser and has called him a 'danger to America.' Rhodes's MAGA membership card not only got him clemency, but also the privilege of meeting with Republican lawmakers once he was sprung. Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio did even better, getting to join Trump at Mar-a-Lago last month after being sentenced to 22 years in prison for his role in the January 6 attack. Tarrio reported that he and his mother had a 'great conversation' with the president. Meanwhile, visa holders like Rümeysa Öztürk and hundreds of others face different fates. They can be kidnapped off the street and imprisoned. Some, like Maryland resident Kilmar Abegro Garcia, makeup artist Andry José Hernández Romero, and scores of Venezuelans can all be sent away to a gulag in El Salvador without any due process, despite court rulings that indicate such actions are unconstitutional. Many thousands of others sit in American jails or prisons, including federal penitentiaries, because they cannot pay bail, or have drug addictions, or were the victims of systematic bias. Nothing is being done for them. Why? They are not MAGA members. They are not protected. Just like any made man in the Mafia, to be a member of the MAGA Club you must vow allegiance to the group. The mob has omertà, its code of silence. MAGA has its own version—omaga, you might call it: Don't ever speak ill of the president or question his motives. You must buy wholly into the MAGA narrative to be considered a full MAGA member. Like any multilevel marketing scheme, the more you pay into the cult and spread its gospel, the more privileges you earn. It's why we see Cabinet meetings wherein department heads try to one-up each other in their praise of the president. Like any other gang of scheming capos, they're trying to please the Don. They're afraid of being turned out of the club. There is a principle known as Wilhoit's Law, deriving from a classical music composer who first posted it on the site Crooked Timber. It states, 'Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.' With Trump's criminal syndicate running the show, the out-groups are various: liberals, Black people, single women, strong women, the LGBTQ+ community, undocumented immigrants, most other immigrant groups, environmentalists, and anyone who doesn't drink at the Fountain of Trump. The president has no intention whatsoever of representing these people, even if they make up relatively half of the country. His goal, instead, is to elevate MAGA members above them. Most of those members will stay with him, he's realized, even if he takes away vital government services they need, such as Medicaid and protections against hazardous foods and unrestrained monopolies, because he has empowered them. Critically, he has given them the very commodity they desperately crave: social status and a feeling of belonging. Democrats are a nuisance because they make people reflect upon things; Trump makes them part of the in-group, in on the joke and entitled to special consideration. Because the gospel of the MAGA Club must remain whole and cannot be challenged, universities and journalists (the ones outside of the right-wing propaganda network) will always be enemies of the Magaverse as well. For all their faults, the overwhelming majority of universities still practice the scientific method and value objective observation and free discussion, even if they may falter in the execution of both from time to time. And those journalists who cannot be quelled into subservience will always be the bane of liars, opportunists, and bullies. This club membership mentality represents a stark break from the politics of the recent past. Presidents have generally looked to convert naysayers to their cause and unite Americans behind their agendas, to build support. Even Nixon, who railed about the press, created an enemies list, and wasn't beyond accusing people of being Communists throughout his career, was also capable of expressing sympathetic understanding for those who disagreed with him, including Vietnam protesters whom he said shared his good intentions and wanted to save American lives. He vilified some, but craved the support of the majority of the nation—the 'silent majority,' as he called it. Trump, on the other hand, has never expressed any sort of sympathy or magnanimity for those who disagree with him. He calls protesters 'terrorist sympathizers' and characterizes them as violent extremists. In his first administration, he even threatened to shoot them. And yet he set the actual MAGA terrorists that attacked the Capitol on January 6 free from prison en masse, no questions asked. Even Trump's social media posts—his incessant trolling (including, recently, a posting with alt-right hate symbol Pepe the Frog)—are intended as signals to club members. Membership has its privileges, including up-to-the-minute updates on whose eye Trump is poking, be they the libs, antifascists, 'alien invaders,' or the critics who dare to question him. That party will never end, so keep your club membership! His recent post about Biden being replaced by a robot, for one, could only have two possible explanations: Trump is stupid enough to believe it (not ruling that out) or he's signaling once again to his supporters that their club—the 'in' group—is mocking and humiliating the outsiders. He made sure to continue to tell his supporters not to feel sorry for Biden, despite his cancer diagnosis, and to continue to attack him because he's a 'vicious' person. He wants to make sure they're still empowered to be callous. The entire point is to expand the ideology behind Wilhoit's Law to a national and perhaps international scale, pitting the aggrieved against their perceived adversaries. Naturally, Trump did not invent this system of ideological rewards and punishments; he has merely built upon groundwork laid by Fox 'News,' Salem Media, and a vast right-wing network of conservative talk show hosts, influencers, and podcasters who have been beating the jingoistic drum of division for decades, positing (as practically every authoritarian regime throughout history has done) that the true greatness of the nation has been undermined by saboteurs from within. Here, he does not finger corporate titans for blame, but rather the poor, the underrepresented, and the maligned classes who have historically been disinvited from elite circles. The privileged want to retain their privileges, the bullies among them yearn to bully again, and neither want to be questioned or criticized. It's why their version of free speech includes an absence of consequences. Consequences only apply to those without power. Life in the big MAGA club is consequence-free.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Key takeaways from Mackinac Policy Conference's Detroit mayoral debate
Five candidates faced off at the Detroit mayoral debate during the Mackinac Policy Conference, May 29, 2025. | Kyle Davidson MACKINAC ISLAND – On the final night of the Mackinac Policy Conference, five candidates gathered in the Grand Hotel's Tea Garden to make their case on why they should be Detroit's next mayor. The five-person panel included former Detroit Police Chief James Craig, Detroit City Council member Fred Durhal III, former nonprofit CEO Saunteel Jenkins, Triumph Church Pastor Rev. Solomon Kinloch, Jr. and current Detroit City Council President Mary Sheffield. Candidates fielded questions about the city's tax incentives, their plans to support business and education, address violent crime and poverty and ensure sustainable funding in the city's budget. Although the panel did not represent the full range of candidates seeking election as the city's mayor, the group was selected by the Detroit Regional Chamber's Political Action Committee due to time constraints. Attorney Todd Perkins, businessman Joel Haashiim, entrepreneur Jonathan Barlow and two-time mayoral candidate Danetta Simpson are also competing for Detroit's executive office, with the primary election scheduled for August 5. The two candidates with the highest vote total will advance to the general election on Nov. 4. With a wide field of candidates each seeking to make the final ballot, here are the highlights from each participant. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Opening the debate, Jenkins noted that many of the city's tax abatement programs would begin expiring in 2027, with over half set to expire by 2030. Jenkins said she would retool these programs at the risk of losing businesses and jobs within Detroit. As Mayor Mike Duggan – who opted against seeking reelection to pursue an independent bid for governor – worked to rebuild confidence in the city, bringing in investments and jobs, the same needed to happen in the city's neighborhoods, Jenkins said, calling for a commercial corridor in each of the city's seven districts. 'We have to ensure that our planning is intentional and that it is inclusive,' Jenkins said. 'And when we are having discussions about tax abatements, discussions about affordable housing, we have a real plan in place that is driving development and affordable housing and public transit in a way that is building our neighborhoods.' If elected, Jenkins said she would craft a strategic plan to help shape economic development in each district, working with communities to decide how they want their commercial districts to look. There is also a need for additional office space for startups that can't afford space downtown, she said. Neighborhood planning efforts should include schools, in order to ensure students have access to high quality options for education, Jenkins said. Additionally, as the city moves forward without $826 million in federal revenue it received through the American Rescue Plan Act, and payments under the city's 'Grand Bargain' coming to an end, the city needed to find ways to grow its businesses and its population, Jenkins said. She noted that she sees a role for a chief growth officer in her administration, if elected. Throughout the debate, Durhal pointed to his prior experience as a member of the Michigan Legislature, promising to coordinate with lawmakers on property tax reform and a willingness to go to bat for additional resources for education within the city. He repeatedly noted, however, that solutions come with a price tag, quoting his grandmother in saying there's 'no romance without finance.' Aside from pressing the city to utilize its current resources and maintaining discipline in the budget process, Durhal proposed a tax on blighted properties and a speculative tax on land sitting under development as potential new sources of revenue. He also pitched a corridor improvement authority for the city, focused on creating walkable neighborhoods where residents have access to groceries and other amenities, which could catalyze small business in the process. Kinloch remained focused on Detroit's neighborhoods and their residents throughout the debate, and said he would work to bring the neighborhoods to the table on issues like tax policy. Kinloch said that the next mayor needed to be open to doing something new to address homelessness, poverty and job creation. He also argued the city's budget could use input from people whose priorities are aligned with the community. On the push to bring business back to residential areas of the city, Kinloch said Detroit should leverage its corporate, philanthropic and community partnerships to create an apprenticeship program to funnel Detroiters into high paying jobs. The city should also work with private-industry grocers to mentor entrepreneurship opportunities, Kinloch said. He also called for an end to food deserts within the city's neighborhoods. 'People shouldn't have to eat out of a liquor store or a gas station,' Kinloch said. Addressing education, Kinloch said his administration would bring in a chief educational officer to coordinate with the Detroit Public Schools superintendent and school board to ensure that the city is providing supplemental resources to ensure students arrive at school healthy and whole. As his fellow candidates offered pitches to address poverty and support businesses in the city, Craig said there needs to be a focus on growing the middle class. 'I talked a lot about growing small businesses. That doesn't take away from continuing to grow big businesses,' Craig said. 'We have got to raise revenues in the city. … We have to collaborate.' That means having a business-friendly city, Craig said. 'And one of the things that I've heard as chief and deputy mayor over time is that in many of the neighborhoods, they feel left out,' he said. 'They feel left out, the businesses feel left out.' Craig argued there's too much red tape for businesses coming into the city, and that efforts to make the city more friendly to business would help stabilize property taxes and keep them lower. He further emphasized the importance of continuing to bring in new business, and that tax dollars pay for vital services like police, fire departments and infrastructure. On policing, Craig promised to pick up where he left off in building trust through neighborhood policing, and noted that homicides had fallen to the lowest level since the 1960s during his tenure as police chief. However, Craig criticized gun buyback programs within the city, saying 'I have never in my 44 years in policing seen a criminal turn in a gun.' 'They don't work. It's all political talk,' he said. While other candidates pledged to work across the aisle to win support for the city from lawmakers in Lansing, Craig pointed to his existing relationship with President Donald Trump, who praised Craig for his response to Black Lives Matter protests in the Summer of 2020. Protestors later filed federal lawsuits arguing the Detroit Police Department used unconstitutional and excessive force and prevented them from exercising their First Amendment rights. The city agreed to a $1 million settlement in 2022. 'It's not about me, it's not about the president, it's about the city of Detroit,' he said. As her opponents offered solutions to address the expiring tax abatement program, Sheffield said her focus would be on addressing poverty and the high property tax rate, which lead to the need for these programs to begin with. Sheffield promised 'real structural property tax reform,' instead. The city also needs to continue to build its middle class, Sheffield said, noting that while Detroit's median income sits around $38,000, the median for the state is around $70,000. 'Without a doubt, we have to ensure that more investment comes back into our neighborhoods, and that we're activating our commercial corridors,' Sheffield said. 'I'm very excited for my administration to be way more hands on as it relates to the education of our youth.' Schools and the workforce are also targets for support, Sheffield said. 'We have to invest more in education and the workforce, creating a pipeline that is ready for the jobs that are coming for today and of tomorrow,' she said. Sheffield also called for a holistic approach in addressing crime which includes community policing alongside programs and efforts to deal with the root causes of violence. She said that could be done by providing support for mental health, jobs and education. If elected, Sheffield said she would retain Todd Bettison as police chief. Detroit is also in need of a new funding approach for programs that would have previously been funded by the federal government. Sheffield said she would consider floating a local sales option tax, a tax on admission to sporting events, concerts and other types of entertainment or a half-a-penny tax. 'If cost savings could be achieved within various departments, I think we should look at that, but more importantly, it's going to be about bringing more revenue into the city of Detroit to fund various programs,' Sheffield said, who later promised to aggressively pursue federal funding alongside state and local partners.
USA Today
6 days ago
- USA Today
Police search for man suspected of fatally stabbing his 2 sisters in Chicago area
Police search for man suspected of fatally stabbing his 2 sisters in Chicago area Show Caption Hide Caption Ex-Arkansas police chief imprisoned for murder escapes prison Grant Hardin, a former Gateway, Arkansas, police chief serving time for murder and rape, escaped from the North Central Unit in Calico Rock on May 25. unbranded - Newsworthy Police in a Chicago suburb are searching for a man suspected of stabbing a woman and a young girl, identified by local media as his sisters. The Streamwood Police Department identified 25-year-old Jalonie Jenkins as the suspect involved in the killing of a 21-year-old woman and a 10-year-old girl in Streamwood, Illinois, on Wednesday evening, May 28. Jenkins' last known location was in Bensenville, a suburb near the Chicago O'Hare International Airport, police said. The two victims were identified as Janyia Jenkins, 21, and Eyani Jones, 10, the Cook County Medical Examiner confirmed to USA TODAY. According to CBS News and ABC7, which cite neighbors and friends of the family, the two victims were Jenkins' younger sisters. Community not believed to be in 'further danger' In a statement on Facebook, Streamwood Police Chief Shawn Taylor said: "Our deepest sympathies are with the families of these young victims. We are working hard to bring a swift resolution to this case so the families can grieve." Taylor added that the department does not believe the community is in "further danger." "This remains a tragic, isolated incident," Taylor said. "However, we believe in erring on the side of caution. If you see the suspect, please avoid him, and call 911 immediately.' Anyone with information should contact the Streamwood Police Department at 630-736-3700 or email police@ or leave a message on the department's confidential tip line at 630-736-3719. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
