Stellantis to cut up to 200 jobs through voluntary exits at Italy's Termoli plant
Carmaker
Stellantis
has agreed with trade unions to implement up to 200 voluntary redundancies at its
Termoli plant
in central Italy, the company said on Thursday.
The announcement follows similar ones on Wednesday and last month for other Italian plants, allowing the Fiat-maker to reduce its workforce in the country by up to some 1,000 employees.
The initiative is part of the company's strategy aimed at rejuvenating its workforce in Italy, which recently included around 300 new hires in Turin, the historic home city of Fiat, and Atessa in central Italy, Stellantis said in a statement.
The company has fewer than 40,000 staff in Italy, down from 55,000 in early 2021, when it was created through the merger of
Fiat Chrysler
and Peugeot maker PSA.
"Stellantis reaffirms that Italy is at the centre of the group's strategies," it said.
Stellantis presented a plan to the Italian government last December to revitalise its output in the country, following years of declining production but the benefit is not expected to be felt until next year.
In March, Stellantis began preparatory activities at the Termoli plant for installing a production line dedicated to electric Dual Clutch Transmission (eDCT) gearboxes for current and future hybrid vehicles.
With this development, Termoli became the third Stellantis production hub alongside Mirafiori in Turin and Metz in France.
Termoli was also one of the sites that Stellantis-led joint venture ACC picked to build its three EV battery making plants in Europe, although ACC subsequently put the plans for gigafactories in Italy and Germany on hold due to sluggish market demand for electric vehicles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Musk's spat with President Trump sparks fresh troubles for Tesla
Elon Musk's bitter falling-out with United States (US) President Donald Trump could be costly for Tesla. As long as he is persona non grata in the Trump administration, Musk, the chief executive of Tesla, will struggle to persuade Republicans not to gut climate policies worth billions of dollars to the electric car and battery company. Musk may also lose sway over federal regulators who could make or break his plans to deploy driverless taxis, which he has described as the future of the company. Tesla is already suffering steep declines in sales and profit. Its share price plummeted 14 per cent on Thursday, its biggest one-day decline, after Musk and Trump began insulting each other on social media. The stock recovered somewhat Friday, rising nearly 4 per cent, perhaps on hopes that the men would reach a truce or because investors thought the stock was now a bargain. There was always a disconnect between Musk and his Republican allies on electric cars. The domestic policy bill passed by House Republicans and being considered by the Senate will hurt the electric car market in the US, where Tesla is the largest manufacturer by far. The bill would eliminate tax credits of up to $7,500 for people who buy electric cars. It would quickly phase out subsidies for battery factories and lithium refineries, and end financial support for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. The bill also imposes an annual fee of $250 on EV owners. Those measures would hurt all carmakers that sell EVs. But the Trump administration is also trying to kill regulations that are especially beneficial to Tesla, which allow it to sell clean air credits to other firms that fail to meet environmental standards. During the first three months of the year, Tesla sold regulatory credits worth $595 million, which was more than the company's net profit of $409 million. In other words, without the credits, Tesla would have lost money. 'In many years, it's the difference between being in the black and being in the red for Tesla,' said Jesse Jenkins, an assistant professor at Princeton University who studies the EV industry. He has calculated that the Republican measures would result in sales of 7.7 million fewer electric vehicles by 2030 than would be the case if the Biden administration policies remained in place. Republican legislation would also eliminate programs that subsidise the cost of large battery storage projects, which has been a growth business for Tesla. Turbulent times - New domestic policy Bill to eliminate tax credits for people who buy EVs, and impose an annual fee of $250 - Will also phase out subsidies for battery factories and lithium refineries, and end financial support for EV charging stations - Trump admin also trying to kill regulations especially beneficial for Tesla - Those rules allow firm to sell clean air credits to other car makers that fail to meet environmental standards
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
No need of slum-dwellers' nod for Dharavi project, says CEO
MUMBAI: Responding to queries on the resistance to the Dharavi redeveloment project from a section of slum-dwellers, its CEO, S V R Srinivas, told TOI that more than 50% of the residents have already consented to the project. But more significantly, he revealed that the project did not require public consent in the first place because the developer had been appointed by the state govt. "Under the SRA rules, the building society appoints the developer. For that, 50% consent is required. But here, the govt has appointed the developer. In this case, there is no need for consent," said Srinivas in an exclusive interview to TOI. The project is being implemented by Nav Bharat Mega Developers Pvt Ltd, an SPV in which the Adani Group holds 80% stake and the govt 20%. The land on which Dharavi stands is owned by the govt and the BMC. Srinivas said around 1 lakh slum-dwellers had responded to the house-to-house survey and just around 20,000 remained to be surveyed. So even if the 50% consent parameter was applied, it had already been crossed, he said. Participation in the door-to-door survey on eligibility for rehabilitation translated into consent, he clarified. "They have given their documents voluntarily. There is a line in the survey which says they are willing to participate in the redevelopment. So, when they sign, it is consent," said Srinivas. Although consent is not required for the project, the govt had made multiple efforts to get residents to respond to the survey and agree to the project, he emphasised. "We don't want to ride roughshod on anybody. We have already given four opportunities. We put it in the newspaper and then we also put it on their doors," he said. Srinivas said that the survey was still ongoing but roughly 5 lakh eligible tenements would need to be given free space within Dharavi and 5 lakh ineligible tenements would have to move out to subsidised rental housing outside Dharavi. But the question is: Why a massive expanse of 541 acres of land has been earmarked for rental housing and a free sale component for the Adani-led SPV? This has fuelled allegations from the opposition that the project is essentially a "land-grab" to capture lucrative real estate both within and outside Dharavi. The 541 acres for rental housing have been allocated in Deonar, Kurla, Aksa, Malvani and salt pan lands in Bhandup, Mulund and Kanjurmarg. Of this, possession has been given of 63.5 acres so far in Kurla and Mulund. Srinivas said the land meant for rental housing was in the possession of the state's DRP and was not with the Adani-led SPV. "The problem is that there is a shortage of land in Mumbai. We had written to many different agencies including from the central government for these lands. In some cases, there were rejections. So, we did not know which lands would come and we started applying to different places," he said. "Now these lands are coming but they will be with the DRP. Unless people are rehabilitated, the land will not be given to the SPV," he said. He also said that rental units would be built in phases. If all the land was not required, then all the parcels would not be used. The land which is not used from the 541 acres would then revert from the DRP to the govt. "Our mandate is limited to Dharavi. The land that is not used, will revert to the govt," said Srinivas. Responding to questions about the basis on which the project has been planned since the door-to-door survey on eligible and ineligible tenements is yet to be completed, Srinivas said, "There was initially a drone survey followed by a LIDAR survey to map the structures in the area. And now there is a physical door-to-door survey, which is almost complete. Based on these three, we did a comparison and an extrapolation of data, which is how it works. In projects of this size, some things can go on simultaneously," he said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
Nepal tea inflow puts India in a bind over Darjeeling and diplomacy
As duty-free tea varieties from Nepal flood the domestic mkt, challenging the iconic Darjeeling tea, India walks a tightrope, weighing geopolitical calculations and domestic political considerations Ishita Ayan Dutt Kolkata Listen to This Article Falling production, shrinking global footprint, and a flood of cheaper imports from neighbouring Nepal – Darjeeling tea, celebrated as the 'Champagne of teas', is losing its aroma. The Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government has sounded the alarm urging the Centre to invoke the safeguard clause in the India-Nepal trade treaty, seeking protection for Darjeeling tea from the surge of unregulated Nepalese imports. Signed in 2009 and renewed every seven years, the India-Nepal treaty provides for a safeguard clause, which can be triggered if imports
