
Approving US-made cars would make UK roads less safe
Although there's not currently much of an appetite for American-made cars in Britain, the US wants its vehicles to be declared 'equivalent' to ours in safety terms – despite them falling way short.
Why is the safety of US-market cars an issue?
Following President Donald Trump's directive that America should sell more cars abroad, the US and EU are currently in negotiations.
The US believes the EU's stricter vehicle safety rules are simply a form of trade protectionism. US ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland said: 'If we sell you a vegetable or a car or a product, if it's safe to use in the US it should be deemed safe to use in the EU.'
Are US vehicles safe?
'When it comes to protecting pedestrians and everyone else outside of vehicles, the gap between crash standards in the US and Europe is an ocean wide,' James Nix, vehicles policy manager for pressure group Transport & Environment (T&E) said.
Dudley Curtis from the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) added: 'One long-standing issue is the design of the front end of vehicles. In America you don't have a pedestrian protection requirement. We've had these since 2003.'
What safety equipment do US cars lack?
There's a host of safety equipment we take for granted that isn't compulsory on US-market cars.
At the very basic level, seatbelt reminders have been compulsory in cars sold in Europe since 2019. In the US, they are only required for the driver's seat. The Biden administration wanted them all-round in 2026-27 but experts think that's now unlikely to happen.
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) has been hailed as the greatest safety advance since the seatbelt as it slows a car automatically if it detects an impending impact. Since 2022 it must be fitted to every new car sold in the EU (and the UK). The US was due to make it compulsory in 2029 but the ETSC says the Trump government has suspended that.
Cars sold this side of the Atlantic since 2022 must also have intelligent speed adaptation. This uses cameras and GPS to encourage drivers to stick to speed limits. Again, it's not compulsory in the US. Neither is fatigue monitoring or emergency calling, which enables the car to automatically summon assistance if it detects a possible driver-incapacitating accident.
Then there are the things we don't see. To get the top five-star Euro NCAP crash test rating, vehicles sold in the EU must pass stringent tests for the protection of occupants in frontal and side-impact collisions, whiplash prevention and safety assist features, as well as pedestrian safety.
Equivalent testing by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the US isn't as rigorous. 'For example, they don't use the latest [more sophisticated] generation of crash test dummies,' the director-general of Europe for the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), Laurianne Krid, pointed out.
What is the problem with selling US-market vehicles here?
As we've seen, simply saying a US car is as safe as a European one doesn't make it so. James Nix from T&E said: 'Particularly since the 2000s, Europe has made significant vehicle safety improvements that simply weren't mirrored in the US.'
To maintain this improved safety standard, all manufacturers – whether from Europe, Korea, Japan, China or the US – must currently seek European type approval for their cars to sell them in large volumes here.
There are concerns that giving in to the US would set a precedent for other countries. The ETSC's Curtis explained: 'We want to send a very clear message that this is a bad idea and will be a big mistake. We don't want to see the EU's world-leading vehicle safety standards undermined, because it's hard to see how that doesn't then undermine the whole system.'
If the US gets its way, we might also see an influx of much larger vehicles. The FIA's Krid said: 'Most of the crash tests we do don't test the compatibility of smaller vehicles with much larger ones. Having larger vehicles coming to Europe isn't going to be great for road safety in general.'
There's also the impact on infrastructure. Krid added: 'We do know the heavier the vehicles and the fewer the axles that weight is put on, the more damage there is to the infrastructure. So bringing in larger vehicles will have an impact on roads.' And the last thing we need is more potholes.
Why aren't US vehicles as safe?
Of course some US-made vehicles such as Teslas meet European type approval requirements, but they are the exception rather than the rule.
The ETSC's Curtis explained: 'The US and Europe have two different regulatory systems. In the US, there's manufacturer self-certification before a car can be sold. Then there's a robust enforcement system run by [the] NHTSA.
'The European type approval system independently checks components, systems and the whole vehicle before it's allowed to be sold.'
The result is that US roads are significantly less safe than Europe's. The ETSC says that since 2013, road deaths in the EU have decreased by 16 per cent. In the US over the same period, they have increased by 25 per cent.
How likely is equivalency to happen?
With the Trump government nothing is off the table. 'It's hard to second guess what the US strategy is,' said Curtis. The concern is it could be the thin end of a wedge that will see larger US vehicles coming in through a back door.
Currently, if you want to fizz around Fulham in a monster Ford F-Series pick-up, you can buy one via the individual vehicle approval (IVA) loophole. Sales of giant Chevrolet Silverados sold in Europe through IVA went up by 513 per cent between 2022 and 2023. Safety experts want the IVA loophole closed.
Krid warned: 'There is a genuine risk that some vehicles [deemed unsafe in Europe] might come through. That's what happens in negotiations. We want to limit the loopholes or whatever might arise from the trade agreement.'
One thing is for sure, there are multiple reasons we should all be concerned about the prospect of car safety standards being diluted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
US consumer prices increase moderately; worries about data quality rise
WASHINGTON, Aug 12 (Reuters) - U.S. consumer prices increased moderately in July, though rising costs for services such as airline fares and some tariff-sensitive goods like household furniture caused a measure of underlying inflation to post its largest gain in six months. The mixed report from the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics on Tuesday did not change financial market expectations that the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates in September amid signs of a deterioration in labor market conditions. Economists, however, cautioned that higher prices from President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs were still coming. They argued that businesses continued to sell merchandise accumulated before the import duties came into effect. While financial markets breathed a sigh of relief on the data, concerns are mounting over the quality of inflation and employment reports following budget and staffing cuts that have resulted in the suspension of data collection for portions of the Consumer Price Index basket in some areas across the country. Those worries were amplified by the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the head of the BLS, early this month after data showed stall-speed job growth in July. Trump on Monday nominated Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni, a critic of the BLS, to head the statistics agency. Antoni was a contributor to "Project 2025," the controversial conservative plan to overhaul the federal government. "Investors might want to hold back on the no-inflation celebration, however, because the goods sitting on store shelves arrived on boats months ago and the tariff hikes have yet to be applied to the goods on ships steaming the consumers' way right now," said Christopher Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS. "Inflation is coming." The CPI rose 0.2% last month after a gain of 0.3% in June. The moderation reflected a 2.2% decline in gasoline prices. Food prices were unchanged after rising 0.3% for two straight months. Grocery store food prices fell 0.1% as a 3.9% drop in the cost of eggs more than offset a 1.5% increase in beef prices and 1.9% rise in the cost of milk. In the 12 months through July, the CPI advanced 2.7%, matching the rise in June. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the CPI would rise 0.2% and increase 2.8% on a year-over-year basis. Excluding volatile food and energy components, the CPI rose 0.3%, the biggest gain since January, after climbing 0.2% in June. The so-called core CPI was lifted by higher prices for services, including a 4.0% rebound in airline fares as well as strong increases in the costs of healthcare and dental services. The cost of household furnishings and supplies rose 0.7%, while footwear prices surged 1.4%. Motor vehicle parts and equipment prices vaulted 0.9%, driven by a 1.0% increase in the cost of tires. The core CPI increased 3.1% on a year-over-year basis in July after an advance of 2.9% in June. The U.S. central bank tracks different inflation measures for its 2% target. The Fed left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range last month for the fifth straight time since December. U.S. stocks opened higher. The dollar slipped against a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury yields fell. The BLS has suspended data collection after years of what economists described as the underfunding of the BLS under both Republican and Democratic administrations. The situation has been exacerbated by the Trump White House's unprecedented campaign to reshape the government through deep spending cuts and mass layoffs of public workers. Citing the need to "align survey workload with resource levels," the BLS suspended CPI data collection completely in one city in Nebraska, Utah and New York. It has also suspended collection on 15% of the sample in the other 72 areas, on average. This move affected both the commodity and services pricing survey as well as the housing survey, which the BLS said resulted in the number of collected prices and the number of collected rents used to calculate the CPI being temporarily reduced. That has led the BLS to use imputations, opens new tab to fill in the missing information. The share of different cell imputation in the CPI data jumped to 35% in June from 30% in May. Different cell imputation, which the BLS uses when all prices are unavailable in the home cell, maintains the item category but expands geography. The home cell method, considered by economists as higher quality, uses the average price of the same item in the same location as the missing product's price. The use of different cell imputation has grown from a share of only 8% in June 2024. Economists said while these measures adopted by the BLS will not introduce bias in the CPI data, the volatility was a cause for concern.


ITV News
27 minutes ago
- ITV News
'We knew we had to get out': Family with trans daughter flees US for New Zealand
Candace and Brandon have lived in Colorado on and off for nine years. They planned to raise their two children there. But last month, the couple was forced to spend their life savings to relocate to New Zealand. The reason, they say, is to protect their ten-year-old transgender daughter from the new administration's targeting of trans individuals within the United States. ' When we woke up the next day and saw Trump had won, we knew we had to get out,' Candace recalled. 'We knew based on the platforms he was running on, and Project 2025, it was a huge indicator of what his next term was going to look like. The fact that they were targeting trans folks, we knew that the writing was on the wall." Trump signs an executive order recognising two sexes only In January, President Donald Trump issued an executive order aimed at restricting access to gender-affirming care for minors. His inauguration speech made his intentions clear. "As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male and female,' Trump said. That line on that day was a turning point for Candace and Brandon. 'It was awful, we just sat there and cried. We couldn't even watch it. It was incredibly devastating to our family to see all of it. 'We had been told by so many people, it's not going to be that bad that quickly, or Project 2025 isn't really going to happen. Day one, it was already awful.' 'Then it was just a matter of where should we go?' Candace said. Chase's hospital stops providing transition-related care Candace felt there was a glimmer of hope for their daughter because they lived in a blue state. She felt like it might shield Chase from the executive order, which blocked federal funds from going to hospitals that provide transition-related care to minors. But Chase's medical team at the Children's Hospital Colorado told them 16 days into the new administration that it could no longer provide transition-related medical care to anyone under 19. The couple were shocked. Colorado was one of a dozen states that passed 'shield' laws, intended to protect access to trans health care. 'Sixteen days in, we got the email that they weren't going to be able to continue medical gender affirming care. That's awful in and of itself, but then we had to deal with her passport,' Candace said. 'We knew we were leaving, and her passport says female, so what was that going to look like? 'We had already heard so many stories of trans people trying to change their gender marker back and them not getting their passports back. Or if they did get them back, they were damaged,' she added. Their daughter is one of the 1.6 million American citizens who identify as transgender, one in five of whom are between the ages of 13 and 17, according to the Williams Institute think-tank at the University of California. Candace said she had sensed her daughter was going to be gender diverse. Chase came out to her parents as non-binary at the age of six. Later that year, she announced that she identified as a girl. Candace admits she initially wanted her daughter to keep figuring out her non-binary identity rather than fully transition, a response which she deeply regrets. But Candace never wavered in her support of her daughter and was committed to making sure she was gender-affirmed. Brandon began researching emigrating to Spain, Portugal, New Zealand or Canada. Candace organised a GoFundMe fundraiser with a goal of $50,000 towards relocating. In the end, they chose New Zealand because Brandon had visited the country a few years ago and knew it was a very LGBTQI+ friendly place, where their children would be able to speak the language and assimilate with relative ease. Brandon received a job offer from a company in New Zealand, and the family packed up their life in America within two months, saying goodbye to the grandparents, cousins and siblings they left behind. Moving was the 'right choice', says Candace As Candace looks forward to her new life 7,400 miles away from home, she is adjusting to life in Queenstown with anxiety and hope. The children started their new school on Monday. "They could not stop talking over one another to talk about what a great day they had - it's heartwarming for us," Candace recalled. "As far as the transness, the great thing is the only documentation needed here is [Chase's] visa and passport, which both say female. It's only going to come up if she chooses to share that with someone.' Unsure if or whether they will ever return to America due to the fear of their daughter's documentation, Candace has no regrets about leaving. 'As we were leaving, we got a message from the gender affirming Care Clinic in Colorado saying that the Department of Justice had subpoenaed records. That is a HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violation. All of these things keep proving that this was the right choice for us.' The moral argument around whether to remain in the US in the face of the increasing hostility towards trans people weighs heavily on Candace and Brandon. 'People said to us, 'Why don't you stay and fight the good fight, stay here and fight for her rights?' "She's a ten-year-old child, we can't stay and fight when her safety, her mental well-being and her health care are at risk,' Candace said. 'It was actually my mum who said, 'You guys go, you get safe. We'll stay here and fight the good fight for you'.'


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
A UFC fight at the White House? Dana White says it's happening as part of deal with Paramount
Hours after Paramount and UFC announced a billion-dollar rights deal, Dana White said he had yet to hear from his friend, President Donald Trump, on his thoughts about the fight company's new streaming home. That was fine with White. The UFC CEO was set to travel to Washington on Aug. 28 to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka, to catch up and discuss logistics on the proposed Fourth of July fight card next year at the White House. Trump said last month he wanted to stage a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards of 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. 'It's absolutely going to happen," White told The Associated Press. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.' The idea of cage fights at the White House would have seemed improbable when the Frittata brothers purchased UFC for $2 million in 2001 and put White in charge of the fledging fight promotion. White helped steer the company into a $4 billion sale in 2016 and broadcast rights deals with Fox and ESPN before landing owner TKO Group's richest one yet — a seven-year deal with Paramount starting in 2026 worth an average of $1.1 billion a year, with all cards on its streaming platform Paramount+ and select numbered events also set to simulcast on CBS. ESPN, Amazon and Netflix and other traditional sports broadcast players seemed more in play for UFC rights — White had previously hinted fights could air across different platforms — but Paramount was a serious contender from the start of the negotiating window. The Paramount and UFC deal came just days after Skydance and Paramount officially closed their $8 billion merger — kicking off the reign of a new entertainment giant after a contentious endeavor to get the transaction over the finish line. White said he was impressed with the vision Skydance CEO David Ellison had for the the global MMA leader early in contract talks and how those plans should blossom now that Ellison is chairman and CEO of Paramount. 'When you talk about Paramount, you talk about David Ellison, they're brilliant businessmen, very aggressive, risk takers,' White said. 'They're right up my alley. These are the kind of guys that I like to be in business with.' The $1.1 billion deals marks a notable jump from the roughly $550 million that ESPN paid each year for UFC coverage today. But UFC's new home on Paramount will simplify offerings for fans — with all content set to be available on Paramount+ (which currently costs between $7.99 and $12.99 a month), rather than various pay-per-view fees. Paramount also said it intends to explore UFC rights outside the U.S. 'as they become available in the future.' UFC matchmakers were set to meet this week to shape what White said would be a loaded debut Paramount card. The UFC boss noted it was still too early to discuss a potential main event for the White House fight night. 'This is a 1-of-1 event,' White said. There are still some moving parts to UFC broadcasts and other television programming it has its hands in as the company moves into the Paramount era. White said there are still moving parts to the deal and that includes potentially finding new homes for 'The Ultimate Fighter,' 'Road To UFC,' and 'Dana White's Contender Series.' It's not necessarily a given the traditional 10 p.m. start time for what were the pay-per-view events would stand, especially on nights cards will also air on CBS. 'We haven't figured that out yet but we will,' White said. And what about the sometimes-contentious issue of fighter pay? Some established fighters have clauses in their contracts that they earn more money the higher the buyrate on their cards. Again, most of those issues are to-be-determined as UFC and Paramount settle in to the new deal — with $1.1 billion headed the fight company's way. 'It will affect fighter pay, big time,' White said. 'From deal-to-deal, fighter pay has grown, too. Every time we win, everybody wins.' Boxer Jake Paul wrote on social media the dying PPV model — which was overpriced for fights as UFC saw a decline in buys because of missing star power in many main events — should give the fighters an increased idea of their worth. 'Every fighter in the UFC now has a clear picture of what the revenue more PPV excuses,' Paul wrote. 'Get your worth boys and girls.' White also scoffed at the idea that the traditional PPV model is dead. There are still UFC cards on pay-per-view the rest of the year through the end of the ESPN contract and White and Saudi Arabia have teamed to launch a new boxing venture that starts next year and could use a PPV home. White, though, is part of the promotional team for the Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford fight in September in Las Vegas that airs on Netflix. 'It's definitely not run it's course,' White said. 'There were guys out there who were interested in pay-per-view and there were guys out there that weren't. Wherever we ended up, that's what we're going to roll with.' White said UFC archival footage 'kills it' in repeat views and those classic bouts also needed a new home once the ESPN deal expires. Just when it seems there's little left for UFC to conquer, White says, there's always more. Why stop at becoming the biggest fight game in the world? Why not rewrite the pecking order in popularity and riches and go for No. 1 in all sports? 'You have the NFL, the NBA, the UFC, and soccer globally,' White said. 'We're coming. We're coming for all of them.' ___