After lab grown chicken, FDA approves lab-grown salmon for public consumption
A new era in sustainable seafood has officially begun. The FDA has granted approval for the first-ever lab-grown fish to be served to the public, marking a major milestone for food innovation.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The honor goes to Wildtype, a San Francisco-based startup whose cultivated salmon is now available on the menu at a celebrated Portland restaurant. With this breakthrough, lab-grown meat has officially moved beyond poultry and into the waters.
Wildtype's big win
In a public announcement, Wildtype shared that the FDA had completed a 'thorough pre-market safety consultation' and concluded there were 'no questions at this time' regarding the company's product.
The agency's assessment deemed Wildtype's cultured salmon as safe as any conventionally harvested fish.
Though this isn't the FDA's first approval of lab-grown meat—that title goes to cultivated chicken in 2022—it is the first for a fish product. What makes Wildtype's salmon stand out is not just how it's made, but how it's meant to be eaten. Unlike traditional seafood that must be cooked, these sushi-grade 'saku' cuts are designed to be served raw, offering a cleaner, sustainable alternative for sashimi lovers.
How it's made
To craft the salmon, Wildtype scientists begin by collecting living cells from Pacific salmon. These cells are then cultivated in a lab under precisely controlled conditions—mimicking the natural environment of the fish, including temperature, nutrients, and pH levels. Over time, the cells grow into edible tissue. To complete the process, plant-based ingredients are blended in to perfect the taste, color, and texture of traditional salmon.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The result is a sushi-ready product that doesn't require fishing or farming, reducing strain on marine ecosystems.
On the menu (for now) in Portland
Hungry for a bite? You'll need to head to Kann, a James Beard Award–winning Haitian restaurant in Portland, Oregon, where Wildtype's salmon made its debut in late May. Chef Gregory Gourdet serves the cultivated fish with spiced tomato, pickled strawberries, strawberry juice, and a crispy rice cracker topped with
epis
, a zesty Haitian pesto.
The salmon will be added to Kann's full menu starting in July. Wildtype also revealed that four other restaurants are lined up to serve the fish later this year—though likely not in any of the eight U.S. states that have banned lab-grown meat.
Despite ongoing political opposition, the science is clear: lab-grown seafood is here, and it's safe. The question now is whether diners—and the industry—are ready to dive in.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Harvard may get some of its funding back. But on one condition, says Education Secretary
Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on Tuesday that Harvard and other universities could get back some of the federal funding cut by the Trump administration if they changed their policies. 'It would be my goal that if colleges and universities are abiding by the laws of the United States and doing what we expect of them, that they can expect taxpayer funded programs,' the secretary said at a Bloomberg News event. McMahon said that the Trump administration was "making progress in some of the discussions" with Harvard, despite the ongoing legal battles. The secretary emphasised that the federal funding has a role to play in academic research at the universities. 'I think if we look at our research as for the public good, which I think is intended, then taxpayers are willing to see their tax dollars to support that kind of really good research. And so I'm sure that would continue at the university level,' she said. President Donald Trump has frozen more than $2.6 billion in federal research funding to Harvard and has moved to cancel its federal contracts. The Trump administration justified the actions as part of its effort to eliminate antisemitism on campus. Meanwhile, Harvard has also taken the fight to the court with two lawsuits against the Trump administration, challenging both the loss of federal funding and a decision by the Department of Homeland Security to revoke its license to enrol foreign students. The administration reportedly also asked the university to share its records about misconduct by international students on campus. However, it said that the college has not offered enough information to satisfy their requests. The Trump administration and Harvard have been at loggerheads, with the President repeatedly singling out the institution and taking aim at its perceived left-leaning and admission practices. Trump has proposed that Harvard's federal funding be moved to trade schools and called for its tax-exempt status to be removed. President Donald Trump recently said that the Massachusetts-based school was "starting to behave". Meanwhile, Harvard has rejected the administration's demands that it implement "viewpoint diversity" on campus in its hiring and admission practices. Columbia University has also lost about $400 million in federal funds and did not sign onto the "friend of the court" argument. Other private colleges, including Cornell University, Princeton University and Northwestern University, also have seen funding revoked in the Trump era.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Clean air zones set to transform Vijayawada, Vizag neighbourhoods from July
1 2 Vijayawada: Come July, select neighbourhoods in Vijayawada and Visakhapatnam could breathe easy, thanks to the phased implementation of the Clean Air Zones (CAZ) project. In a major step towards improving urban air quality, the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) on Tuesday hosted a multi-agency workshop in Vijayawada to kick-start the phased implementation of CAZs. It brought together key officials from municipal corporations, police and transport departments of the two fast-growing cities and featured the expertise of Transport for London (TfL). Areas close to Ramesh Hospital Junction, Siddhartha College Junction in Vijayawada and King George Hospital in Visakhapatnam will benefit from the CAZ initiative and are gearing up for the implementation. "The phased approach will allow authorities to tailor solutions for these neighbourhoods to inspire more city-wide efforts, while building the foundation for broader, long-term clean air strategies across Andhra Pradesh", said P Krishnaiah, chairman, APPCB. Based on the broader vision of chief minister Chandrababu Naidu to foster healthier, future-ready urban environments, Artha India — a Mumbai-based organisation supporting governments for effective urbanisation and digitalisation implementation efforts — is leading implementation support for the project. Technical expertise for the project is coming from London and Delhi-based partners, TfL and TERI, respectively. Artha India is also expected to be onboarded as a knowledge partner to Andhra Pradesh for climate resilience and health. "A successful implementation of Clean Air Zones will improve air quality and particulate matter concentration at local hotspots. For the past two years, we have been gathering technical inputs and mapping stakeholders to support implementation of site-specific emission-reduction measures involving congestion management, streamlining public transport, last-mile connectivity, and other green initiatives", says Artha India CEO, Pritika Hingorani. The forthcoming phase of CAZ implementation will also include area improvement projects that include optimising parking arrangements and novel nature-based solutions like permeable pavements and Miyawaki forests at junctions. "We are confident that the participation and efforts of all stakeholders in implementing pollution control measures starting next month, including low-cost continuous air monitoring, will make CAZs a success. We are also exploring how to make this initiative sustainable and low-cost in the long run by involving businesses as partners in building a green and clean Vijayawada", said Dr. Swapna Kota, project manager , Sustainability and Resilience Unit, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation.
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Don't mix business with tourist visas, affirms tax tribunal ruling
Mumbai: The perils of travelling on a tourist visa for business purposes may not be confined to run-ins with foreign authorities. Sometimes it could even spell trouble with the local taxman. Indian businessmen who spend months abroad to look after overseas interests and carefully preserve their NRI status, may even find themselves in a spot if the tax authorities question their 'residency' status due to the type of visas approved by countries they travelled to. Recently, a tribunal has upheld the Income Tax (I-T) department's decision to tax the 'global income' of the bakery chain Hot Breads founder who, according to the tax office was a 'resident' for certain years, and not an NRI as claimed by the Chennai-based relaxation on the period of stay given to someone who was abroad for employment or business was denied to Mahadevan as he had travelled on tourist visas. His argument that the visits were purely in connection with his businesses in multiple countries was rejected by the Chennai bench of the I-T Appellate Authority, a quasi-judicial authority. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Mahadevan to Move Court When contacted, a family member speaking on behalf of Mahadevan, said, "We are currently reviewing the order of the Hon'ble ITAT in detail. While we are disappointed with the outcome, we believe we have a strong case on merits and are considering all available legal options. We remain committed to full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and will continue to cooperate with the authorities as required."The residency status of an individual is determined by the rules on the number of days spent. If someone stays for 182 days or more in India, he is considered as a resident whose global income (along with local earnings) for that year may be taxed in India. Alternatively, if a person spends at least 60 days in a year and a total of 365 days in the previous four years, he too is treated as a tax the second rule extends a partial exemption to those travelling overseas for jobs or self-employment. For them, the minimum period of stay is 182 days instead of 60. This relief was not given to number of days are typically counted on the basis of the timing-stamp on passports. The tax office, however, obtained the information from the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO)-a practice that was upheld by the Tribunal. Based on the FRRO data, the I-T department claimed that Mahadevan had spent 182 days or more in the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and if the duration of stay were less than 182 days, Mahadevan's overseas travels would not have been considered to treat him as a resident-thanks to his tourist visas and despite his argument that a person would not travel a country frequently for tourism. The tribunal held that every country restricts visas for specific purposes."The decision underscores the importance of holding the correct visa category, as an inappropriate visa can jeopardize an individual's residential status and complicate the taxation of the global income in India. Nevertheless, if it can be factually established that the individual left India for the purpose of conducting business and genuine business activities were indeed undertaken abroad (though under an inappropriate visa), then the benefit of extending the 60-day period to 182 days under Explanation 1(a) to Section 6(1) of the I-T Act should be granted. However, it is important to note that such a benefit is available only when the individual 'leaves' India for the purpose of employment or business and not 'visiting' abroad in connection with business," said Ashish Karundia, founder of the CA firm Ashish to Rajesh Shah, partner of Jayantilal Thakkar & Co, "A resident Indian becomes non-resident only if they go abroad for employment, including self-employment. Simply staying outside India for 182 days does not make anyone a non-resident. The type of visa is equally important. But this is ignored-either due to ignorance or for convenience." The ruing implied that an assessee cannot avoid tax on global earnings merely because he runs businesses abroad. Countering ITAT's decision to disregard the tax residency certificate issued by the UAE to Mahadevan, Harshal Bhuta, partner at the CA firm PR Bhuta & Co, said "An individual staying in the UAE for over 183 days in a calendar year qualifies as a resident of UAE under the India-UAE DTAA (tax treaty), irrespective of the purpose of stay. In cases of dual residency, the treaty's tie-breaker rules must apply and the treaty-based residency cannot be summarily disregarded."
