logo
Inside Italy: Why is air pollution in northern Italy so bad?

Inside Italy: Why is air pollution in northern Italy so bad?

Local Italy08-02-2025

Inside Italy is our weekly look at some of the news, talking points and gossip from Italy that you might not have heard about. It's published each Saturday and members can receive it directly to their inbox, by going to their newsletter preferences or adding their email to the sign-up box in this article.
Earlier this week, Italian environmental watchdog Legambiente released its latest report on air pollution in major cities across the country.
The report found that 25 of 98 Italian cities monitored had exceeded the legal threshold for coarse particulate matter, or PM10, in 2024 (the limit is set at a maximum of 35 days a year with a daily average of over 50 micrograms of PM10 per cubic metre).
According to Legambiente, average PM10 levels exceeded the 50-microgram limit on a total of 70 days in Frosinone, giving the Lazio city the title of Italy's 'smog capital' for the second consecutive year.
Besides Frosinone however, only three other non-northern cities (Naples, Catania and Terni) were found to have violated clean air ordinances in 2024.
The remaining 21 urban centres, including Milan, Turin, Verona and Venice, were all located in the Po Valley, in the north of the country.
High levels of air pollution in the region, which straddles Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto and Emilia-Romagna, covering an area of around 48,000 square kilometres, shouldn't come as a surprise.
In recent years, the Po Valley has consistently been ranked by experts among the areas with the worst air pollution in the entire European continent.
A 2023 study by academics at Utrecht University and Switzerland's Tropical and Public Health Institute found that more than a third of people living in the region breathed air whose concentrations of PM2.5 particles were four times the World Health Organisation's guideline limit.
A 2023 investigation conducted by the European Data Journalism Network also found that Lombardy's Milan, Cremona and Monza were the three worst European provinces for air pollution, as average annual PM2.5 levels exceeded 21 micrograms per cubic metre in all cases.
Why does all of this matter?
PM2.5 (fine particulate matter) and PM10 (coarse particulate matter) are both regarded by scientists as dangerous to human health.
These particles are small enough to be inhaled into the lungs, where they can cause a range of health problems, particularly for people with existing respiratory conditions such as asthma.
Long-term exposure to high levels of particulate matter has also been linked to cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, as well as an increased risk of lung cancer.
What makes the Po Valley so heavily polluted?
A number of different factors contribute to the Po Valley being one of the worst places for air pollution in Europe, according to experts.
Firstly, the Pianura Padana is among the most heavily industrialised areas on the continent: Lombardy is the top industrial region in the EU, with Veneto (6th) and Emilia Romagna (9th) also figuring in the top ten.
This translates to high levels of emissions - mainly nitrogen oxides - derived from industrial combustion and manufacturing or refinery processes.
But with over 23 million residents (around 40 percent of the national population), the Po Valley is also a very densely populated area.
This results in very high local concentrations of pollutants (especially particulate matter and nitrogen oxides) derived from domestic heating and road traffic.
The region's weather conditions and the influence of nearby mountain ranges are also believed to contribute to pollution.
According to meteorologist Flavio Galbiati, the Alps and Apennines surrounding the Po Valley 'affect the wind regime, whose intensity is generally very weak'. This contributes to relatively lengthy periods of air stagnation.
Secondly, the area frequently experiences a phenomenon known as 'thermal inversion' during the cold months: the 'layer' of air close to the ground becomes colder (and heavier) than the layer above it, which prevents it from rising through the atmosphere.
This creates a 'clog that prevents air circulation, trapping pollutants close to the ground, where their concentration can only increase day after day.'
What's being done about this?
While the area's geographical features cannot be changed, the transport, agriculture and heating sectors could all be regulated to reduce pollution and protect public health, according to Legambiente.
This would include a gradual switch to fully electric public transport, the phase-out of combustion vehicles and heating devices using non-renewable sources, and environmentally-friendly urban planning.
But regional authorities in the Po Valley have so far failed to take meaningful and decisive steps, voicing concerns that many of the required measures would damage the local economy.
Even more alarmingly, they have often openly opposed new EU policies aimed at reducing pollution.
In May 2023, the regional heads of Veneto, Lombardy, Piedmont and Emilia Romagna all opposed EU directives setting out stringent emission limits and environmental targets to be met by 2030.
Lombardy's president Attilio Fontana called the new rules 'unreasonable'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Residents evacuated as major fire breaks out at university north of Rome
Residents evacuated as major fire breaks out at university north of Rome

Local Italy

time4 days ago

  • Local Italy

Residents evacuated as major fire breaks out at university north of Rome

The fire broke out on the roof of the university's agriculture faculty building shortly after 10am, Italian media reported. As of mid-afternoon on Wednesday, firefighters and military officers were still struggling to contain the blaze. #Viterbo, #incendio facoltà di agraria: proseguono le operazioni di spegnimento dall'esterno dell'edificio, #vigilidelfuoco in azione di contenimento delle fiamme che hanno coinvolto il 2° piano, oltre al tetto [ #4giugno 12:30] — Vigili del Fuoco (@vigilidelfuoco) June 4, 2025 Everyone within 500 metres of the building, including local residents, was evacuated and those within a 1-kilometre radius instructed to close their windows to avoid inhaling smoke. No injuries were immediately reported, though some in the vicinity were sent to Santa Rosa hospital with smoke inhalation symptoms. A worker who was initially reported missing has since been found, La Repubblica newspaper said. Dramatic video footage published on the paper's website showed flames engulfing the roof of the building. The Viterbo Prosecutor's Office is reportedly waiting to receive information from the firefighters and rescue workers on the ground before opening an investigation into the cause of the fire. According to initial reports, the roof had been undergoing renovation work by workers who were using an oxyacetylene torch for welding. It may then have spread to chemistry and genetics laboratories where highly flammable substances including ethanol were stored. Patrizia Marini, president of Italy's national association of agricultural institutes, RENISA, told reporters she was 'very saddened by the serious incident that has occurred in one of Italy's most important agricultural colleges.'

REVEALED: The Italian cities with the 'best' quality of life for retirees
REVEALED: The Italian cities with the 'best' quality of life for retirees

Local Italy

time28-05-2025

  • Local Italy

REVEALED: The Italian cities with the 'best' quality of life for retirees

Want to get the most out of your retirement in Italy? Look to the north. That's the main takeaway from a ranking of the best Italian cities for residents aged over 65 published by Italian financial daily Il Sole 24 Ore on Monday. All of the top ten-ranked cities were in the north of the country, with the top three concentrated in the northeastern Triveneto area. At the head of the pack was the city of Bolzano, near Italy's border with Austria, which regularly tops quality of life rankings. South Tyrol's capital scored highly for its above-average social spending on the elderly, life expectancy, and availability of libraries, as well as low rates of use of medication for chronic health conditions and anti-obesity drugs. In second place came Treviso, north of Venice, which performed well in all areas except for the number of nurses per 100,000 inhabitants. The Veneto city was followed by Trento, which topped the list for life expectancy. Rounding out the top ten were Como, Cremona, Verona, Vicenza, Lodi, Parma and Aosta. Of the top 40 towns and cities ranked, 38 were in the north, with the central city of Macerata appearing in 25th place, and Nuoro, Sardinia, ranked 39th. 36 of the bottom 40 cities, by contrast, were in the centre-south, with just Savona (74th place), Verbano-Cusio-Ossola (90th), Imperia (92nd) and Massa-Carrara (93rd) located in the north. Southern Italian towns and cities were penalised due to the lower availability of public services, including hospital beds, as well as lower amounts paid out in pensions in the poorer half of the country. At the very bottom of the list, in 107th place was the Sicilian city of Trapani, which performed poorly on almost all metrics including life expectancy, public spending on the elderly, and availability of libraries and green spaces. Agrigento, on Sicily's western coastline, came 106th, preceded by Reggio Calabria at 105th. They were joined in the bottom ten by Vibo Valentia, Messina, Crotone, Terni, Caltanissetta, Caserta and Cosenza. Rome ranked towards the middle of the pack at 63rd place, performing worse than Venice (24th), Bologna (27th), Milan (34th), and Florence (46th). Palermo came in a low 89th, but still managed to beat Naples (91st). While such rankings provide a clear picture of a town or city's social and health services and public amenities, they often fail to consider factors that may have an equally strong bearing on quality of life. Il Sole 24 Ore's survey, for example, didn't take into account climate, cost of living, or access to nature – all things that people looking to retire in Italy from abroad are likely to consider important. Readers responding to our surveys in the past have recommended southern or central Italy as the best place to retire, pointing to the warm weather, long stretches of coastline, and friendliness of locals.

EXPLAINED: How much time can parents in Italy take off for sick children?
EXPLAINED: How much time can parents in Italy take off for sick children?

Local Italy

time25-04-2025

  • Local Italy

EXPLAINED: How much time can parents in Italy take off for sick children?

In Italy, this type of time off is called " congedo per la malattia del figlio"—literally, leave for a child's illness. It allows parents to stay home and care for a sick child without facing penalties at work. How much leave you're entitled to depends largely on how old your child is. If your child is under the age of three, you can take as many days off as needed to care for them when they're sick—there's no official limit. But once your child turns three, the rules become more restrictive. Between the ages of three and eight, each parent is entitled to up to five working days of leave per year for a child's illness. That's five days per parent, so both parents could potentially take time off, though typically not at the same time unless agreed upon with the employer. If your child is over the age of eight, there is no statutory allowance - presumably the government thinks that kids can take care of themselves once they hit the famously mature age of nine. The caveat here is that in the private sector, this kind of parental leave is almost always unpaid. Under Italian law, there is no automatic payment or wage compensation when a parent takes time off work to care for a sick child. However, collective agreements - which are negotiated contracts between unions and employers for specific industries or companies - can offer better terms. So unless a specific company agreement or public sector policy provides compensation, parents are often left to balance the cost of unpaid leave against the need to care for their children. In order to justify the days of absence you must provide the employer with the medical certificate of the child. What if I fall ill? If you're the one who falls ill, there's a structured pay system. The first three days - known as the ' carenza ' or waiting period - are fully paid by the employer. From the fourth to the twentieth day, employees typically receive 50 percent of their usual salary, and from the twenty-first day onward, the rate increases to 66.66 percent. Initially, employers front the cost of this sick pay, but they then recover it by reducing their social security contributions to INPS, Italy's national social security agency. If you're self-employed you may also be entitled to sick pay, under certain conditions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store