Government to fund one-off national day of reflection for survivors of abuse in care
Erica Stanford.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The government has confirmed a one-off national day of reflection for survivors of abuse in care will take place on Wednesday, 12 November, 2025.
Lead Coordination Minister for the government's response Erica Stanford said a $1 million fund had been set up for survivor-led groups to apply to hold local or regional events to mark the day.
But a survivor says the day felt like "symbolic lip service" with many survivors still waiting for justice or fair redress.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon promised a National Remembrance Day in his
apology to survivors
in Parliament last year.
A year on from the apology, Stanford said the day aimed to acknowledge survivors of abuse in care, raise awareness about a part of New Zealand's history, and remind people of government progress in responding to the recommendations of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care.
The final report from the Royal Commission
found abuse was rife in state and faith-based care
settings over decades, and the state failed to respond to signs of systemic abuse and neglect. The Commission made 138 reccommendations to the government to right past wrongs, and prevent abuse from occurring again.
Stanford said survivors had indicated they would like to mark the one-off day of reflection in their own way - the day would consist of community-led events and activities, as well as activities organised by government agencies that demonstrated "progress, accountability and transparency".
"Survivors have indicated they would like to mark the day in their own way and their preference is for survivor-focused groups and organisations to hold local, regional or national events."
Up to $10,000 would be available for local events and up to $25,000 for regional events, and applications were open until 31 August.
At the time, Luxon said the day would "provide us with an opportunity to stop and reflect on what you endured and ensure we are doing all we can to prevent future abuse".
But survivor Tu Chapman, who is the spokesperson for Tikanga-based survivor movement He Kura Morehu, said many were expecting the national day of remembrance to be an enduring event, rather than a one-off day.
"It's a little bit of a joke to be honest, one day doesn't acknowledge the decades of abuse, the decades of violence and harm that continues to plague survivors today, and impact us today."
Tu Chapman is the spokesperson for Tikanga-based survivor movement He Kura Morehu.
Photo:
RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly
Chapman said the day felt like lip service when many survivors were still waiting for justice or fair redress.
The announcement earlier this year from the government that no public servant would be held accountable for abuse against survivors meant justice had not been delivered, Chapman said.
A lack of legislative change designed to prevent abuse in care from happening again was also unjust, Chapman said.
Survivor groups applying for the fund for the day of reflection must have legal entity status to apply.
Chapman said that would mean some groups would miss out on holding events, because with only four months to apply, there was limited time to set up a legal and governance structure and meet the criteria for funding from a government agency.
That would impose barriers on many survivor groups, Chapman said.
"We will miss out and other groups will miss out, because the rules aren't realistic for survivor groups."
Chapman also questioned whether the $1m was coming out of $774m set aside for abuse in care redress, or another source of funding.
The government earlier this year committed $774 million on its redress system, increasing average payments from about $19,000 to $30,000, and opening up an option to top up previously settled claims by up to 50 percent.
But it did not follow through on a pledge made on the national day of apology to set up an entirely new redress and compensation scheme, recommended by the Royal Commission of Inquiry and survivors.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
41 minutes ago
- Scoop
New Low From Govt In Public Service Act Changes Aimed At Ending Long Term Planning, Diversity & Inclusion & Pay Equity
The Government's proposed changes to the Public Service Act, to be debated in Parliament today, aim to strip away key provisions that ensure fairness, equality and long-term planning in the public sector. Under the proposed amendments, detailed in the Public Service Amendment Bill, diversity and inclusion, pay equity and long-term planning would be downgraded. "This is a new low from the Government. It now wants to tell chief executives of Government departments that they are not to focus on the long-term public interest, this is reckless given that the complex problems New Zealand's facing need long term policy solutions," said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi. "This approach will limit New Zealand's ability to solve complicated problems like climate change adaptation, family violence and our infrastructure deficit." The Public Service Amendment Bill also scraps requirements on pay equity. It would remove responsibilities for chief executives and the Public Service Commissioner to work towards pay equity between women and men, and to work towards eliminating bias and discrimination in decisions about pay. "Pay equity is about fairness and justice for workers and includes ensuring flexible and part time work is available. The Government has already ripped up pay equity claims, denying pay increases for more than150,000 women in the public and community sectors. Taking away its priority in this legislation again shows how little the Government values supporting the career of women and closing the gender pay gap." The Bill would also remove requirements on chief executives and the Public Service Commissioner to foster a public service that's inclusive and representative of the communities it serves. "Diversity and inclusion in our workforce are not nice to haves - they are essential to delivering fair and effective public services that are sensitive to the needs of all New Zealanders. The public service does its job well and is legitimate because it represents our diverse country. Reducing the importance of these principles risks turning back decades of progress." The PSA is also alarmed by amendments to the purpose of the Public Service Act which would reduce emphasis on pursuing the long-term public interest, and remove the requirement of the public service to enable both the current Government and successive governments to develop and implement their policies. "This is a worrying attack on the political neutrality of the public service and makes it less accountable to the people of New Zealand. Public services must look beyond the next political cycle. Downgrading the public service's role in pursuing the long-term public interest means less focus on how our public service can meet future challenges - whether that's dealing with an ageing population, infrastructure challenges, adapting to new technology, or responding to climate change. "The Government has stripped the public service of thousands of jobs despite our population growing, and our challenges becoming more complex and urgent. "The Bill was tabled on the same day the Government extended a tax break for big tobacco, showing how misplaced its priorities are. "This is a time to invest in a fairer, more future-focused public service - not tear down the progress we've made. It's 2025, not 1955." Note
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Oil and gas exploration ban repeal passes final reading
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts. Photo: RNZ The government's repeal of the 2018 oil and gas exploration ban has passed its final reading in Parliament. The legislation had been set down for Tuesday night, but was delayed after a last-minute amendment to change the rules around liability for the clean-up of decommissioned oil and gas fields. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts stood in for Resources Minister Shane Jones, saying the ban has pushed power prices up. "The ban sent a chilling message to the investment community, halting the very exploration that underpins our energy security, and leading directly to the supply constraints and price volatility that we see today." Labour's Megan Woods said the repeal of the ban was a "very potent symbol of the shambles that this government is when it comes to energy policy," and that Prime Minister Christopher Luxon "is leading a government that is so far out of touch with ordinary New Zealanders and more intent at doing the bidding of multinational oil and gas companies". The bill passed 68 votes to 54, with all coalition parties in support and the opposition parties opposed.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Petroleum law passes, with a last minute twist
File photo. Photo: 123RF The exploration and extraction of petroleum in New Zealand will be more accessible from this week with the government's Crown Minerals Amendment Bill having received a third and final reading in Parliament this afternoon. The Bill (soon to be an Act pending Royal Assent), is the brainchild of Minister for Resources Shane Jones. It removes the 2018 law passed by the Ardern government which limited new petroleum exploration permits to onshore Taranaki. On Tuesday, the Clerk announced the commencement of the third reading of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill, but rather than beginning that final debate, a last-minute motion from Jones meant the Bill was sent back to the committee stage in what is called a recommittal. Recommittals, although not unprecedented, don't happen all that often, and if they do occur, it's usually when a member's bill is being considered. (Member's Bills without the significant drafting resource possessed by a government are more likely to have oddities that need tidying up.) The process of returning a bill to an earlier stage enables the bill to receive further refinement. This may be necessary for several reasons - perhaps a fault or loophole has been discovered, or the government has had a last-minute change of mind regarding a specific provision. In any case, to make these changes, the bill is sent back to the Committee of the whole House stage, where amendments can be put forward. After reportedly spotting a loophole, Jones had tabled a significant amendment at 5pm on Monday which was then debated less than 24 hours later in Tuesday's recommittal. The change itself related to who pays the cost of decommissioning and cleaning up oil wells once production has ceased. The amendment paper, which was successfully included in the bill, places the power for determining who pays for decommissioning costs in the hands of the Minister for Resources and the Minister of Finance (currently Shane Jones), replacing the model of trailing liability. This is the third policy iteration within the current amendment bill. The Opposition spent most of Tuesday evening drilling into the last-minute switch, trying their best to extract answers from the Minister about why it was decided and who he had consulted with about it. To listen to some of those exchanges, click the link to the audio version of this story at the top of the page. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
