Senate sergeant-at-arms to serve summons for Sara Duterte
The Senate sergeant-at-arms is set to serve on Wednesday morning the writ of summons for Vice President Sara Duterte at her office in Mandaluyong City.
Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Roberto Ancan will be the one to serve the summons at the Office of the Vice President (OVP), based on a Super Radyo dzBB report of Nimfa Ravelo.
Once received, Duterte will be given a non-extendible period of 10 days to answer to the articles of impeachment against her.
The Vice President is currently in Malaysia for a personal trip with her family.
The Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, on Tuesday night voted to return to the House of Representatives the articles of impeachment against Duterte without dismissing or terminating them.
The motion was approved with a vote of 18 affirmative, five negative, and no abstentions.
The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint.
The seven Articles of Impeachment against Duterte include:
Conspiracy to assassinate President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Marcos, and Speaker Martin Romualdez;
Malversation of P612.5 million in confidential funds with questionable liquidation documents;
Bribery and corruption in the Department of Education (DepEd) during Duterte's tenure as Education Secretary, involving former DepEd officials;
Unexplained wealth and failure to disclose assets in her Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN), with her wealth reportedly increasing fourfold from 2007 to 2017;
Involvement in extrajudicial killings in Davao City;
Destabilization and public disorder efforts, including boycotting the State of the Nation Address (SONA) while declaring herself "designated survivor," leading rallies calling for Marcos Jr.'s resignation, obstructing congressional investigations, and issuing threats against top officials; and
The totality of her conduct as Vice President.
— VDV, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
44 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Palace says Marcos not against wage hike
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. is not against wage hike, Malacañang clarified Friday. At a press briefing, Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro was asked for reaction on the statement made by Kabataan party-list that it was Marcos who ''killed'' the proposed measure to raise the salary of workers as he favors the ''rich boys club.'' ''Diktador ba ang Pangulong Marcos Jr.? Hindi naman po. Hayaan na lang po muna natin ang usapin na 'yan sa Kongreso at ang Pangulo naman po ay hindi tutol sa increased wage hike dahil ito po naman ay makakabuti sa mga manggagawa,'' Castro said. (Is President Marcos Jr. a dictator? He's not. Let's leave the discussion to the Congress. The President is not against wage hike since this is good for our workers.) However, Castro said there is a process that must be followed in increasing the wage of workers. With 171 yes votes, zero no votes, and one abstention, the House of Representatives last week approved on third and final reading the proposed measure granting a P200 increase in the daily minimum wage for workers in the private sector. The House version of the legislated wage hike offered a higher increase than the P100 approved by the Senate. The House and the Senate will have to reconcile the differences at the bicameral conference committee before transmitting the enrolled bill to Malacañang. But since the 19th Congress has adjourned sine die, the bill will have to be refiled in the 20th Congress. Marcos will look into the economic implications of the proposed increase in the minimum wage for workers, Castro earlier said. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Kin of drug war victims believe ICC can address Duterte's needs — Conti
The families of drug war victims believe that the International Criminal Court (ICC) can provide for the needs of former President Rodrigo Duterte after he requested for an interim release to an undisclosed country on humanitarian considerations, ICC Assistant to Counsel Atty. Kristina Conti said Friday. 'Ang kanilang basehan, humanitarian. Kaya ito nga, nagko-konsultahan kami ng mga biktima. Sabi nila makatao lang rin naman. Oh sige kung gusto niyang kung saka-sakali magpagamot at maayos,' Conti told Super Radyo dzBB. (Their basis is humanitarian. So yes, we are consulting the victims. They said it's only humane. Okay, if he wants to undergo treatment and recover, that's fine.) 'Pero sa tingin namin ngayon, 'yung ICC facilities ay kayang mag-arrange ng medical assistance sa kanya,' she added. (But we believe that ICC facilities are currently capable of arranging medical assistance for him.) This came after the Duterte camp asked the ICC for him to be released to an undisclosed country based on humanitarian considerations as he is 80 years old. It said that the undisclosed country 'represents a stable and suitable environment" for Duterte. When asked if age is a big consideration, Conti stressed that Duterte was previously declared fit for trial. 'As long as you are 'fit for trial,' meaning kaya mo tumayo, kaya mo makinig. Hindi ka naman— kumbaga, ano ito, nababaliw o nag space out, pwede ka pa mag-trial,' she said. (As long as you're fit for trial, meaning you are able to stand and listen. And you're not, let's say mentally incapacitated or spacing out, you can still be tried.) 'Kung maalala ninyo sa huli nating pagkita sa kanya… Chineck ng doktor daw eh. Kaya sabi ng judge, na claim na 'yan, nasabi na 'yan ni Duterte 'di ba. Eh, sabi ng doktor fit for trial ka. Okay. Period,' she added. (Remember his last appearance… He was supposedly checked by a doctor. So the judge said, that's already been claimed, Duterte himself mentioned it, right? And the doctor said he was fit for trial. Okay. Period.) Self-serving Meanwhile, Conti dismissed some of the claims made by the Duterte camp in their request for interim release as 'self-serving.' Duterte's camp claimed that since the Chief Prosecutor's leave of absence, 'the Prosecution has confirmed its non-opposition to interim release… on the understanding that the terms and conditions set out in Annex A to this filing would be met.' Duterte's camp also claimed that the receiving state had expressed its willingness to accept him. 'Hanggat hindi nagsasalita o kumu-kumpirma itong dalawang ito, eh sa ngayon serving 'yung mga statements na 'yan,' Conti told Super Radyo dzBB. (As long as these two do not speak or confirm anything, for now, those statements remain self-serving.) Conti added that the victims will be allowed to give their comment on Duterte's interim request. 'Magkakaroon ng pagkakataon na itong 'yung biktima ay magsalita at mag weigh in doon sa interim release. Inaalam namin ang deadline ng observations ng interim release,' she said. (There will be an opportunity for the victim to speak and weigh in on the interim release. We are currently determining the deadline for submitting observations regarding the interim release.) According to Conti, the conditions indicated under the annexes may be similar to previous conditions for conditional release. ''Yung hindi ka pwedeng lamyenda nang lamyenda, gala-gala. Nandoon ka lang sa isang lugar at hindi ka talaga kumbaga 'malaya.' Ikaw pa rin ay under detention at under custody ng state. At importante na present ka sa lahat ng hearing,' she said. (You can't just keep roaming around or wandering. You have to stay in one place and you're not really 'free.' You're still under detention and under the custody of the state. And it's important that you're present at all the hearings.) GMA News Online has reached out to the ICC for comment and confirmation. Duterte is currently under ICC custody at The Hague, Netherlands. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chua calls for neutrality after some senator-judges join Sara in Malaysia
House prosecution member Manila Representative Joel Chua on Friday called on senator-judges to observe neutrality in the impeachment of Sara Duterte after some of them joined the Vice President in a trip to Malaysia. This comes after Senator-judges Robin Padilla and Imee Marcos joined Duterte in Malaysia to commemorate Independence Day on Thursday. 'Ang nakalagay kasi sa rules of impeachment na ginawa po ng Senado dapat ay mag-exercise sila ng neutrality,' Chua told GMA Integrated News' Unang Balita in an interview. (What is stated in the rules of impeachment made by the Senate is that they should exercise neutrality.) 'Nakakalungkot nga dahil ilang senator-judges na nagpaliwanag, nagpahayag na talagang kahit anong mangyari ay nandoon sila sa panig ng kabila,' he added. (It is sad because several senator-judges already explained and stated that no matter what happens, they will side with the other camp.) Chua said the House prosecution team will discuss possible steps to address the issue. Aside from Chua, one of the authors of the 1987 Constitution, Christian Monsod, earlier said that Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa and Francis Tolentino should inhibit themselves from sitting as senator-judges after they sought to dismiss the impeachment case against Duterte. Motion for clarification Meanwhile, Chua said the House prosecution team is planning to file a motion for clarification on the order of the Senate or the impeachment court to remand the complaint back to the lower chamber. 'Kaya nga po kami ay magsusumite ng clarificatory para at least malinawan po kami sa kanilang aksyon,' Chua said. (That's why we will submit a clarificatory so that at least we can be clear about their actions.) 'Sa totoo lang dapat noong June 2 pa pinatawag na kami ng Senado. Dapat nandodoon na kami. Tapos ito ay na-move ng June 11. So, anong magiging epekto itong mga ginagawa po Senado para malaman din po namin kung saan po talaga pauusad itong mga pangyayari,' he added. (Actually, the Senate should have summoned us on June 2. We should have been there. Then it was moved to June 11. So what will be the impact of the Senate's actions so that we can also know where these events are really going.) On Tuesday, Senator-judge Alan Peter Cayetano moved to amend Senator Dela Rosa's motion to dismiss the case and instead made the motion that the articles of impeachment be returned to the House until such time that: The House of Representatives certify to the non violation of Article XI, Section 3, paragraph 5 of the Constitution, which provides that 'No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within one year; include the circumstances on the filing of the first three impeachment complaints"; and The House of Representatives of the 20th Congress communicates to the Senate that it is willing and ready to pursue the impeachment complaint against the Vice President. PhilConsa Philippine Constitution Association (PhilConsa) governor Dindo Garciano, however, pointed out that the motion for clarification will imply that the House has agreed that the Senate's order is correct. For Garciano, the House prosecutors should challenge the Senate's order by filing a motion for reconsideration instead. 'Ang sinasabi nga natin, unconstitutional at null and void ang order na yun. So mag-file ka ng motion for reconsideration. Atakehin mo yung order. Sabihin mo that your order, with all due respect your honors, is null and void, its void ab initio, from the very beginning,' Garciano said in a separate interview on Unang Balita. (What we are saying is that order is unconstitutional, null, and void. So file a motion for reconsideration. Attack the order. Say that your order, with all due respect your honors, is null and void, its void ab initio, from the very beginning.) 'You have no business to tell us to prove that our Articles of Impeachment or complaint is unconstitutional or not. It is not for us, the burden of proof is not on us to prove the constitutionality. It is for the defender to prove that our Articles of Impeachment is unconstitutional,' he added. (You have no business to tell us to prove that our Articles of Impeachment or complaint is unconstitutional or not. It is not for us, the burden of proof is not on us to prove the constitutionality. It is for the defender to prove that our Articles of Impeachment is unconstitutional.) Garciano also pointed out that Duterte's defense team should be the one raising such a concern and not the Senate who is sitting as an impeachment court. Duterte was impeached by the House on February 5 with more than 200 congressmen endorsing the verified complaint against her. The vice president was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte has denied the allegations. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
