Janaki V vs State of Kerala review: Noble intentions marred by flawed execution
Director Pravin Narayanan has penned an interesting story, revolving around issues that women still face across the country. From cybercrime, stalking, eve-teasing, to physical assault and abuse, social stigma, and the conversations surrounding abortion – the filmmaker has included all these elements in his story, and on paper has crafted a smartly written legal drama. However, when it comes to screenplay and execution, the director seems to have gotten confused about the kind of film he wanted to make. The film chooses several sub-plots to use as misdirections but ends up developing them to an extent where the sub-plot seems more intriguing, only for them to be dropped abruptly. The inconsistent integration of mass elements, seemingly just to tap into Suresh Gopi's star appeal, feels more like a distraction than an elevation.'Janaki V vs State of Kerala' paves the way for conversations that are important in today's society. But the in-your-face social message, which only receives prominence at the very end of the film without proper setups throughout its runtime, seems forced and ends up being barely effective. Considering all the elements at the director's disposal - the story, theme and Suresh Gopi - an obvious struggle in managing and utilising available resources is evident.Suresh Gopi returns to the big screen after a significant gap and brings the same dramatic charm and energy he always has. However, his performance – particularly the dialogue delivery – is on a completely different acting wavelength from the rest of the cast. Carrying a more theatrical approach, the character of Advocate David Abel Donovan often feels out of place and distracting from the film's core intensity.advertisementAnupama Parameshwaran delivers an impressive performance as Janaki V. Effectively communicating her grief, pain, trauma, circumstances, and strength all at once, Anupama becomes the emotional bridge between the audience and the story. The 'Premam' actor carries this weight well. The rest of the cast also deliver strong performances.The film, edited by Samjith Mohammed, could have benefited from a crisper cut. Several shots lingered for far too long, affecting the overall pace. While some sequences showcased a creative attempt to convey emotions, none stood out as particularly innovative. Both the cinematography and music followed a traditional approach, with nothing that left a lasting impression.In conclusion, 'Janaki V vs State of Kerala' is a film that sets out with noble intentions and a socially relevant premise but falters in execution. While the story is rooted in pressing real-world issues, the film struggles to find a consistent voice. With a more cohesive screenplay, restrained editing, and a clearer narrative focus, this courtroom drama could have made a far greater impact.- EndsMUST WATCH:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pink Villa
6 minutes ago
- Pink Villa
Thammudu OTT Release: When and where to watch Nithiin starrer action drama online
Nithiin starrer Thammudu released in theaters on July 4, 2025. The action drama film is now all set to make its debut online after becoming a box office debacle with mixed-to-negative reviews. When and where to watch Thammudu Thammudu is slated to begin streaming on the OTT platform, Netflix, from August 1, 2025. The official confirmation about the film's digital streaming was made by the platform through a post on their social media handle. Sharing the post, the handle Netflix India South said, 'Thana lakshyanni, akkani thirigi thevadaniki ee thammudu is on a mission! Watch Thammudu on Netflix, out 1 August in Telugu, Tamil, Malayalam and Kannada.' Here's the official post for Thammudu: Official trailer and plot of Thammudu Thammudu is an action drama film following the life of Jai, a skilled archer who is in search of his sister Jhansi, who got separated from him as a child. As years progress, Jhansi has become a government officer with ideals, leading a happy life with her family. However, being a woman of principles, Jhansi refuses to sign a report that contains false details related to a chemical factory explosion in Vizag, making her and her family face the wrath of a corrupt industrialist. As all seems to end, Jai reunites with Jhansi, deciding to save her. How he takes on the responsibility of protecting her and her family, using archery skills, forms the rest of the story. Cast and crew of Thammudu Thammudu features Nithiin in the lead role with actress Laya making a return to Telugu cinema after making a cameo appearance in Amar Akbar Anthony (2018). Apart from the leading actors, the movie features an ensemble cast of actors like Kantara fame Sapthami Gowda, Varsha Bollamma, Saurabh Sachdeva, Hari Teja, Swasika, Temper Vamsi, Chammak Chandra, and many more in key roles. Thammudu is written and directed by Venu Sriram, marking his first collaboration with Nithiin. The film was musically crafted by B. Ajaneesh Loknath. Moreover, cinematographers like KV Guhan, Sameer Reddy, and Satyajit Pande (Setu) handled the visuals of the film. Prawin Pudi edited the cinematic venture.
Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Malayalam star was betrayed by all the men she loved. Died all alone at 53
Agencies Malayalam star Srividya died lonely at the age of 53 Srividya, an iconic figure in South Indian cinema, captivated audiences with her grace, charisma, and emotional depth. While her presence on the silver screen evoked admiration and reverence, her personal life was marked by pain, heartbreak, and an unfulfilled longing for love. Beneath her luminous performances was a woman who yearned for sincere affection—love that she was ready to give unconditionally but tragically never received in return. Despite being cherished by fans and respected by peers, she lived a life burdened by betrayal, loneliness, and sorrow until the on July 24, 1953, in Chennai, Srividya came from a family deeply entrenched in the performing arts. Her mother, M. L. Vasanthakumari, was an acclaimed Carnatic vocalist, and her father, 'Vikatam' Krishnamurthy, was a Tamil actor. Despite her lineage suggesting a future in music, Srividya gravitated toward dance and acting. Her early exposure to classical dance helped her develop expressive facial movements and poised body language—skills that later defined her onscreen magnetism. Srividya began her cinematic journey at just 13, making her debut in the Tamil historical film Thiruvarutchelvar (1967), which featured veterans like Sivaji Ganesan, Savitri, and Gemini Ganesan. It was a modest role, but it ignited a lifelong connection with 1969, at the age of 16, Srividya entered the Malayalam film industry with the movie Chattambikkavala. She was cast opposite Sathyan, a legendary actor who was 57 at the time. Her poise, maturity, and beauty surprised many. The following year, she featured in Kumara Sambhavam, playing the celestial nymph Menaka. Her elegant dance in the song 'Maya Nadana Viharini' garnered widespread appreciation and highlighted her as an emerging her versatility and grace, Srividya swiftly became a sought-after actor in Malayalam, Tamil, and Telugu films. Filmmakers were drawn to her ability to balance glamour with gravitas, and she transitioned seamlessly from one powerful role to another, building a formidable body of work across made Srividya distinct from her contemporaries was her readiness to play characters beyond the conventional mold. While many actresses of her era pursued glamorous leads, Srividya embraced roles that were far more layered—even those where she played older women or secondary characters. Rather than chase stardom, she prioritized the depth and relevance of a like Kattathe Kilikkoodu, Ente Sooryaputhrikku, Innale, Kabooliwala, Aniyathi Pravu, Aaraam Thampuran, and Randam Bhavam featured her in motherly or supporting roles, which she portrayed with incredible emotional depth. Her performances resonated so strongly that audiences frequently remembered her more than the leads. Even on television, she left an indelible impression with her nuanced roles in various serials, maintaining her connection with the audience until her final the height of her career in the early 1970s, Srividya fell in love with Kamal Haasan, who was then a rising star. Their relationship was intense and, by many accounts, genuine. They even considered marriage. However, as Kamal's career took off, he asked Srividya to postpone their plans to tie the knot. She, unwilling to delay her dreams of building a home and family, expressed her desire to move later recalled, during an interview with Kairali TV, that Kamal had visited her home one day. Her mother advised them to wait a few more years, suggesting that both had bright futures and shouldn't rush into a decision they might regret. This advice did not sit well with Kamal, who left abruptly. Soon afterward, he married dancer Vani Ganapathy, and their once-promising relationship ended in silence. Despite the break, Kamal always remained a significant emotional figure in Srividya's her heartbreak, Srividya found comfort in her connection with filmmaker Bharathan. Their relationship, as revealed by screenwriter and Bharathan's friend John Paul on Safari TV's Charithram Enniloode, went beyond societal definitions. It was an intimate, soulful bond that didn't conform to labels like KPAC Lalitha, who eventually married Bharathan, recounted that he often visited her home just to talk to Srividya over the phone since her family disapproved of male callers. Lalitha, who worked with both, revealed that Srividya once confided her doubts about the relationship, citing Bharathan's growing mistrust. Eventually, the two parted ways. Though he later married Lalitha, Bharathan reportedly attempted to reconnect with Srividya—but she distanced herself for emotional turmoil, Srividya crossed paths with George Thomas, a film producer involved with her movie Theekkanal. He appeared attentive, caring, and aligned with her need for emotional security. Desperate to feel loved and hoping to prove to her detractors that she had moved on, she decided to marry him. Despite warnings from her mother and close friends like actor Madhu and veteran performer Manorama, she converted to Christianity and married George in Mumbai. However, Srividya's dream of domestic bliss soon turned into a nightmare. Contrary to his claims, George was not a wealthy film producer but a salaried employee appointed by a chit fund company, Star of Cochin, as a frontman for their film ventures. He had misrepresented himself entirely, using her fame for personal and financial gain. Having realized the deception, Srividya had no choice but to return to work. Offers still came her way, and her performances were consistently appreciated. However, her husband began siphoning off her earnings. Director Alleppey Ashraf once stated that George forged her signatures to access her bank accounts and depleted her if financial exploitation wasn't enough, he also abused her physically and emotionally. Rumors of his infidelity surfaced, further damaging their already crumbling marriage. The arguments between them became frequent and intense. After enduring years of pain and betrayal, Srividya left George and returned to her separation initiated a long and arduous legal battle. Because the marriage had been registered under the Christian Marriage Act, divorce proceedings were complicated. George held on to much of her property and assets, and the case dragged on for 14 years. Srividya eventually won, but the personal toll was immense. She had lost years of her life and most of her emotional compound her misery, her mother—her only close family—passed away during this time. Srividya, already devastated by her failed relationships and a bruising legal fight, now found herself utterly alone. Her relatives, sensing her vulnerability, abandoned her too. Despite all her public acclaim and cinematic triumphs, she had no one to turn to in her most difficult pained Srividya most was not the loss of money or status, but the emotional void. She had always longed for a loving partner, a child, and a peaceful home—experiences she was denied throughout her life. Her own childhood had been devoid of warmth, as her parents were locked in a loveless marriage. She had hoped to create a better life for herself, but fate seemed determined to keep happiness out of dream of settling in America to escape the scars of her past also collapsed when she was diagnosed with cancer. It was an aggressive form of the disease, and as her health deteriorated, so did her hopes. Those who cared for her during this time reported that she would often plead with doctors to end her suffering.
Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Jaya Bachchan once said she would have 'slapped' Shah Rukh Khan after Aishwarya Rai fallout
Jaya Bachchan Once Expressed Anger at Shah Rukh Khan After Rift With Aishwarya Rai Shah Rukh Khan and Aishwarya Rai, two of Indian cinema's most celebrated figures, delivered memorable performances together in films like Josh, Mohabbatein, and Devdas. Their on-screen pairing was a favourite among audiences, but their off-screen equation took a drastic turn in the early 2000s. Despite their successful collaborations, a professional rift led to Aishwarya being removed from multiple films they were initially set to do together. According to reports cited by News18 and others, the reasons for this fallout were never clearly stated. Aishwarya herself later confirmed that she was dropped from several projects that originally featured Shah Rukh Khan, including Chalte Chalte and Veer Zaara. These sudden exclusions had a noticeable impact on her career at the time. While Shah Rukh later apologised, the rapport between them was never fully restored. The fallout between Shah Rukh and Aishwarya didn't just remain a professional matter. It drew the attention of Aishwarya's family as well, particularly her mother-in-law, Jaya Bachchan, who had always shared a warm rapport with Shah Rukh. In a 2008 interview with People magazine, Jaya was asked if she still held any resentment toward Shah Rukh over what happened. She admitted she did, and said that although she hadn't yet spoken to him about it, she intended to. She added that had he been at her home at the time, she would have slapped him — just as she would have done if it had been her own son. Despite the anger, she also made it clear that she felt a deep emotional bond with Shah Rukh and admitted to having a personal fondness for him. The strain in their relationship was also evident during Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan's wedding in 2007, where Shah Rukh was noticeably absent. At the time, it was reported that the two actors were still not on speaking terms following the Chalte Chalte controversy. As per News18, Jaya Bachchan addressed this directly, pointing out that if it had been possible to invite Shah Rukh without upsetting family dynamics, the wedding date itself would have been changed. Though the fallout left visible cracks, the passage of time brought some healing. Shah Rukh's apology, along with a gradual softening of tensions, helped bridge the distance.
