logo
Chinese investors snap up stocks on hopes for an end to price wars and overcapacity

Chinese investors snap up stocks on hopes for an end to price wars and overcapacity

Independent21-07-2025
China's stock market is buzzing over government promises to tackle price wars that have hurt profits and worsened global trade tensions.
The prevailing catchphrase is 'anti-involution,' and it reflects efforts to curb intense competition and overcapacity in industries like solar panels, steel, and electric vehicles.
With rising trade barriers such as President Donald Trump 's higher tariffs, and relatively weak domestic demand, manufacturers have been slashing prices, undermining their bottom lines and driving some out of business.
The producer price index, which measures the price that factories receive for their goods, has fallen steadily for nearly three years in China in a prolonged bout of deflation. The long-running issue spilled over into global markets as low-priced Chinese exports worsen trade friction with key trading partners including the United States and Europe.
Solar panel glass makers agree to cut output by 30%
In a series of recent statements, the Chinese government and industry associations have signaled they're getting serious about reining in cut-throat competition, known as invollution or 'neijuan' in Chinese.
The top 10 makers of glass for solar panels agreed on June 30 to shut kilns and cut production by 30%, an industry association said. The government has launched an auto safety inspection campaign, addressing concerns that automakers were skimping on quality to cut costs.
It's unclear whether these efforts will succeed, but the sense that China may finally be tackling this chronic problem was enough to spark a rally in stocks in some of those under-pressure sectors.
Shares of Liuzhou Iron & Steel Co. gained 10% on Friday and have risen more than 70% since June 30. Solar panel glass producer Changzhou Almaden Co. fell at the end of last week but is still up about 50%.
More broadly, two exchange traded funds in solar panels and steel have risen about 10%, outpacing a 3.2% rise in the Shanghai Composite, China's leading market index.
The performance of EV-maker stocks has been mixed, with Li Auto and Nio recording double-digit percentage gains while market leader BYD declined.
Foreigners can't buy Chinese stocks directly but they are able to invest in about 2,700 stocks and 250 exchange traded funds through the Hong Kong exchange.
Government calls intense price wars 'disorderly'
The gains follow high-level government pronouncements against disorderly price wars. On June 29, the People's Daily newspaper, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, ran a lengthy page 1 article on involution, saying they run counter to the party's goal of high quality economic development.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping weighed in at a closed-door economic meeting, calling for better regulating competition and incentives by local governments to attract factory investments that are blamed for overinvestment in affected industries.
The tougher talk began with a focus on automakers in late May, specifically around electric vehicle price wars that began more than three years ago.
Analysts at investment bank UBS said the shift is good news for auto industry profits and company stocks.
'Though it's difficult to imagine a sudden U-turn of the industry from fierce competition to orderly consolidation, it's indeed possible to have near-term ceasefire of the price war,' they wrote.
Weak demand and overcapacity bring a fight for survival
After BYD launched another round of price cuts on May 23, some competitors, the main industry association and government all called for fair and sustainable competition.
The EV battery industry, the cement association and major construction companies have issued statements echoing calls for an end to excess competition.
The term involution, which suggests a spiraling inward and shrinking, was initially applied in China to students and young workers, who felt they were caught up in meaningless competition that led nowhere as the job market weakened and wages stagnated in recent years.
At the industry level, it has come to mean sectors that have too many companies competing for a slice of the pie, leading to fierce price cutting to try to gain market share.
The mismatch between production capacity — how much an industry can make — and actual demand for the product, reflects overcapacity that forces companies to compete for survival in a limited market space, said a recent article in the Communist Party magazine Qiushi.
Obstacles to fixing the problem
Some Chinese industries, especially steel and cement, have long suffered from overcapacity. A government push to promote green industries has fostered similar problems in that sector, including solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles.
A flood of Chinese exports is leading to more trade barriers in Europe and the U.S. and in some emerging markets such as Mexico, Indonesia and India.
Ultimately, economists say industries need to consolidate through company mergers and bankruptcies. But the process will take time. A major obstacle is provincial governments that want to protect local companies and jobs.
Alicia García-Herrero, the chief economist for Asia-Pacific at the Natixis investment bank, said that recent comments by top Chinese economic officials suggest they realize something needs to be done.
'How much is action versus words, I don't know,' she said. 'But I do think it's a big problem for China.'
___
Associated Press researcher Yu Bing contributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil's BRF minority shareholders back Marfrig deal
Brazil's BRF minority shareholders back Marfrig deal

Reuters

time44 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Brazil's BRF minority shareholders back Marfrig deal

SAO PAULO, Aug 2 (Reuters) - The majority of minority shareholders of Brazilian poultry and pork processor BRF ( opens new tab have approved a proposed tie-up with beefpacker Marfrig ( opens new tab, according to a securities filing on Saturday. The move will create another global food company with origins in Brazil and factories in South America, North America, the Middle East and China. The filing showed 71.4% of minority shareholders in BRF approved the terms of the deal with Marfrig, not including abstentions. Shareholders representing 90% of BRF's free float cast their votes, the filing said. The results indicate support for the deal's completion ahead of an extraordinary general shareholders meeting scheduled for August 5. In May, Marfrig unveiled a plan to complete its takeover of BRF, a move that could be followed by the listing of shares of the combined corporate entity, to be called MBRF, in the United States. In public disclosures, Marfrig and BRF said the proposed deal would involve a share swap whereby BRF shareholders would receive 0.8521 shares of Marfrig for each BRF share they own. MBRF will also control Marfrig-owned National Beef, a meat processor based in the United States.

India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say
India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say

India will keep purchasing oil from Russia, despite President Donald Trump threatening to impose penalties for doing so, two Indian officials said on Saturday Officials in India, the most populous country on Earth, told Reuters and That contradicted a statement from Trump, who on Friday told reporters his understanding was that India would 'no longer' be buying oil from Russia. "These are long-term oil contracts," an unnamed Indian official told Reuters. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Last week, Trump said India would face unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil in addition to a 25 percent tariff on goods. However, China and Turkey, two countries that also purchase large amounts of Russian oil, have not faced similar penalty threats. India drastically increased its import of Russian oil after the Kremlin invaded Ukraine in 2022, while many other countries began to cut back it's imports. The cheap availability of Russian oil allowed India to reduce its reliance on other countries, such as Saudi Arabia or Iraq, who typically sell to Asian countries at a higher price. While India faced criticisms for doing so, the general consensus around India's increase in imports has been that it helps avoid a global surge in oil prices. It's unclear why exactly Trump has targeted India in reducing its import of Russian oil. The president has recently expressed frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin for failing to come to the peace talks table to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. On Friday, India's external affairs spokesperson Randdhir Jaiswal said India and Russia had a 'time-tested partnership' and that India was analyzing its energy sourcing. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," Jaiswal said, according to Reuters. India heavily relies on energy imports to sustain the needs of it's more than one billion population. It imports more than one million barrels per day.

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin

This week sees the 80th anniversaries of the only two uses of nuclear weapons in war against human targets. The Hiroshima bomb will be commemorated on Wednesday. The Nagasaki bomb will be marked on Saturday. These actions, though generally believed to have brought the Second World War to an end, remain highly controversial, not least because of the large number of non-combatant civilians who died of appalling injuries. American military authorities prevented the publication of some pictures of the aftermath for many years. Some of the scientists involved in developing the bomb regretted it deeply. Albert Einstein, who had urged President Franklin Roosevelt to embark on the research which led to it, later said this was 'the one great mistake in my life'. But whatever we think now about President Harry Truman's decision to drop two bombs on Japan, such discoveries cannot be undiscovered. Several countries, including Britain, concluded that the best response was to build their own bombs, so deterring attack by any other nuclear power. This policy has, on the whole, worked. The 1961 Cuban missile crisis was defused because both Moscow and Washington had the sense to see that a compromise was better than the end of the world. Both backed down. Since then, most of us have believed that Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) would deter all but the crazy from taking actions which might lead to the use of nuclear weapons. The Russians have developed a grim system known as the Dead Hand, which would deliver a shattering nuclear response to an American nuclear strike, even if the Kremlin leadership were all dead in the ruins of an irradiated Moscow. It was this which former Russian President Dmitri Medvedev was referring to when he recently taunted Donald Trump over his approach to Russia. And Mr Trump duly rose to the bait, proclaiming that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions' in response to what he called the Russian's 'highly provocative' comments. This is probably bluster. Mr Trump's advisers will have told him that Mr Medvedev is not a significant figure. And the US Navy always has several of its 12 Ohio-class submarines, equipped with formidably accurate Trident multi-warhead missiles, within striking range of Russia. Even so, with a war still in Ukraine, it would be unwise to be complacent. MAD may have worked so far but the world is madder than for many years, with Russo-American relations tense, dogged by mutual incomprehension and personally unfriendly. Mr Trump may be unpredictable and erratic but the root of this problem is Vladimir Putin's cruel and lawless aggression, made worse by despicable bombing attacks on civilians. Mr Trump is right that it must stop, and it is Mr Putin who must stop it. If he does not, who knows where it might lead? Russia has relied too long on its nuclear strength to limit the West's response. The West must now deploy the most severe conventional military, diplomatic and economic means to bring Putin to the negotiating table and to obtain a ceasefire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store