Russia's navy looks to be stretched thin after getting battered by Ukraine and losing a key port, Western officials say
During an interview aboard the Royal Netherlands Navy frigate HNLMS De Ruyter last week, Commodore Arjen Warnaar said these recent setbacks have greatly affected the Russian Navy from the Mediterranean Sea to the Arctic region.
"I think they're stretched," said Warnaar, commander of Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 — one of the military alliance's immediate reaction forces — while its flagship vessel De Ruyter conducted operations in the Norwegian Sea.
Russia's navy has always been under a certain degree of strain due to limits in shipbuilding, maintenance, and modernization, redeployment challenges, and operational overstretch. Recent setbacks, however, have put further pressure on the fleet.
At the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine lacked a naval force capable of meeting the threat. What little it had didn't last long. To prevent the Russians from capturing it, the Ukrainians scuttled their one major warship. Its other naval vessels were damaged, destroyed, or captured.
To project power in the Black Sea and fight back against Moscow, Kyiv launched an asymmetric military campaign involving domestically produced naval drones and missile strikes.
Ukrainian operations have damaged or destroyed dozens of Russian warships and naval vessels and forced Moscow to relocate much of the Black Sea Fleet from its Sevastopol headquarters in occupied Crimea to the port of Novorossiysk on the other side of the region.
Staggering Russian losses and forced retreats under relentless Ukrainian strikes have stretched a Russian fleet already hobbled by attrition, aging ships in need of repair, and a shipbuilding industry too strained to replace them.
Russia's naval setbacks worsened in late 2024 after Syrian rebel forces seized the capital, Damascus, and toppled the Assad regime, bringing a swift end to the country's yearslong civil war.
Russia provided military support to the Assad regime during the brutal conflict, and in exchange, it enjoyed a significant presence at Syria's Tartus naval facility on the Mediterranean Sea. However, the change in Damascus has jeopardized the future of Moscow's operations at the strategic port.
Warnaar said the fallout of these two setbacks has been significant for the Russian Navy.
"I think they've always been stretched," Warnaar said of Russia's naval forces, but the situation looks to be getting worse. "Once things start to happen — and, obviously, Ukraine is an example — they'll be even more stretched." He noted that NATO has the assets for any additional stretch required.
"Looking at what they're doing in the Mediterranean, losing a port there means losing logistical support — and that stretches the capabilities they have, which mainly come from this Northern Fleet," the commander said. The Northern Fleet is based in Russia's Murmansk region, along the Barents Sea.
A NATO official echoed Warnaar's assessment and said losing Tartus means Russia now needs to pull assets from other regions to support operations in the Mediterranean, putting greater stress on Moscow's ships and submarines and support systems to sustain the deployments.
And Russia's Black Sea losses have only added to its force generation challenges, said the NATO official, speaking with Business Insider on the condition of anonymity to discuss alliance observations concerning Russia's navy.
These issues are not unique to the Russian Navy. The official said many militaries face force generation issues. But Moscow's problems are compounded by its efforts to keep pace with NATO's vast, jointly organized maritime presence around the European continent.
These challenges are becoming increasingly important in the Arctic region, where climate change is opening up new shipping lanes, creating military and economic opportunities for NATO allies — and adversaries.
The growing significance of the High North region was underscored last month when Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 — led by the sleek Dutch warship De Ruyter — deployed to the frigid waters off the northern coast of Norway to conduct a range of operations.
British Cdr. Craig Raeburn, chief of staff of the maritime group, told Business Insider that NATO was "operating in this area because it's something we haven't done for a while." He said one of the many reasons the consortium of warships deployed to the Arctic is to keep an eye on Russian activity in the region and also "see how they react to us being here."
Moscow was relatively unmoved by the deployment. At one point, a lone Russian naval aircraft operated in close proximity to the maritime group, but none of its ships came out to monitor the NATO activity, Warnaar said. He attributed this to possible strain on the Russian Navy following a series of major exercises called July Storm.
Cdr. Arlo Abrahamson, spokesperson for NATO Allied Maritime Command, said the alliance's maritime presence across the Euro-Atlantic is intended to defend and protect allied interests.
"In projecting this maritime presence, with a robust security network of Allied navies, if an adversary wants to maintain a similar profile, it's going to place strain on their force generation capabilities," Abrahamson said in emailed remarks to Business Insider. Russia isn't able to match that without stress on the fleet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
12 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Billionaires say a private jet is one of life's greatest luxuries. Here's how much it costs.
More than 15 years ago, Oprah Winfrey shared one of her famous nuggets of wisdom: "It's great to have a private jet," she said at Duke University's 2009 commencement. "Anyone that tells you that having your own private jet isn't great is lying to you." But she did leave out one detail: Having a private jet is expensive — really expensive. Costs such as crew, custom features, and maintenance can add to the already hefty price tag of purchasing a private plane, companies that manage these and charter fleets told Business Insider. "There is a lot that goes into owning an airplane, a lot of expenses that aren't on the surface," said Jamie Walker, the executive chairman of jet management company Jet Linx. Some of the most popular private jet models — the Bombardier Challenger 300 and 350, the Embraer Phenom 300, the Cessna Citation XLS+, and the Gulfstream G550 — cost between $9.5 million and $33 million brand new, Walker estimated. The cost fluctuates by model. But even when purchased used, many list for sale for eight figures. That's not including customization, which is "where things get fun," Walker said. See: Paris Hilton's "SlivAir," a Gulfstream G450 with a Barbie pink paint job and "That's Hot" written on a wing. "We've seen clients spend anywhere from a few hundred thousand to several million on customizations," Walker said, who compared it to "building a luxury home." Interior upgrades like custom cabinetry and headrests imprinted with logos start at about $65,000. Premium woodwork and Hermès leather seats can exceed $1 million. WiFi from Starlink or L5 can cost between $120,000 and $450,000. A private jet can cost more than $1 million a year to run Once a jet is delivered, the costs of operating it start to add up. Leona Qi, the president of the US division of charter firm VistaJet, estimated that it typically costs more than $1 million a year to run a single jet. Members of a private jet's crew — at least two pilots, sometimes an air host — are typically considered full-time employees. Each can earn between $150,000 and $400,000 a year. They also have to be properly certified, trained, and insured, at the owner's cost. While some jet maintenance is scheduled — much like a car's, it's based on mileage and crew — unexpected fixes can leave an unlucky owner seven figures in the red in a bad year. An engine overhaul, for example, can cost as much as $1.5 million per engine, Walker estimated (and most jets have two). Then there's a hangar. A parking spot in New York or Miami can cost as much as $450,000 a year, significantly more than one in smaller cities like Omaha or St. Louis. Fuel can make up about one-third of all ownership costs, Walker said. And most private jet owners hire a company to manage it all. Jet Linx said it charges between $7,000 and $12,000 a month for its management services. To charter or not to charter? That is the multimillion-dollar question. The expenses and headaches of owning a plane have some uber-wealthy turning to charter. Qi at the jet charter company said she doesn't think it makes financial sense to own an aircraft unless you fly more than 350 hours a year, want a completely personalized jet with a toothbrush and a set of fresh clothes on board, or need it at a moment's notice. Through charter companies like VistaJet, members can buy a certain number of flying hours a year, while fractional ownership firms like NetJets sell members a share in a specific aircraft. Even when money is no object, some of the wealthiest in the world choose to charter out of privacy concerns. Privately owned jets can be tracked by the public, while charter jets — whose passengers aren't revealed publicly — are much more discreet. "The group had a plane and we sold it," LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault said of his company's jet, speaking in 2022 on a French radio station. "The result now is that no one can see where I go because I rent planes when I use private planes." Others charter jets when they can't use their personal planes. As many as 50% of VistaJet's clients own their own jets but use VistaJet as a backup service when their aircraft is undergoing maintenance or is already in use, the company said. On the other hand, there are private jet owners who don't use their planes very often and charter them out to mitigate some of the costs associated with ownership. (They do something similar with their superyachts.) "Most people who are unfamiliar are surprised," Walker said. "They're like, 'Really, people with that much wealth and companies that are that big that make that much money care about offsetting half a million bucks?' And they do. They absolutely care about that." Well, they care, but not enough to forgo a plane altogether. Look at the infamously frugal Warren Buffett, who resisted a private jet for years. Once he splurged, there was no looking back. "Were I to die tomorrow, you could be sure Berkshire's earnings would increase by $1 million annually, since Charlie would immediately sell our corporate jet, The Indefensible (ignoring my wish that it be buried with me)," he wrote in Berkshire Hathaway's 1990 investor letter.

Business Insider
13 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I had 12 jobs over 22 years at Microsoft. Here's what it taught me about finding my ideal job.
This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Brieanne Yuchasz, the founder of ViewPoint Coaching & Consulting, about her years at Microsoft. Business Insider has verified Yuchasz's former employment. The following has been edited for length and clarity. Are you someone who made an unconventional career move? If you're comfortable discussing it with a reporter, please fill out this quick form. We want to hear who have made nontraditional moves out of corporate life. I've always been fascinated with the question: "What's next?" My own experience plays a big part in that. In 22 years at Microsoft, I held 12 different roles — from program management to community management, and eventually chief of staff. I was laid off once and managed teams through reorganizations. Having these different roles meant I could streamline my vision for my career and what I value in a job. It also meant I developed the skills to run my own business. I quit Microsoft in 2023 and started my career coaching business. Every move taught me a lesson on career management, which I now pass on to my clients. Starting at Microsoft in the early 2000s I majored in business administration at Western Washington University. The college had an advisory board that connected me with people at Microsoft, Starbucks, and Boeing. I received job offers from all three. Microsoft seemed the most innovative company in the early 2000s, so I joined the product launch team as a product information coordinator. We worked on producing the CDs, manuals, and certificates of authenticity for Microsoft products. I moved into an operations program manager role, working across several product launches. I loved learning about the products and collaborating with legal, marketing, and policy teams. Over seven years, I worked on everything from server products to PC games. I even got my name in the credits for the "Age of Mythology" game. In 2005, I was promoted to manage a team of product launch managers. I grew my leadership skills, but it also brought stress. I had my first panic attack, a year into the role. After the panic attack, I realized as a new manager, I hadn't learned how not to care so much about team members and their stresses, how to deal with the fear of failure, and how to deal with my inner critic. I asked to return to an individual contributor role. Thankfully, my manager supported me. I transitioned into a new team called online operations in 2008, where I focused on the customer experience, working on what is now the Microsoft Store. Discovering change management I stayed in online operations until 2012, when I became a program manager in Microsoft's advertising team and helped lead the group through a reorganization. I wanted to do something more people-focused. In 2013, I invested in personal training as a career coach, partly to develop my coaching skills at Microsoft and partly because I was becoming really interested in people and dynamics. Through managing multiple career pivots, I realized that when I'm clear on my values, my purpose, and my long-term vision, I can see the paths to get there. I've taken that with me into my coaching. In 2014, I moved into community management: hosting monthly calls, onboarding leaders, and helping them navigate the organization. Two years later, I shifted to training and readiness within the same team. Fear took over Unfortunately, my position meant I knew another reorganization was coming, and fear took over. I assumed I'd land in a role I didn't want, so in 2017, I jumped into another role on a marketing team. I didn't take time to think it through, and the new job wasn't a fit. I was laid off a year later, in 2018. I tried launching my coaching business — but realized I didn't have enough knowledge yet to run it full time. My values, purpose, and vision have shifted over the years, but when I was laid off, I really focused on these, which helped me clarify my next role. After reaching out to people at Microsoft, I rejoined as a senior business program manager in 2019. I could lead the rhythm of the business, build team culture, and drive initiatives. I really found my groove. The role aligned with my skills and strengths: planning, organizing, team building, and change management. I set my career development plan, and identified that a chief of staff role and retiring as a coach is where I would set my vision. In 2022, I became a chief of staff. I'd finally reached a career peak, which was exciting — but then that question came up again: "What's next?" I missed the partner-facing elements of previous jobs. I wasn't able to work with clients on a daily basis and missed the teamwork. I realized I could focus on clients more deeply as a coach. I was also looking at the writing on the wall, knowing that layoffs would be coming again. It was the time of year, fiscal planning season. Handing in my notice in May 2023 was a big decision. Microsoft is a special place, and I love the people, innovation, and scale. I may go back one day, if they'll have me. On my last day, I was more reflective than emotional. But after 22 years, I was finally ready to start my own business. Navigating change after Microsoft Going from Microsoft to running my own business was the biggest change of all. I had savings to support me as I grew my coaching business, and I adjusted my lifestyle to reduce spending. Overall, my experience at Microsoft was incredible. Over more than 20 years there, I learned that change is constant. If you can learn to embrace it, then you can thrive. But every move gave me something new, like experience in operations, sales, marketing, and business management, so I don't regret it. All of it helped me to run a small business.


Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Melania Trump Letter to Putin Handed Over in Alaska
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. President Donald Trump gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a letter from the first lady on Friday during a crunch meeting in Alaska, Reuters reported. According to the news agency, citing two White House officials, the letter raised the plight of thousands of Ukrainian children who have reportedly been abducted by Russian forces since Putin ordered an all-out invasion in February 2022. Newsweek contacted the White House and Russian Foreign Ministry for comment on Saturday via email outside regular office hours. Why It Matters Ukrainian authorities allege that tens of thousands of Ukrainian children have been kidnapped by Russian authorities and taken either to Russia or to areas of Ukraine under Russian control. In March 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Putin in response to the alleged abduction of Ukrainian children. Russian authorities said children were removed from war zones for their own safety and described the warrant as "outrageous and unacceptable." First lady Melania Trump, who is Slovenian, taking a personal interest in the fate of Ukrainian children could put additional pressure on Putin over Russia's conduct in the war. What To Know On Friday, Trump met with Putin at the Jointoa, to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine. The talks ended without Putin committing to a ceasefire, though Trump said they had been "very productive" with "many points we agreed on." Reuters reported that during the meeting, Trump gave Putin a letter written by the first lady that raised concern over the fate of thousands of Ukrainian children said to be removed from their families without consent by Russian authorities. The exact content of the letter has not been reported. According to Kyiv, about 20,000 Ukrainian children have been abducted since February 2022, which it said met the United Nations' definition of genocide. In June 2024, the U.S. said it was aware of "credible reports" of Ukrainian children being listed on Russian adoption websites, which it described as "despicable and appalling." Russian President Vladimir Putin at a news conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15 and first lady of the United States Melania Trump at the Children's National Hospital in Washington, D.C.,... Russian President Vladimir Putin at a news conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15 and first lady of the United States Melania Trump at the Children's National Hospital in Washington, D.C., on July 3. More ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP/ANDREW HARNIK/GETTY According to the British newspaper The Sun, some abducted Ukrainian children were barred from speaking in their own language and forced to sing the Russian national anthem. Moscow said it evacuated children from conflict areas as a humanitarian measure. Trump has said his wife notes that Russia continues to bomb Ukrainian cities despite the U.S. president's telephone calls with Putin. According to USA Today, the president said in July: "I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' And she said, 'Oh really? Another city was just hit." In recent weeks, Russian state media has criticized the fist lady, with one prominent pro-regime TV anchor describing her as a "Ukrainian agent." Following his meeting with Putin, Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he had "largely agreed" with Putin about potential land swaps between Ukraine and Russia. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky previously said he would not hand over any Ukrainian territory to Moscow. What People Are Saying U.S. President Donald Trump, commenting on potential Russian sanctions after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, told Sean Hannity: "I think I don't have to think about that now. … I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now." Trump also said Putin, widely regarded as a dictator, gave him advice on how to run "honest elections." Standing alongside Trump in Alaska, Putin said: "Our negotiations have been held in a constructive atmosphere of mutual respect." Trump said: "I've always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir. … We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. It made it a little bit tougher to deal with, but he understood it." What Happens Next In remains to be seen whether the first lady's letter will prompt any action from Moscow regarding Ukrainian children, and if not, whether the U.S. government will take any action.