logo
How India's youth can challenge U.S. tariffs

How India's youth can challenge U.S. tariffs

The Hindu2 days ago
In early August, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that imports from India to the U.S. will be charged tariffs at 50%. This includes a 25% penalty for India's oil purchases from Russia. The U.S. tariffs bring challenges to the Indian economy. What are the policy options for India?
Tariffs are the taxes levied on imports from other countries. The average tariff imposed by the U.S., the world's largest export market, was 2 to 3% for two decades until 2024. All that has changed with President Trump announcing a steep hike in U.S. tariffs on April 2 this year.
If the 50% tariff rate imposed on India takes effect, a shirt that an Indian firm sells for $10 will cost as much as $15 for the U.S. consumer. The tariffs on goods from India are higher than the tariffs the U.S. has imposed on India's export competitors (Table 1). Therefore, a similar shirt shipped from Vietnam or Bangladesh will cost $12 or less, making Indian products uncompetitive. When Mr. Trump launched the tariff war in April this year, his fury was directed mainly at China, which was charged with tariffs of 145%. But subsequently, the two countries agreed to cool off their animosities, and the U.S. tariffs on China have now come down to 30%. Astonishingly, India, a close U.S. ally, is now the country (with Brazil) threatened with the highest U.S. tariffs.
For India, the dollars it earns by selling textiles, pharmaceuticals, software services, and other products to the U.S. are critical for bridging the country's external trade deficit. Mr. Trump's tariffs may lead to job and income losses in India, at least in the short run. At the same time, in exchange for reducing tariffs, the U.S. is seeking greater access for its agricultural products, especially dairy, in the Indian market. This will in turn have adverse impacts on Indian farmers.
Nature of China's influence
The unfolding tariff war shows that low wages alone will not give a lasting competitive advantage to a country in the export market. China's strengths emerge from its enormous scale, massive infrastructure, and growing technological capabilities. China has established an unassailable lead in several industries. Its shares in global exports are 36.3% in textiles and clothing and 24.9% in machine and electrical equipment. The corresponding shares for India are 4.4% and 0.9% respectively (Table 2).
China's vice-like grip over large parts of the global production network and exclusive access to some critical materials such as rare earths may have quickened the melting of ice between it and the U.S. Moreover, further uncertainty and tariff escalations with other countries may derail plans by global companies to diversify their investments away from China and do more business with India and Vietnam.
If left with low wages as its only bargaining chip, India will remain on the periphery of global business, ever to be pushed by lower-cost suppliers and by the whims of tariff administrators of rich countries. Despite their early starts, India's IT and pharmaceutical industries tread unsteadily in low-value activities due to their underinvestment in research and development.
From producer to consumer
A significant source of demand for export-driven economic growth in China and other developing countries over the last few decades has been consumers in high-income countries in the West. However, the purchasing capabilities of developed countries have been going downhill for a while due to their ageing populations and growing inequalities. With rising tariffs and protectionism, the markets in the West will also be less open.
This means that future economic growth must be built around the demand from the home markets of countries such as India and China. The populations of these countries will have to transform themselves from being low-cost producers to producers and consumers simultaneously — from being servers left with only crumbs from growth to diners who occupy the high table of capitalist progress. Such a transformation can occur only with sweeping economic changes. Wages and incomes must rise quickly in India. High-value-adding economic activities based on technology and knowledge must replace growth extracted exploitatively from labour.
The role of young India
Those who doubt Indians' ability to partake in growth derived from skills and talent need only to look at the record of Indians in the U.S. over the past half-century. The immigration to the U.S. of engineers, doctors, and other professionals, most of them trained in India's public universities, has grown steadily since the 1970s. Approximately, a third of the graduates from Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) migrated abroad, most of them to the U.S., through the 1970s and 1980s. The population of Indian immigrants in the U.S. rose from 0.3 million in 1982 to 1.3 million in 2000 and 3.2 million in 2023. Although still only 1% of the U.S. population, Indian immigrants have a disproportionately higher representation in higher education and research and as entrepreneurs and corporate leaders. The 'brain circulation' they set in has contributed to the U.S.'s continued global dominance in technology and innovation.
Today, one out of every five young people in the world lives in India. At a time when the youth population is declining not only in high-income countries but also in China, the multitude of its young will be India's trump card (Chart 1). Indians in the age group between 15 to 29 years and enrolled in secondary schools or colleges number approximately to 120 million, which is as big as the population of Japan. If accompanied by appropriate policy interventions to enhance their skills and training, these young Indians could become the movers and shakers in the emerging knowledge economy.
The U.S. administration will be wise enough not to underestimate India's strategic importance by factoring in only the relatively small size of its goods trade. If young Indians are turned away from the U.S. due to visa and job restrictions, the U.S. will be the bigger loser in the long run.
As the battle on trade and tariffs rages on, India's best defence will be its young people, their sheer numbers and the promise they hold. The home market they generate will be large enough to compensate for any dip in export earnings, provided jobs and incomes expand fast. Greater public expenditures on health and education, and a renewed focus by domestic businesses on innovation will be critical for unleashing the strengths of India's young as a shield against growing global turbulences.
Jayan Jose Thomas is a Professor of Economics at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration reviewing records of over 55 million foreigners with US visas for ‘revocation'
Trump administration reviewing records of over 55 million foreigners with US visas for ‘revocation'

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump administration reviewing records of over 55 million foreigners with US visas for ‘revocation'

The State Department said Thursday that it's reviewing the records of more than 55 million foreigners who hold valid U.S. visas for potential revocation or deportable violations of immigration rules. Should such information be found, the visa will be revoked and, if the visa holder is in the United States, he or she would be subject to deportation.(Unsplash/Representative Image) In a written answer to a question posed by The Associated Press, the department said that all U.S. visa holders are subject to 'continuous vetting' with an eye toward any indication that they could be ineligible for the document. Should such information be found, the visa will be revoked and, if the visa holder is in the United States, he or she would be subject to deportation. The department said it was looking for indicators of ineligibility, including visa overstays, criminal activity, threats to public safety, engaging in any form of terrorist activity, or providing support to a terrorist organization. 'We review all available information as part of our vetting, including law enforcement or immigration records or any other information that comes to light after visa issuance indicating a potential ineligibility,' the department said. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, his administration has thus far focused on deporting migrants illegally in the United States as well as holders of student and visitor exchange visas. The State Department's new language suggests that the re-vetting process, which officials acknowledge is time-consuming, is far more widespread. The administration has steadily imposed more and more restrictions and requirements on visa applicants, including requiring all visa seekers to submit to in-person interviews. But the review of all visa holders appears to be a significant expansion of what had initially been a re-vetting process focused mainly on students who have been involved in pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel activity. Officials say the reviews will include all the visa holders' social media accounts, law enforcement and immigration records in their home countries, along with any actionable violations of U.S. law committed while they were in the United States. 'As part of the Trump Administration's commitment to protect U.S. national security and public safety, since Inauguration Day the State Department has revoked more than twice as many visas, including nearly four times as many student visas, as during the same time period last year,' the department said. Earlier this week, the department said that since Trump returned to the White House, it has revoked more than 6,000 student visas for overstays and violations of local, state and federal law, the vast majority of which were assault, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and support for terrorism. It said that about 4,000 of those 6,000 were due to actual infractions of laws and that approximately 200–300 visas were revoked for terrorism-related issues, including providing support for designated terrorist organizations or state sponsors of terrorism.

Trump says he plans to patrol streets of Washington DC with US troops
Trump says he plans to patrol streets of Washington DC with US troops

New Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Trump says he plans to patrol streets of Washington DC with US troops

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said he plans to patrol Washington's streets on Thursday with troops he deployed to the US capital in a show of force against what he claims is a "crime emergency." Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard to deploy in Washington last week vowing to "take our capital back," despite protests by some residents and statistics showing violent offenses falling. "I'm going to be going out tonight I think with the police and with the military of course... We're going to be doing a job," the Republican told Todd Starnes, a host for right-wing media outlet Newsmax. He spoke one day after his vice president, JD Vance, was greeted by boos and shouts of "Free DC" -- referring to the District of Columbia -- on his own meet-and-greet with troops deployed in the city. The DC National Guard has mobilized 800 troops for the mission, while Republican states Ohio, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia are sending a total of around 1,200 more. They have been spotted in major tourist areas such as the National Mall and its monuments, the Nationals Park baseball stadium and others. In addition to sending troops onto the streets, Trump has also sought to take full control of the local Washington police department, attempting at one point to sideline its leadership. Some residents have welcomed the crackdown, pointing to crime in their areas -- but others have complained the show of force is unnecessary, or has not been seen in parts of the US capital where violence is concentrated. Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller visited troops at Washington's Union Station Wednesday. Loud boos could be heard from outside as Vance walked into a fast-food restaurant at the train station. People also shouted expletive-laden jeers and slogans including "Free DC! Free DC!" Vance dismissed the hecklers as "a bunch of crazy protesters."

Donald Trump to patrol Washington DC streets with federal officers today
Donald Trump to patrol Washington DC streets with federal officers today

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump to patrol Washington DC streets with federal officers today

President Donald Trump said he would join federal law enforcement officers patrolling the streets of Washington, DC on Thursday, a move to highlight his administration's takeover of the city's public safety efforts. Donald Trump has sought to discredit the city's crime statistics, ordering the Justice Department to investigate whether local officials falsified the figures.(Reuters) 'I'm going to be going out tonight, I think, with the police, and with the military, of course. So we're going to do a job,' Trump said in an interview with conservative radio host Todd Starnes. A White House official later confirmed Trump's plans. Further details were not provided. Trump last week surged US officers and troops into the nation's capital and put the MPD under federal control, saying murders, carjackings and robberies there amounted to a national emergency. While a post-pandemic crime surge in DC stirred public safety fears, Justice Department data released in January showed violent crime in the city plunging to a 30-year-low. The effort marked Trump's highest-profile moves yet to drive home his law-and-order message. But they are deeply unpopular with DC residents and any appearance by the president on the streets of the nation's capital could stoke tensions further. Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller were heckled on Wednesday when they met with National Guard members at Union Station. Almost eight in 10 Washingtonians oppose Trump's takeover and 65% said they don't think it will make the city any safer, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll. Over the last week, the administration has faced criticism that the federal deployment has focused on low-crime, tourist-friendly areas of Washington and has not produced a significant uptick of arrests. Attorney General Pam Bondi said Wednesday that the effort has resulted in 550 arrests and 76 illegal firearms being seized. But data from DC Mayor Muriel Bowser's office showed that MPD arrests in the week before the federal takeover were higher than the week after. The White House has been adamant that the numbers don't accurately depict the level of crime and blight in Washington. Trump has sought to discredit the city's crime statistics, ordering the Justice Department to investigate whether local officials falsified the figures. Democrats have dismissed the the move as a thinly veiled attempt for Trump to take power in the nation's capital and amplify his message that liberal policies are soft on crime.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store