Pentagon reveals how much Donald Trump's troop deployment to Los Angeles for 60 days could cost
The Pentagon estimates that the deployment of National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles will cost $134 million. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the move amidst Democratic objections. Protests continue due to Trump's immigration policies. Trump has ordered troops to assist law enforcement, but local officials say they are not needed. California has sued the administration.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday was asked if he would use the Insurrection Act as a response to the protests in Los Angeles over his administration's immigration crackdown.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump to revoke Insurrection Act?
Amid the massive protests in Los Angeles, the Pentagon said Tuesday it expects its 60-day deployment the California National Guard and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles to cost at least $134 million. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday defended the deployment of National Guardsmen and Marines to Los Angeles amid objections from Democrats about their domestic deployment. Protests continue in Los Angeles and other cities across the country in response to Trump's immigration crackdown.President Donald Trump's decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles amid mass deportation protests will likely cost $134 million, the Pentagon's budget chief told lawmakers. The cost covers expenses such as travel, lodging, and meal expenses, according to Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell, the acting chief financial officer at the Department of Defense."We've been clear from the start—this is a 60-day mission because we want to send a message to the rioters, looters, and thugs attacking law enforcement that we're not backing down," Hegseth said during testimony before the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee.Acting Pentagon comptroller Bryn MacDonnell, testifying at a House budget hearing on Tuesday alongside Hegseth, said the estimate covers costs such as travel, housing and food, as per Politico. Pentagon Comptroller Bryn Woollacott MacDonnell said the money will be pulled from the troops' existing operations and maintenance accounts.Democratic lawmakers sought answers from Hegseth about the deployments, and raised concerns about sending active-duty U.S. troops to a mission that they said would be better performed by law enforcement officers."This is a deeply unfair position to put our Marines in. Their service should be honored. It should not be exploited," said Representative Betty McCollum, a Democrat from Minnesota, on a House Appropriations subcommittee.Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to assist law enforcement with the protests, although California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have said they are not needed. California has sued the Trump administration over the use of troops, arguing it violates state sovereignty.The President defended his decision to send Another 2,000 National Guard troops along with 700 Marines to Los Angeles, escalating a military presence local officials and Gov. Gavin Newsom don't want and the police chief says creates logistical challenges for safely handling protests. Additional protests against immigration raids are expected to continue in other cities Tuesday.President Donald Trump on Tuesday was asked if he would use the Insurrection Act as a response to the protests in Los Angeles over his administration's immigration crackdown."If there's an insurrection, we would certainly invoke it. We will see," Trump responded."There were areas of Los Angeles last night where you could call it an insurrection," he later added. He again claimed, without evidence, that the protesters are "paid insurrectionists."(With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump says China will supply rare earths: Why these elements are crucial for US
US President Donald Trump said Wednesday that a 'deal' has been reached with China, with Beijing agreeing to make it easier to provide magnets and rare earth metals to American companies. These minerals have become ubiquitous, from being used in smartphones to electric vehicles. But China's restrictions on exports of seven of these rare earth elements have threatened to upend the global supply chain, hitting the US as well as India read more US President Donald Trump meets with China's President Xi Jinping at the start of their bilateral meeting at the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, June 29, 2019. File Photo/Reuters United States President Donald Trump has claimed to have reached a 'deal' with China amid trade talks. He stated that Beijing is ready to facilitate the supply of magnets and rare earth metals to US companies. The US, on the other hand, has agreed not to revoke the visas of Chinese nationals on American college campuses. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi [Jinping] and me,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday (June 11). 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US president's remarks come after two days of high-level trade talks between the US and China in London. While it may not be a deal, but a 'framework' that paves the way for more talks between the world's two biggest economies. Let's take a closer look. US-China trade talks President Donald Trump's comments about a 'deal' between the US and China come after the two sides agreed to a truce in May after imposing sky-high tariffs on each other's imports. In his post on Truth Social, Trump said the 'deal' allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods. China would impose a 10 per cent tariff on US imports. The details about the new agreement are unclear so far. Amid no clarity, the response from markets was muted, with the S&P 500 up 0.1 per cent. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the two sides had 'reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus'. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he added. Last month, the US and China agreed in Geneva to pause the high tariffs that had nearly paralysed trade between the two countries. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday that Trump was reviewing the details of the deal. 'But what the president heard, he liked,' she added. Analysts have reacted to the US president's announcement, pointing out that more details need to be known. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Adam Button, Chief Currency Analyst, Forexlive, Toronto, told Reuters, 'Obviously, it's good news that China and the US have reached some sort of agreement, and Trump has certainly tried to spin it positively. But it's not clear what path the US and China are on and what they're trying to achieve. Trump hinted at this, saying he wants to expand China trade. In some ways, the US-China talks have created more questions than answers. Is this tariff rate going to stick? And what exactly are the US and China working towards? 'The ultimate takeaway on China is that things aren't getting worse. So, that's good. We probably built in some expectations of maybe material progress.' Why rare earth metals are important for US The significance of China's export of rare earth metals and magnets for the US was underlined in Trump's post, which specifically mentioned them, along with the broader trade agreement. Rare earths are 17 metallic elements, consisting of scandium, yttrium and the lanthanides. While these materials are found throughout the Earth's crust, extracting and processing them is costly and environmentally damaging. The modern world cannot function without rare earths. They are used in smartphones, missiles, flat-screen TVs, batteries in electric vehicles, MRI scanners and cancer treatments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD From the automotive industry to defence, permanent magnets made with rare earth elements (REEs) are essential across sectors. The US military is heavily reliant on rare earths from China. According to a 2025 research note from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) think tank, these materials are used in F-35 fighter jets, lasers, satellites, Tomahawk missiles, Virginia- and Columbia-class nuclear-powered submarines, unmanned aerial vehicles and smart bombs. In April, China imposed export restrictions on seven rare earth elements and magnets amid tensions with the US over Trump's new tariffs. Washington had levied 145 per cent taxes on Chinese imports, with Beijing retaliating with 125 per cent on US goods. 'The United States is already on the back foot when it comes to manufacturing these defence technologies,' Gracelin Baskaran of CSIS said in an interview published by the think tank. 'China is rapidly expanding its munitions production and acquiring advanced weapons systems and equipment at a pace five to six times faster than the United States. While China is preparing with a wartime mindset, the United States continues to operate under peacetime conditions.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The International Energy Agency said China produces 61 per cent of mined rare earths, but controls 92 per cent of the global production output. The US-China trade deal, while yet to be finalised, would come as a relief for American defence companies such as Lockheed Martin — which uses the most samarium in the US – a rare earth metal used in military-grade magnets, according to The Guardian. China entirely controls the supply of this element. China's restrictions impact India China's export restrictions on seven rare earth elements (REE) and magnets have threatened to disrupt global supply chains. New Delhi could also feel the heat of these export curbs. India's import of rare earth magnets has ramped up in the last five financial years — 12,400 tonnes in FY21 to 28,700 tonnes in FY24. This further surged to 53,700 tonnes in FY25. Of the 53,700 tonnes of permanent magnets – several containing rare earth elements — exported in 2024-25, 93 per cent were from China. This was prior to Beijing's export restrictions announced in April. As per an Indian Express report, India has up to three weeks of REE magnet supply left. Amid the potential shortage, industry executives are expected to travel to China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China's restrictions apply to seven rare earth elements – samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. It also requires companies to secure special export licenses to export the minerals and magnets. Speaking to Indian Express earlier, a senior executive from the Indian car industry said that importers now have to give an undertaking to Chinese suppliers that the rare earth magnets obtained from the Asian giant would only be used in vehicles and not for defence purposes. India's automotive industry could feel the heat of China's export restrictions as these magnets are vital for the production of electric vehicles and various automotive components, including gear mechanisms and drive trains. Saurabh Agarwal, Partner & Automotive Tax Leader, EY India told Times of India (TOI), 'The recent actions by China have significantly disrupted global supply chains, particularly through their increasing export control over critical commodities. This underscores the urgent need for India, and indeed any nation, to foster a self-sustaining economy. We must prioritise developing our own critical mineral resources and building an end-to-end domestic supply chain, especially as the world shifts towards greater self-reliance.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Given the current trajectory of our growing economy, it's imperative that the government introduces a Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme specifically for rare earth magnets and critical mineral recycling. This will be crucial in the mid-term for establishing a robust domestic supply chain,' he added. 'In the short run, we must leverage our diplomatic channels to engage with the Chinese government and resolve the immediate challenges around export control licenses. This is essential to prevent production stoppages in our industries,' Agarwal suggested. On Monday, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal had admitted that China's export restrictions will have short-term impacts on the domestic automotive and white goods sectors. 'Obviously, there are issues around the stopping of permanent magnets from China to India, which will affect our auto sector, particularly, and several white goods and other sectors Some companies have put in their applications, and we hope that good sense should prevail and they will get their approvals for permanent magnets,' he told reporters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Goyal said that the Indian embassy is engaging with China on the issue and his ministry is also working on resolutions. When asked whether the government will bring a PLI scheme for the sector, he said he has interacted with automobile companies, who remain 'very' confident about resolving the issue. 'They are in dialogue with our innovators, startups and they say they will take care of any funding requirement or pricing correction that may need to encourage faster roll out and growth of this sector,' Goyal said. With inputs from agencies
The Hindu
42 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA
A federal court hearing is scheduled for Thursday (June 12, 2025) on whether the Trump administration can use the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles. California Gov. Newsom has depicted the federal military intervention in the nation's second-largest city as the onset of a much broader effort by Mr. Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed that, saying the deployment of troops was unnecessary and meant to undermine local jurisdictions and intimidate the city's large immigrant population. Mr. Newsom filed an emergency motion requesting the court's intervention after President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response on Wednesday. The Democratic governor argued the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and said sending troops to help support immigration raids would only promote civil unrest. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Mr. Trump called up the National Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. Mr. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. Most demonstrations have been peaceful, but this weekend, some turned raucous with protesters setting cars on fire in downtown Los Angeles. The city has imposed a nightly curfew covering a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometer) section where protests have occurred in the sprawling metropolis of 4 million people. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Newsom filed the motion Tuesday, the same day the military announced some members of the National Guard were now standing in protection around federal agents. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations, as Mr. Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement. Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer chose not to rule immediately but set the hearing for Thursday in federal court in San Francisco. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
India-US trade pact likely to miss 'Fall' deadline, New Delhi seeks clarity on Trump's policy
As Indian and the US trade representatives negotiate the initial trenches of a bilateral trade agreement. Here's the reason why both nations might miss the fall deadline in finalising a deal read more While India and the United States work towards finalising the initial aspects of a bilateral trade deal , reports are emerging that both nations will likely miss the fall deadline in finalising an agreement. Sources close to the matter told The Times of India that New Delhi is seeking clarity from the US President Donald Trump's administration on its trade policy. While the two nations are finalising an 'initial tranche' of the proposed trade deal before July 9, Washington, DC, is yet to give clarity on its trade policy beyond the Trump tariffs. 'A long-lasting agreement will require the US to move beyond a case-by-case approach, which can form the basis for a durable agreement,' the source told The Times of India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The source stated that New Delhi is seeking clarity on how the tariff cuts committed by the US Trade Representative will be implemented, since there is no clarity on whether the move would require approval from the US Congress. India is also monitoring the legal challenges to Trump's reciprocal tariffs, which have created 'uncertainties on how the duty cuts will be negotiated.' Three factors India will be looking at The two nations started discussing a bilateral trade agreement following the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in February. Following the talks, it was announced that the two nations had agreed to negotiate a bilateral trade deal by the Fall before the US President decided to roll out reciprocal tariffs on April 2, which was suspended later. Meanwhile, it is pertinent to note that the American trade deals with the United Kingdom and China are also interim and are not final agreements . The source told TOI that New Delhi will be looking at the following three key factors while negotiating a deal with the Trump administration: New Delhi 'wants to secure the best possible deal for its businesses so that they can get market access in return for lower duties in India,' a source told TOI. The source argued that an agreement would give American companies access to a market of close to 1.5 billion people. The Indian government will also be looking at how tariffs are being reset for other countries to determine its next move forward. The government would seek protection in several segments, such as agriculture and segments like staples are fully on board. The source concluded that while the current negotiation is focusing on goods trade, India's interests in the service sector are not getting addressed at the moment.
