
Why BlueFloat's demise is just the beginning, not the end of offshore wind
Although I don't know about the particulars of BlueFloat's exact situation, which also impacted plans for the Illawarra, as an offshore wind consultant I do know a lot about the process of getting these projects up generally.
That's why I can confidently say this actually is just the beginning.
This is a new industry for Australia and whenever you do something new for the first time it's like making a pancake, the first one is never quite perfect.
Energy-intensive industries like minerals mining and metals manufacturing will be the big winners from offshore wind.
There is a reason these industries are co-located with coal-fired power stations historically, and why the offshore wind zones have been designated in these same regions - Gippsland, Illawarra, Hunter.
With offshore wind, Australia is looking to capitalise on the growing global demand for green metals. For the Illawarra, that's steel made with renewable energy.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's decision to host a meeting between Australian iron ore miners and Chinese steelmakers during his visit to China last week shows that our leaders are attuned to the economic potential of green metals.
Why green metals? Europe, with Asia soon to follow, has introduced a "carbon border adjustment mechanism" which acts as a tax on polluting industries. What this means is the high-pollution products we currently export will become uncompetitive in the next 10 to 20 years.
To replace those export losses, Australia needs to adapt and focus on producing green exports.
Our customers are changing their habits, so we must change our offerings.
If you owned a doughnut shop and all your customers started demanding cream-filled rather than jam-filled doughnuts you wouldn't keep pushing jam-filled doughnuts.
You would switch to cream-filled, otherwise you'd go out of business.
So how exactly do we get from here to there?
Well there are three main hoops that developers need to jump through to make it happen:
The Australian offshore wind market has some unique conditions, for example in the Illawarra it means floating wind technology is needed which is still relatively new.
Therefore it's OK to have some delays - it allows Europe and Asia to make the mistakes for us to learn from, and bring industrial costs down for us.
But Australia can't afford to wait too long as our polluting exports become less and less viable, we need to pivot to green exports to secure the long-lasting careers that keep communities together.
Offshore wind is not just about meeting current energy needs, it will offer export stability; giving local kids the chance to build a life in the place they grew up and earn good money without leaving the region they love.
That's why strong community engagement and clear support from both the federal and state government - via an offtake auction pathway - is so important.
The news that Spanish energy company BlueFloat bailed on its $10 billion Gippsland offshore wind proposal, has triggered a chorus of people (mostly anti-offshore wind proponents) heralding the end of the industry before it's even begun.
Although I don't know about the particulars of BlueFloat's exact situation, which also impacted plans for the Illawarra, as an offshore wind consultant I do know a lot about the process of getting these projects up generally.
That's why I can confidently say this actually is just the beginning.
This is a new industry for Australia and whenever you do something new for the first time it's like making a pancake, the first one is never quite perfect.
Energy-intensive industries like minerals mining and metals manufacturing will be the big winners from offshore wind.
There is a reason these industries are co-located with coal-fired power stations historically, and why the offshore wind zones have been designated in these same regions - Gippsland, Illawarra, Hunter.
With offshore wind, Australia is looking to capitalise on the growing global demand for green metals. For the Illawarra, that's steel made with renewable energy.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's decision to host a meeting between Australian iron ore miners and Chinese steelmakers during his visit to China last week shows that our leaders are attuned to the economic potential of green metals.
Why green metals? Europe, with Asia soon to follow, has introduced a "carbon border adjustment mechanism" which acts as a tax on polluting industries. What this means is the high-pollution products we currently export will become uncompetitive in the next 10 to 20 years.
To replace those export losses, Australia needs to adapt and focus on producing green exports.
Our customers are changing their habits, so we must change our offerings.
If you owned a doughnut shop and all your customers started demanding cream-filled rather than jam-filled doughnuts you wouldn't keep pushing jam-filled doughnuts.
You would switch to cream-filled, otherwise you'd go out of business.
So how exactly do we get from here to there?
Well there are three main hoops that developers need to jump through to make it happen:
The Australian offshore wind market has some unique conditions, for example in the Illawarra it means floating wind technology is needed which is still relatively new.
Therefore it's OK to have some delays - it allows Europe and Asia to make the mistakes for us to learn from, and bring industrial costs down for us.
But Australia can't afford to wait too long as our polluting exports become less and less viable, we need to pivot to green exports to secure the long-lasting careers that keep communities together.
Offshore wind is not just about meeting current energy needs, it will offer export stability; giving local kids the chance to build a life in the place they grew up and earn good money without leaving the region they love.
That's why strong community engagement and clear support from both the federal and state government - via an offtake auction pathway - is so important.
The news that Spanish energy company BlueFloat bailed on its $10 billion Gippsland offshore wind proposal, has triggered a chorus of people (mostly anti-offshore wind proponents) heralding the end of the industry before it's even begun.
Although I don't know about the particulars of BlueFloat's exact situation, which also impacted plans for the Illawarra, as an offshore wind consultant I do know a lot about the process of getting these projects up generally.
That's why I can confidently say this actually is just the beginning.
This is a new industry for Australia and whenever you do something new for the first time it's like making a pancake, the first one is never quite perfect.
Energy-intensive industries like minerals mining and metals manufacturing will be the big winners from offshore wind.
There is a reason these industries are co-located with coal-fired power stations historically, and why the offshore wind zones have been designated in these same regions - Gippsland, Illawarra, Hunter.
With offshore wind, Australia is looking to capitalise on the growing global demand for green metals. For the Illawarra, that's steel made with renewable energy.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's decision to host a meeting between Australian iron ore miners and Chinese steelmakers during his visit to China last week shows that our leaders are attuned to the economic potential of green metals.
Why green metals? Europe, with Asia soon to follow, has introduced a "carbon border adjustment mechanism" which acts as a tax on polluting industries. What this means is the high-pollution products we currently export will become uncompetitive in the next 10 to 20 years.
To replace those export losses, Australia needs to adapt and focus on producing green exports.
Our customers are changing their habits, so we must change our offerings.
If you owned a doughnut shop and all your customers started demanding cream-filled rather than jam-filled doughnuts you wouldn't keep pushing jam-filled doughnuts.
You would switch to cream-filled, otherwise you'd go out of business.
So how exactly do we get from here to there?
Well there are three main hoops that developers need to jump through to make it happen:
The Australian offshore wind market has some unique conditions, for example in the Illawarra it means floating wind technology is needed which is still relatively new.
Therefore it's OK to have some delays - it allows Europe and Asia to make the mistakes for us to learn from, and bring industrial costs down for us.
But Australia can't afford to wait too long as our polluting exports become less and less viable, we need to pivot to green exports to secure the long-lasting careers that keep communities together.
Offshore wind is not just about meeting current energy needs, it will offer export stability; giving local kids the chance to build a life in the place they grew up and earn good money without leaving the region they love.
That's why strong community engagement and clear support from both the federal and state government - via an offtake auction pathway - is so important.
The news that Spanish energy company BlueFloat bailed on its $10 billion Gippsland offshore wind proposal, has triggered a chorus of people (mostly anti-offshore wind proponents) heralding the end of the industry before it's even begun.
Although I don't know about the particulars of BlueFloat's exact situation, which also impacted plans for the Illawarra, as an offshore wind consultant I do know a lot about the process of getting these projects up generally.
That's why I can confidently say this actually is just the beginning.
This is a new industry for Australia and whenever you do something new for the first time it's like making a pancake, the first one is never quite perfect.
Energy-intensive industries like minerals mining and metals manufacturing will be the big winners from offshore wind.
There is a reason these industries are co-located with coal-fired power stations historically, and why the offshore wind zones have been designated in these same regions - Gippsland, Illawarra, Hunter.
With offshore wind, Australia is looking to capitalise on the growing global demand for green metals. For the Illawarra, that's steel made with renewable energy.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's decision to host a meeting between Australian iron ore miners and Chinese steelmakers during his visit to China last week shows that our leaders are attuned to the economic potential of green metals.
Why green metals? Europe, with Asia soon to follow, has introduced a "carbon border adjustment mechanism" which acts as a tax on polluting industries. What this means is the high-pollution products we currently export will become uncompetitive in the next 10 to 20 years.
To replace those export losses, Australia needs to adapt and focus on producing green exports.
Our customers are changing their habits, so we must change our offerings.
If you owned a doughnut shop and all your customers started demanding cream-filled rather than jam-filled doughnuts you wouldn't keep pushing jam-filled doughnuts.
You would switch to cream-filled, otherwise you'd go out of business.
So how exactly do we get from here to there?
Well there are three main hoops that developers need to jump through to make it happen:
The Australian offshore wind market has some unique conditions, for example in the Illawarra it means floating wind technology is needed which is still relatively new.
Therefore it's OK to have some delays - it allows Europe and Asia to make the mistakes for us to learn from, and bring industrial costs down for us.
But Australia can't afford to wait too long as our polluting exports become less and less viable, we need to pivot to green exports to secure the long-lasting careers that keep communities together.
Offshore wind is not just about meeting current energy needs, it will offer export stability; giving local kids the chance to build a life in the place they grew up and earn good money without leaving the region they love.
That's why strong community engagement and clear support from both the federal and state government - via an offtake auction pathway - is so important.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
YouTube to be included in social media ban for under 16s after exemption reversed
Children and teenagers will be barred from logging in to YouTube under the incoming social media ban for under 16s after the government reversed its plan to grant the video sharing site an exemption. Rules of how the ban will operate are set to be presented to parliament on Wednesday, including details of the types of platforms that will not be captured, such as those primarily concerned with gaming, messaging, health and education. It comes days after Google, the parent company of YouTube, threatened legal action if the government scrapped its previously flagged exemption on the basis of the platform's educational uses. Over the weekend, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said a decision on whether YouTube would be included was yet to be made — despite the draft rules naming the platform as exempt — and that the government would not be influenced by threats from social media companies. "Our government is making it clear — we stand on the side of families," Mr Albanese said in a statement on Tuesday. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it." YouTube differs from other popular social media sites in that it doesn't require users to have an account to access most features and young people will still be able to use the site in a logged-out state after the world-leading laws come into force in December. But including YouTube in the list of social media platforms covered by the ban — which already includes apps like TikTok and Instagram — means under 16s won't be able to access age-restricted content on the video-sharing site. Former communications minister Michelle Rowland initially flagged that YouTube was likely to be exempt from the laws in November last year. But the proposed carve out was thrown into question last month when eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant — who is tasked with implementing the laws — wrote to new Communications Minister Anika Wells formally recommending it be scrapped. She cited eSafety research that found young people used YouTube more than any other social media platform and it was where they were most likely to experience harm online. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube — almost 37 per cent," Dr Inman Grant said. "This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation." She also argued that YouTube had the characteristics of a platform that should fall under the ban and cautioned against naming specific platforms for carve outs. The platform's competitors had separately campaigned against its exclusion, accusing the government of making a "sweetheart deal" in private submissions. YouTube has previously argued that it is a video streaming platform, rather than a social media site, and therefore should not be captured by the ban, citing evidence that it is widely used in classrooms and by parents. Under the new laws, which are due to come into force on December 10, social media companies will face fines of up to almost $50 million for failing to take "reasonable steps" to bar under 16s from their platforms. "There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online — but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. "There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children."

Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16
YouTube Kids will escape the federal government's teen social media ban that could serve as a model for other sites to keep offering their products, and ads, to children under the age of 16. The main YouTube platform will join Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X and Snapchat in being caught by the ban, which is set to come into effect on December 10, after the government backflipped on its earlier plan to exclude Google's video streaming site. The government is expected to table rules in parliament on Wednesday to set which online services will be captured by the laws that were enacted with bipartisan support last year in an effort to protect children from online bullying and body image issues. Sites that are primarily intended for education, messaging, health or online gaming will be exempt. YouTube's inclusion in the ban sets the government up for a possible fight after the platform's owner, Google, sent a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells threatening to sue if it was not given an exemption. Loading Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said restricting YouTube from use by children under 16 meant his government stood on the side of Australian families. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it,' he said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'

The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16
YouTube Kids will escape the federal government's teen social media ban that could serve as a model for other sites to keep offering their products, and ads, to children under the age of 16. The main YouTube platform will join Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X and Snapchat in being caught by the ban, which is set to come into effect on December 10, after the government backflipped on its earlier plan to exclude Google's video streaming site. The government is expected to table rules in parliament on Wednesday to set which online services will be captured by the laws that were enacted with bipartisan support last year in an effort to protect children from online bullying and body image issues. Sites that are primarily intended for education, messaging, health or online gaming will be exempt. YouTube's inclusion in the ban sets the government up for a possible fight after the platform's owner, Google, sent a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells threatening to sue if it was not given an exemption. Loading Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said restricting YouTube from use by children under 16 meant his government stood on the side of Australian families. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it,' he said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'