
China should mull a 4% GDP target, focus on jobs, debts in next five years, says former official
Xu Lin, who helped draft Beijing's five-year plan for decades while an official at the National Development and Reform Commission, made the comments as the world's second-largest economy is increasingly relying on economic planning for continued growth.
Compared with some market estimates of around 4.5 per cent annual growth from 2026-30, he said the potential growth rate and growth target figure should be around 4 per cent in the next five to 10 years, owing to China's shrinking population, its falling savings and production rate, and other headwinds.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
'It is inappropriate to set a target higher than the potential growth in China's 15th five-year plan, if considering the complex international environment and domestic difficulties such as property, the debt down-cycle and weak market confidence,' Xu told Comparative Studies magazine in an interview published on social media on Tuesday.
'An annual 4 per cent GDP growth would be very good if employment can be expanded and the debt ratio is controlled,' said Xu, who is now academic director of the Pangoal Institution, a Beijing-based think tank, and also chairman of China-US Green Fund.
China did not give a quantitative growth target in its 2021-2025 development plan, but the market has largely been estimating an annual expansion of at least 4.8 per cent until 2035 based on leadership's goal of doubling the country's gross domestic product by then. "Given the intensification of China-US strategic competition, the external environment will become more complicated"
Growth pressure has been mounting since the pandemic and amid a tumultuous trade war with the US. Meanwhile, the potential for growth and Chinese leadership's assessment of the external environment are important factors in Beijing's setting of economic growth targets.
'Given the intensification of China-US strategic competition, the external environment will become more complicated over the next five years,' he said, adding that 'this will bring new uncertainties for outbound Chinese investment and its reliance on the international market and resources'.
Despite China's rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics, Xu said more consideration should be given to how much these sectors can meaningfully lift economic growth.
The ex-official also warned against using short-term stimulus measures, suggesting instead that the government roll back outdated supply-side curbs that stifle demand in high-elasticity sectors such as services, culture and leisure, as such curbs are choking consumption before it can take root.
He advocated for unleashing market forces, expanding private-sector participation, and advancing structural reforms to ensure long-term, resilient growth.
'The most dynamic and fastest-growing periods of China's economy since the reform and opening-up era were often when the market was given the most freedom – even if things looked a little chaotic,' Xu said.
Xu also pointed to three structural shifts – the rise of the service economy, digital and intelligent transformation, and the green transition – as long-term engines of sustainable growth. He said those areas could fuel China's economic momentum for the next two decades.
With flexible job creation and low entry barriers, the sector has become a safety net during economic slowdowns – absorbing laid-off workers through platforms such as food delivery, logistics and ride-hailing. Services now account for 48 per cent of total employment, outpacing both manufacturing and agriculture, which create 29 and 23 per cent of jobs, respectively. The services sector also generates more jobs per unit of GDP than other sectors.
Cities such as Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore and New York offer valuable lessons, he said, with mature service economies that China could look to for inspiration.
President Xi Jinping this week called for public input on China's 2026-30 national development plan, with a stated emphasis on science, technology and modernisation – a sign of the leadership's evolving strategic priorities.
A full blueprint, including detailed economic and social targets, is expected to be unveiled in March.
More from South China Morning Post:
For the latest news from the South China Morning Post download our mobile app. Copyright 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
BRICS defies Western scepticism, charts reformist path
As BRICS (and now BRICS+) matures into a serious platform for South-South cooperation, Western outlets have doubled down on trivialising its substance to neutralise its appeal. The "division and dysfunction" refrain was predictably trotted out in commentaries about the recent 17th BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Chinese President Xi Jinping's absence, his first since taking office in 2012, was swiftly weaponised. The Guardian called BRICS "unbalanced". CNBC suggested that it lacked cohesion. Al Jazeera framed it as "dispersion". Yet few noted that Premier Li Qiang, China's second-in-command, attended in Xi's place (not a foreign minister, but China's top economic policymaker). Far from symbolic, this signalled sustained high-level commitment. Also overlooked: Indonesia joined BRICS as a full member. Not only is it a major Southeast Asian economy, it is also a G20 member. Hardly a lightweight. This undercuts the narrative of weakening cohesion but raises uncomfortable questions about the cohesion of the West's own institutions. Missing, too, is the fact that BRICS operates by consensus, not coercion. Meanwhile, the economic scaremongering felt equally familiar. United States President Donald Trump's revived tariff threats were deployed to overshadow the BRICS summit, suggesting peril for any country engaging seriously with the bloc. The bloc is provoking the global North, we are told. Never mind that many BRICS members maintain close ties with the West, and that the group's own declarations call for reform within global institutions, not withdrawal from them. Nevertheless, the fundamental truth missed entirely is that BRICS economies are productive economies. They manufacture semiconductors, refine oil, export food and mine rare earths. Their growth is grounded in material reality. By contrast, much of the West's economic weight rests on inflated valuations and speculative finance. A tech stock may be worth billions one week and could collapse the next. The same distortive lens is applied to BRICS declarations. Dismissed as vague or aspirational, these statements are rarely read in full. The 2025 declaration proposed the incubation of a multilateral guarantee mechanism and advanced work on digital settlement interoperability. These are not rhetorical flourishes; they are structural shifts. Even Brazil's sustainability initiative was framed as "vague" and dependent on Northern financing. The implication is clear: the Global South cannot innovate without strings and certainly not without permission. This logic reaches its peak by casting the Global South as perpetually poor, passive or behind. The fact that the BRICS summit hosted over 10 partner countries, including Malaysia, Nigeria and Vietnam, each with distinct development strategies and aspirations, is ignored. That these countries are asserting plural models of cooperation is seen not as maturity, but as risk. Rather than meet this shift with clarity, Western commentary doubles down on old tropes, such as the claim that BRICS is anti-Western. It simply does not hold. The group's foundational ethos is reformist, not revisionist. It seeks a more equitable order — one where sovereignty is respected, trade is not weaponised and conditionalities do not dictate policy. It is not a rival bloc, but a parallel platform complementary to global efforts and anchored in international law. This accusation of politicisation is deeply ironic. BRICS is not held together by ideology or enforced alignment. Its members have different political systems, regional interests and diplomatic postures but have chosen to cooperate. That is not political bloc behaviour but rather pragmatic pluralism. Malaysia's participation in the summit itself offers a striking counterpoint to the Western narrative. Notably, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was the only foreign leader invited to deliver a keynote at the BRICS Business Forum. More than symbolic, his presence sparked a cascade of bilateral engagements — many requested by other nations. Anwar positioned Malaysia as a bridge between East and West, showcasing the bloc's appeal as a platform for pragmatic diplomacy, not polarised alignment. In truth, BRICS is doing what the West once claimed to champion: empowering developing nations to co-shape the rules of global engagement. Its institutional growth is real, from think tank networks to cross-border infrastructure platforms. Its financial architecture is maturing. The West's critique of BRICS says less about BRICS itself, and more about its own anxiety over declining influence. The writer is the founder of think tank EMIR Research


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
China EV brands Zeekr, Neta accused of inflating car sales via insurance scheme
BEIJING: Chinese electric vehicle brands Neta and Zeekr reportedly inflated sales figures by insuring cars before they were sold, allowing them to book early sales and meet aggressive targets. Documents reviewed by Reuters reveal Neta recorded over 64,719 premature sales between January 2023 and March 2024, more than half its reported 117,000 sales in that period. Zeekr, owned by Geely, used a similar method in late 2024 through its main dealer in Xiamen, according to dealers and buyers. The practice, known as 'zero-mileage used cars,' has drawn regulatory concern amid China's intense EV price war. State media recently named Zeekr for inflating sales, while authorities plan to ban reselling registered cars within six months. Neta's parent company, Zhejiang Hozon New Energy Automobile, did not respond to requests for comment. Geely denied the allegations, stating Zeekr's insured vehicles were for showroom display only. However, buyers in Guangzhou and Chongqing reported discovering pre-existing insurance policies on their newly purchased cars. Analysts say such practices distort financial reports and inventory tracking. Dealers also face pressure, with some admitting unsold cars remain in warehouses. Neta's sales have declined sharply since 2022, and its parent company entered bankruptcy last month. - Reuters


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Ringgit closes slightly lower against greenback
SPI Asset Management's Innes said the ringgit is under pressure mainly because of concerns the US Federal Reserve might keep interest rates higher for longer. KUALA LUMPUR: The ringgit slipped 0.01% against the US dollar at the close, as the local note continued trading on the defensive yesterday, which offered some technical comfort for the ringgit. At 6pm, the local note was traded at 4.2400/2490 from 4.2395/2440 at Wednesday's close. SPI Asset Management managing partner Stephen Innes said the ringgit is under pressure mainly because of concerns that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) might keep interest rates higher for longer, as markets reassess the inflation outlook. He added that the US dollar has strengthened recently as investors are becoming less certain that the Fed will cut rates in September. Innes also said that the dollar's recent bid reflected a subtle but growing shift in sentiment, which markets are slowly walking back their conviction that the Fed will cut the interest rate in September. 'Sticky core inflation, fuelled in part by service-sector dynamics and the slow-burn impact of tariffs, is keeping the Fed in a wait-and-see mode. 'The ringgit remains vulnerable to a temporary widening in the US-Malaysia exchange rate spread. 'This does not necessarily break the broader 4.20-4.30 range, and we are still inside expected bands for now, but it does create a bias for further weakness,' he added. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said that the ringgit weakened against the US dollar in the early morning session to 4.2575 in response to the US Consumer Price Index (CPI), which continued to increase in June to 2.7% from 2.4% previously. 'The latest CPI print appears to give the impression that the Fed may not be inclined to cut the Fed Fund Rate in the upcoming meeting in July. 'In a nutshell, the ringgit maintained its narrow-range trade in light of the ongoing uncertainties over the US tariffs,' Mohd Afzanizam said.