Golden Dome set to get another $13B as project leader takes helm
The office will be led by Vice Chief of Space Operations Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, unanimously confirmed by the Senate on Thursday as the first Golden Dome for America Direct Reporting Program Manager, according to a Pentagon statement released Tuesday.
Guetlein, who Trump named as the Golden Dome lead in May, will be 'responsible for developing the Golden Dome portfolio of capabilities,' and report directly to Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg.
'Golden Dome for America requires a whole-of-nation response to deter and, if necessary, to defeat attacks against the United States,' the Pentagon said in the release. 'We have the technological foundation, national talent, and decisive leadership to advance our nation's defenses. We are proud to stand behind Gen. Mike Guetlein as he takes the helm of this national imperative.'
Intended to protect the skies over the continental United States, Golden Dome promises a network of space-based missiles launched from satellites to intercept missiles launched from the ground, an expensive, untested technology.
The Trump administration has insisted the project is necessary to protect against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks and will only cost $175 billion.
To fund the effort, $24.4 billion was included for the project in the One Big, Beautiful Bill, signed by Trump on July 4.
Then on July 17, the House voted to pass the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, which includes roughly $13 billion for advanced initiatives to support Golden Dome.
But the purported price tag, also announced by Trump in May, is far below estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, which pegged the figure at more than $500 billion over 20 years to develop. Other estimates have placed the cost at $1 trillion.
What's more, missile defense experts highly doubt a Golden Dome system as Tump has described can be created in under three years.
Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) last month called out 'the physics' of Golden Dome, pressing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to seek out viability analysis from scientists instead of defense and space firms.
'This idea, you know, might not be fully baked,' Kelly, an engineer by trade, told Hegseth during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on June 18.
'You've got to go back and take a look at this. . . . You could go down a road here and spend hundreds of billions of dollars of the taxpayers' money, get to the end, and we have a system that is not functional,' Kelly added.
In its statement, the Pentagon said Golden Dome would establish partnerships with industry, academia, national labs and other government agencies to rapidly develop and field the system, with an architecture to be developed within the next 60 days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's Ceasefire-Or-Sanctions Deadline Hits For Putin - CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Trump's Ceasefire-Or-Sanctions Deadline Hits For Putin CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip 45 mins Three years of bloodshed hits a pivotal point, Vladimir Putin reveals what he wants in exchange for ending his invasion of Ukraine. But, will Donald Trump endorse it?
New York Times
3 minutes ago
- New York Times
What Lobsters and Chickens Tell Us About Europe's Trade Logic
The European Union's trade deal with the Trump administration has met with fierce criticism because on its face, it is full of giveaways to Washington and devoid of victories for the bloc's 27 nations. But to understand Europe's approach, consider the lobster. E.U. officials made a variety of concessions to seal the agreement. Among them was keeping tariffs on lobster imports at zero, extending a 2020 deal that had been set to expire. Other sweeteners included a pledge to buy $750 billion in American energy over three years and a loose promise to make hundreds of billions in investments in American firms and technologies. Look closely at those offerings, though, and a pattern emerges. The European Union has handed America feel-good triumphs while dodging, at least for now, several of its most painful demands. Lobsters are a case in point. They are politically relevant in the United States, where the Maine-centric industry is a point of pride and has powerful champions in Congress. But they are neither economically important nor especially politically sensitive in Europe. And while Europeans offered to freely import the crustaceans, they resisted the Trump administration's demands that they change other food-related rules to allow for more imports of America's beef or chicken — far more politically explosive topics across the bloc. 'They must be giggling to themselves in Brussels,' said Marc Busch, a professor of international business diplomacy at Georgetown University who has for years followed food tariffs. He noted that Europe has not agreed to change crucial sanitary regulations that ban hormone-raised beef or acid-washed chicken. Those can still be used to block more politically important agricultural imports, Mr. Busch said, 'literally until the cows come home.' European officials have been clear that the setup happened by design. A senior E.U. official on Tuesday told reporters that while the bloc will extend the zero tariffs on lobsters and drop trade barriers on bison meat, which is not widely produced in Europe, it will not be changing its policies to take more beef. The cattle industry has a powerful political presence in France, Belgium and elsewhere. Lobsters were a simpler way to create agricultural good will. Europe has spent the past several months threatening to impose sky-high tariffs on the New England seafood if no trade deal were reached. By extending zero tariffs instead, the European Union will give American lobster exporters a chance to expand their footprint on the continent. Europe is a major market for lobster, but it buys most of the crustaceans from Canada, with which the bloc has a free-trade agreement. It may not yet be time for the lobstermen to celebrate, though, because the new trade framework has not been finalized. The two sides have yet to publish a formal joint statement announcing the deal, and although the European Union indicated this past week that one was coming soon, negotiations continue — which means things could still fall apart. Still, if the agreement holds, it is full of features like the lobster deal. Several of the incentives the European Union used to clinch the agreement may look like gifts, but if so, they are gifts unearthed from the back of the closet, dressed up in nice wrapping paper and topped with a fancy bow. They look good, but they did not cost Europe much. Take Europe's promise to buy $750 billion in energy. That number is spread across three years, and it includes Europe's existing purchases of American gas and oil, expected future additional purchases and anticipated investments in things like nuclear infrastructure by American companies in Europe. But while the European Commission, the bloc's executive arm, can estimate how much European companies might spend, those decisions are up to the private sector. The European Union cannot force businesses to buy American energy if the math does not make sense. Likewise, the bloc's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States is a tally of expected spending from European companies. It is simply an expectation of how much money could flow toward America, not even a commitment of how much will. And although the bloc has agreed that it will not adopt network usage fees, which would have forced big tech companies like Netflix and YouTube to pay internet providers to deliver their content to consumers, its negotiators have said they have not bent on more important digital regulations. The Trump administration wanted the European Union to soften its rules policing speech online, for instance, but those have not changed, at least for now. The new trade deal does include some unambiguous losses for the Europe Union. About 70 percent of the bloc's exports to the United States now face a 15 percent tariff, one that kicked in at midnight Thursday. That is up from the low single digits before this year. And the bloc has promised to drop tariffs on American industrial goods and cars to zero, which could expose European manufacturers to more U.S. competition. Although European negotiators say they dodged worse outcomes, follow-through will be critical. For instance, the European Union's 15 percent rate is expected to eventually apply to cars and pharmaceuticals. That is a relief for automakers, which were previously facing 27.5 percent tariffs, and for drugmakers, which President Trump has warned could contend with levies as high as 200 percent. But the United States has yet to put its commitments on car tariffs into practice or to formally finish its plans on pharmaceuticals, keeping uncertainty alive. The European Union has been following through on its promises, hoping the deal will hold. It has suspended a retaliation package and committed to extending the zero tariffs on lobsters past their July 31 expiration date. That timing was lucky. Lobster season kicks off in earnest in July, said Marianne LaCroix, the executive director at the Maine Lobster Marketing Collaborative, a marketing group for the industry. More stable rules of the road will make it easier for lobster processors and sellers to plan. 'The challenging thing for the industry this year has been all of the uncertainty,' she said.
9 minutes ago
California's Newsom, Pelosi back Texas Democrats as GOP warns of more escalations over walkout
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California Gov. Gavin Newsom and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi appeared shoulder-to-shoulder Friday with Texas Democratic lawmakers in a show of support for their nearly weeklong walkout, which has blocked a vote on congressional redistricting maps sought by President Donald Trump in a widening national battle over U.S. House control. Texas has been the epicenter of Trump's push to gerrymander congressional maps to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority before next year. But the standoff is threatening to spill into other states — including California, New York, Florida and Indiana — in an emerging proxy war for control of Congress in 2026. California is moving toward a special election in November that Democrats hope could slash five Republican-held House seats in the liberal-leaning state, in direct response to the maneuvering in Texas. 'We are trying to defend democracy, as opposed to see it destroyed district by district,' Newsom said amid the crowd of lawmakers at the governor's mansion. 'There are no rules for Donald Trump.' Pelosi defended the Texas walkout, calling it 'self-defense for our democracy.' She said Democrats will not let Trump 'pave over' free and fair elections in the country. The appearance of nationally prominent Democrats Newsom — a potential 2028 presidential candidate — and Pelosi underscored the increasingly high stakes for a deeply divided Washington. Earlier Friday the Texas House failed to meet a quorum for the third time this week as Democratic lawmakers continued to stay away from Austin. Texas Republicans had warned they would escalate efforts to end the walkout if defiant Democrats do not return to the Capitol. But the lawmakers who bolted for points across the country Aug. 3 still were not back for Friday's scheduled House floor vote. The Texas Constitution requires at least 100 members to be present for the 150-member House to do business, and Republicans hold an 88-62 majority in the chamber. Only 95 lawmakers were counted as present. Frustrated Republican leaders continued to ratchet up the pressure, including new and expanding efforts to try to remove Democratic lawmakers from office and seeking help from the FBI to assist state troopers trying to find them. 'We have all hands on deck, we are continuing to explore' options to force Democrats home, Speaker Dustin Burrows said after the chamber failed to reach a quorum. 'We will keep pressing forward until the job is done. … Each one of you knows eventually you will come back.' The news conference in Sacramento came several days after Texas Democrats appeared in Illinois with Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who said he supported the walkout 'because they don't want to live in a country where the president rigs elections for his side. That's not democracy.' One of the lawmakers in California, Texas State Rep. Ann Johnson, alluded to the national implications of the dispute, saying, 'We recognize this is not just about Texas. This is about ensuring that the voters get to determine the outcome of their next election.' As California Democrats privately prepare a proposal for new House district lines that would go to voters, Assembly member Isaac Bryan said, 'This is not a turn-the-other-cheek moment while they continue to send blow after blow to the foundations of democracy.' The Texas House is scheduled to reconvene Monday, but the dozens of Democrats who left the state have shown no signs of buckling. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit directly to the all-Republican state Supreme Court on Friday seeking to have 13 of the Democratic lawmakers immediately removed from office, or at least given a 48-hour warning that they must return or have their offices declared vacated. The lawsuit argues that the lawmakers have effectively 'abandoned' their office and duties, and they were singled out for making public statements that they left for the purpose of blocking the vote and disrupting House business. "Their out-of-state rebellion cannot go unchecked, and the business of Texas must go on,' Paxton said. Paxton's lawsuit includes Rep. Gene Wu, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, who also faces a similar lawsuit filed by Gov. Greg Abbott. Wu's legal team argued that the state constitution allows House members to be removed only by a two-thirds vote of the chamber, not the courts. Wu said this week that quorum-breaking is not an abandonment of office but a legitimate form of dissent. In a separate filing in state district court, Paxton also sued former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke, who ran unsuccessfully for governor and Senate, alleging that his political group, Powered by People, improperly gave money to cover costs for the absent Democrats and continued to raise more for them. O'Rourke and his organization did not immediately issue a response to the filing but said this week that they would be undeterred by Paxton's threats. Paxton said later Friday that he had been granted a temporary restraining order halting the spending and fundraising while the case continues. Abbott promised that he's willing to play the long game to get the bill passed. 'We have an agenda to pass priorities critical to Texans, and we will get it done. I'll call special session after special session—no matter how long it takes—until the job is finished,' Abbott said on the social platform X. The current special session ends Aug. 19, and the missing lawmakers already face mounting fines for every day they are gone and civil arrest warrants issued by the state House. Trump wants five more seats out of Texas to potentially avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms, when Democrats reclaimed the U.S. House and proceeded to thwart his agenda and impeach him twice. The dynamics could embroil the 2026 midterm campaign in legislative and court battles testing Trump's power over the Republican Party, Democrats' ability to mount opposition and the durability of the U.S. system of federalism that balances power between Washington and the states. ___
