
Can Trump Beat The Second Term Curse That Haunts The White House
While he likes to provoke opponents with the possibility of serving a third term, Donald Trump faces a more immediate historical burden that has plagued so many presidents: the 'second term curse'.
Twenty-one US presidents have served second terms, but none has reached the same level of success they achieved in their first.
Second term performances have ranged from the lacklustre and uninspiring to the disastrous and deadly. Voter dissatisfaction and frustration, presidential fatigue and a lack of sustainable vision for the future are all explanations.
But Trump doesn't quite fit the mould. Only one other president, Grover Cleveland in the late 19th century, has served a second nonconsecutive term, making Trump 2.0 difficult to measure against other second-term leaders.
Trump will certainly be hoping history doesn't repeat Cleveland's second-term curse. Shortly after taking office he imposed 50% tariffs, triggering global market volatility that culminated in the ' Panic of 1893 '.
At the time, this was the worst depression in US history: 19% unemployment, a run on gold from the US Treasury, a stock market crash and widespread poverty.
More than a century on, Trump's ' move fast and break things ' approach in a nonconsecutive second term might appeal to voters demanding action above all else. But he risks being drawn into areas he campaigned against.
So far, he has gone from fighting a trade war and a culture war to contemplating a shooting war in the Middle East. His ' big beautiful bill ' will add trillions to the national debt and potentially force poorer voters – including many Republicans – off Medicaid.
Whether his radical approach will defy or conform to the second term curse seems very much an open question.
No kings
The two-term limit was enacted by the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution in 1951. Without a maximum term, it was feared, an authoritarian could try to take control for life – like a king (hence the recent ' No Kings ' protests in the US).
George Washington, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson all declined to serve a third term. Jefferson was suspicious of any president who would try to be re-elected a third time, writing:
should a President consent to be a candidate for a 3d. election, I trust he would be rejected on this demonstration of ambitious views.
There is a myth that after Franklin Delano Roosevelt broke the de facto limit of two terms set by the early presidents, the ghost of George Washington placed a curse on anyone serving more than four years.
At best, second-term presidencies have been tepid compared to the achievements in the previous four years. After the second world war, some two-term presidents (Eisenhower, Reagan and Obama) started out strong but faltered after reelection.
Eisenhower extricated the US from the Korean War in his first term, but faced domestic backlash and race riots in his second. He had to send 500 paratroopers to escort nine Black high school students in Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce a federal desegregation order.
Reagan made significant tax and spending cuts, and saw the Soviet Union crumble in term one. But the Iran-Contra scandal and watered down tax reform defined term two.
Obama started strongly, introducing health care reform and uniting the Democratic voter base. After reelection, however, the Democrats lost the House, the Senate, a Supreme Court nomination, and faced scandals over the Snowden security leaks and Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative groups.
Truly disastrous examples of second term presidencies include Abraham Lincoln (assassination), Woodrow Wilson (first world war, failure of the League of Nations, a stroke), Richard Nixon (Watergate, impeachment and resignation), and Bill Clinton (Lewinsky scandal and impeachment).
Monumental honours
It may be too early to predict how Trump will feature in this pantheon of less-than-greatness. But his approval ratings recently hit an all-time low as Americans reacted to the bombing of Iran and deployment of troops in Los Angeles.
A recent YouGov poll showed voters giving negative approval ratings for his handling of inflation, jobs, immigration, national security and foreign policy. While there has been plenty of action, it may be the levels of uncertainty, drastic change and market volatility are more extreme than some bargained for.
An uncooperative Congress or opposition from the judiciary can be obstacles to successful second terms. But Trump has used executive orders, on the grounds of confronting 'national emergencies', to bypass normal checks and balances.
As well, favourable rulings by the Supreme Court have edged closer to expanding the boundaries of executive power. But they have not yet supported Trump's claim from his first term that 'I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President'.
Some supporters say Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. And he was only half joking when he asked if there is room for one more face on Mount Rushmore. But such monumental honours may only amount to speculation unless Trump's radical approach and redefinition of executive power defy the second-term curse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In sixth call since January, Putin tells Trump: Russia ‘will not step back from goals' in Ukraine
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke by phone on Thursday, their sixth publicly known conversation since Trump returned to the White House in January. According to the Kremlin, the leaders discussed a range of global flashpoints including Ukraine, Iran and broader US-Russia relations. On the war in Ukraine, Putin's top foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov said Trump 'again emphasised the importance of a quick cessation of hostilities.' Putin, meanwhile, reiterated Moscow's position that it is ready for talks with Kyiv, but under conditions that would secure what he called Russia's 'goals' in Ukraine. These include Ukraine's withdrawal from its NATO bid and recognition of territory Russia has seized since its 2022 invasion. Putin repeated claims that Russia invaded to fend off NATO expansion and defend Russian-speaking populations — assertions flatly rejected by Kyiv and the West. While Thursday's call made no mention of recent US policy changes, it came amid the Pentagon's confirmation that it is pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine to reassess military stockpiles. The delayed supplies reportedly include air defense missiles and precision-guided artillery. On Iran, Ushakov said the Russian president stressed the need to resolve tensions 'by political and diplomatic means.' The call came just days after US airstrikes on June 22 targeted three locations inside Iran. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, speaking in Denmark after a meeting with EU leaders, said he expects to speak with Trump 'in the coming days' about the implications of the pause. 'I'm not sure that they have a lot of common ideas, common topics to talk [about], because they are very different people,' Zelenskyy said when asked what he expected from the Trump-Putin exchange. The latest call adds to a string of resumed high-level contacts between Trump and Putin, signaling their shared interest in thawing US-Russia relations, which have deteriorated dramatically since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The conversation also came just two days after Putin spoke directly with French President Emmanuel Macron — their first call in nearly three years.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
'He Could Get Offended': Putin Rushes Out Of Conclave To Keep Trump From Waiting Too Long
Last Updated: Russian President Putin left the Strong Ideas forum to speak with US President Trump. They discussed Middle East tensions and Ukraine, emphasizing diplomatic solutions. Russian President Vladimir Putin rushed to leave a plenary session of the Strong Ideas for a New Time forum to promote new projects, in a hurry, as he was scheduled to speak with US President Donald Trump on Thursday. Putin was attending the forum held by the Agency for Strategic Initiatives. The talks between the two leaders marked their sixth known discussion since Trump resumed office. The talks are also happening against the US's unsuccessful attempts to mediate a Ukraine ceasefire. The Russian President apologised to the host and the crowd and announced that he is going to have a phone call with Trump and requested the audience, 'Please, don't be angry. I understand that we could talk more, but it's so awkward to make [Trump] wait; he could get offended." Putin rushes to talk to Trump, lest he gets offended for being made to wait — RT (@RT_com) July 3, 2025 According to RT News, the two leaders discussed Middle East tensions 'in great detail". The Russian leader emphasised that all issues need to be solved by diplomatic means. The presidents also agreed to stay in close contact. RT News further posted on X, 'Putin wished Trump SUCCESS in implementing his BBB and congratulated him on the upcoming Independence Day. The Russian leader noted that their countries are connected by deeper historical roots." Noting that the call lasted almost an hour, Ushakov added, 'He also mentioned the Russian side's readiness to continue the negotiation process." Putin stressed the need for diplomatic solutions to conflicts involving Iran and other Middle Eastern issues during his discussion with Trump. 'From the Russian side, the significance of resolving all disputed issues, disagreements, and conflicts exclusively through political and diplomatic means was stressed," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov relayed to reporters after the call. First Published:
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US House Republicans move Trump's major tax-cut bill toward final vote
Republicans in the US House of Representatives advanced President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill toward a final yes-or-no vote early on Thursday morning, appearing to overcome internal party divisions over its cost. During a marathon overnight session, lawmakers cleared a final procedural hurdle needed to begin debate on the bill in a 219-213 vote at around 3:30 a.m. ET (0730 GMT). It was not clear when they would hold a final vote on passing the legislation. If it is approved, the bill will go to Trump to sign into law. The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programs, fund the president's immigration crackdown, and eliminate many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months to avert a devastating default. Republicans broadly support the bill, which contains most of Trump's domestic priorities, saying it would spur economic growth and deliver tax breaks to Americans across the economic spectrum. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill but lack the votes to stop it, as Republicans control both the House and the Senate by slim margins. Republicans can afford no more than three defections in either chamber to get a final bill passed. Early on Thursday, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries was four hours into a speech in which he blasted the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would come at the expense of less affluent Americans. "This disgusting abomination is not about improving the quality of life of the American people," he said. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires." Several dozen Democrats joined Jeffries on the House floor, while only a handful of Republicans were in the cavernous chamber. Jeffries' speech recalled a record-setting April speech by Democratic Senator Cory Booker that accused Trump of "recklessly" challenging the nation's democratic institutions. The past two weeks have shown deep Republican divides on the bill, which would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. That debt has grown steadily over the past two decades regardless of which party was in control in Washington. The bill would also make major cuts to social programs including Medicaid, ultimately leaving nearly 12 million Americans without health insurance. Rural hospitals have warned that could force them to scale back service, prompting Republicans to add $50 billion to help keep them afloat. A handful of Republican holdouts have objected to the bill. One, Senator Thom Tillis, opted not to seek re-election after voting against it. Nonetheless, Trump has succeeded in getting the votes to advance the legislation at each step of the way. The Senate passed the legislation by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday. TRUMP PHONE CALLS Votes in the House, which Republicans control by a 220-212 margin, were held open for hours on Wednesday during the day and overnight as House Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House talked with reluctant members. Republican leaders said Trump made late-night phone calls to win over wavering Republicans, but they predicted that some would still vote against it. Nothing has been unanimous in this for process, and that's going to hold true on the floor, Representative Steve Scalise, the No. 2 House Republican, told reporters. Trump kept up the pressure. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet Trump's self-imposed deadline of getting the legislation approved by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Scalise said that delay would not happen. "What really got everybody to the finish line is the realization, there aren't going to be any more changes to this bill. It's time to come together, make a decision," he said.