Taxation system needs fundamental reform
EDITORIAL: Reportedly, the World Bank (WB) deferred the approval of additional International Development Association (IDA) credit equivalent to $70 million for the Pakistan Raises Revenue (PRR) project. It is concerning that official documents reveal Pakistan's tax system raises little revenue, creates economic distortions, and imposes a disproportionate burden on the poor — largely due to systemic inefficiencies.
Alarmingly, the World Bank's analysis shows that Pakistan's fiscal policies have a more pronounced effect on increasing poverty and a weaker impact on reducing inequality compared to other lower-middle-income countries.
The WB analysis reflects ground realities. Pakistan's taxation system is heavily skewed towards indirect taxes, while even a significant portion of direct taxes is collected through indirect mechanisms. The result is: even the direct taxes levied in this manner get priced in similar to indirect prices that are passed on and exacerbate the burden of high rates of indirect taxes on the people with disproportionately higher onus on the poor, while the wealthy remain immensely undertaxed.
A major share of taxes is collected at the import stage — on average, around 60 percent of GST during FY19–FY24. Additionally, a sizable portion of direct taxes is collected at the import stage. Compliant businesses adjust this against their income tax liabilities, but informal players simply pass the cost on to consumers. Even within the domestic supply chain, taxes intended to target traders and retailers are eventually transferred to the end consumer. These tax inefficiencies are embedded in domestic goods, making them more expensive and reducing the competitiveness of local firms. This is a key reason why Pakistan's exports have failed to diversify beyond traditional sectors. Large exporters with access to FBR (Federal Board of Revenue) officials and the PMO (Prime Minister's Office) get their tax refunds, while smaller or newer players struggle to achieve the same.
You cannot export inefficiencies — this is why exports have stagnated, while distortions remain priced into domestic goods and services. The lower the income, the higher the burden — especially when essentials like milk are taxed at one of the highest GST rates in the world. The government has also imposed Super Tax on corporates, which in some cases — particularly in relation to FMCGs — has been passed on to consumers. This is evident from the fact that net margins for these companies have remained stable, while gross margins have increased. Higher income taxes are, in effect, also being passed on through price hikes.
Higher taxation partly explains the unprecedented inflation witnessed over the past couple of years. This has pushed poverty levels up — now estimated at a staggering 44 percent. The poor are being strangled while the middle class is sliding into poverty. Meanwhile, the wealthy continue to enjoy rising incomes and pay a far smaller share of taxes leading to widening of the already yawning inequality. Another structural issue is tariff protection, which allows big businesses to protect their margins while raising prices for consumers — placing a heavier burden on low-income segments.
Under the current tax structure, achieving productive growth and export expansion is nearly impossible. The system needs fundamental reform. All income — regardless of source — should be treated equally in both letter and spirit. Reliance on indirect taxes must be reduced. Corporate income tax rates should be lowered, and, most importantly, GST rate should be slashed. However, these goals remain pipe dreams without political will and enforcement. There must be a starting point. The government should capitalise on falling inflation, subdued global commodity prices, and improving economic sentiment to initiate long-overdue tax reforms in the FY26 budget.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Govt ignored agri sector in upcoming budget: SAB
The Sindh Abadgar Board (SAB) has deplored that the government appears indifferent to budgetary suggestions of their cohort as no consultative process has got underway with only few days left in the budget presentation. A meeting of the board, a group which lobbies for the rights of farmers, was held in Hyderabad on Thursday with Mahmood Nawaz Shah in the chair. The meeting underlined that the prevailing slump in agricultural economy, on the contrary, called for painstaking pre-budget deliberations among the stakeholders. The growers found fault with what they described as the government's 'cherry-pick' policy with regard to their sector's deregulation which, they claimed, is now being manipulated by the traders to the detriment of their corps. They contended that the actual deregulation of the agro-economy also encompassed free export of the agricultural produce, which to the utter disadvantage of the agriculturists, is being retrained. "[Besides] the export will only enhance when the agricultural industry is competitive. One of the aspects of competitiveness is to analyze the international prices which are backed by heavy subsidies in input costs like in India," they said. They pointed out that they will become competitive with foreign growers when a robust infrastructure is provided to the rural economy. "The anomaly of 18% GST [General Sales Tax] on locally produced cotton and the duty free import of cotton ought to be removed." The meeting also demanded withdrawal of the GST from imported and locally made machinery, implements and tractors. The measures like arranging subsidised credit, grants, equity participation and public private partnership have also become essential to support the sector with which the livelihood of tens of millions of people is connected. They gave reference of India, which has converted 22% of their area to high efficiency systems whereas Pakistan has not achieved even 0.5% target. Livestock The SAB has discredited the official figure of the livestock sector's over 4% growth in the ongoing fiscal. The Federal Planning Commission's working paper for the upcoming federal budget speaks about 4.7% expansion in the sector over the previous year.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
WB readjusts poverty line in Pakistan at 44.7%
Listen to article The World Bank has adjusted upward the income levels in an effort to measure global poverty, which has also pushed the percentage of Pakistanis living in poverty by to 44.7% — an outcome that may not still be fully reflecting the harsh ground realities due to the use of seven years old survey data. The Washington-based lender on Thursday released its new international poverty line to reflect changes in the prices of goods and services and their implications on the global population. The new poverty line for Pakistan, which is a lower middle-income country, is set at $4.20 per person per day, up from $3.65, said Christina Wieser, the senior poverty economist of the World Bank while briefing the media persons here. She said that due to the upward revision, for the lower middle income level, the poverty ratio has jumped from 39.8% of the old level to 44.7% on the threshold of $4.20 per day income. The World Bank has also updated the extreme poverty line from $2.15 to $3 per person per day. Because of the revision in the threshold, 16.5% of the Pakistani population lives in extreme poverty, up from 4.9% under the previous $2.15 threshold, said Christina. She said that one of the reasons for such a high jump was that the majority of the people were clustered around $2.15 to $3 per day income level, which resulted into a significant surge. About 82% of this increase in extreme poverty is due to the higher value of the new international poverty line reflecting increases in the national poverty lines of comparator countries, with the rest explained by price increases in Pakistan between 2017 and 2021, according to the World Bank. The World Bank has not used the latest population census data and instead relied on the United Nations population dataset. Christina also added that the underlying Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2018/19 data has been used for both national and international estimates. While international poverty lines are essential for tracking global progress and comparisons, national lines remain more appropriate for informing country-specific policy decisions, said the senior economist. Anything that has affected since 2019 is not included in either Covid-19 or 2022 floods, as the baseline remains the same, said Christina while responding to a question. We are desperately looking forward to the new household integrated economic survey to update our baseline, she added. The local economists had estimated a sharp rise in poverty after the 2022 floods, which inundated one-fourth of the country and adversely impacted populations in three provinces. These updates to the international poverty lines ensure that poverty estimates remain accurate and comparable across countries. The methodology remains consistent with past updates, continuing a practice that began with the introduction of the dollar-a-day line in 1990, according to the World Bank economist. "The revisions help position Pakistan's poverty levels in a global context and underscore the importance of continued efforts to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience," said Najy Benhassine, the outgoing World Bank Country Director for Pakistan. For domestic policy and programme targeting, the national poverty line remains unchanged and continues to serve as the primary benchmark for assessing poverty within Pakistan, Christina said. The forthcoming World Bank Poverty, Equity, and Resilience Assessment for Pakistan will provide critical context for interpreting these updated poverty estimates, she added. The report would offer a detailed update on poverty, inequality, and non-monetary outcomes, will investigate key drivers of poverty, and outline a forward-looking agenda to enhance prosperity and resilience for all Pakistanis. According to the government's last official available numbers, which are based on the 2018-19 survey, 21.9% of the population was living below the national poverty line. However, because national poverty lines differ widely, the resulting poverty rates are not comparable internationally. The need for new international poverty lines arises from the evolving price levels and cost of basic needs across the world and within income groups, according to Christina Wieser. To maintain accurate global comparisons, the World Bank periodically updates these poverty lines. International poverty estimates are based on the headcount of people with consumption below the international poverty line, defined in purchasing power parities (PPPs). Pakistan is among the countries experiencing the largest changes in poverty when transitioning to the 2021 PPPs based on the Low-Income International Poverty Line, according to the World Bank. The World Bank said that the international poverty line should be used only for cross-country comparison and analysis; for evaluating poverty in a particular country (Pakistan), the national poverty line remains the appropriate standard. The revisions help position Pakistan's poverty levels in a global context and underscore the importance of continued efforts to reduce vulnerability and improve resilience, The new figures reflect updated international thresholds and improved data from other countries, not deterioration in living standards, according to Christina.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
India paving ground for N-war: Bilawal
Listen to article Former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Thursday said India is laying the ground for the first nuclear war over water by disrupting the supply of the precious resource and disregarding the World Bank-brokered Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan. Addressing the Middle East Institute in Washington, Bilawal, who is also chairman of the Pakistan People's Party, said India shutting off Pakistan's water supply is laying the foundation for the first nuclear war over water. "We have declared that cutting off our water supply would be an act of war," he added. The PPP chairman said, "We don't say it in a jingoistic manner. We don't say it with any relish. It is an existential crisis for us. Any country on the planet, no matter their size, their strength or their ability, would fight for their survival and fight for their water." He asserted that India must abide by the IWT and the US and other countries must take a firm stance to not allow it to violate the treaty. "You cannot allow this precedent to be set in the Pakistan context, because we'll fight the first war, but it won't be the last. If India is allowed to stop our water, every upper riparian with hostilities to a lower riparian will have a carte blanche," Bilawal highlighted. "And if our dialogue and diplomacy in pursuit of peace are to be successful, if we are to talk to India, have a positive dialogue with India, make new arrangements, new deals, perhaps even new treaties with India, then surely they first must abide by the old treaties and take back their decision vis-a-vis the IWT," the former foreign minister noted. He said India held the IWT in abeyance after the deterioration in relations between the two countries following the April 22 Pahalgam attack in occupied Kashmir. In retaliation, Pakistan decided that it would exercise the right to hold all bilateral agreements with India, including but not limited to the Simla Agreement, in abeyance. It also announced the closure of the Wagah border and suspension of all trade with New Delhi, among other measures. Bilawal criticised the Indian government, saying it had refused cooperation on terrorism, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's offer for cooperation on investigating the Pahalgam attack, US President Donald Trump's mediation in the current dispute and more dialogue. "All that means there'll be more terrorism, more war, and no peace. The prime minister of India and his government may want to damn his people to this fate. I refuse to damn my people, and I refuse to damn the people of India to this fate, which is why my delegation and I will be traveling from capital to capital with a simple message: We want peace. We need your help," said Bilawal. "Surely, India and Pakistan working together, we can eradicate terrorism from the subcontinent. India and Pakistan working together can create that conducive environment in Kashmir where the people that live there can live there free from oppression, suffocation, and actually see prosperity. India and Pakistan's cooperation obviously would require the waters to flow freely, but it should lead to broader cooperation," Bilawal maintained.
