Aurat March condemns Jami's conviction under defamation laws
The case began at the Lahooti Melo festival in 2019, where Jami read out a statement written by an alleged victim of sexual harassment targeted by a "music video and TVC director" at a music festival. He later posted about it without naming anyone. However, he shared a screenshot from another victim's account, which had Sohail Javed's name in it.
Javed subsequently filed a Rs1 billion defamation suit against Jami, claiming that the public reading of the statement had damaged his reputation and caused him 'mental torture.'
In June, a sessions court in Karachi found Jami guilty of criminal defamation and sentenced him to two years in prison. The verdict drew criticism from activists and the creative community, who argued that the conviction would discourage survivors and their supporters from speaking out. Both parties were previously ordered by the court to maintain the status quo and refrain from further public statements about the case. On Thursday, the Sindh High Court granted bail to Jami.
Have something to add to the story? Share it in the comments below.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PAC orders probe against town chairman
The Sindh Assembly's Public Accounts Committee has referred a corruption reference against Mustafa Bilal, Chairman Town Municipal Corporation (TMC) Mian Sarfaraz in Hyderabad, to Sindh Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE). PAC Chairman Nisar Ahmed Khuhro, who conducted a hearing of the TMC in Karachi on Tuesday, also directed Sindh Secretary Local Government to initiate an inquiry over allegations that Bilal violated the law by single-handedly passing the budget for fiscal 2024-25. Embezzlement of the public funds, illegal expenditures and other irregularities are among the allegations which have been levelled against the TCM's chairman who has been accused for singularly approving the TMC's budget of over Rs1 billion. He is also being blamed for continuously withdrawing funds from the Octroi Zilla Tax head without obtaining signatures of the town municipal commissioner. TMC Miaz Sarfaraz is one of the nine TMC which work under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (HMC). The vice chairman accused the corporation's chairman for corruption, misappropriation of funds and for passing the budget without calling the due meeting of the corporation's council. The vice chairman of Union Committee (UC) 24 blamed Bilal for holding meetings of the council occasionally to fulfill the formalities without engaging the council in constructive works. "He sends extortion receipts of Rs400 to all shopkeepers," he alleged. The vice chairmen of UC 20 and UC 21 charged the chairman for completely failing to undertake development works. Many of the vice chairman during the hearing demanded a forensic audit of the TMC's revenues and expenditures. Khuhro inquired Bilal to share details about monthly income and expenditures of the corporation. The PAC's chairman was briefed that the TMC received Rs18 million monthly from the OZT share and that Rs13 million of that fund is spent on the salaries.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Man sentenced to death for killing daughter
A court has sentenced a man to death and 74 years of imprisonment along with a fine and compensation amounting to Rs9.6 million, after finding him guilty of murdering his five-year-old daughter and injuring his wife, two infant daughters, and stepson. District and Sessions Judge Abdul Raheem announced the verdict in a case registered at Mansoorabad Police Station against Zeeshan, son of Shaukat, a resident of Malikpur. The court found that Zeeshan had fatally attacked his daughter Anushka and injured his wife Shama Bibi, daughters Saman (aged two) and Huma (three months), and his stepson Talha using scissors during a domestic altercation. According to the prosecution, Zeeshan was married to Shama Bibi and allegedly became resentful over the repeated birth of daughters. In a fit of rage, he carried out the brutal assault at home. An FIR was lodged based on a statement from Samiullah, a relative of the family, under Sections 302, 324, 337F1, and 337F of the Pakistan Penal Code. After the trial, the court convicted Zeeshan of murder and sentenced him to death. The judge also ordered him to pay Rs1 million in compensation to the victim's family. In case of non-payment, he would serve an additional six months in prison. For the attempted murder of four family members, he was handed four separate prison terms of 10 years each under Section 324, along with a Rs 100,000 fine for each count, or six additional months in jail for each default in payment. Under Section 337D, he received three prison terms of 10 years each for causing severe injuries. In addition, the court imposed a one-year sentence and Rs 50,000 fine under one count of Section 337F, and a further three-year term with a Rs 70,000 fine under another.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Regressive jirgas
Listen to article The federal government's recent move to revive the jirga system in the newly merged districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is not just regressive, but also unconstitutional and dangerously reminiscent of the colonial-era governance. A committee led by the Federal Minister for Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan has been formed to explore alternative justice systems in these districts, raising fears of a de facto rollback of the 25th Constitutional Amendment, which integrated the former tribal areas into Pakistan's legal and administrative mainstream and abolished the jirga system — a move celebrated as a step towards constitutional equality, rule of law, and human rights for the region's long-neglected population. Nonetheless, the initiative to reinstate this system signals not only a betrayal of the promises made to the tribal population but also a troubling attempt to offload state responsibility for justice onto a parallel, informal, and often brutal institution. Undoubtedly, jirgas operate entirely outside the constitutional framework and the rule of law. They violate the principle of separation of powers, usurp judicial authority, and often lead to egregious human rights violations. Most disturbingly, jirgas are structurally biased against women. The recent tragic case of a 19-year-old bride murdered in Pirwadhai, Rawalpindi, allegedly on the orders of a jirga, and the killing of a couple in Balochistan on the pretext of an illicit relationship are only the latest examples in a long list of so-called "honour" killings facilitated by these illegal forums. Such incidents are a stark reminder that when justice is privatised, it is the most vulnerable who suffer. The Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 makes it abundantly clear that only the state has the authority to administer justice, and such illicit practices of informally adjudicating on civil and criminal matters are violative of Articles 4, 8, 10-A, 25 and 175(3) of the Constitution. In 2004, the Sindh High Court declared jirgas unconstitutional and illegal, a position reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in 2006 and again in 2017. The top court also noted that the jirga and panchayat systems violate Pakistan's international legal obligations, including commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Yet, the persistence and now potential formal revival of these forums illustrate the state's failure to assert its monopoly on justice and its hesitance to challenge entrenched tribal and feudal power structures. Supporters of jirgas argue they provide swift and culturally resonant dispute resolution. But this is a false economy. The real reason people turn to jirgas is not their efficiency or fairness, but because the formal justice system remains slow, expensive and inaccessible, particularly in rural and tribal areas. Instead of reinstating medieval mechanisms, the state should commit to making the judiciary accessible, the police accountable, and the legal system responsive to citizens' needs. Worse still, this regressive proposal comes at a time when the federal government has failed to meet its financial and developmental promises to the merged districts. The commitment to provide Rs100 billion annually in development funds, along with a 3% share in the NFC award, remains unfulfilled. The resurgence of militancy, ongoing political tussles between the Centre and K-P, and administrative chaos in the merged districts have only compounded public disillusionment. The state's failure to deliver tangible benefits post-merger has created a vacuum, one it now dangerously proposes to fill with a broken, discredited system. Let us be clear: reinstating jirgas is not a neutral administrative measure; it is a reversal of constitutional progress and a betrayal of the people of the tribal districts. It reinforces outdated power hierarchies, legitimises violence against women, and undermines national unity. The path forward lies not in restoring colonial relics but in upholding the Constitution, investing in institutional reform, and ensuring equal protection of the law for every citizen. Pakistan must decisively reject the politics of appeasement cloaked in cultural nostalgia. It is time to bury jirgas for good.
