Sequoia's Moritz backs Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan after Trump's 'artless bullying'
"Trump's assault has no modern precedent," Moritz wrote, calling the attack a "vindictive political sideshow."
Moritz, who spent decades at Sequoia Capital and has known Tan for nearly four decades, highlighted the CEO's previous turnaround of Cadence Design Systems. Moritz said there is "no one better equipped to transform Intel's fortunes."
"Now the Intel board must decide whether to march to the beat of so many other corporate leaders and capitulate to the president's artless bullying or to set an example for other companies and display some backbone," he wrote in a piece published in the Financial Times Sunday. "Early signs of defiance are encouraging."
Tan is set to visit the White House on Monday to assuage concerns about his background and discuss ways that Intel can work with the U.S. government.
The Wall Street Journal was first to report Tan's White House visit.
In a post to Truth Social last week, Trump called for Tan's resignation and said the 65-year-old was "highly CONFLICTED." Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark. has also raised questions over Tan's ties to Chinese companies and the potential national security risks.
Tan later addressed the "misinformation" in a letter to employees, saying that he has "always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards."
Moritz joined Sequoia Capital in 1986 and stepped down in 2023. During his tenure, he made successful early bets on the likes of Google and PayPal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal
President Trump's trade and energy policies are recalibrating the global economic order — and not by accident. Under his leadership, trade is no longer simply about moving goods. It is a tool of strategic policy — one that drives industrial revival, and shapes strategic, economic and national outcomes. Trump's approach is disruptive but methodical. Tariffs create negotiating power, leading to trade agreements that reduce deficits and rewire supply chains. When combined with U.S. energy exports and capital markets, this strategy doesn't just rebalance trade — it reinvigorates American industry. As a senior negotiator on the U.S.-China Phase I Trade Agreement in Treasury during Trump's first term, I saw firsthand that what critics dismissed as 'erratic', 'chaotic' and 'unpredictable' was, in fact, deeply strategic. President Trump's instincts, honed by decades of high-stakes dealmaking, informed a broader strategy. He approached policy like a grandmaster playing three-dimensional chess: every tariff, handshake and message was a calculated move to reassert American economic leadership. Just as in Trump's first term, this administration began by confronting structural imbalances. The 2024 U.S. goods trade deficit hit $1.2 trillion — its highest in history. In response, Trump used executive authority to impose reciprocal tariffs — not as an end in themselves, but as tools to bring others to the table. Starting in early 2025, Trump's targeted tariffs compelled negotiations to rebalance trade relationships and repatriate supply chains. Japan agreed to reduce average industrial tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent and pledged $550 billion in U.S.-bound investment. The European Union followed suit, agreeing to a framework that includes a baseline 15 percent tariff on industrial goods, expanded market access for U.S. energy, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, and a commitment to $420 billion in foreign direct investment into the U.S. And, most recently, the United States also reached a trade agreement with South Korea: Seoul will face a 15 percent duty, reduced from a threatened 25 percent, in exchange for a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S.-owned projects and purchase $100 billion in American liquefied natural gas and energy products. Indonesia and the Philippines opened markets for U.S. agriculture and energy, while committing to major purchases, including 50 Boeing aircraft. Vietnam accepted 20 percent tariffs and tighter controls on transshipped Chinese goods. Negotiations continue with India, Taiwan and others. Together, these countries now account for $809 billion — or 67 percent — of the 2024 U.S. trade deficit. Once deals with India and Taiwan are finalized, that coverage will exceed three-quarters. A mere 5 percent improvement across these relationships could slash the annual deficit by up to $95 billion. Beyond deficit reduction, these agreements reset incentives. They punish transshipment, enhance transparency and support rules-of-origin provisions that favor North American manufacturing. The result? Companies are investing in new U.S. production — auto components, semiconductors, specialty steel and energy systems. And job creation follows capital. Analysts estimate that up to 1.5 million advanced manufacturing jobs could be brought back to American soil over five years — a far cry from Barack Obama's declaration that some U.S. manufacturing jobs were gone forever. Trade reform paves the way for yet another explosion in growth: deploying U.S. energy and capital into newly aligned partner markets. Programs like America Crece and Asia EDGE, flagship infrastructure growth initiatives during Trump's first term, demonstrated the power of this model. This programming identified and unlocked growth opportunities in our partner countries using American energy exports and American equipment, employing American workers, and financing through American capital markets. In Latin America alone, we identified over $300 billion in infrastructure projects with U.S. private capital in the lead. In Vietnam, we identified $8 billion in near-term energy exports and $50 billion in longer-horizon infrastructure investments. Before the Biden administration ended this programming, we executed on $2.5 billion in transactions in Panama, backed a $3.5 billion facility in Ecuador and laid the groundwork for more than $4 billion in liquefied natural gas-based investment flows into Vietnam. Japan and Taiwan are now adopting this U.S. liquefied natural gas-driven model. Their national priorities — liquefied natural gas security and grid modernization — create natural demand for U.S. energy exports and financing partnerships. Trade deals open the market; energy and infrastructure partnerships deliver the substance. Our capital markets are unmatched in size, efficiency and depth. Trump's tariff leverage opens doors. Energy exports and U.S. financing flow through them — fueling global infrastructure while anchoring demand for American industry. This energy multiplier also advances a core tenet of Trump's economic agenda: U.S. energy dominance. American liquefied natural gas, coal and refined products are now strategic assets — tools of both commercial strength and geopolitical influence. Trump's approach fuses trade, energy and finance into a cohesive doctrine. It turns deficits into investment. It transforms market access into industrial revival. And it leverages the full might of U.S. capital to strengthen allies abroad and jobs at home. If the goal is to bring back U.S. manufacturing, secure energy markets and make capital markets work for working Americans — this is the model. The chessboard is set. And America, once again, is playing to win. Mitchell A. Silk served as assistant secretary for International Markets at the U.S. Treasury during Trump's first term. He was the senior Treasury official on U.S.-China trade negotiations and helped design America Crece and Asia EDGE. He is the author of ' A Seat at the Table: An Inside Account of Trump's Global Economic Revolution,' to be published in September 2025.
San Francisco Chronicle
30 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Shopping for school supplies becomes a summer activity as families juggle technology and tariffs
NEW YORK (AP) — Feeling nostalgic for the days when going back to school meant picking out fresh notebooks, pencils and colored markers at a local drugstore or stationary shop? The annual retail ritual is both easier and more complicated for today's students. Chains like Walmart generate online lists of school supplies for customers who type in their zip codes, then choose a school and a grade level. One click and they are ready to check out. Some schools also offer busy parents a one-stop shop by partnering with vendors that sell premade kits with binders, index cards, pens and other needed items. Yet for all the time-saving options, many families begin their back-to-school shopping months before Labor Day, searching around for the best deals and making purchases tied to summer sales. This year, the possibility of price increases from new U.S. tariffs on imports motivated more shoppers to get a jump start on replacing and refilling school backpacks, according to retail analysts. Retail and technology consulting company Coresight Research estimates that back-to-school spending from June through August will reach $33.3 billion in the U.S., a 3.3% increase from the same three-month period a year ago. The company predicted families would complete about 60% of their shopping before August to avoid extra costs from tariffs. 'Consumers are of the mindset where they're being very strategic and conscientious around price fluctuations, so for back to school, it prompts them to shop even earlier,' said Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights, the research division of software company Adobe Inc. Getting a head start Miami resident Jacqueline Agudelo, 39, was one of the early birds who started shopping for school supplies in June because she wanted to get ahead of possible price increases from new U.S. tariffs on imported products. The teacher's supply list for her 5-year-old son, who started kindergarten earlier this month, mandated specific classroom items in big quantities. Agudelo said her shopping list included 15 boxes of Crayola crayons, Lysol wipes and five boxes of Ticonderoga brand pencils, all sharpened. Agudelo said she spent $160 after finding plenty of bargains online and in stores, including the crayons at half off, but found the experience stressful. 'I am overwhelmed by the need to stay on top of where the deals are as shopping has become more expensive over the years,' she said. A lot of the backpacks, lined paper, glue sticks — and Ticonderoga pencils — sold in the U.S. are made in China, whose products were subjected to a 145% tariff in the spring. Under the latest agreement between the countries, Chinese goods are taxed at a 30% rate when they enter the U.S. Many companies accelerated shipments from China early in the year, stockpiling inventory at pre-tariff prices. Some predicted consumers would encounter higher prices just in time for the back-to-school shopping season. Although government data showed consumer prices rose 2.7% last month from a year earlier, strategic discounting by major retailers may have muted any sticker shock for customers seeking school supplies. Backpacks and lunchboxes, for example, had discounts as deep as 12.1% during Amazon's Prime Day sales and competing online sales at Target and Walmart in early July, Adobe Insights said. Throughout the summer, some of the biggest chains have are advertising selective price freezes to hold onto customers. Walmart is advertising a 14-item school supplies deal that costs $16, the lowest price in six years, company spokesperson Leigh Stidham said. Target said in June that it would maintain its 2024 prices on 20 key back-to-school items that together cost less than $20. An analysis consumer data provider Numerator prepared for The Associated Press showed the retail cost of 48 products a family with two school age children might need — two lunchboxes, two scientific calculators, a pair of boy's shoes — averaged $272 in July, or $3 less than the same month last year. Digital natives in the classroom Numerator, which tracks U.S. retail prices through sales receipts, online account activity and other information from 200,000 shoppers, reported last year that households were buying fewer notebooks, book covers, writing instruments and other familiar staples as students did more of their work on computers. The transition does not mean students no longer have to stock up on plastic folders, highlighters and erasers, or that parents are spending less to equip their children for class. Accounting and consulting firm Deloitte estimates that traditional school supplies will account for more than $7 billion of the $31 billion it expects U.S. parents to put toward back-to-school shopping. Shopping habits also are evolving. TeacherLists, an online platform where individual schools and teachers can upload their recommended supply lists and parents can search for them, was launched in 2012 to reduce the need for paper lists. It now has more than 2 million lists from 70,000 schools. Users have the option of clicking on an icon that populates an online shopping cart at participating retail chains. Some retailers also license the data for use on their websites and in their stores, said Dyanne Griffin, the architect and vice president of TeacherLists. The typical number of items teacher request has remained fairly steady at around 17 since the end of the coronavirus pandemic, Griffin said. 'The new items that had come on the list, you know, in the last four or five years are more the tech side. Everybody needs headphones or earbuds, that type of thing, maybe a mouse,' she said. She's also noticed a lot of schools requiring clear backpacks and pencil pouches so the gear can't be used to stow guns. Enter artificial intelligence For consumers who like to research their options before they buy, technology and retail companies have introduced generative AI tools to help them find and compare products. Rufus, the AI-powered shopping assistant that Amazon launched last year, is now joined by Sparky, an app-only feature that Walmart shoppers can use to get age-specific product recommendations and other information in response to their questions. Just over a quarter of U.S. adults say they use AI for shopping, which is considerably lower than the number who say they use AI for tasks such as searching for information or brainstorming, according to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll in July. Some traditions remain Before the pandemic turned a lot more people into online shoppers, schools and local Parent Teacher Associations embraced the idea of making back-to-school shopping easier by ordering ready-made bundles of teacher-recommended supplies. An extra fee on the price helped raise money for the school. Market data from Edukit, a supplier of school supply kits owned by TeachersList parent company School Family Media, shows that about 40% of parents end up buying the boxes, meaning the other 60% need to shop on their own, Griffin said. She noted that parents typically must commit no later than June to secure a bundle, which focus on essentials like notebooks and crayons. Agudelo said her son's school offered a box for $190 that focused on basics like crayons and notebooks but didn't include a backpack. She decided to pass and shop around for the best prices. She also liked bringing her son along for the shopping trips. 'There's that sense of getting him mentally prepared for the school year,' Agudelo said. 'The box takes away from that.'
Business Wire
30 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Rosen Law Firm Encourages LifeMD, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of LifeMD, Inc. (NASDAQ: LFMD) resulting from allegations that LifeMD may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. So What: If you purchased LifeMD securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses. What to do next: To join the prospective class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@ for information on the class action. What is this about: On August 5, 2025, after the market closed, LifeMD reported its financial results for the second quarter of 2025. In this announcement, LifeMD announced revised guidance. Among other metrics, LifeMD stated that it was expecting total revenue in the range of $250 to $255 million, compared with previous guidance of $268 to $275 million. On this news, the price of LifeMD stock plummeted 44.8% on August 6, 2025. Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
