
AI-generated Anime: The future of animation or the death of art?
Credits: Uchi: Japan Real Estate
AI-generated anime has taken the internet by storm, sparking a debate over the future of animation. AI is now 'permeat[ing] the creative realm'raising questions about its influence on art, copyright and the livelihood of traditional animators.
Legendary director
Hayao Miyazaki
even warned that AI-made animation can be 'an insult to life itself', highlighting fears that algorithms might lack the human touch behind emotional storytelling. At the same time, new AI tools promise to speed up production and democratize creativity. In short: is AI a powerful assistant for anime, or is it threatening to replace artists?
AI tools powering new Anime
Today's AI toolset can do remarkable things. For example, EbSynth lets artists paint a single keyframe and automatically propagates that style across an entire video sequence, transforming raw animation into a stylized scene.
Runway ML is a creative suite with advanced 'image-to-video' features, enabling users to generate and refine animated clips with just a few reference images. Major software makers are also adding AI: for instance, Adobe's Firefly and Sensei engines can turn text or sketches into polished characters and backgrounds (and even animate them) with minimal effort.
In short, tools like Ebsynth, Runway and Adobe's AI are making it easier than ever to produce anime-style visuals.
Ebsynth –
A free application that 'enables artists to transform their animated footage by applying the visual style of a chosen key frame'
i
. It preserves the painted style (color palette, brushwork, etc.) and applies it seamlessly to the moving image.
Runway ML –
An AI-powered creative suite for generating and editing images and video. With features like Gen-4 image-to-video, Runway helps creators bring still frames to life.
Adobe AI (Firefly, Sensei) –
Adobe's AI tools allow text or doodles to become fully rendered characters or scenes. For example, Firefly can generate anime-like character art from prompts, while Character Animator adds real-time motion to illustrations.
These tools deliver major advantages. They can automate time-consuming tasks (like in-between frames or complex backgrounds), letting even small teams produce polished animation much faster. Industry analysts note that advanced models can create high-quality, emotionally expressive anime art 'with minimal technical expertise'. The result is a kind of
democratization
of anime: hobbyists and independent artists can now experiment with ambitious projects that would have needed a large studio before.
AI models (many based on GANs and diffusion) are capturing finer details – facial expressions, lighting, textures – with speed and consistency that rival traditional methods.
Case study:
Netflix
's The Dog & The Boy
Credits: ComicBook.com
One high-profile example is Netflix Japan's 2023 short 'The Dog & The Boy'. This 3-minute sci-fi anime about a boy and his robot dog made headlines because
all
of its background art was generated by AI. Netflix's anime arm explained that it used an in-house AI (based on DALL·E) trained on thousands of images from its catalogue to help during a Japanese anime labor shortage.
Concept art was first drawn by a human, then repeatedly processed with AI and hand-tweaked.
The result looked visually acceptable, but the way it was made provoked outrage. When Netflix tweeted about the experiment, many fans and artists accused the company of using AI 'to avoid paying human artists'. On social media, comments criticized the approach as unethical (AI models are often trained on
scraped
human art) and dehumanizing.
The short's credits even listed 'Human' vs. 'AI+Human' for background art, which many found disrespectful. Industry figures joined in: a union leader said the backgrounds looked 'hackneyed' and 'not original'. Mashable's review agreed that criticism of the AI work was 'fair'. In short, Netflix's AI experiment made global headlines – not because the story was bad, but because it touched a nerve in the animation community.
Creative concerns vs. Technological benefits
The debate is now front and center in anime circles. On one side, many artists worry that AI could erode the craft of animation. AI can mimic styles but it might never match human creativity and emotional depth. Critics point out that the trending 'Ghibli-style' filters (which turn any photo into a pastel, Studio Ghibli-like image) are fun, but they also spark controversy. As one Times of India report noted,
AI Ghibli
art 'poses a serious threat to the originality and livelihood of human artists'.
Hayao Miyazaki himself has publicly decried AI art as lacking life and soul. There are also legal and ethical concerns: many AI models are trained on copyrighted images, leading to a 'legal minefield' of ownership and right issues.
On the other side, proponents emphasize how AI can assist rather than replace artists. Anime veteran
Goro Miyazaki
(Hayao's son) predicted that a fully AI-animated film could be made in the next few years, but he also noted the technology's potential: it might allow 'great' new talent to emerge that otherwise never would. Indian studios report practical gains: for example, Reliance Animation says it is 'committed to integrating AI' to
improve efficiency
and even
unlock new creative potentials
in storytelling.
In a year-end interview, several industry leaders observed that AI is now used at various production stages – from early storyboarding to final in-betweening – and they view it as a tool to hasten the execution of work. Many see AI-generated in-betweens and backgrounds as helpers that free animators to focus on characters and emotion.
Key advantages of AI in anime include:
Speed:
Automating laborious tasks (like background art or tweening) dramatically speeds up production3.
Experimentation:
Artists can prototype scenes or styles quickly with text-to-image models, fueling creativity and innovation.
Accessibility:
Even solo creators or small studios can produce high-quality animation without large budgets, thanks to user-friendly AI tools.
Meanwhile, major concerns include:
Artistic authenticity:
Can AI capture the nuance and emotion of hand-drawn art? Skeptics cite Miyazaki's warning that machines may lack 'emotional depth'.
Job displacement:
If studios rely heavily on AI, junior animators and background artists may find fewer opportunities. The Netflix short ignited fear of artists being replaced.
Copyright and ethics:
AI tools trained on vast data scraped from artists' work raise tricky questions about ownership and fair credit.
Global and Indian trends
These debates are happening worldwide, and India is no exception.
Globally, market analysts report that the AI anime generator market is booming: a recent industry report estimated it at over $90 billion in 2024, with fast growth expected through 2030. Advanced AI models (GANs, transformers, diffusion) are driving unprecedented quality, making anime art generation a lucrative field.
In India, anime fandom and production are also on the rise. The Indian anime market is projected to grow at a CAGR of ~13% through 2030.
Viewership is young and growing (nearly 40% of Indian anime fans are 18–24 years old), and streaming platforms report increasing anime subscriptions. Industry analysts explicitly cite emerging tech – including AI, VR and AR – as factors that will fuel this growth.
AI-generated anime has even become a social media craze in India. 'Ghibli-style' filters (powered by AI) went viral on
Instagram
and Twitter, with celebrities and politicians joining in. In March 2025, Prime Minister
Narendra Modi
shared a series of AI-made Studio Ghibli–inspired portraits of himself.
Other influencers have posted 'Ghiblified' images of daily life, underscoring how fascinated Indian audiences are by this AI art wave. At the same time, Indian animation studios are experimenting with AI. A recent Indian industry survey noted that studios are adopting AI for storyboarding, previsualization, and even script-generation to boost efficiency and creativity.
The future of Anime in an AI world
So where does this leave the anime art form? For now, most experts envision collaboration, not replacement. As Goro Miyazaki acknowledged, a completely AI-made anime
might
happen soon, but human vision remains central. India's creative leaders talk about AI enabling
new
styles and workflows, rather than killing off animation.
In practice, we're likely headed for a hybrid future: AI will handle rote work and rapid prototyping, while human artists inject emotion, originality and storytelling.
The question – 'AI-Generated Anime: future or death of art?' – is itself driving fresh creativity. Some artists are embracing AI as a new brush, while others push back to protect traditional craft. The real answer may be in the balance. For the global anime industry (and its booming Indian market), the challenge will be to integrate AI with respect for creators and originality. If managed well, AI might revolutionize the
future of animation
, accelerating projects and expanding what's possible. But if mishandled, it could indeed dim the unique spirit of hand-drawn anime. Only time will tell whether AI in the anime industry becomes a renaissance for creativity or an unwanted endnote to an art form.
Check out our list of the
latest Hindi
,
English
,
Tamil
,
Telugu
,
Malayalam
, and
Kannada movies
. Don't miss our picks for the
best Hindi movies
,
best Tamil movies,
and
best Telugu films
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
250+ startups and counting, with Runway Incubator at UPES
India has emerged as one of the world's most dynamic startup ecosystems, currently home to over 119 unicorns (Tracxn, 2025) and thousands of ventures disrupting traditional industries. Ranked third globally in terms of the number of startups, the country continues to benefit from government-led initiatives focused on building job creators rather than just job seekers. A robust digital infrastructure and a new generation of entrepreneurial talent have further accelerated this momentum. Yet, many young innovators, particularly from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, still lack access to a nurturing ecosystem that provides structured mentorship, funding opportunities, and hands-on experience to transform ideas into meaningful impact. Recognising this need, UPES has taken a proactive approach to foster innovation and entrepreneurship from the ground up. At UPES, this nurturing ecosystem has a name: Runway. Launched in 2021, Runway is the university's dedicated startup incubator, built to empower student founders and early-stage entrepreneurs from ideation to investment. In just under four years, Runway has grown into a full-fledged innovation hub, supporting over 250 startups. This reflects UPES' broader vision to embed entrepreneurship into the fabric of education, not as an elective, but as a core skill for the future. What sets the Runway apart is the credibility it has built in a remarkably short span. The incubator has secured over ₹20 crore in competitive grants from key national and state-level agencies, including DST, MeitY, DBT–BIRAC SPARSH, Startup Uttarakhand, and ACIC–AIM, NITI Aayog. Startups nurtured at the incubator have collectively raised close to ₹25 crore in external funding. These recognitions have positioned Runway as a serious platform for entrepreneurship—not only for students, but also for startups across the region seeking capital, mentorship, and technical support. Runway is grounded in a philosophy that seeks to lower barriers to entrepreneurship—especially for students from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, many of whom are first-generation entrepreneurs. The incubator welcomes students from all disciplines—engineering, law, design, liberal studies—encouraging interdisciplinary innovation. The focus is not just on launching startups, but on building ventures that solve real-world problems. Support spans a curated pre-incubation program, access to co-working spaces, labs for prototyping, legal and IP advisory, training in the art of pitching and GTM strategy, and mentorship from ecosystem experts and industry leaders. Regular demo days help connect founders with investors and funding opportunities. The most powerful driver, however, is the entrepreneurial culture on campus, where students are inspired to see themselves not just as job seekers, but as creators. This culture of action-oriented innovation will be further strengthened through 'The Pitch', an upcoming Shark Tank-style event at UPES. The high-stakes showcase will feature 12–15 early-stage startups pitching live for a chance to secure funding from a ₹3 crore pool, with a minimum ticket size of ₹25 lakhs (approximately $25,000) per startup. But this is more than just a funding event. The Pitch reflects UPES' broader vision of redefining higher education by backing entrepreneurial talent with real money, real mentorship, and real opportunities. With university leadership, investors, and industry experts on the panel, the event is set to mark a bold chapter in UPES' journey as a startup university. This culture has already given rise to several promising startups such as: UGreen Technology Founded by Gaurav Dwivedi ( Petroleum Engineering, UPES, 2019–2023), UGreen Technology is a CleanTech venture that began as a bold idea, and Runway was the first to believe in it. UGreen launched India's first carbon capture pilot for the E&P sector. Its flagship product, OCOFix, uses a patented molecular engineering method to decarbonise hard-to-abate industries. With ₹92.5 lakh raised through grants and a ₹4 crore funding round in the pipeline, UGreen is setting the pace in climate innovation. Gaurav thanks his alma mater for the exposure and access to cutting-edge labs for his success. 'The professors believed in my ideas even before they were fully formed. Their mentorship was instrumental in turning an idea on paper into a national-level CleanTech startup,' he says. Pension Box Founded by Kuldeep Parashar ( Applied Petroleum Engineering, UPES, 2010–2014), Pension Box is helping India rethink retirement. It offers a digital pension infrastructure that enables users, especially gig workers and the self-employed, to plan, automate, and manage their retirement savings effortlessly. With ₹7 crore in funding from marquee investors, including the founders of Zerodha, the platform has grown rapidly and become a thought leader in the retirement tech space. Kuldeep credits UPES for having instilled in him the confidence to think beyond the obvious. 'The faculty not only taught us what was in the books but also challenged us to apply that knowledge in real-world scenarios. That mindset helped shape my entrepreneurial journey,' he says. Indian Hempstore Founded by Siddharth Gupta (MBA, Logistics, Materials, and Supply Chain Management, UPES, 2013–2015), Indian Hempstore is building India's first hybrid marketplace for hemp-based products. The venture promotes sustainable alternatives across fashion, food, wellness, and lifestyle, while also supporting rural producers and artisans. The idea took root during Siddharth's time at UPES, where early exposure to sustainable practices inspired him to explore hemp as a future-ready material. With support from Runway, Indian Hempstore has fulfilled over 2,000 orders, onboarded 40+ brands, and generated over ₹15 lakh in revenue, helping position hemp as a planet-positive solution for the future. Siddharth credits UPES and Runway for enabling him to channel his purpose into a scalable business. 'Runway gave us the space to dream bigger and the support to build what truly matters- a startup that is good for people and the planet,' he says. These ventures stand out not only for innovation but for their purpose, with a focus on accessibility and social impact. They reflect what's possible when young entrepreneurs are equipped with the right environment and intent. With Runway, UPES is doing more than launching startups, it's cultivating changemakers who may well define India's next innovation wave.


Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Adobe Photoshop Beta Now Available for Android Phones and Tablets
After much anticipation, Adobe has officially launched the Photoshop Beta app for Android, giving users access to powerful photo editing tools right on their smartphones and tablets. This release follows the earlier rollout for iPhones in February 2025 and is now set to transform the Android editing experience with a host of professional-grade features. The delay in launching on Android was mainly due to the platform's highly fragmented ecosystem. With thousands of device types varying in screen sizes, specs, and performance capabilities, Adobe needed additional time to optimize the app for a consistent and smooth experience across the board. The Photoshop Beta app comes with full support for both Android phones and tablets—marking a notable shift in Adobe's mobile strategy, which had previously offered limited tablet compatibility. To run the app, devices must have Android 11 or later and at least 6GB of RAM, though 8GB is recommended for optimal performance. Key features of the Android version closely mirror the desktop software, including: Layer and masking support, enabling complex edits with multiple elements AI-powered tools via Adobe Firefly, such as Generative Fill to add or remove elements using text prompts Precision selection tools for isolating parts of an image Classic brushes like Spot Healing and Clone Stamp Adjustment layers and blend modes for advanced colour correction and creative effects Access to Adobe Stock assets, offering a wide range of free images and design elements These tools bring a professional-level editing experience to Android users, ideal for creators who need to work on the go. What sets the Android release apart during this beta phase is free access to nearly all tools and stock assets, unlike the iPhone version, which required a subscription from day one. However, Adobe has stated that a subscription model will be introduced once the beta testing period concludes. With this release, Adobe is clearly aiming to level the playing field between iOS and Android users, delivering a robust mobile editing experience backed by powerful AI.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 days ago
- First Post
Japan's moon-landing attempt ends in failure, ispace's lander falls silent
Japan's private moon lander launched by Tokyo-based company iSpace crashed while attempting a touchdown on the lunar surface on Friday, marking the latest casualty in the commercial rush to the moon. read more People await the update on ispace's private lunar lander's attempt to touch down on the moon Friday, June 6, 2025, in Tokyo, Japan. AP A private lunar lander from Japan crashed while attempting a touchdown Friday, the latest casualty in the commercial rush to the moon. The Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada apologised to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for Ispace. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name 'Resilience' for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. 'This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Hakamada told reporters. He stressed that the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned, and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Long the province of governments, the moon became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than wins along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Another U.S. company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the moon's south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5-foot (2.3-meter) Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for NASA. The rover, weighing just 11 pounds (5 kilograms), was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than one inch (a couple centimeters) per second. It was capable of venturing up to two-thirds of a mile (1 kilometer) from the lander and should be operational throughout the two-week mission, the period of daylight. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Besides science and tech experiments, there was an artistic touch. The rover held a tiny, Swedish-style red cottage with white trim and a green door, dubbed the Moonhouse by creator Mikael Genberg, for placement on the lunar surface. Minutes before the attempted landing, Hakamada assured everyone that ispace had learned from its first failed mission. 'Engineers did everything they possibly could' to ensure success this time, he said. He considered the latest moonshot 'merely a stepping stone' to its bigger lander launching by 2027 with NASA involvement. Ispace, like other businesses, does not have 'infinite funds' and cannot afford repeated failures, Jeremy Fix, chief engineer for ispace's U.S. subsidiary, said at a conference last month. While not divulging the cost of the current mission, company officials said it's less than the first one, which exceeded $100 million. Two other U.S. companies are aiming for moon landings by year's end: Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin and Astrobotic Technology. Astrobotic's first lunar lander missed the moon altogether in 2024 and came crashing back through Earth's atmosphere. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For decades, governments competed to get to the moon. Only five countries have pulled off successful robotic lunar landings: Russia, the U.S., China, India and Japan. Of those, only the U.S. has landed people on the moon: 12 NASA astronauts from 1969 through 1972. NASA expects to send four astronauts around the moon next year. That would be followed a year or more later by the first lunar landing by a crew in more than a century, with SpaceX's Starship providing the lift from lunar orbit all the way down to the surface. China also has moon landing plans for its own astronauts by 2030.