
California governor says ‘democracy under assault' by Trump as military intervenes in LA protests
Calling President Donald Trump a threat to the American way of life, Gov. Gavin Newsom depicted the federal military intervention in Los Angeles as the onset of a much broader effort by Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation's democracy.
In a speech Tuesday evening, the potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate said the arrival of National Guard and Marine troops in the city at Trump's direction was not simply about quelling protests that followed a series of immigration raids by federal authorities.
Instead, he said, it was part of a calculated 'war' intended to upend the foundations of society and concentrate power in the White House.
'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next,' a somber Newsom warned, seated before the U.S. and California flags. 'Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived.'
As head of the heavily Democratic state known as the epicenter of the so-called Trump resistance, Newsom and the Republican president have long been adversaries.
But the governor's speech delivered in prime time argued that Trump was not just a threat to democracy, but was actively working to break down its guardrails that reach back to the nation's founding.
″He's declared a war. A war on culture, on history, on science, on knowledge itself,' Newsom said. 'He's delegitimizing news organizations, and he's assaulting the First Amendment.'
[FULL ADDRESS] Governor Newsom addresses Californians in response to President Trump's assault on democracy and the President's illegal militarization of Los Angeles. pic.twitter.com/8Md1TFJbRm
— Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) June 11, 2025
Newsom added that Trump is attacking law firms and the judicial branch — 'the foundations of an orderly and civil society.'
'It's time for all of us to stand up,' Newsom said, urging any protests to be peaceful. 'What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty, your silence, to be complicit in this moment. Do not give in to him.'
His speech came the same day that Newsom asked a court to put an emergency stop to the military helping federal immigration agents, with some guardsmen now standing in protective gauntlet around agents as they carried out arrests.
The judge chose not to rule immediately, giving the Trump administration several days to continue those activities before a hearing Thursday.
Trump has activated more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines over the objections of city and state leaders, though the Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. They were originally deployed to protect federal buildings.
Newsom's speech capped several days of acidic exchanges between Trump and Newsom, that included the president appearing to endorse Newsom's arrest if he interfered with federal immigration enforcement. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump told reporters.
Over the years, Trump has threatened to intercede in California's long-running homeless crisis, vowed to withhold federal wildfire aid as political leverage in a dispute over water rights, called on police to shoot people robbing stores and warned residents that 'your children are in danger' because of illegal immigration.
Trump relishes insulting the two-term governor and former San Francisco mayor — frequently referring to him as Gov. 'New-scum' — and earlier this year faulted the governor for Southern California's deadly wildfires.
Trump has argued that the city was in danger of being overrun by violent protesters, while Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have called the federal intervention an unneeded — and potentially dangerous — overreaction.
The demonstrations have been mostly concentrated in the city's downtown hub. Demonstrations have spread to other cities in the state and nationwide, including Dallas and Austin, Texas, Chicago and New York City, where a thousand people rallied and multiple arrests were made.
Trump left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, which authorizes the president to deploy military forces inside the U.S. to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a U.S. president.
'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' he said from the Oval Office.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kamala Harris election results: Was U.S elections 2024 rigged? Ex-VP gets zero votes in a New York County
Kamala Harris 2024 election results are under scrutiny after she reportedly received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York, triggering a major lawsuit. Filed by SMART Legislation, the case demands a full hand recount of presidential and state senate ballots. Shocking data shows hundreds voted for Democrats like Kirsten Gillibrand, but allegedly not for Harris, raising red flags about vote counting accuracy. A New York judge has ordered the recount, citing the need for transparency. Experts call the results statistically 'highly unlikely.' This lawsuit could reshape public trust in the 2024 election results. Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of New York's Rockland County during the 2024 election, prompting a lawsuit and full recount order. Voting data irregularities spark questions about ballot counting and public confidence in U.S. election integrity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Kamala Harris get zero votes in parts of New York? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What triggered the lawsuit challenging the 2024 election? 'There is clear evidence that the senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted.' Could the voting data be the result of a technical or reporting issue? What is the court's response to the election lawsuit? Was the 2024 U.S. presidential election rigged? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What happens next in the 2024 election case? Why this case matters for future elections FAQs: A surprising legal challenge to the 2024 election results has gained momentum after official data revealed that Kamala Harris received zero votes in parts of Rockland County, New York. The lawsuit, now moving forward in court, is raising serious concerns about the accuracy and integrity of both the presidential and state senate election results in the case is being led by SMART Legislation, the action arm of the non-partisan group SMART Elections, which focuses on election security and voting rights. The group is demanding a full hand recount of all ballots cast in Rockland County during the 2024 election to determine whether there were irregularities in vote of the most shocking revelations in the lawsuit is that former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, reportedly received no votes in certain voting districts in Rockland County. This data raised immediate red flags among election observers, prompting calls for a deeper District 35, 331 people reportedly voted for Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, yet none of those voters appeared to select Harris for president — an unusual pattern given typical party-line voting trends. In District 55, 909 voters backed Gillibrand, but only two votes were recorded for discrepancies have led analysts to question the integrity of the vote counts, as such patterns are statistically unlikely without some form of error or lawsuit was filed by SMART Legislation after multiple voters signed sworn affidavits stating that they voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare, yet her reported vote totals were lower than expected. These testimonies raised doubts about whether all ballots were properly Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, emphasized the gravity of the issue:She stressed the need for a public, transparent hand recount of all ballots to restore public confidence in the election say it's possible, but the numbers are hard to ignore. According to Max Bonamente, a physics and astronomy professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, the data "would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation."Bonamente pointed out that four out of the five towns in Rockland County showed statistically improbable results when compared with historical voting data, particularly from the 2020 election. These discrepancies suggest that the current figures may not reflect actual voter Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court has ordered a full hand recount in Rockland County, marking a key development in the case. Her ruling signals that the concerns raised are being taken seriously by the court's decision sets the stage for a meticulous review of the presidential and state senate ballots, which could potentially alter the reported outcomes in the county — and possibly have broader implications depending on what the recount viral claims and social media speculation, there is no credible evidence that the 2024 election was rigged. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which monitors election security, confirmed that there were no signs of external tampering or hacking. Additionally, bipartisan audits, paper ballot verification, and local election board reviews have reaffirmed the election it's completely valid for the public to question irregularities, it's important to separate local voting patterns from national election integrity. The claim that Kamala Harris received zero votes in one New York precinct does not prove fraud; it simply reflects bloc voting behavior and the influence of hyper-local political the lawsuit progresses, all eyes are on the hand recount process in Rockland County. If the recount shows errors or manipulation in the vote tally, it could lead to further legal challenges in other parts of the state or even the case also raises wider questions about election transparency, vote counting accuracy, and public trust in electoral systems, especially in an era where voting technology is under increasing now, officials and observers await the results of the recount, which could shed light on whether this was an isolated incident or a sign of deeper systemic issues in the 2024 election lawsuit underscores the importance of election integrity and voter confidence. Even a single case of miscounted ballots can erode public trust in the system. Whether the issue in Rockland County turns out to be a clerical error, a software glitch, or something more concerning, the need for transparency and accountability is we look ahead to future elections, ensuring that every vote is counted accurately — and that any anomalies are addressed quickly and fairly — will be essential to upholding democracy in the United voting data triggered concerns over counting errors or reporting issues in Rockland challenges vote accuracy and demands a recount after irregular results in Kamala Harris's vote totals.


Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Japan and US still far apart in tariff talks, says Japanese Prime Minister
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba still sees distance with the US when it comes to trade talks, according to an opposition party leader who met with the leader to discuss US tariffs. Ishiba is expected to meet US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders gathering in Canada starting Sunday. Ahead of that potentially key meeting, the prime minister gathered with opposition party leaders Thursday to canvass their thoughts on the American levies. Speaking to reporters after the gathering, Japan Innovation Party co-leader Seiji Maehara said that Ishiba said there is a large gap between the US and Japanese stances, and that he doesn't have a particular timeline in mind for when the two sides may come to an agreement. 'If there's progress before I meet the president, that's in and of itself good,' Ishiba told reporters in Tokyo Thursday. 'But what's important is to achieve an agreement that's beneficial to both Japan and the US. We won't compromise Japan's interests by prioritising a quick deal.' The upcoming summit gathering in Canada is viewed as a potential moment for Japan and the US to reach some kind of an agreement after two months of back-and-forths. Failing to get any kind of deal there could worsen Ishiba's standing ahead of a national election next month as the tariffs threaten to push Japan's economy into a technical recession. Maehara and Yuichiro Tamaki, head of the Democratic Party for the People said that Ishiba also mentioned the US and Japan are discussing Japan's US Treasuries holdings, without elaborating on details. Tamaki told Ishiba that Japan could help US yields stabilize by reinvesting in US bonds — specifically by buying longer-term bonds when current holdings mature. Japan remains the biggest foreign holder of US Treasuries. In early May, Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato's remarks that suggested US Treasuries could be used as a negotiating tool drew great market interest, but later Kato appeared to walk back those comments and in particular the idea that Japan might use the sale of US Treasuries in negotiations. While Japanese party leaders continued to discuss the tariffs' impact, Trump appears to be ramping up pressure. The US president said he intended to send letters to trading partners in the next one to two weeks setting unilateral tariff rates, ahead of a July 9 deadline to reimpose higher duties on dozens of economies. For Japan, an across-the-board tariff is set to increase to 24% from 10% on that day barring a deal. The Asian nation is trying to earn a reprieve from a 25% tariff on cars and car parts and a 50% levy on steel and aluminum. Ishiba's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is expected to travel to North America later this week for the sixth round of negotiations with his counterparts. Still, in a different debate with opposition party leaders held in parliament on Wednesday, Ishiba hinted at how quickly the situation could change.


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Walmart heiress sparks firestorm with No Kings ad - MAGA calls for nationwide boycott
Christy Walton , who is part of the Walmart family, paid for a big ad in The New York Times. She asked people to attend town hall meetings and talk about the country's future. The ad was for " No Kings Day ," which is on June 14, the same day as Trump's birthday, Flag Day, and the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. The ad didn't name Trump directly, but said, 'We honor our commitments and stand by our allies.' 'We defend against aggression by dictators.' 'We respect our neighbors and trading partners.' 'The honor, dignity, and integrity of our country are not for sale', as mentioned in the ad by The New York Times and reported by Newsweek. Many people, especially Trump supporters, saw this as a direct criticism of Trump's 'America First' policies and foreign policy ideas. This led to backlash online, with MAGA supporters calling for a boycott of Walmart. Kari Lake, who supports Trump, posted a photo of the ad on X and asked her followers, 'Do you shop at Walmart?' Tariffs and Boycotts A Walmart spokesperson said the company has nothing to do with the ad. Christy doesn't work for Walmart, is not on the board, and doesn't help make decisions. Christy Walton is worth $19.3 billion and became part of the Walmart family after marrying John Walton, son of founder Sam Walton, who died in 2005, as mentioned by Newsweek. Some Republicans, like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, reacted by saying the Walmart family is angry about China tariffs. The boycott trend isn't new, Walmart has already been targeted this year along with Amazon, Nestlé, and General Mills, as part of 'economic blackouts.' Live Events Trump himself slammed Walmart earlier for saying that his tariffs on China would make their products more expensive. He posted on Truth Social that Walmart should 'eat the tariffs' instead of passing the cost to customers, as stated by Newsweek. Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group, said people are upset because the ad doesn't match their political views, but it's still freedom of speech. Experts say the boycott may not last long, as Walmart remains the most affordable option for many. FAQs Q1. Why are Trump supporters angry with Walmart? They believe a Walmart heiress 's ad was against Trump, so they're calling for a boycott. Q2. Did Walmart support the No Kings ad? No, Walmart said it had nothing to do with the ad and the heiress doesn't work for them.