Legacy body ‘lacks powers of a public inquiry to examine Sean Brown murder'
The head of a legacy body has conceded it does not have the same array of powers that a public inquiry would to examine the murder of GAA official Sean Brown.
The Irish Government is among those who have backed Mr Brown's family's long campaign for a public inquiry.
Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal in Belfast affirmed a previous court ruling, compelling the UK government to hold a public inquiry into his killing.
However, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn has applied for a Supreme Court appeal on the judicial rulings.
Mr Brown, 61, the then chairman of Wolfe Tones GAA Club in the Co Londonderry town of Bellaghy, was ambushed, kidnapped and murdered by loyalist paramilitaries as he locked the gates of the club in May 1997.
No-one has ever been convicted of his killing.
Preliminary inquest proceedings last year heard that in excess of 25 people had been linked by intelligence to the murder, including several state agents.
It was also alleged in court that surveillance of a suspect in the murder was temporarily stopped on the evening of the killing, only to resume again the following morning.
In an interview earlier, Mr Brown's elderly widow Bridie, 87, said she does not know why her husband was killed, and reiterated her call for a public inquiry into his death to answer the questions her family has.
'I don't know why they chose Sean, I just do not know because he was the same with everybody,' she said during an interview on BBC's The GAA Social podcast.
'He treated everybody alike, he walked with both sides of the community.'
She also paid tribute to the turnout of thousands in Bellaghy last Friday evening to support her family's campaign for a public inquiry.
'It was emotional,' she said.
'Never in my wildest dreams had I thought about so big a turnout.'
Last month, Mr Benn said he is taking steps to ensure that the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) is capable of carrying out an independent and rigorous investigation into Mr Brown's murder.
During an appearance at the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, ICRIR chief commissioner Sir Declan Morgan was pressed by SDLP leader Claire Hanna on the Brown case.
Sir Declan said if the case came to the ICRIR, his investigators would carry out a cold case review, a scoping exercise and would treat the case as a criminal investigation and gather all the evidence.
'But I agree that we could not do the next step which is subsequent to that, once the terms of reference have been set, and up to that point, we're definitely Article 2 compliant,' he told MPs at the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee.
'But the next bit is having identified what the issues are to then organise a hearing with proper representation by lawyers in relation to that, and also understanding that the sensitive information arrangements, in my view, need to be reviewed and the commission needs to be able to exercise proper challenge in relation to those.'
Speaking outside the meeting, Ms Hanna said the ICRIR in its current form 'cannot fully meet the needs of the family of Sean Brown'.
'Today's comments from Sir Declan Morgan are welcome and shine a light on where the ICRIR falls short,' she said.
'Any further delay to the resuming and restarting of inquests alongside the continued denial of a public inquiry to the Brown family is the British Government delaying truth and justice.
'The SDLP is committed to the delivery of legacy structures that families can buy into. Sir Declan's comments underline our key concerns about deficiencies relating to participation by families in proceedings and the continued existence of a veto on information by the Secretary of State.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Students campaign for school uniform rule changes in Northern Ireland
Rhea and Astrid, who are both 11-years-old, are two school pupils on a mission. The friends, from County Fermanagh in Northern Ireland, successfully campaigned for their school to change its uniform rules, so girls can choose between wearing skirts and they are trying to persuade the Northern Irish government to change the law so that every school has to offer the choice of whether to wear skirts or trousers to their and Astrid said it's "weird and unfair" that some schools still enforce told the BBC: "I didn't really like being made to wear a skirt, it just felt wrong. It's 2025".And Astrid said, she thought it was "important to have the choice for our privacy and for our comfort". Some schools in Northern Ireland, and around the rest of the UK, already allow girls to have a choice between wearing trousers and others still make skirts compulsory for female pupils. Astrid and Rhea's school changed its policy after the girls wrote a letter with the help of Dr Mairead Ryan, a mental health campaigner. Her research outlined a link between school uniforms and physical Ryan said: "Gendered uniforms can limit girls' movement and engagement in physical activities.""Uniform items like dresses and skirts can restrict certain movements and inhibit young girls from climbing, jumping, and participating in other forms of active play that are crucial for their development," she added."It's quite hard to run around without your skirt blowing up in the wind," Rhea added."All schools have the power to change it so if you have the power, then I think you probably should." The Minister for Education of Northern Ireland, Paul Givan, told BBC News the decision lies with individual schools and their boards of Rhea and Astrid have now taken their case to the home of the Northern Ireland government, Stormont, where they spoke at an education committee looking into broad changes to school uniform Quinn, Northern Ireland's Commissioner for Children and Young People, said: "The girls have articulated in their words how wearing trousers would make such a big difference. Not only to their education but also to their play time, to their privacy and to other areas of their lives."I believe that it needs to be legislated on because that would remove any doubt."We want to hear your thoughts on this matter - let us know in the comments section below...
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Alliance leader says abuse ‘unacceptable' as colleague targeted
Alliance Party leader Naomi Long has described homophobic abuse that one of party colleagues was subjected to as 'despicable'. Earlier this week Stormont Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir said he had experienced 'vile homophobic comments' and spoke out about misogynistic remarks directed at some of his officials, as well as racism against workers in the agri-food sector recently on social media. It comes during heated opposition from the farming community to Mr Muir's proposed Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029 which is currently out for consultation. Mr Muir has been urged to scrap the proposals which are aimed at improving water quality and the wider environment by reducing and preventing pollution caused or induced by nutrients from agricultural sources. Opponents say the proposals could devastate agriculture, reduce livestock numbers and undermine food security. Speaking to media in Belfast on Wednesday, Ms Long urged constructive engagement around policy. 'I think it's despicable that any politician in any role is subjected to the kind of abuse, threat, intimidation that we see commonplace now being directed at politicians, and what Andrew has been subjected to in particular is appalling and unacceptable,' she said. ' People have a right to disagree with Andrew's policy, they have a right to disagree with his direction of travel as minister, they do not have a right to harass, intimidate, threaten and abuse him, and there needs to be a clear line drawn between the two. 'A constructive engagement around policy, around practice, is entirely reasonable. Abuse is unacceptable.' Speaking in the Assembly on Tuesday, Mr Muir contended there is 'a lot of misinformation' around the proposals, adding that social media commentary has been 'disgraceful'. 'There's been misogynistic comments against officials in my department,' he said. 'There's been racist comments in relation to people that we are very, very fortunate to have working within our agri-food sector. 'And not for a very long time have I seen such vile homophobic comments about myself. 'I am a gay man, and I am proud to be a gay man, and it has no relevance whatsoever to the Nutrients Action Programme nor my ability to do this job.' Disappointment was expressed at the social media comments referred to across the chamber, including from Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole, Sinn Fein MLA Aoife Finnegan, UUP MLA Robbie Butler and DUP MLA Trevor Clarke, who said opposition to the programme 'should not be personalised against anyone'.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Sinn Fein ‘will always stand on the side of journalism'
Sinn Fein 'will always stand on the side of journalism', one of its MPs has said. North Belfast MP John Finucane was speaking after his party's former president Gerry Adams won a defamation case against BBC Northern Ireland. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former party official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. On Friday, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. However, the broadcaster has been granted a stay on paying out the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. Speaking outside court on Friday, Adam Smyth, director of BBC NI, said implications of the libel victory against the broadcaster are 'profound', and could 'hinder freedom of expression'. On Wednesday, Sinn Fein vice-president Michelle O'Neill told reporters in Belfast that Mr Adams was 'right to defend his good name'. But, she said, in a 'separate issue', journalists are 'entitled to do your job, to report fairly and honestly and actually scrutinise things, and to do so without any kind of intimidation or any fear'. She also pointed out that Mr Finucane, in his role as a solicitor, had defended Belfast journalists Trevor Birney and Barry McCaffrey. He added: 'We've been witness to journalists being murdered for doing their job in Gaza, we have seen the arrest of Trevor Birney and Barry McCaffrey for doing their job (to) a very high standard. 'So I think we'll always stand on the side of journalism to be able to do their job robustly, without anybody receiving fear or intimidation as a result of that.' Earlier this week, Amnesty International published a report revealing there has been more than 70 attacks and death threats against journalists in Northern Ireland over the last six years. It also concluded that the region is the most dangerous place in the UK to be a reporter. Also speaking to media in Belfast on Wednesday, Stormont Justice Minister and Alliance Party leader Naomi Long said she condemns intimidation, threats, violence and abuse directed at anyone. 'The idea that this kind of abuse, this kind of vitriol, is normalised in our society, I think, is unacceptable, and we do need a reset,' she said. 'It is not acceptable to threaten a journalist because you don't like what they published. It is not acceptable to threaten their family because you want to intimidate them from doing their job. 'A free press is part of the accountability mechanisms in a democratic society, and a fair and free press is absolutely essential to holding those in power, whether political power or otherwise, to account, and when you try to curtail that, when you try to restrict that in terms of threats and intimidation and violence, then you are essentially attacking democracy, not just individual journalists.' She said she believes fundamentally in the freedom of the press, adding that if there is more that the PSNI can do in that regard, she would want them to do it. 'I cannot direct the PSNI, as you're aware, as Justice Minister, but as leader of the Alliance Party, I am absolutely clear that there is no space in our society and no place for intimidation or threat against journalists,' she said. 'Some of the stories that people have expressed, some of the stories that people have told about repeated threats being brought to them by the PSNI, about their families being intimidated, their children, their partners, that is completely unacceptable, and it needs to be taken seriously, thoroughly investigated and hopefully followed up with robust prosecution.'
