Rapidly expanding school voucher programs pinch state budgets
An elementary school math teacher instructs a fifth grade class at a private school in Wheeling, W.Va. Costs are skyrocketing as states rapidly expand school voucher programs, which divert public funds to pay for private school tuition. (Photo by Gene J. Puskar/The Associated Press)
In submitting her updated budget proposal in March, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs lamented the rising costs of the state's school vouchers program that directs public dollars to pay private school tuition.
Characterizing vouchers as an 'entitlement program,' Hobbs said the state could spend more than $1 billion subsidizing private education in the upcoming fiscal year. The Democratic governor said those expenses could crowd out other budget priorities, including disability programs and pay raises for firefighters and state troopers.
It's a dilemma that some budget experts fear will become more common nationwide as the costs of school choice measures mount across the states, reaching billions of dollars each year.
'School vouchers are increasingly eating up state budgets in a way that I don't think is sustainable long term,' said Whitney Tucker, director of state fiscal policy research at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a think tank that advocates for left-leaning tax policies.
Vouchers and scholarship programs, which use taxpayer money to cover private school tuition, are part of the wider school choice movement that also includes charter schools and other alternatives to public schools.
Opponents have long warned about vouchers draining resources from public education as students move from public schools to private ones. But research into several programs has shown many voucher recipients already were enrolled in private schools. That means universal vouchers could drive up costs by creating two parallel education systems — both funded by taxpayers.
School vouchers are increasingly eating up state budgets in a way that I don't think is sustainable long term.
– Whitney Tucker, director of state fiscal policy research at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
In Arizona, state officials reported most private school students receiving vouchers in the first two years of the expanded program were not previously enrolled in public schools. In fiscal year 2024, more than half the state's 75,000 voucher recipients were previously enrolled in private schools or were being homeschooled.
'Vouchers don't shift costs — they add costs,' Joshua Cowen, a professor of education policy at Michigan State University who studies the issue, recently told Stateline. 'Most voucher recipients were already in private schools, meaning states are paying for education they previously didn't have to fund.'
Voucher proponents, though, say those figures can be misleading. Arizona, like other states with recent expansions, previously had more modest voucher programs. So some kids who were already enrolled in private schools could have already been receiving state subsidies.
In addition to increasing competition, supporters say the programs can actually save taxpayer dollars by delivering education at a lower overall cost than traditional public schools.
One thing is certain: With a record number of students receiving subsidies to attend private schools, vouchers are quickly creating budget concerns for some state leaders.
The rising costs of school choice measures come after years of deep cuts to income taxes in many states, leaving them with less money to spend. An end of pandemic-era aid and potential looming cuts to federal support also have created widespread uncertainty about state budgets.
Trump's school choice push adds to momentum in statehouses
'We're seeing a number of things that are creating a sort of perfect storm from a fiscal perspective in the states,' said Tucker, of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Last year, Arizona leaders waded through an estimated $1.3 billion budget shortfall. Budget experts said the voucher program was responsible for hundreds of millions of that deficit.
A new universal voucher program in Texas is expected to cost $1 billion over its next two-year budget cycle — a figure that could balloon to nearly $5 billion by 2030, according to a legislative fiscal note.
Earlier this year, Wyoming Republican Gov. Mark Gordon signed a bill expanding the state's voucher program. But last week, he acknowledged his own 'substantial concerns' about the state's ability to fund vouchers and its public education obligations under the constitution.
'I think the legislature's got a very tall task to understand how they're going to be able to fund all of these things,' he said in an interview with WyoFile.
Voucher proponents, who have been active at the state level for years, are gaining new momentum with support from President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans.
In January, Trump ordered federal agencies to allow states, tribes and military families to access federal money for private K-12 education through education savings accounts, voucher programs or tax credits.
Last week, Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee voted in favor of making $20 billion available over the next four years for a federal school voucher program. Part of broader work on a bill to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, the measure would need a simple majority in the House and the Senate to pass.
Sweeping private school voucher program tucked inside US House tax bill
Martin Lueken, the director of the Fiscal Research and Education Center at EdChoice, a nonprofit that advocates for school choice measures, argues school choice measures can actually deliver savings to taxpayers.
Lueken said vouchers are not to blame for state budget woes. He said public school systems for years have increased spending faster than inflation. And he noted that school choice measures make up a small share of overall state spending — nationally about 0.3% of total state expenditures in states with school choice, he said.
'Public schooling remains one of the largest line items in state budgets,' he said in an interview. 'They are still the dominant provider of K-12 education, and certainly looking at the education pie, they still receive the lion's share.
'It's not a choice problem. I would say that it's a problem with the status quo and the public school system,' he said.
Washington, D.C., and 35 states offer some school choice programs, according to EdChoice. That includes 18 states with voucher programs so expansive that virtually all students can participate regardless of income.
But Lueken said framing vouchers as a new entitlement program is misleading. That's because all students, even the wealthiest, have always been entitled to a public education — whether they've chosen to attend free public schools or private ones that charge tuition.
'At the end of the day, the thing that matters most above dollars are students and families,' he said. 'Research is clear that competition works. Public schools have responded in very positive ways when they are faced with increased competitive pressure from choice programs.'
Public school advocates say funding both private and public schools is untenable.
Some states reexamine school discipline as Trump order paves go-ahead
In Wisconsin, Republican lawmakers are considering a major voucher expansion that would alter the funding structure for vouchers, potentially putting more strain on the state's general fund.
The state spent about $629 million on its four voucher programs during the 2024-2025 school year, according to the Wisconsin Association of School Business Officials, which represents employees in school district finance, human resources and leadership.
The association warns proposed legislation could exacerbate problems with the 'unaffordable parallel school systems' in place now by shifting more private schooling costs from parents of those students to state taxpayers at large.
Such expansion 'could create the conditions for even greater funding challenges for Wisconsin's traditional public schools and the state budget as a whole,' the association's research director wrote in a paper on the issue.
In Arizona, Hobbs originally sought to eliminate the universal voucher program — a nonstarter in the Republican-controlled legislature. She has since proposed shrinking the program by placing income limits that would disqualify the state's wealthiest families.
That idea also faced Republican opposition.
Legislators are now pushing to enshrine access to vouchers in the state constitution.
Marisol Garcia, president of the Arizona Education Association, the state's 20,000-member teachers union, noted that vouchers and public education funds are both sourced from the general fund.
'So it almost immediately started to impact public services,' she said of the universal voucher program.
While the union says vouchers have led to cutbacks of important resources such as counselors in public schools, Garcia said the sweeping program also affects the state's ability to fund other services like housing, transportation and health care.
'Every budget cycle becomes where can we cut in order to essentially feed this out-of-control program?' she said.
Stateline reporter Kevin Hardy can be reached at khardy@stateline.org.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
More Americans say neither party has strong leaders: CNN poll
Americans are more likely to say neither party has strong leaders than they are to attribute the characteristic to either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party, according to the latest CNN/SSRS poll. In the May poll, released on Sunday, respondents were asked which party is best described as 'the party with strong leaders.' More than 4 in 10 people — 43 percent — said 'neither party,' while Republicans followed close behind with 40 percent. Only 16 percent of respondents said the statement best describes the Democratic Party. By comparison, in a 2006 poll that asked the same question, only 10 percent said 'neither party,' while 49 percent said the Republican Party and 35 percent said the Democratic Party. Among registered voters in the latest poll, more respondents — 44 percent — said Republicans are 'the party with strong leaders,' while 40 percent said 'neither party,' and 15 percent said the Democrats. The survey comes as Democratic officials reckon with new reporting suggesting former President Biden's inner circle took steps to shield the American public from signs of his alleged mental and physical decline as he embarked on his reelection campaign. The Republican Party also controls the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. The survey included 2,539 adults and was conducted on May 5-26. The margin of error is 2.7 percentage points.

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Says Democrats Will Subpoena Musk If They Retake House
A House Democratic lawmaker said that if Democrats retake control of the House of Representatives, they will likely issue a subpoena to former Trump administration special government employee and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Musk, who departed the administration last week in accordance with the expiration of his special government employee status, appeared alongside President Donald Trump in a news conference in the Oval Office on May 30. The tech billionaire played a key role in the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), whose mission is to root out fraud and cut wasteful government spending. So far, it reports it has helped save taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, but aims to raise that to more than $1 trillion.


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
After lawmakers pass budget with cuts and tax hikes, Gov. JB Pritzker blames state's fiscal challenges on Trump
SPRINGFIELD — While offering a sunny take on the passage of a roughly $55 billion state spending plan balanced in part by cutting back on some of his own priorities, Gov. JB Pritzker on Sunday blamed Illinois' latest fiscal challenges not on a state tax system he once described as 'unfair' and 'inadequate' but on economic headwinds created by President Donald Trump. 'This year has been hard across the entire Midwest — indeed, the entire country,' Pritzker told reporters in his state Capitol office, nodding to cuts in areas such as public health and higher education in neighboring red states Indiana and Iowa. 'Donald Trump's incomprehensible tariff policies have put a tax on our working families and dampened the nation's economic outlook,' he said. 'The Trump slump is affecting every state, and the chaos and uncertainty of the Republicans' proposed cuts to health care and education and jobs have made budgeting, well, harder than ever before.' The spending plan, which was passed by lawmakers on Saturday shortly before a midnight deadline and awaits Pritzker's signature before the state's fiscal year begins July 1, makes nearly $400 million in spending cuts, including $193 million in operational cuts across state agencies beyond what Pritzker proposed in February, according to budget negotiators. It also relies on increased taxes on tobacco products, online sportsbooks, and overseas and out-of-state corporate earnings as well as one-time revenue measures, which together total more than $800 million. Pritzker's efforts to blame Trump for Illinois' latest budget woes and contrast the state's spending decisions with those of neighboring Republican-led states came at the end of a spring legislative session during which the governor continued efforts to raise his national profile. His relentless criticisms of Trump — particularly in a fiery speech to New Hampshire Democrats and appearances on cable news, late-night TV and podcasts — have stood in contrast to the softer tone employed by some other prominent Democratic governors and further fueled speculation Pritzker is eyeing a White House run in 2028. Before that, however, the billionaire Hyatt Hotels heir must officially decide whether to run next year for a third term as governor. It's widely expected he will, though he didn't answer when asked about it as he departed his Sunday morning news conference. Pritzker's reluctance to embrace a more comprehensive approach to overhauling the tax system after his failed effort to amend the state constitution in 2020 to allow for higher rates on larger incomes suggests a wariness about giving credence to political opponents eager to brand him as a tax-raiser. Indeed, the governor vowed to use his veto pen this year if lawmakers sent him a spending plan that relied on 'broad-based' increases to sales or income taxes. Pritzker's hesitancy over taxes extended to the unresolved debate about how to overhaul governance and increase funding for Chicago-area mass transit systems facing a looming fiscal cliff of more than $771 million. While echoing the need for changes to the disjointed board structure of the city and suburban bus and train systems, the governor hasn't publicly endorsed a funding plan, and legislators left town without sending one to him. As for the state's longer-term financial picture, the kind of deeper cuts Republicans espouse are anathema to Pritzker and the legislature's Democratic supermajority. But rather than expending political capital on broader revenue-generating efforts such as a renewed push for a graduated-rate income tax or an attempt to expand the sales tax to cover more services, both common practices in other states, Pritzker's answer on Sunday for state budget stability is 'more stability out of Washington, D.C.' 'We would not have suffered this problem had we not had the Trump slump affecting us,' Pritzker said. 'There are $500 million of reduced revenues to the state of Illinois as a result of what Donald Trump has done to a booming economy.' Throughout the closing days of the legislative session, which adjourned in the early morning hours Sunday, Democrats repeatedly pointed the finger at Trump and congressional Republicans for the difficulties the General Assembly faced in crafting the upcoming year's budget. Presenting the spending plan on the House floor late Saturday, Majority Leader Robyn Gabel of Evanston said a big reason for many of the proposed cuts was the uncertainty over whether the Trump administration would deprive Illinois of critical federal funding for Medicaid and in other areas. 'I want to emphasize that these were not decisions made lightly or made hastily. These are strategic efficiencies so we can invest in the needs of our working families and seniors on fixed incomes,' Gabel said. 'Of course, we do not know the full extent of the cuts Washington is preparing. But we do anticipate that health care access and infrastructure will be most directly impacted.' Democrats cut back on the $350 million annual increase in school funding required under a 2017 state law, withholding $43 million that normally would go to a grant program designed to help school districts with high property tax rates and low real estate values. They characterized the move as a pause to allow for a study of whether the program is working as intended. The overall spending plan followed Pritzker's recommendation to pause one of his key priorities: a $75 million annual increase to boost the number of seats in state-funded preschool programs. The budget would keep the spending level with the current year. The budget also cuts back on another Pritzker priority, suspending monthly contributions to the state's 'rainy day' fund for a year. Instead, about $45 million would be held in the general fund, which pays for day-to-day operations. Funding for a program that provides Medicaid-style health insurance for noncitizens ages 42 to 64 also was zeroed out, a savings the governor's office estimated at $330 million, though the budget includes $110 million to continue coverage for those 65 and older. During the House debate, Rep. Dagmara Avelar, a Democrat from Bolingbrook and member of the legislative Latino Caucus, said she was supporting the overall spending plan even though it was 'not a perfect budget.' 'In fact, it's painful. It eliminates a program that has been a lifeline for many, including people that I have fought alongside for years,' she said. 'But I'm voting 'yes' because leadership requires hard choices. And this budget protects more than it cuts.' To that end, the budget includes an 80-cent-per-hour wage increase for direct support professionals who work with people with developmental disabilities. But it reduces the hours the state would pay for by 35%, which Gabel, the House majority leader, characterized as 'rightsizing.' Advocates and unions have said wages needed to be raised by $2 an hour to meet recommendations that those workers be paid 150% of minimum wage. At a Senate committee hearing on the plan Saturday afternoon, Sen. Chapin Rose of Mahomet, a GOP budget negotiator, called the reduction in hours a 'cynical sleight of hand.' Safety-net hospitals serving low-income patients and communities are set to receive $118 million in grant funding, less than the roughly $160 million some lawmakers were hoping for. The Monetary Award Program, which provides grants to lower-income college students, will see a $10 million boost to a total of nearly $722 million. The budget also will devote $75 million to help ensure pensions for newer state employees meet a federal requirement to be on par with Social Security benefits, and it sets aside $100 million for a 'bridge fund' to cover unexpected shortfalls in the coming year. Despite the fiscal challenges, the Democratic plan includes $8.2 billion in new spending on infrastructure projects, which are separate from the operating budget and funded by dedicated taxes and borrowing. Republicans accused the majority party of once again hoarding that money for projects in their own districts. 'Let's hide this stuff. Let's hide it so that the public doesn't see it until it's too late. Let's blame everybody but ourselves. The Trump administration did this. The Trump administration did that. I call BS,' GOP Rep. John Cabello of Machesney Park, who was a Trump delegate during last year's Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, said during the House debate late Saturday. Cabello also said Republicans weren't given a chance to fund projects on behalf of taxpayers in their districts. On the revenue side, a tax amnesty program that would allow delinquent filers to pay off their tax debt without penalties is expected to generate $228 million in one-time money for the state. The plan also includes a set of tax law changes that would give the state the ability to tax more offshore and out-of-state corporate income. Taken together, those changes would bring in an estimated $336 million in ongoing revenue. Democratic Rep. Will Guzzardi of Chicago, a House budget negotiator and member of the progressive caucus, said the budget will be balanced, in part, with 'revenues paid for by the biggest and most profitable corporations that do business in Illinois, who can afford to pay a little bit more to help us fund the operations of our state, closing loopholes and going after financial tactics that those companies use to avoid paying what they should.' There's also a new per-wager tax on online sportsbooks, expected to generate $36 million in the coming year. Taxes will go up on tobacco from the current rate of 36% of wholesale price for cigarettes and 15% for vaping products to 45% across the board, including nicotine pouches, which have exploded in popularity in recent years. The $50 million in anticipated revenue would go to tobacco cessation efforts and the state's Medicaid program. Republicans criticized the use of one-time revenue streams to fill shortfalls, including the diversion of money from road projects by again delaying a shift of revenue from the sales tax on gasoline from the state's general fund to the road fund, freeing up $171 million to spend on operations. Pritzker defended the practice, saying Democrats crafting the budget tried to ensure 'any one-time revenues … really matched up with or … were diminishing of the one-time expenditures that we have to make.' Even without a substantial overhaul of the state's income or sales taxes, Pritzker said, the state has 'gotten really much closer than ever before' to erasing a structural budget deficit his administration pegged at $3.2 billion shortly after he took office in 2019. Still, some other Democrats, especially members of the party's progressive wing, believe there needs to be a deeper look at how services for residents across the state are funded, particularly given the uncertain economic times. Guzzardi, the House budget negotiator, was a co-sponsor of legislation that put the graduated income tax question on the 2020 ballot and 'fought really hard' in the unsuccessful campaign for its passage. 'I still think it's the kind of change that our state is going to need, the systemic change to our tax structure, to ease the burden on working families and to generate the revenue we need to fund vital services by asking the folks at the top to pay,' Guzzardi said Sunday. 'We have to make a more convincing case to the voters, that much is really clear.' More immediately, though, lawmakers are under pressure to address the dire financial situation facing Chicago-area mass transit with the impending expiration of federal coronavirus relief money. In the closing hours of the spring session, Senate Democrats introduced and passed a plan to address mass transit governance and funding, including a new $1.50 fee on retail deliveries. Sen. Ram Villivalam, a Chicago Democrat and point person on transit issues, called the plan 'unprecedented' and said it would create 'the world-class, safe, reliable, accessible, integrated public transit system we need for our northeastern Illinois region.' But key House Democrats said their chamber didn't take up the Senate proposal before adjourning for the spring because they wanted to focus first on overhauling the way the various transit agencies operate before allocating taxpayer money to those changes. 'I would say that the commitment has always been to do reform first. And then talk about doing revenue,' Rep. Eva-Dina Delgado, a Chicago Democrat, said. 'We worked really hard along with the Senate on putting together that reform. Unfortunately, we had different approaches to how to get that across the finish line.' Rep. Kam Buckner, another Chicago Democrat involved in transit negotiations, said it would've been 'irresponsible' for House members to vote on the Senate plan without being thoroughly familiar with its funding proposal. The measure came over from the Senate after midnight Sunday, when the threshold to pass legislation taking effect before June 2026 increased from a simple majority to three-fifths. That didn't allow enough time for House Democrats to review the proposed tax and round up the votes needed to pass it, Buckner said. Pritzker likewise said Sunday that he hadn't had much time to review the delivery tax proposal, which was met with stiff opposition from business groups and others. 'I obviously want to make sure we're lowering, not raising, taxes whenever we can,' the governor said, adding that he looks forward to reviewing future proposals in the coming months. It's important for there to be 'significant work that'll need to be done over the summer and in the fall' on governance and funding the Chicago-area and downstate transit systems, Pritzker said.