How to compare pet insurance quotes
Comparing pet insurance quotes is less about finding the cheapest policy and more about finding the right fit for your pet's needs and your budget. Here's how to compare quotes for pet insurance.
Learn more: How does pet insurance work? A complete guide.
1. Figure out the type of coverage you need
In general, there are three types of pet insurance:
Accident and illness. This is the most common type of pet insurance. It covers accidents, plus illnesses like cancer, infections, allergies, digestive issues, and more. It's more comprehensive than just accident-only insurance.
Accident-only. This type of pet insurance covers sudden injuries like broken bones, swallowed toys, or snake bites. It's usually the cheapest option, but it doesn't cover illnesses like ear infections or cancer.
Wellness/preventive care add-ons. This is optional coverage you can tack on to your base pet insurance plan. It reimburses for routine expenses like checkups, vaccines, dental cleanings, flea meds, and more, up to your plan limits.
Not all pet insurance covers the same things (even if you're comparing accident and illness plans across the board). As you compare, make note of what's included by default versus what costs extra (like add-on coverage). For instance, some pet insurance plans exclude coverage for:
Congenital and hereditary conditions, like hip dysplasia or cherry eye
Chronic conditions, like diabetes or epilepsy
Behavioral issues, like separation anxiety or aggression
2. Understand what affects your quote
Insurers use several factors to price pet insurance policies. You'll often see different rates from different companies, even with the same info. Here's what companies typically consider:
Species. Cat insurance tends to cost less than dog insurance.
Breed. Some breeds are more prone to health issues (think French bulldogs or golden retrievers), which could raise premiums.
Age. Premiums often go up as your pet gets older. Some companies won't even issue new policies to pets over a certain age. For example, Trupanion's limit is age 14 and Healthy Paws is age 13 for buying a new policy.
Gender. Male pets can sometimes cost more to insure in some breeds if they're more prone to certain diseases.
Veterinary service costs. If vet services cost more in your area, you could pay higher premiums. Even inflation and other economic factors could influence the pet insurance quotes you receive.
Preexisting conditions. Most insurers won't cover anything your pet was diagnosed with before the policy started. Some (like Figo or Fetch) will cover curable preexisting conditions if there haven't been symptoms or treatment for a certain amount of time.
Up next
Up next
3. Gather documents and info about your pet
Before you start plugging details into quote tools, it helps to have a few things handy. Most pet insurance providers will ask for:
Your pet's age. You usually need their birth date or your best estimate. Puppies and kittens often cost less to insure if you enroll them young.
Breed or mix. Be as accurate as possible. If your pet is a mix, you may need to select the closest breed combo or 'mixed breed' option.
ZIP code. Insurance rates are localized, so you'll receive a quote for pet insurance based on your area.
Medical history. You don't need to upload records during the quote process, but insurers may request them later for claims or preexisting condition reviews.
Any known health issues. If your pet has a prior diagnosis, it's good to know how long it's been since symptoms or treatment. Some companies will cover certain conditions if they've been resolved for a certain number of months.
Quick tip: Keep all this info in a Google doc or a notes app so you can copy and paste as you compare across sites. It'll save you time and help keep your pet insurance quotes consistent.
4. Shop around to get the best pet insurance rate
Once you know what kind of pet insurance coverage you want and have your pet's info ready, it's time to start comparing quotes. There are three main ways to do that:
Insurance provider websites. This gives you the most accurate quote and allows you to see exactly what each company offers. Try getting quotes from at least three to five top pet insurance companies for a fair comparison.
Pet insurance marketplaces. Sites like Pawlicy Advisor or PetInsuranceQuotes.com let you compare multiple companies side-by-side with one form. These are great for quick overviews, but may not show all available options.
Independent agents or brokers. If you're overwhelmed or want help understanding your options, an agent who specializes in pet insurance can walk you through it. Just make sure they're not biased toward one company.
Tips for getting the best rate
Start while your pet is young if you can. Premiums are lower for younger, healthier pets.
Adjust your deductible and reimbursement settings. A higher deductible or lower reimbursement rate can shrink your premium, but always aim to choose a deductible and reimbursement rate you could comfortably afford in an emergency.
Ask about discounts. Some providers offer savings for spaying/neutering, multi-pet discounts, military discounts, or savings for paying annually.
5. Choose your policy and buy
Once you've compared quotes and narrowed down your options, take one last look at the fine print. Double-check the exclusions, waiting periods, and any reimbursement limits that might affect your pet's care.
If you're deciding between two similar plans, consider the following:
How the claim process is handled
Whether or not you can pay your vet directly
How long the window is to submit claims
Whether or not a mobile app is offered
These small details can make a big difference if and when you use the policy. When you're ready, you can usually buy your policy online. Most companies let you enroll in just a few minutes.
Best way to compare pet insurance
The best way to compare pet insurance is to do your homework. Get quotes from at least three pet insurance companies. Look closely at what's covered, what's excluded, and how much you'll actually pay out of pocket. And don't forget to factor in your pet's unique needs — like breed-specific conditions, age, or a history of health issues.
Lastly, keep your own situation in mind as you shop. Many of the best pet insurance companies stand out for different reasons, and not all of those reasons will apply to you. For instance, Yahoo Finance found that Pets Best is the top provider overall, but MetLife is best for insuring multiple pets, Spot offers the broadest range of included coverage, and Embrace rewards healthy pets with shrinking deductibles.
Learn more: How insuring a pet may save money in the long run
Frequently asked questions
Do I have to have pet insurance?
No, you don't technically need pet insurance. But if your pet is relatively healthy and doesn't really have much that can constitute a preexisting condition, it can be a financial safety net if your pet ever gets sick or injured. Vet bills for emergency care, surgeries, or chronic conditions can easily run into the thousands.
How much does pet insurance cost?
Pet insurance costs vary based on your pet's species, breed, age, location, and the coverage you choose. On average, accident and illness plans cost around $62.44 per month for dogs and $32.21 for cats, according to the North American Pet Health Insurance Association. But your premium could be higher or lower depending on your pet details, deductible, reimbursement rate, and annual limit.
Who has the cheapest pet insurance?
Yahoo Finance found that Lemonade pet insurance has excellent costs. That said, there isn't one company that's the cheapest for every pet and every situation across the board. It's still smart to grab pet insurance quotes from at least three companies to know which has the right combo of price and value for you.
Does pet insurance cover vet bills?
Yep, most pet insurance plans reimburse you for eligible vet bills related to accidents and illnesses. Some pet insurance companies will even cover things like exam fees, prescription drugs, and behavioral therapy. You'll usually need a wellness add-on for routine care like vaccines, routine blood work, flea meds, or dental cleanings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eating fries over boiled potatoes increases type 2 diabetes risk
People who eat three portions of French fries a week have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, a new study suggests. Those who consume similar amounts of boiled, baked or mash potatoes do not have an increased risk, researchers found. An international team of researchers, including an expert from the University of Cambridge, wanted to investigate any links between potato consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Academics analysed data on studies tracking the health of more than 205,000 health workers in the US. Repeated surveys about people's diets were performed over almost four decades. And during the study follow-up periods, some 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. Overall the research team found that consumption of baked, boiled or mashed potatoes were not linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). But people who had a higher consumption of French fries – at least three weekly servings – had a 20% increased risk. And those who eat fries five times a week appeared to have a 27% increased risk. 'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method,' the authors wrote in The BMJ. 'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries. 'Higher intake of French fries, but not combined baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes, was associated with a higher risk of T2D.' The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8%. 'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' they wrote. But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found. The research team also performed a review of all of the other studies on the topic which had similar findings. In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the US and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.' They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.' Commenting on the study, Dr Faye Riley, research communications lead at Diabetes UK, said: 'This research shows that the link between potatoes and type 2 diabetes isn't as clear-cut as it might seem. 'Type 2 diabetes is a complex condition, with many factors influencing its development, including genetics, age and ethnicity. 'Diet is just one part of the picture, but this study suggests that how food is prepared can make a difference and reinforces the advice to prioritise whole grains and cut back on fried or heavily processed foods as a way to support a balanced diet and reduce your risk.'
National Geographic
14 hours ago
- National Geographic
Eating too much of this favorite food could increase your diabetes risk
Not all potatoes are created equally, according to a new study that analyzed nearly four decades of health data to understand the potential links between potato intake and diabetes risk. Photograph by Gerd Ludwig, Nat Geo Image Collection You might want to think twice before you reach for that last french fry at the bottom of the bag. A new study from a team of researchers at Harvard University found that eating too many fries was associated with significantly higher risk for developing Type 2 diabetes. In the study published in BMJ, researchers analyzed nearly four decades worth of self-reported dietary data from 205,000 nurses and health professionals, making it one of the most comprehensive studies regarding potato intake and diabetes to date. The results showed those who ate three servings of boiled, mashed or baked potatoes a week had a marginally increased Type 2 diabetes risk of 1 percent. However, respondents who ate three servings of french fries a week had 20 percent risk. (It's possible to reverse diabetes—and even faster than you think.) 'The big takeaway? Not all potatoes are created equally,' says Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, the lead researcher and a postdoctoral research fellow in Harvard University's department of nutrition. If the findings make you a bit salty, fear not: There are some caveats that might put your mind at ease. So do you need to be worried if you only eat fries occasionally—or if you prefer the sweet potato kind? And if you're going to keep eating french fries anyway, is there anything you can do to modify diabetes risk? National Geographic put these questions to the experts. Scientists have suspected for years that white potatoes could increase our risk of Type 2 diabetes. That's because when our bodies break down potato starch, it quickly converts into glucose that enters our bloodstream and can cause our insulin to spike. To learn more about this relationship, Mousavi's team built upon a 2015 study that had previously looked at this question using the same survey data. This time however, the BMJ study followed participants for a longer period and included 7,000 respondents with new cases of Type 2 diabetes. Mousavi's study also conducted an additional meta-analysis of similar research worldwide. 'That allowed us to cut through the noise and show that the increased risk of diabetes really centers on French fries, not all potatoes,' Mousavi says. (Scientists finally know where potatoes come from—and the answer is very weird.) Pratik Pokharel, a postdoctoral fellow at the Danish Cancer Institute, who was not part of the study, says the research tracks with his team's own potato findings. 'Higher consumption of potato fries was associated with poorer glucose tolerance and reduced insulin sensitivity. These effects, over time, could increase the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.' A study published in The BMJ found that eating french fries three times a week increased a person's risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus by up to 20 percent. The researchers noted that other forms of potato, such as boiled or baked potatoes did not show the same correlation. Photograph by Jimena Peck, The New York Times/Redux (Top) (Left) and Photograph by Matt Roth, The New York Times/Redux (Bottom) (Right) The study defined a serving of french fries as about 4 to 6 ounces, or roughly a medium to large McDonald's fries. Three servings a week is where scientists identified the 20 percent increase in diabetes risk. As we know, however, people don't always stick to recommended serving sizes—particularly in the United States. 'We supersize everything,' says Walter Willett, the study's co-author and a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. So if you're eating one heaping pile of fries once a week, you might still need to listen up. (Diet soda might be making you hungrier.) Portioning can help. Johanna Lampe, a registered dietician and experimental nutritionist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, argues potatoes may be easier than other foods to eyeball to make sure you have the right portion. 'French fries, typically eaten as a discrete component, may be even more accurately quantified,' she says. While no number is 'safe' Mousavi says, it's clear 'the more you eat, the steeper that risk gets.' Are sweet potato fries still safe? While the study didn't focus on sweet potatoes specifically, mixed research suggests they do likely have a lower glycemic index. When we break down low glycemic index foods, the glucose enters our bloodstream more gradually. Still, they're carbohydrates, and might increase diabetes risk if eaten in large quantities, Willett says. Oil, fat, and salt also play a role in risk. Overall, more research is needed. Knowing how much the potato is revered—it's the third-most consumed crop, according to the International Potato Center—researchers wanted to provide people with healthy alternatives. And it turns out, Willett says, 'the choices make a big difference.' They found that replacing baked, mashed, or boiled potatoes with whole grains could decrease diabetes risk by 4 percent, while replacing french fries with whole grains decreases risk by 19 percent. (Your body needs whole grains. Here's how to find the most effective ones.) One surprise in their findings? Swapping out boiled, baked or mashed potatoes for rice actually increased diabetes risk, likely due to the food's high glycemic index. If you're not drooling over whole grains, you can start slow, says Hilary Seligman, the director of the Food Policy, Health, and Hunger Research Program at University of California, San Francisco. 'Just substitute them for refined grains in the two or three products you find most palatable to start,' Seligman says. Whole grain crackers, cereal, or bread are all great options. One caveat is that during the time the study was conducted, french fries were mostly cooked using trans fat oils, 'many which are banned now,' Mousavi says. So, the topic should be revisited. When it comes to potatoes, 'the focus should be on healthier preparation,' Pokharel says. Think baked french fries with olive oil. What about air-frying? Mousavi says, 'While we didn't compare air-frying directly, it likely poses a lower risk than traditional deep-frying—but more studies are needed.' Or start with baby steps. Get a side salad with your burger next time. And opt for smaller portions, Mousavi advises. 'The big takeaway is that small everyday choices really do add up.'
UPI
14 hours ago
- UPI
French fries, but not mashed potatoes, linked to type 2 diabetes
1 of 2 | Consumption of french fries, but not potatoes prepared in other ways, was linked to increased levels of type 2 diabetes in a Harvard study released Wednesday. File photo by Bill Greenblatt/UPI | License Photo ST. PAUL, Minn., Aug. 6 (UPI) -- French fries, but not mashed, baked or boiled potatoes, were linked Wednesday to type 2 diabetes in a study whose authors say food preparation, as well as the kinds of foods eaten, makes a difference in reducing health risks. Researchers at Harvard University's T.H. Chan School of Public Health also found that by swapping out French fries with whole grains, a person can reduce the risk for type 2 diabetes by 19%. The new paper, led by postdoctoral researcher Seyed Mohammad Mousavi and co-authored by prominent Harvard nutrition and epidemiology expert Walter Willett, was published in The British Medical Journal. After examining data about the diets and diabetes outcomes of more than 205,000 adults enrolled in a trio of major longitudinal U.S. studies spanning more than three decades, they determined that three servings weekly of french fries was associated with a 20% excess risk of developing type 2 diabetes, or T2D. Conversely, they saw no significant association between consumption of baked, boiled or mashed potatoes and risk of T2D, despite potatoes being "highly stigmatized" and dismissed as generally unhealthy by some in the nutrition world. The results led the authors to conclude that how foods are prepared matters just as much as what types of foods are eaten in the risk for diabetes, which last year affected 38.4 million Americans of all ages, some 11.6% of the population. The vast majority of cases are type 2 diabetes, which is highly associated with obesity and poor diet. "For consumers, the takeaway is simple: how you prepare a food can be just as important as what you eat," Mousavi told UPI in emailed comments. "A boiled or baked potato has a very different impact on health than the same potato deep-fried at high temperatures in unhealthy oils." He said he and his colleagues hope the results will help shift the conversation about healthy diets to into more "nuanced -- and useful" directions and away from blanket condemnations of certain foods, which usually are not "'good' or 'bad' in isolation -- it's always good or bad compared to what. "If you swap potatoes, especially fries, for whole grains, you gain health benefits; if you swap fries for another fried snack, you probably won't. Choosing cooking methods that minimize added fats, salt, and harmful compounds, and making thoughtful replacements, is key," Mousav said Deep frying is one of the unhealthiest ways to cook, according to the American Diabetes Association, which notes that frying creates trans fats that have been shown to cause heart disease and stroke. Often, frying requires the use of flour or breading, which also adds carbohydrates. The current study used a new kind of "meta-analytic" approach to estimate how swapping potatoes for whole grains could affect the risk of T2D. It involves two separate meta-analyses: one based on data from 13 cohorts examining potato intake and the other from 11 cohorts on whole grain intake, each involving more than 500,000 participants, including 43,000 with a T2D diagnoses, from across four continents. While french-fried potatoes and other types of deep-fried foods have long been suspected as a risk factor for T2D, the new study has deepened understanding of the link on several levels, such as by showing the risk is "dose-dependent" and begins at relatively low intakes -- even less than one serving of fries per week, Mousavi said. "Second, we confirm that not all potato preparations carry the same risk, highlighting that deep-frying is the key driver here," he added. "Third, we compared the effect of fries with other carbohydrate sources and found that, except for white rice, all other carb sources were healthier choices than fries. "By combining decades of detailed dietary data with a meta-analysis across multiple populations, we provide stronger evidence that it's not just the food itself, but also the frying process -- and what you choose to replace it with -- that matters for diabetes risk." Some other researchers have suggested that potatoes have gotten a bad rap when automatically lumped in with foods that are considered a risk for diabetes. Dr. Hana Kahleova, director of clinical research for the Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine, a Washington-based nonprofit group that advocates for healthier foods, agreed it's wrong to dismiss potatoes as unhealthy without regard for how they're prepared. Rather, some studies "suggest that potatoes, particularly boiled potatoes, may have beneficial effects on body weight and reduce the risk of diabetes," she told UPI. "Potatoes can be consumed in many ways," Kahleova said. "The data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey show that french fries are the most consumed vegetable in the U.S. When Americans eat away from home, french fries make up almost two-thirds of all consumed potatoes. "At home, most potatoes are consumed as potato chips. The cooking method and the foods people consume potatoes with seem to be responsible for the bad rap of potatoes." Some research shows that potatoes can reduce the risk of diabetes and lead to weight loss, including a 2022 study on behalf of the Alliance for Potato Research and Education that found consuming baked white potatoes produced no harmful effects on measured health outcomes and actually provided some cardiometabolic health benefits when substituted for foods such as long-grain white rice. Similarly, Kahleova cited Finnish and Dutch cohort studies that span a 20-year follow-up period that reported a lower risk of T2D was associated with increased consumption of potatoes, along with an increase in vegetables and legumes. "In a cohort study conducted in almost 2,000 adults in Iran who were followed for six years, the risk for incident diabetes was 54% lower in people with higher intakes of total potatoes, and 53% lower for high intake of boiled potatoes, compared with those who had the lowest intakes," she said. The latest french-fry findings "contribute to the totality of the evidence on eating patterns and their association with health risk," concurred dietician Stacey Krawczyk, director of nutrition and wellness for the American Diabetes Association. "Eating patterns that have several weekly servings of fried foods, potatoes in this case, may also have other lifestyle and meal choices that could also contribute to a person's overall health," she told UPI. "We encourage people to choose a variety of foods when building ADA's Diabetes Plate," in which potatoes earn a spot on the dish as a "quality carbohydrate" along with starchy vegetables, legumes, whole grains, fruits, milk and yogurt. "We encourage people to use a foundation of whole and less-processed forms of foods as they build their balanced plate," Krawczyk added. "In general, using methods of cooking that do not involve frying are preferred." Study co-author Mousavi said his study underscores the need to "move beyond" the broad food categories now found in typical nutrition guidelines. "Lumping all potatoes -- or all grains, for that matter -- into a single group can hide important differences in health effects," he said. "Policy recommendations and public health messaging should highlight not just the food itself, but also its preparation and what it's replacing, as these factors can dramatically change its nutritional quality and long-term health impact."
