
What is the status of US tariff negotiations?
Many of these tariff hikes were part of a package first announced in April, under which dozens of economies were due to face higher levies – up from a 10 per cent level – over their trade surpluses with the United States.
The twice-postponed deadline for duties to take effect is now Friday, Aug 1.
But Washington has expanded its group of targets coming up against these tariffs, while announcing agreements with the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines.
A deal with the European Union unveiled on Sunday sees a 15 per cent tariff imposed on European exports to the United States, down from the 30 per cent that Trump earlier threatened.
Where do other US trade talks stand?
Seoul is racing to reach a deal with Washington, as Tokyo's success in landing an agreement has "amped up the pressure for South Korea," a government source told AFP.
Local media reported that Seoul was preparing to propose more than US$100 billion in investment as part of a broader agreement, with expected participation by major firms such as Samsung and Hyundai Motor. The South Korean government did not confirm this.
But South Korean officials have outlined proposals to deepen collaboration in sectors like shipbuilding, semiconductors and batteries.
National Security Advisor Wi Sung-lak has told reporters that the two countries are in "the final and most crucial phase of negotiations" to avert Trump's proposed 25 per cent duty.
Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told Bloomberg Television Thursday that he was optimistic his country could reach an agreement with the United States to avert Washington's 26 per cent tariff threat.
Goyal insisted there were not any sticking points in the US-India relationship or in trade talks, and clarified that immigration rules – including those around H-1B visas for skilled workers – had not come up in negotiations.
Despite Goyal's remarks, local media reported the prospects of an interim deal before Aug 1 had dimmed.
Taiwanese Premier Cho Jung-tai said Thursday that officials are "working hard" on negotiations, amid worries that an unfavorable tariff level could hit the self-ruled island's economy.
Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim said Taipei's negotiating team was "working almost 24 hours a day to achieve trade balance and Taiwan's industrial interests, and even to further deepen cooperation."
Although Canada and Mexico were spared from Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs announced in April, goods from both countries entering the United States generally face a separate 25 per cent duty if they fall outside a North American trade pact.
This figure stands to jump to 30 per cent for Mexico come Aug 1, while the level for Canada was set at 35 per cent.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said her administration was "doing everything" possible to avert the duties and that she would speak with Trump if necessary to try to reach a pact.
Trump told reporters Friday there was no deal with Canada so far.
Brazil is girding for a virtual trade embargo on its planes, grains and other goods if Trump's threatened 50 per cent tariff on its exports takes effect on Aug 1.
The United States runs a trade surplus with Latin America's biggest economy, which was not originally expected to face steeper tariffs under Trump's "reciprocal" duties plan.
Trump has not attempted to hide the political motivation in targeting Brazil, citing a judicial "witch hunt" against his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro, when he unveiled the tariff rate.
The political nature of the spat makes a last-minute deal appear less likely.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
25 minutes ago
- The Star
SEC ends lawsuit against Ripple, company to pay $125 million fine
FILE PHOTO: A representations of cryptocurrency Ripple is seen in front of a stock graph and U.S. dollar in this illustration taken, January 24, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo NEW YORK (Reuters) -The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said it ended its case accusing Ripple Labs of selling unregistered securities, leaving a $125 million fine intact and ending one of the cryptocurrency industry's highest-profile lawsuits. Ripple and the SEC agreed on Thursday to dismiss their appeals of the fine imposed by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan and her injunction against the sale of Ripple's XRP token to institutional investors. XRP is the third-largest cryptocurrency by market value, trailing bitcoin and Ethereum, according to the market service CoinMarketCap. The SEC sued Ripple in December 2020, near the end of U.S. President Donald Trump's first White House term, accusing it of selling XRP tokens without registering them as securities. In a mixed ruling in July 2023, Torres said XRP was covered by securities laws when sold to institutional investors, while XRP that Ripple sold on public exchanges was not. She imposed the fine in August 2024. Following Trump's reelection, a more crypto-friendly SEC began retreating from some enforcement cases, and together with Ripple asked Torres to lift the injunction and reduce the fine to $50 million. She refused, saying neither side came close to showing "exceptional circumstances" that outweighed the public interest in enforcing the injunction and $125 million fine. The SEC said the dismissal of the appeals means the injunction and fine remain in effect. Stuart Alderoty, Ripple's chief legal officer, in a post on X referred to the SEC's actions and said the dismissals mark "the end" of the case. Since Trump reentered the White House, the SEC has also ended civil lawsuits against crypto exchanges Binance, Coinbase and Kraken. The case is SEC v Ripple Labs Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-10832. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Joe Bavier)


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Shadows of Nagasaki, Hiroshima loom 80 years on
THIS week marks the 80th anniversary of the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Horrific though the bombings might have been, they did lead to a quick end of the Pacific war and to Japan foreswearing war as a means to settle disputes between and among countries ever since. For 80 years, the anniversaries have always been very poignantly and publicly commemorated and appeals made for world peace and an end to nuclear weapons. Yet the most recent years have seen a troubling resort to arms by nations in order to achieve various aims. The latest Thailand-Cambodia border flare-up was thankfully quite speedily stopped through the good offices of Malaysia as the current Asean chair, saving both nations from more losses of lives, property and national reputations. Same goes for the Israel-Iran bombing spree and other armed disputes from the Horn of Africa to the Caucasus. The Gaza war, meanwhile, has descended into an increasingly senseless and indefensible humanitarian crisis of unconscionable scale as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems determined to press on with Israel's military superiority and advantages, not just to defeat Hamas but to also control and occupy Gaza, perhaps indefinitely. Meanwhile, the internal crisis in Myanmar continues to cause needless suffering and displacement of people from conflict zones. But perhaps the most troubling war is the unresolved conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which looks increasingly like a war of attrition and a battle of nerves between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is backed by the West, including the United States. This is especially troubling because of the ominous nuclear undertones that both Russian and US leaders have introduced to their respective rhetoric about the Ukraine war. As verbal sparring occasionally flared between Russia and the US over the conflict, Russian leaders would throw in reminders about their country's nuclear capability. That was always a quite effective tactic by Russia to try to cower US leaders into stepping back. Until now, that is. When former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev recently hinted again about the Ukraine crisis possibly embroiling the US, the insinuations about the war escalating into a nuclear confrontation had the opposite effect on US President Donald Trump. Trump very publicly caused the re-positioning of US nuclear submarines in response to the Medvedev outburst. As a result, no matter what Trump's intended or unintended aims in direct response to Medvedev, the nuclear taboo since Hiroshima and Nagasaki dropped a notch or two. This comes as the major nuclear powers — the US, Russia and China — have reportedly grown their respective nuclear arsenals even as more nations join the nuclear club: India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel and possibly Iran next. During the time of the US-Soviet Union contest for global supremacy, there were simultaneously substantive talks and agreements to limit both powers' nuclear-arms capabilities. The world today, however, is bereft of such reassuring talks to curtail the growing proliferation of nuclear weapons. A quick end to the Russia-Ukraine hostilities is perhaps crucial to Japan's and much of the world's desire to never again see the likes of another Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
No contempt for Trump officials over Venezuela deportations, appeals court rules
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court overturned on Friday a lower court's ruling finding probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in contempt of court over their handling of the deportations of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants under a centuries-old wartime law. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found in April that officials could face criminal contempt charges for willfully disregarding his March 15 order barring the deportations to El Salvador of alleged Venezuelan gang members under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without the chance to challenge their removals. The Trump administration appealed. On Friday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals sided with the government by a 2-1 vote. "The District Court's order raises troubling questions about judicial control over core executive functions like the conduct of foreign policy and the prosecution of criminal offenses," Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas wrote in an opinion. (Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York and Andrew Goudsward in Washington; Editing by Mark Porter)