
Islamic taxes were lighter than Roman ones, says Sharjah panel
Held in collaboration with the Holy Quran Academy and Al Qasimia University, the event was attended by Dr. Abdullah Khalaf Al Hosani, Secretary-General of the Holy Qur'an Academy, alongside a distinguished gathering of academics, intellectuals and university students.
The session featured Dr. Nasser Al Falasi, Assistant Professor in the History Department at Zayed University, Dr. Abdul Hakim Al Anis, Scientific Expert at the Holy Qur'an Academy, and was moderated by Dr. Rashid Al Naqbi. The discussion formed part of SPL's broader efforts to revive Arab and Islamic knowledge traditions and to reinforce the role of libraries as essential cultural and intellectual hubs in society.
The speakers presented a wide-ranging discussion that included a critical analysis of the development of governance in Islamic civilisation. They highlighted the fairness and superiority of its financial system compared to Western and Roman models, and shared anecdotes from the Arab literary tradition.
The insights reflected the intellectual richness and humanistic depth of Muslim scholars, whose pioneering approaches in fields such as philosophy, health and sociology often preceded modern discourse.
Governance in Islamic civilisation
In the session, Dr. Nasser Al Falasi discussed the development of governance in Islamic civilisation, highlighting how the historian's perspective shapes the understanding of history. He stressed that the Islamic financial system played a key role in the prosperity of the Islamic state and criticised the reliance of some Orientalist scholars on Roman and Western sources, which has led to misinterpretations of Islamic taxation, particularly the jizya.
He compared the Islamic and Roman financial systems, showing that Islamic taxes were significantly lighter. For example, annual tax rates under Islamic governance were much lower and more inclusive, with exemptions for women, children and older people. Unlike the Roman model, the Islamic system protected non-Muslims without obliging them to take part in military service.
Dr. Al Falasi noted that some Western historians have recognised the jizya as a refined financial structure that supported public welfare and enabled non-Muslim communities to thrive economically. He also highlighted the Islamic approach's flexibility, which considered distance, hardship and agricultural conditions, applying tax only to cultivated land.
He concluded with the discovery of early Islamic tax records from the second century Hijri, later compiled by a British historian, offering rare insights into the practical workings of Islamic fiscal policy.
Wit and wisdom in Arab literary heritage
On his part, Dr. Abdul Hakim Al Anis presented a paper exploring the wit and depth of Arab literary heritage, highlighting the intellectual vibrancy of Islamic civilisation. He added that Arab scholars produced a wide range of works covering science, art, philosophy and daily life, many of which are preserved in leading libraries around the world.
He shared examples of unconventional texts, including historical accounts, reflections on human experiences such as hunger and grief, and writings that captured the final moments of prominent figures, noting that these works reveal that Arab scholars addressed themes often considered modern, centuries ago.
Al Anis also discussed humorous and practical literature on topics, including health, ageing and social etiquette. Some of these writings have gained renewed interest in contemporary health and social studies, showing the lasting relevance of Islamic thought.
He concluded that issues such as emotional well-being and interpersonal conduct, now widely discussed in modern literature, were deeply examined by early Arab thinkers, offering valuable insights that remain relevant today.
The event also included a specialised workshop on Arabic calligraphy and Islamic ornamentation, giving participants the opportunity to explore the beauty and history of Islamic arts in an integrated setting that bridged thought and creativity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
14 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Arab Parliament President commends UAE's leading role in supporting Palestinian people
5 Aug 2025 19:14 CAIRO (WAM) President of the Arab Parliament, Mohammed Ahmed Al Yammahi, commended the UAE for its pioneering humanitarian role in supporting the Palestinian people and alleviating their suffering amid the dire humanitarian crisis in the Gaza said that the UAE's initiatives, most notably 'Operation Chivalrous Knight 3,' represent an honourable model of Arab solidarity and effective humanitarian efforts encompass a wide range of support, including the dispatch of ships and convoys of trucks loaded with food, medical supplies, and shelter UAE has also conducted airdrops to reach areas that are inaccessible by land, in coordination with fraternal and friendly Yamahi highlighted the recent arrival of the eighth UAE aid ship, Khalifa, at Al Arish Port. The vessel carried over 7,166 tonnes of humanitarian aid, including food, medical, and health supplies, shelter materials, fully equipped ambulances, and water tankers to address urgent needs in the Gaza further noted that since the launch of "Operation Chivalrous Knight 3," the UAE has delivered over 80,000 tonnes of humanitarian and relief aid to GazaThese supplies were transported by land, sea, and air, through more than 600 airlifts, 17 cargo ships, and 5,400 UAE has also supported the medical sector by establishing a field hospital in Gaza and a floating hospital off the coast of Al Arish. He also commended the ongoing coordination between the UAE and Egypt to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those who need it most.


Al Etihad
14 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
SEC issues decision to form Police Judicial Council in Sharjah
5 Aug 2025 19:40 SHARJAH (WAM) During its meeting on Tuesday, the Sharjah Executive Council (SEC), chaired by His Highness Sheikh Abdullah bin Salem bin Sultan Al Qasimi, Deputy Ruler of Sharjah and Vice Chairman of the Council, issued a decision to form the Police Judicial Council in the Emirate of Sharjah, to be chaired by Brigadier General Omar Ahmed Sultan Bu meeting was attended by His Highness Sheikh Sultan bin Ahmed bin Sultan Al Qasimi, Deputy Ruler of Sharjah and Vice Chairman of the Sharjah Executive Council (SEC).The Council discussed a number of topics related to monitoring the performance of local departments and authorities, with the aim of ensuring the highest quality of services provided to the community across various Council issued a decision regarding the formation of the Police Judicial Council in the Emirate of Sharjah, chaired by Brigadier General Omar Ahmed Sultan Bu Alzoud, with membership of Brigadier General Faisal Ibrahim Al Sheikh Nassar, Brigadier General Dr. Muqarrab Khalifa Abdullah Al Muqarrab, Brigadier General Amer Amin Mohammed Al Harmoudi, Brigadier General Abdulrahman Mohammed bin Ashour, Brigadier General Humaid Abdullah Al Musharrakh, Lieutenant Colonel Obaid Obaid Al Kindi, and Captain Saeed Obaid Mohammed Al Council approved the general organisational structure of the Sharjah Archives, supporting the department's functions and responsibilities in line with its mandate. This step comes as part of the ongoing development of organisational frameworks and governance across various government entities. The Council also directed its General Secretariat to complete the legislative procedures required for Council reviewed the 2024 annual report of the Sharjah Noble Quran and Sunnah Establishment, which highlighted the institution's key achievements and efforts over the past year. The report detailed the main programmes and activities that support the Establishment's strategy and objectives, including its mission to strengthen the role of the mosque and enhance the skills of Quran memorisers across report noted that the number of Quran tutors reached 1,179 male and female instructors, with 1,465 Quranic circles serving 32,636 male and female students. Additionally, there are 24 Iqraa circles with 249 participants specialising in granting the connected sanad (chain of narration) to the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. The report also showcased joint initiatives with various government, educational, academic, and correctional institutions across the cities and regions of the Emirate. The Council extended its sincere thanks and appreciation to the Sharjah Noble Quran and Sunnah Establishment for its blessed efforts in serving the Holy Quran and promoting Islamic values. It praised the Establishment's role in embedding the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah within society through its impactful programmes and distinguished initiatives.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Syria after Assad: How Israel and the US are accelerating plans to partition the country
Last month, Israel launched a new round of air strikes on Syria, hitting targets near Damascus, Homs and the southern province of Sweida. Presented as attacks on Syrian government forces and under the pretext of protecting the Druze minority, they aim to advance the Zionist regime's ongoing campaign of regional domination and fragmentation. Since the fall of Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, Israel has expanded its aggression, occupying more than 400 sqkm of additional Syrian territory and systematically destroying what remains of the country's military infrastructure. This escalation comes as Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, now in its 23rd month, continues to reverberate across multiple fronts. The United States has also carried out air strikes and raids, backed Kurdish forces in the northeast and facilitated Israeli attacks - all to maintain its foothold in Syria and prevent the rise of any force that could challenge its order. While the US prioritises geostrategic control and the protection of its energy and security interests, Israel seeks to break Syria into ethnic and sectarian enclaves as part of a decades-old strategy to fragment the Arab world and cement its own regional hegemony. This policy follows the approach both have pursued since the outset of the Syrian war in 2011. At its core lies a shared objective: to dismantle Syria as a unified, sovereign state and ensure that no regional or global actor can challenge the American-Israeli order in the Middle East. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Fragmenting Syria Israel's strategy in the Arab world can be traced back to the early days of the Zionist state. Internal Israeli strategic documents from the 1950s, including proposals by the Israeli foreign ministry and Mossad, advocated for a Kurdish state as a buffer against Arab nationalism. This vision was later crystallised in the infamous 1982 Yinon Plan, authored by Oded Yinon, a former Israeli foreign ministry official. The plan called for "the dissolution of districts of ethnic and religious minorities...[as] Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long will disintegrate into several states along the lines of its ethnic and religious structure". Israel's dominance depended on fragmenting the Arab world into sectarian and ethnic enclaves, replacing strong, unified countries with weak, balkanised statelets The Yinon Plan argued that Israel's security and dominance depended on the dissolution of Arab states into smaller sectarian and ethnic entities, including Druze, Alawi, Kurdish, Maronite, Coptic and others. The aim was to replace strong, centralised Arab states with weak, balkanised statelets that posed no threat to Israel and could potentially become allies or proxies under Israeli protection. In the case of Syria, this strategy involves the partition of the country into four main zones of influence: 1) a Druze homeland centred in Sweida in southern Syria, where Israel hopes to foster a Druze-aligned mini-state under its influence; 2) an Alawi statelet in the coastal region under Russian protection, centred around Latakia and Tartus; 3) a Kurdish zone in northeastern Syria, backed by the US, where the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and People's Protection Units (YPG) control vast swathes of territory; and 4) a Sunni Arab belt under Turkish influence, especially along the northern and northwestern borders and the heartland. This partition model directly serves Israeli goals by keeping Syria weak, divided and unable to re-emerge as a regional actor capable of supporting the Palestinian resistance or opposing Israeli expansionism. It has long been embedded in Zionist strategy for the Middle East. One of the most influential Zionist thinkers and advisers to American and Israeli officials, Bernard Lewis, wrote in 1992: "Most of the states of the Middle to such a process [of 'Lebanonisation']. If the central power is sufficiently state then a chaos of squabbling, feuding, fighting sects, tribes, regions, and parties." Crippling Syria Since 2013, the Zionist regime has waged a sustained aerial campaign on Syrian territory, often under the pretext of targeting Iranian or Hezbollah positions. After 7 October 2023, these attacks expanded to include the assassination of senior Iranian and Hezbollah commanders on Syrian soil, as part of a wider assault on the so-called "Axis of Resistance" - targeting Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and allied forces across the region, including in Syria. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of Israel's war on Gaza Israel's destabilisation efforts in Syria mirror the siege and destruction it is inflicting on Gaza, and are aimed at weakening resistance forces and accelerating the long-standing plan to divide the country. Over time, Israel has destroyed Syria's air defence systems, weapons depots, military bases and scientific research centres. In recent months, this strategy has sought to deter Iran, prevent Syria from rebuilding its military capacity and enforce permanent Israeli military and psychological superiority in the region. Controlling Syria The US strategy in Syria aligns with its post-Cold War grand strategy of preventing any regional or global rival from gaining ground. During the Cold War, Washington viewed Syria, especially under former President Hafez al-Assad, as a Soviet client state and a supporter of Arab nationalist causes, Palestinian resistance and regional alliances opposed to US influence. After the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US sought to isolate Syria and prevent it from filling the regional vacuum left by Saddam Hussein's ouster. Since Syria's 2011 uprising, the US has adopted a policy of selective engagement: backing Kurdish forces in the northeast under the guise of countering extremist groups and limiting Iranian influence, while allowing Israeli strikes. Syria after Assad: Why Israel's vow to 'protect' the Druze is hollow Read More » Even though the US appears to support a de facto partition of Syria, its objective is not necessarily Israeli-style ethnic fragmentation. Rather, it seeks to preserve a military and political presence that blocks Russian and Iranian access to the eastern Mediterranean and ensures any future Syrian government aligns with Washington's strategic interests. The recent escalation in the southern Druze-majority city of Sweida underscores Israel's interest in carving out a loyal enclave along its northern front - a goal consistent with the Yinon Plan's strategy of cultivating alliances with minorities who might favour autonomy under Israeli patronage. Yet the Druze community remains divided, with many rejecting foreign interference. While Israel pushes for this statelet, the US is cautious - calling for calm but avoiding any condemnation, wary of backlash in neighbouring states and among Druze communities inside Israel. It also fears that further fragmentation could strengthen extremist groups or open the door to Russian and Iranian gains. The US, therefore, prefers a controlled, divided Syria - weak enough to be pliant but not totally collapsed - where it can retain influence without triggering wider regional instability. Israel, by contrast, is more willing to tolerate, or even foment, chaos if it means permanently removing Syria as a potential threat, especially having already annexed the Syrian Golan Heights. Turkey's stake Turkey plays a crucial role in Syria's current reconstruction. Ankara initially sought regime change in Damascus by backing opposition groups and militant factions. However, after failed attempts to unseat Assad and growing concerns over Kurdish autonomy near its borders, Turkey shifted focus. Turkish forces moved into parts of northern Syria, where they support Syrian Arab and Turkmen militias in order to check and limit Kurdish influence. Since the ouster of Assad, Turkey has become the main power backing and supporting the current Syrian regime. Turkey's interests diverge sharply from those of the US and Israel, which have focused on empowering Kurdish militias and Druze separatists, respectively. While the US and Israel have supported Kurdish actors as counterweights to Assad and Iran, Turkey considers any Kurdish autonomy a national security threat. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan recently declared: "Turkey will intervene against any attempts to fragment Syria or allow militant groups to gain are warning you: no group should engage in acts towards division." Fight for the 'Heartland' A famous principle of geopolitical theory, put forward by British academic and politician Halford Mackinder, states: "Who rules Eastern Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; who rules the World Island commands the world." Unless regional actors form a coordinated response, Syria's dismemberment could become a permanent reality By analogy, Syria occupies a central node in the Arab world, controlling vital transit routes, trade corridors and regional alliances - much like Mackinder's Heartland. Regional and global powers believe that whoever controls Syria, or a major part of it, will influence - if not shape - the entire Middle East. In this context, the US and Israel are executing a two-pronged policy in Syria. For the US, Syria is a chessboard on which it seeks to block adversaries, protect petrodollar hegemony and secure Israel's position without becoming too entangled. For Israel, Syria is an existential threat to be dismantled and restructured into a patchwork of mini-states. The danger lies in the prolonged suffering of the Syrian people, the erosion of Arab sovereignty and the potential explosion of wider conflict. Unless regional actors - particularly Turkey, but also Iran and Arab states - form a coordinated response, Syria's dismemberment could become a permanent reality, fulfilling the long-standing Zionist blueprint for a fractured, compliant Middle East. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.