
Business Leaders Welcome New Agreement with EU
Business leaders have welcomed a new UK agreement with the European Union.
As part of the deal, a new SPS agreement will make it easier for food and drink to be imported and exported by reducing red tape.
Some routine checks on animal and plant products will be removed completely, allowing goods to flow freely again, including between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The UK will also be able to sell various products, such as burgers and sausages, back into the EU again.
The UK Government said that closer co-operation on emissions through linking respective Emissions Trading Systems would improve the UK's energy security and avoid businesses being hit by the EU's carbon tax due to come in next year.
Combined, the SPS and Emissions Trading Systems linking measures alone are set to add nearly £9 billion to the UK economy by 2040, the UK Government said.
Meanwhile a new Security and Defence Partnership will pave the way for the UK defence industry to participate in the EU's proposed new €150 billion Security Action for Europe (SAFE) defence fund.
The UK Government said that with more than 160 firms employing more than 20,000 people in defence, Wales was 'well-placed to benefit' from an increase in defence spending, adding that it was 'exploring access' to the EU defence fund for firms based in Wales.
Ben Cottam, Head of Wales at the Federation of Small Businesses, said:
'As Wales's most important trading partner, FSB welcomes the announced easing of trade barriers between the UK and the EU.
'In particular, simplifying exports for Welsh food and drink SMEs provides a vital injection of confidence and certainty for these key businesses, enabling them to unlock new opportunities for growth and innovation in the EU market.
'There is a role now for Wales's business support organisations to proactively engage with businesses to provide comprehensive guidance on what the deal means for them and how they can capitalise on the benefits of this improved trading environment.'
Kate Nicholls, Chief Executive of UKHospitality, said:
'The new agreement with the EU to remove trade barriers is positive news for hospitality businesses and will help to further increase access to high-quality, affordable food and drink for business and consumers alike.
'We're pleased that there is a clear commitment to co-operate further on a youth experience scheme. These schemes are beneficial for those already working in hospitality, tourism and other cultural sectors to live and work in either the UK or EU. Not only does it provide economic benefits, but it also provides new opportunities for critical cultural exchange, which ultimately delivers richer experiences for customers.
'I urge both parties to pursue a model with maximum flexibility, and mirroring existing schemes with Australia and New Zealand is a sensible approach.'
Nick Farmer, Partner and Head of Outbound Services at accountancy and advisory firm Menzies, welcomed the announcement but warned that without broader reform, business will remain constrained by unnecessary red tape.
He said:
'This is the reset businesses have been crying out for – but it must be the start, not the end. If the Government is serious about supporting growth, this has to lead to wider reform. Today's news provides much-needed positivity, but true progress means tackling the broader non-tariff frictions still making UK-EU business harder than it needs to be.
'We need to see real momentum on lifting the trade barriers, red tape and regulatory hurdles that are still holding companies back. Exporters in many sectors are still facing unnecessary constraints – practical, coordinated action is now essential to get UK trade back to where it should be.'
Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) said the opening of UK-EU talks on key areas such as grid linkage and emissions trading offered opportunities to drive down costs for homes and businesses, boost energy security and accelerate the drive to net zero.
OEUK's head of energy policy Enrique Cornejo said:
'I hope we can work with our European partners to drive down costs and unlock a new era of innovation and collaboration across our shared energy mix from offshore wind, hydrogen to carbon capture – all secured by domestic oil and gas production and our world class supply chains.
'With Europe's largest CO2 storage capacity – 78 gigatonnes, equivalent to 200 years of UK emissions – the UK can develop international carbon storage services for European countries lacking capacity, creating a £7 billion market by 2040, while also becoming a leader in low-carbon hydrogen production, both blue and green, for countries with limited production capacity such as Germany.
'The linkage of UK-EU emissions trading systems could help to create a more robust market and avoid significant costs for UK exporters as the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism comes into force. This has the potential to reintegrate UK and EU electricity markets, reducing frictions and costs to consumers.
'By transforming the North Sea into an integrated hub that produces low-cost, high-value energy for consumers, the UK and its neighbours can capitalise on the existing resources, supply chains, skills and expertise we have built up together over many decades.'
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:
'I'm determined that Wales will feel the benefit. Take iconic Welsh lamb for example. More than 90% of Welsh lamb exports go to the EU. This agreement will slash costs and red tape for this £190 million industry. Welsh producers used to sell thousands of tonnes of cockles and mussels each year, but since 2021 they've been banned from selling to the EU. We're ending this unfair treatment so exports can resume. Reducing barriers to trade will be good for the economy, good for businesses and good for Welsh workers.
'But we're not stopping there. Wales has more than 160 defence companies that employ more than 20,000 people. We're exploring access to the €150 billion EU defence fund for firms based in Wales. That will benefit companies and their workers in Wales, as well as making our continent more secure in this new era.
'We're protecting British steel and jobs; by restoring how much we can export tariff free – so more UK steel can be exported to the EU. And we're securing opportunities for young people across Wales too, restoring the chance for young people to live and work in the EU.'
The UK Government said it would continue to hold talks with the European Union on the details of each commitment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ken Ofori-Atta: Interpol issues red notice for Ghana's fugitive ex-minister
Ghana's former finance minister Ken Ofori-Atta has been placed on Interpol's Red Notice list for allegedly using public office for personal comes after Ghanaian prosecutors declared him a wanted person as well as a fugitive from justice, as he was outside the country, over his alleged involvement in several corruption cases when he was in government.A Red Notice is not an arrest warrant but a request to police worldwide to detain someone pending who is said to be out of the country for medical reasons, has not commented on the allegations, but he has said he has been unlawfully treated. The 65-year-old has been accused of causing financial losses to the state. The allegations include questions over procurement procedures in the building of a controversial national cathedral, which remains a hole in the ground despite the alleged spending of $58m (£46.6m) of government lawyers had offered to represent him but the state prosecutor said they could not respond to criminal charges on behalf of their who sued MP and won $18m hopeful he will pocket the moneyIn February, Ofori-Atta appealed to the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) to remove his name from the wanted list and provided a definite return date in prosecutor Kissi Agyabeng accepted Ofori-Atta's assurance and subsequently took his name off the wanted list. But in March Ofori-Atta filed a lawsuit, claiming unlawful treatment and requesting removal of related content from the OSP's social media this month, Ofori-Atta was re-declared a wanted person and a fugitive from justice after failing to appear before an investigative panel. Agyebeng subsequently formally initiated the Red Notice request, seeking international help in tracking down the former official, local media reported. "We want him here physically, and we insist on it. A suspect in a criminal investigation does not pick and choose how the investigative body conducts its investigations," Agyebeng the Red Notice released on late Thursday, Interpol said Ofori-Atta is wanted on charges of "using public office for profit".He was finance minister from January 2017 to February 2024, when the New Patriotic Party (NPP) was in NPP lost last December's elections to the National Democratic John Mahama, who was inaugurated in January, went on to establish an investigative committee known as Operation Recover All committee has received over 200 complaints of corruption, amounting to more than $20bn in recoverable has directed the attorney general and minister of justice to launch investigations into these allegations, stating that Ghana will no longer be a safe haven for some Ghanaians have criticised him for discontinuing cases against his former allies on trial. More Ghana stories from the BBC: Can Ghana's new president meet the voters' high expectations?The Maths Queen with a quantum mission to mentor girlsWhy some Ghanaians are fighting in insurgency-hit Burkina FasoGhana wants more for its cashews, but it's a tough nut to crack Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica


The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves's spending review will reveal what this government's priorities really are
On 11 June, the government will unveil its long-awaited spending review, laying out how it wants to spend more than £600bn annually on public services over the next few years. That's about a fifth of the entire British economy. The choices made over funding for the NHS, schools, courts, prisons and much more besides will shape life in the UK in the coming years. It's no exaggeration to say this could be the defining domestic policy moment of this parliament. Rachel Reeves's first budget included a big tax rise and a two-year increase in borrowing to boost spending on public services. For future years, the chancellor has repeatedly reaffirmed her 'ironclad' commitment to borrow only to invest. Such is the dismal state of the public finances that even with tax revenues that are high by historical standards, spending growth in the coming years will be relatively modest. Overall day-to-day departmental spending is set to rise by an average of just 1.2% above inflation over the next three years. This will make the spending review tough. Allocating spending across departments will inevitably mean picking winners and losers. The single most consequential decision will be how much funding to allocate to the NHS. The NHS budget is big – it accounts for 40% of day-to-day spending on public services. That's comfortably more than is spent on schools, universities, the police, prisons and defence combined. For decades, the savings from declining defence spending were effectively ploughed into the health service. Those 'peace dividend' days are gone. The government has already committed to increase defence spending to 2.5% of national income. It's unusual for health and defence spending to grow at once – and unheard of for it to happen in a period of low growth and high interest rates. If the government also chooses to prioritise the NHS budget alongside defence, other departments' budgets will see cuts. Consider this scenario: if the government increases defence spending as promised, and opts for a 3.4% annual increase in NHS funding – below the long-term average and far short of the 6% growth seen under Labour in the 2000s – it would probably be enough to hire the staff the government's workforce plan says the NHS needs and deliver improvements to NHS performance before the next election. But the wider implications would be stark: it would require cuts of 1% a year to the budget for all other departments. The government could, of course, allocate less to the NHS. That could jeopardise the promise to substantially reduce hospital waiting times by the next election and to build an 'NHS fit for the future'. But it would free up resources for its other missions to 'break down the barriers to opportunity', 'make Britain a clean energy superpower', deliver 'safer streets' and 'kickstart economic growth'. When funding is tight, more money for a shiny new initiative inevitably means less money for something else. The prime minister noted that achieving the five missions of his government will demand 'relentless focus and prioritisation'. We'll soon find out, when push comes to shove, what this government's priorities are. Some departments, and some ministers, are likely to be disappointed. Once the spending review settlements are revealed, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, may not be the only Labour MP calling for higher taxes to reduce pressure on spending. By autumn, however, disgruntled colleagues could be the least of Reeves's concerns. At the spring statement in March, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was significantly more optimistic about growth prospects than most other forecasters. Since then, global developments have been bad news for the UK's economic outlook. If the OBR downgrades its growth forecast, that could easily wipe out the chancellor's limited wiggle room against her fiscal rules – perhaps several times over. Last November, Reeves was adamant that she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes'. But unless she gets lucky, she will have to come back with something to avoid a breach of her rules for borrowing. Assuming her fiscal rules remain 'ironclad', Reeves will have three options. She could cut departmental spending, just a few months after settling multiyear spending plans with her cabinet colleagues. She could make further cuts to the social security budget, when there is pressure – not least from some MPs – to do the exact opposite. Or she could raise taxes again to pay for the spending that has already been pledged. It's clear why speculation about potential tax rises will continue. But we should not let speculation about the budget distract us from scrutinising the spending review itself. The government's decisions on how to allocate more than £600bn of spending a year for several years will be of great consequence, whatever happens in the autumn. And, since speculation about the budget will inevitably continue, the discussion should shift from simply how taxes could be tweaked to raise more revenue to how they could be reformed to be less damaging to growth. Delivering higher growth deserves its place as the government's number one mission and should be a central focus across all areas of policy. Reeves is yet to show any interest in tax reform. She is missing an opportunity. With challenging years ahead, we need a government that seizes every opportunity to drive up economic growth. Achieving that mission would make everything else easier. Helen Miller is the incoming director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How much money Elon Musk lost because of feud with Donald Trump
The controversial former-head of DOGE Elon Musk has reportedly lost more than $34billion from his personal net worth after his fall from grace at the White House and very online break up with the US President. Shares in Musk's Tesla also dropped more than 14 per cent at the end of yesterday, losing about $150billion in market value - the largest single-day decline in the company's history. It is the second largest loss of personal net worth, beaten only by Musk's own wipe out again in November 2021, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index of the 500 wealthiest people on the planet. He remains the richest man in the world, with a huge $334.5 billion fortune. Musk, who officially left the White House last week, reached a peak of nearly $500 billion in the months after Trump's election success. The valuation of his companies had surged thanks to the belief they would profit from his close relationship with Trump and his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, it was reported. But his government contracts with the US were on the line last night as he continued to take part in a savage war with words against Donald Trump, with their partnership breaking down over a tax-cut and spending bill. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social. The withdrawal would have potentially huge consequences for his Tesla and SpaceX revenue. SpaceX has been awarded over $17 billion in government contracts since 2015, according to ABC news. Much of that money comes from NASA and the Department of Defence. One of Trump's oldest advisors, Steve Bannon, went further and suggested the government seize SpaceX under the Defense Production Act - a move that would undoubtedly trigger challenges. Musk, who had threatened to decommission the SpaceX Dragon capsule - a critical lifeline for transporting American astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station - ultimately retreated. After a user on X suggested he 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days', Musk abruptly posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' It was not before he claimed that Trump is 'in the Epstein files', suggested that he should be impeached and replaced with 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Moments before the Epstein charge, Trump had taken to Truth Social and said he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said the billionaire went 'CRAZY!' With that, Musk announced that it was 'time to drop a really big bomb.' This 2014 image shows Elon Musk (right) alongside Ghislaine Maxwell (left) who facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. She's currently serving time in federal prison '@RealDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Jeffrey Epstein is a serial child sex offender who died in prison in 2019. Trump pledged to release the files related to Epstein, with Attorney General Pam Bondi releasing some pages in February, but most of that information was already in the public domain. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. Asked for comment, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail in a statement: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' The brawl started when the X-owner had originally campaigned to stop the 'disgusting abomination' of the x bill which he believed would contribute too much to the country's $36.2 trillion debt. Trump's big, beautiful bill' called for getting rid off electric vehicle tax credits - the cause of Musk's frustration, according to Trump. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co. estimated that the bill would cut about $1.2 billion from Tesla's full-year profit. Despite staying quiet at first, Trump then told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and they 'had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore'. Musk immediately responded via tweet, saying: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election'. He had spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's campaign among other other Republicans in last year's election. However, the drastic drop in net worth might not reveal the true impact on Musk who increasingly relies on his private enterprises as a source, it was reported in Bloomberg.