Is Russia producing a year's worth of NATO ammunition in three months?
'In terms of ammunition, Russia produces in three months what the whole of NATO produces in a year,' Rutte said on 10 June, adding that Putin's war machine is 'speeding up, not slowing down".
Rutte, who became chief of the military alliance in October last year, went on to repeat the same warning.
'Let me repeat it again. NATO's economy is 25 times bigger than Russia's. It's 50 trillion (dollars), and the Russian economy is two trillion. That two-trillion-dollar economy is producing four times as much ammunition as the whole of NATO is producing at the moment,' he said.
We verified his claims against the available data. We found that, while Moscow's ammunition production may have been approximately four times more than that of the NATO Alliance in 2024, there are signs that the gap could be closing.
What do we know about Russia's ammunition production capacity?
Information about Moscow's military production capacity is classified. Experts' estimates are based on the statements of officials, leaked intelligence and historical data.
We can say with certainty that Moscow has steeply increased its ammunition production since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, outpacing its western counterparts.
The Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service estimates that Russia produced or refurbished 400,000 artillery rounds in 2022, multiplying its production more than eleven-fold to produce 4.5 million rounds in 2024.
An analysis by consulting firm Bain & Company for Sky News in May 2024 came to the same conclusion, putting the total number of shells produced or refurbished in 2024 at an estimated 4.5 million rounds.
Russia predominantly produces 122mm and 152mm artillery shells, while the NATO-standard shell has a slightly bigger diameter of 155mm, and is mainly used in the Western Howitzer systems, such as those provided by allies to Kyiv.
The Bain & Company analysis estimates that the 152mm shell favoured by Moscow is also around four times cheaper to produce at $1,000 (€860) per shell compared to $4,000 (€3430) for the NATO-standard 155mm shell.
The ammunition stockpile available to Moscow is also believed to be greater than its own production capacity due to the stocks it imports from its allies.
According to media reports citing South Korean intelligence leaked this week, North Korea has supplied Russia with 12 million rounds of 152mm shells to be used in Ukraine.
While this figure cannot be independently verified, satellite imagery analysed by the Wall Street Journal last December showed signs of a significant scaling up of production facilities in North Korea as well as an increase in shipments to Russia.
How does NATO's capacity compare?
We verified Rutte's statements by looking at the comparative ammunition production capacity of European allies and the US, the main NATO manufacturers.
In 2024, Europe and the US produced an estimated 1.2 million shells per year, according to the Berlin-based German Institute for International and Security Affairs, compared to Russia's estimated 4.5 million.
These estimates would roughly align with Rutte's claim that Russia is producing four times more ammunition annually than its NATO counterparts.
Yet the Western alliance is looking to dramatically close the gap in 2025.
The European Commission has set a target to ramp up ammunition production to 2 million rounds per year in 2025, while the US is looking to hit a new target of 100,000 rounds per month by October.
Other allies, including Norway, the United Kingdom and Canada, are also looking to boost supply chains.
While hitting those targets would see NATO significantly close the gap on Russia, western allies have in the past struggled to fulfil their promises.
The European Union missed its target to provide Ukraine with one million artillery shells by March last year, prompting the Czech Republic to spearhead an international fundraising drive to procure more ammunition rounds for Kyiv, which has since secured the participation of 16 countries.
The Czech initiative has since delivered 1.6 million shells to Ukraine. The Czech foreign minister said in May that funding has been secured to keep the programme going through to 2026, but that its future depends on parliamentary elections scheduled to take place in October.
Is the Western lag endangering Ukraine's resistance?
It is also unclear how much of those Western stockpiles would be sent to Ukraine in 2025. The government in Kyiv has previously said it needs around 200,000 ammunition rounds per month to be able to withstand Russian assaults on the front line.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently said that Ukraine hopes to receive some 3 million artillery shells from its allies this year, including 1.8 million from a Czech-led programme.
But the West, particularly Europe, is still struggling to fire up its ammunition industry. Explosives — the essential core of ammunition shells — are in shortage with just one single factory in Poland currently producing trinitrotoluene or TNT.
Western targets are also still far behind Russia's, despite the Russian economy being almost 25 times smaller than the combined size of NATO's economies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
41 minutes ago
- France 24
Fossil-fuel pledge in EU-Trump deal sparks climate fears
As part of the framework agreed Sunday, the EU said its companies would buy $750 billion of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the United States -- split equally over three years -- to replace Russian energy sources. Many experts believe the eye-watering figure to be unrealistic -- and point out that market dynamics rather than EU policymakers dictate companies' energy choices. Even on the supply side, Simone Tagliapietra of the Bruegel think-tank noted that the United States might not be able to build the additional export capacity within such a short time frame. Brussels insists the number was not plucked out of thin air to keep Trump happy, but was based on an analysis of energy needs as it phases out Russian imports because of the Ukraine war between now and 2027. The proposed increase would mean more than tripling annual energy imports from the United States -- about $70 billion last year -- and equate to well over half the 378 billion euros' worth of overall EU energy imports last year. 'Submission' A large part of the EU's additional billions would go to imports of LNG, which is transported in liquid state to European ports before being converted back to gaseous form and injected into the bloc's power network. The United States currently account for about half of the EU's LNG imports, ahead of Russia on 20 percent -- a figure Brussels wants to cut to zero to choke off income that helps fund the war in Ukraine. But environmental groups warn against a massive switch to American LNG extracted in part though hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which uses explosives to create cracks in rock formations to release oil and gas deposits. The highly polluting process comes with steep costs to both the climate and local environment, and is banned in a number of European countries. "The Commission risks replacing one disastrous dependency with another -- unplugging Putin's gas and plugging in Trump's," Greenpeace warned when the EU's phase-out plans were presented. Francois Gemenne, a policy expert who co-authored the UN's most recent IPCC report on climate change, in 2023, accused the EU of "submission" to Trump's pro-fossil fuel agenda. Elected on a promise to "drill, baby drill," the US leader is openly hostile to renewable energy efforts and lashed out again at windmills "ruining" the landscape before meeting with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend. For Aymeric Kouam of the Strategic Perspectives think-tank, the energy deal with Trump is both "dangerous and counterproductive" and imperils its goal to become carbon neutral by 2050. "Tying Europe's energy future to the US as a main supplier undermines the bloc's energy security strategy, anchored in supply diversification, renewable energy development, and energy efficiency increase," he said. The EU pushed back at the charge on Tuesday. "This agreement does not contradict our medium- to long-term decarbonisation objectives or targets at all," a commission spokesperson told reporters of the three-year energy pledge. The Trump trade deal comes as the EU debates its 2040 emissions-reduction target, a key step towards its net zero goal. The commission has proposed a target of cutting emissions by 90 percent compared to 1990 levels, but with new flexibilities to win over reluctant member states. The EU says it has already cut climate-warming emissions by 37 percent relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate scepticism in many European countries.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
EU and US spin conflicting versions of trade deal
The trade deal between the European Union and the United States is off to a rocky start. The preliminary agreement, announced at the end of a face-to-face meeting of Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump in Scotland, has prompted a massive wave of criticism over its heavily lopsided nature in favour of American interests. On Monday, the European Commission spent the day briefing journalists to defend the deal as an anchor of stability and predictability in troubled times, a pill that is hard to swallow but necessary to avoid a havoc-wreaking tariff war across the Atlantic. Then the story took a new twist when the White House published a fact sheet about the agreement with multiple claims that mismatched or downright contradicted the version of events presented by the Commission just hours earlier. On Tuesday, Brussels replied with its own statement, sowing further confusion. Euronews takes a closer look at the clash of narratives. Pharmaceuticals What the White House says: Pharmaceuticals will be subject to the across-the-board 15% tariff that will apply to the majority of EU-made products as of 1 August. What the Commission says: Pharmaceuticals will, for the time being, be spared from the 15% tariff and instead remain under the current 0% rate until the Trump administration completes its Section 232 investigation into the sector. "There will be no tariffs on pharmaceuticals this Friday," a senior official said. While the US' Section 232 investigation could lead to a tailor-made, painfully high tariff, as was the case for steel and aluminium, the Commission expects the 15% will act as the maximum ceiling, blocking the imposition of any additional duties on top. "I believe that this commitment will be honoured and respected in this case," said Maroš Šefčovič, the European Commissioner for Trade. Energy purchases What the White House says: The EU will "double down" on its purchases of American energy, buying $750 billions' worth by the end of Trump's second term. In practice, this will amount to $250 billion each year. What the Commission says: The Commission, which negotiated the deal on behalf of all 27 member states, lacks the competence to determine the amount, the type and the origin of the energy supplies acquired by governments and companies. Therefore it cannot legally bind the bloc to the goal of spending $750 billion on American energy. The announced number is an indication based on the needs the EU will face in the coming years to phase out the consumption of Russian fossil fuels, an arduous effort that has boosted the role played by American liquefied natural gas (LNG). "It's important to remember that the European Commission is not buying any of these commodities and neither is the US government selling any of this," a Commission spokesperson said. "These are all commercial decisions made by the companies: those companies that buy and those companies that sell." The spokesperson noted the annual figure of $250 billion would be all-encompassing, covering ordinary purchases of American fuel, which currently range from $92 to $100 billion, as well as technology and investments. Investment pledge What the White House says: The EU will invest $600 billion in the US by the end of Trump's second term. "This new investment is in addition to the over $100 billion (that) EU companies already invest in the United States every year," the fact sheet says. What the Commission says: As with the energy purchases, the Commission is unable to design and implement investments on behalf of the private sector. The $600 billion is another indication based on the executive's contacts with industry. "It's not something the EU, as a public authority, can guarantee – it's something based on the intention of private companies," a senior official said. The aggregated $600 billion figure might shrink once the impact of the EU-US trade deal, which is disadvantageous for the bloc, begins to take effect. Despite the uncertainty, the White House is portraying the energy and investment pledges as a fait accompli. Weaponry What the White House says: The EU "agreed to purchase significant amounts of US military equipment", the fact sheet says, without citing any financial figure. What the Commission says: Absolutely not. The Commission has resolutely denied making any pledge to ramp up purchases of American-made weaponry. This is a highly sensitive matter for Brussels, given that defence is a strictly national competence that member states zealously guard. While Ursula von der Leyen has promoted ambitious initiatives to boost defence spending, the final decision of how this money is spent – or if it is spent at all – rests exclusively in the hands of capitals. "Arms procurement is not a matter for the Commission," the senior official said. "I think this was more an expression of expectation on the part of President Trump that the increased defence expenditure (in Europe) would benefit US defence companies because of the quality of the US defence equipment, but it was not calculated in any way in the figures we talked about." Steel and aluminium What the White House says: The sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminium will remain "unchanged", meaning the EU will continue to pay the 50% rate imposed by the Trump administration as a result of the Section 232 investigation. "This new tariff regime will generate tens of billions of dollars in revenue annually and help to close the longstanding trade imbalance between the United States and Europe by encouraging local sourcing, reshoring production and ensuring that foreign producers contribute their fair share to the American economy," the fact sheet says. What the Commission says: The EU insists the deal will establish a specific quota system to settle the long-standing dispute over steel and aluminium. Under the system, the volume of EU exports that fall within the quota will benefit from a lower tariff rate. Once the quota is exceeded, the 50% will apply, senior officials explained. Due to the embryonic state of the agreement, the Commission is still unable to provide technical details on how the quota will work in practice. Its press release simply says the system will be based on "historic levels" of steel and aluminium exports. The White House's fact sheet mentions a commitment to provide "meaningful quotas" for several products, but only in the context of US products bound for the EU market, not vice versa, as the Commission has stated. Digital and agricultural barriers What the White House says: As part of the new deal, the US and the EU will address "non-tariff barriers" in food and agricultural trade, "including streamlining requirements for sanitary certificates for US pork and dairy products". The two sides will also address "unjustified digital barriers", the White House adds, with commitments to maintain network usage fees and zero duties on electronic transmissions. What the Commission says: Yes, the EU is willing to streamline sanitary certificates, which are forms, and discuss network fees, but that's as far as it goes. The bloc will retain its "right to regulate autonomously" at all stages, said Olof Gill, the Commission's spokesperson for trade, in reply to the White House's claims. "We're not moving on our regulations. We're not moving on our rules. We're not moving on the system that we built up over many decades that our citizens trust," Gill said. "That will not form part of this agreement with the US." Throughout the negotiations that preceded the deal, US officials consistently denounced the bloc's regulatory framework, calling for the abolition of its digital rules, food safety standards and value-added tax (VAT) as top irritants.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Russia kills 25 in Ukraine, as Kremlin says 'committed' to peace
The strikes on several regions came hours after US President Donald Trump issued Moscow with a new deadline to end its grinding invasion of Ukraine -- now in its fourth year -- or face tough new sanctions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of purposefully targeting a prison in the Zaporizhzhia region -- that Russia claims as its own -- killing 16 people and wounding more than 40 others. "It was a deliberate strike, intentional, not accidental. The Russians could not have been unaware that they were targeting civilians in that facility," Zelensky said on social media in response. The Kremlin denied that claim. "The Russian army does not strike civilian targets," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, including from AFP. Peskov added that Moscow had "taken note" of Trump's new deadline and told journalists that it remained "committed to the peace process to resolve the conflict around Ukraine and secure our interests." 'War crimes' Ukraine's justice ministry said Moscow's forces hit the prison with four glide bombs, while police said 16 inmates were killed and 43 were wounded. Bricks and debris were strewn on the ground around buildings with blown-out windows, according to images released by the ministry. The facility's perimeter was intact and there was no threat that inmates would escape, it added. Rescue workers were seen searching for survivors in pictures released by the region's emergency services. The source added there were no Russian war prisoners being held at the centre. Ukraine's human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets said the Zaporizhzhia attack was further evidence of Russian "war crimes". "People held in places of detention do not lose their right to life and protection," he wrote on social media. In addition to the glide bomb attack, the Ukrainian air force said that Russia had launched 37 drones and two missiles overnight, adding that its air defence systems had downed 32 of the drones. Zelensky said that among the separate attacks, Russian forces had targeted a hospital in the town of the Kamyanske in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Hospital targeted "Three people were killed in the attack, including a pregnant woman. Her name was Diana. She was only 23-years-old," Zelensky said. Separate strikes in the eastern Kharkiv region that borders Russia killed six people, regional authorities said. In the southern Russian region of Rostov, a Ukrainian drone attack killed one person, the region's acting governor said. Kyiv has been trying to repel Russia's summer offensive, which has made fresh advances into areas largely spared since the start of the invasion in 2022. The Russian defence ministry claimed fresh advances across the sprawling front line on Tuesday, saying its forces had taken control of two more villages -- one in the Donetsk region, and another in the Zaporizhzhia region. The prison strike on Tuesday came on the three-year anniversary of a attack on another detention facility in occupied Ukrainian territory that Kyiv blamed on Moscow and that was reported to have killed dozens of captured Ukrainian soldiers. Ukraine and Russia blamed each other for the strike over the night of July 29 three years ago on the detention centre in the Russian-occupied Donetsk region, which the Kremlin says is part of Russia. Ukraine says that dozens of its soldiers who laid down their arms after a long Russian siege of the port city of Mariupol were killed in that attack on the Olenivka detention facility.
