logo
They survived ice ages and hunted mammoths; so why did the Neanderthals suddenly disappear? Now a physicist blames something in the sky

They survived ice ages and hunted mammoths; so why did the Neanderthals suddenly disappear? Now a physicist blames something in the sky

Economic Times22-06-2025
Live Events
Radiation as a Hidden Killer?
A Caution Against Oversimplification
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Neanderthals have long puzzled scientists. These ancient relatives of modern humans thrived across Europe and parts of Asia for hundreds of thousands of years. But around 40,000 years ago, they disappeared, just as Homo sapiens spread across the same regions. What really caused their extinction remains one of human evolution's biggest mysteries.Now, a new and unusual theory suggests that space weather, not climate, competition, or disease, may have played a decisive role.A recent study by Dr. Agnit Mukhopadhyay, a space physicist from the University of Michigan , proposes that a powerful cosmic event known as the Laschamp excursion might have played a part in the Neanderthals' decline. The findings were published in the journal Science Advances.The Laschamp event occurred about 41,000 years ago, when the Earth's magnetic poles temporarily flipped. During this brief reversal, the planet's magnetic field, which normally protects us from cosmic radiation, dramatically weakened for several centuries.Mukhopadhyay argues that this weakening may have exposed the Earth's surface to much higher levels of ultraviolet (UV) and cosmic radiation, particularly in some parts of the world.The core of the hypothesis is that Neanderthals, already living in small, isolated populations, may have been more vulnerable to this radiation than Homo sapiens. The study claims that Homo sapiens had tighter clothing, used red ochre as UV protection, and took shelter in caves helping them survive the radiation. Neanderthals, in contrast, might have lacked these protections.Computer simulations in the study even show that auroras, a sign of increased solar activity, might have been visible across much of the world during this time, proof, the author argues, of the heightened radiation environment.While the theory is bold and imaginative, many experts are skeptical.Researchers José-Miguel Tejero and Montserrat Sanz Borràs, writing for The Conversation, point out that the idea rests on shaky archaeological evidence.For example, it assumes that Neanderthals didn't wear fitted clothing. While it's true that no sewing needles have been found at Neanderthal sites, there is clear evidence that they processed animal hides and likely wore functional garments using other techniques, such as tying hides with leather cords or splinters.In fact, genetic studies of lice suggest that humans, possibly including Neanderthals, were already wearing clothes over 200,000 years ago. The absence of needles doesn't prove the absence of clothes.The study also claims that Homo sapiens used red ochre as sunblock. While experiments show that ochre can somewhat block UV rays, this claim is also disputed. Ochre was widely used by both Neanderthals and modern humans, often for symbolic or cosmetic reasons. There is no solid evidence that either group used it primarily for sun protection.Neanderthals are known to have used ochre for over 100,000 years. In one example, a painted scallop shell found in a Neanderthal cave in Spain shows their symbolic use of pigments long before Homo sapiens arrived in Europe.Most scientists believe that multiple factors caused the Neanderthals' disappearance. These include, interbreeding with Homo sapiens (evident in modern DNA), smaller populations that were more vulnerable to decline, limited long-range hunting tools, unlike the projectile weapons used by sapiens, Changing climate, and possibly, competition for resources.In this broader context, Mukhopadhyay's theory appears too narrow. Critics note that there is no archaeological evidence of a sudden, global collapse of Neanderthal populations tied to the Laschamp event. If radiation were such a major factor, it would have also harmed Homo sapiens populations living outside caves in sunny Africa, which doesn't seem to have happened.The Neanderthal story is complex. These early humans were not primitive brutes. They developed tools, built shelters, made symbolic objects, and survived in extreme climates for hundreds of thousands of years. They even lived through earlier magnetic reversals, such as the Blake event 120,000 years ago.Mukhopadhyay's theory adds an intriguing piece to the puzzle, but it's far from conclusive.So, did a shift in Earth's magnetic field doom the Neanderthals?Probably not. While the Laschamp event may have had some environmental impact, there's no strong evidence that it caused Neanderthal extinction . The theory suggests that the disappearance of Neanderthals was likely due to a mix of climate, biology, and human interaction.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China unveils ‘gunpowder-powered' space debris catcher that could covertly disable enemy satellites
China unveils ‘gunpowder-powered' space debris catcher that could covertly disable enemy satellites

Economic Times

time20 hours ago

  • Economic Times

China unveils ‘gunpowder-powered' space debris catcher that could covertly disable enemy satellites

Live Events How does the launcher work? Addressing the space junk crisis Possible military implications? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Chinese researchers have developed a new space-debris catcher that quietly launches a net to capture dangerous debris orbiting Earth. A team of aerospace engineers from Nanjing University of Science and Technology and collaborators in Shanghai and Shenyang have introduced a compact launcher capable of capturing space device propels a capsule containing a net toward floating debris like defunct satellites and spent rocket parts. Once caught, the debris can be safely pulled out of orbit to burn up in Earth's traditional projectile systems, this launcher operates silently, producing no smoke, flash, or strong vibrations. Its innovative design prevents the destabilization of the host spacecraft and allows for precise and safe operation in per the South China Morning Post, this technology was unveiled last month in the peer-reviewed Chinese journal Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica system uses a small gunpowder charge to generate high-pressure gas that drives a piston forward. A specially designed weak section breaks at a preset pressure to release the net capsule.A unique 35-degree angled ring acts like a collapsing flower, absorbing most recoil energy and reducing thrust impact by over 9 per cent compared to earlier SCMP explains that this careful engineering minimizes barrel movement, ensuring sensitive satellite instruments remain unharmed. The sealed design also traps gas, preventing contamination of the space debris has become a critical threat to satellites and spacecraft, with growing amounts of defunct equipment posing collision risks. This new launcher is compact, requires no external power, and can be mass-produced, offering an efficient solution to help clean up dangerous orbital the primary goal is debris management, experts warn that the technology could be adapted for covert military use. Unlike visible missile strikes or explosions, this system could disable or capture an adversary's satellite silently, leaving it to appear as though it failed naturally.A Beijing-based space scientist, speaking anonymously to the South China Morning Post, said, 'There would be no explosion, no visible attack, only a satellite that ceases to respond.'The launcher's emergence comes amid intensifying geopolitical competition in space. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans nuclear weapons in orbit and requires peaceful use of space, but does not explicitly forbid conventional kinetic weapons like China's debris catcher is currently operational or still in development remains unclear. Yue Shuai, the project lead and associate professor at Nanjing University of Science and Technology, is noted as an expert in space weapon systems and has already launched two payloads into orbit, with more planned.

Jessica Radcliffe wasn't attacked by an Orca; in fact, scientists reveal these killer whales are friendly and often let dolphins swim right beside them
Jessica Radcliffe wasn't attacked by an Orca; in fact, scientists reveal these killer whales are friendly and often let dolphins swim right beside them

Economic Times

timea day ago

  • Economic Times

Jessica Radcliffe wasn't attacked by an Orca; in fact, scientists reveal these killer whales are friendly and often let dolphins swim right beside them

Dolphins voluntarily seek the company of killer whales Live Events A survival strategy in disguise (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A disturbing video recently went viral on social media, claiming to show a marine trainer named Jessica Radcliffe being violently attacked and killed by an orca during a live marine park show. The clip, shared across multiple platforms, was convincing enough to spark outrage and fear among fact-checking investigations by outlets including IB Times and Vocal Media confirm the video is entirely fabricated. No credible news reports, marine park employment records, or public documents show that Radcliffe ever existed, let alone that such an attack identified the footage as AI-generated, warning how quickly misinformation can spread once emotional and graphic imagery takes hold sensationalized stories like the Radcliffe hoax paint orcas as relentless killers, research documented by National Geographic reveals a surprising truth: in the wild, these apex predators can form complex, even friendly relationships with other species, including animals they could easily British Columbia's icy coastal waters, scientists have recorded Pacific white-sided dolphins actively swimming alongside certain types of killer whales , specifically, fish-eating northern and southern resident pods, and the killer whales are allowing orcas feed exclusively on salmon and pose no threat to dolphins, unlike Bigg's killer whales, which hunt marine drone footage, researchers from the Coastal Ocean Research Institute have documented these interactions lasting minutes to calves sometimes chase dolphins playfully, while adults may flick their tails in annoyance, but the dolphins remain undeterred, weaving confidently among the believe this unlikely alliance may be strategic. By associating with resident orcas, dolphins could be using them as a shield against their mammal-hunting killer whales tend to avoid the more vocal resident pods, making dolphin–resident orca encounters a potential life-saving relationship isn't equal; dolphins gain protection, but resident orcas show little obvious their tolerance hints at a mutual understanding shaped by intelligence, social complexity, and perhaps even shared family ties; both species belong to the Delphinidae findings counterbalance the viral fear-mongering of the Radcliffe hoax. While orcas are powerful predators capable of lethal attacks, they are also social, intelligent animals whose behavior depends on species type, environmental context, and long-standing ecological relationships.

Turmeric to green tea: Can herbal supplements put the liver in danger?
Turmeric to green tea: Can herbal supplements put the liver in danger?

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

Turmeric to green tea: Can herbal supplements put the liver in danger?

A recent study reveals a concerning trend. Millions in the US regularly consume herbal supplements. These supplements contain ingredients potentially harmful to the liver. Researchers at the University of Michigan analyzed data. They found widespread use of supplements with hepatotoxic botanicals. Turmeric, green tea, and ashwagandha are among the commonly consumed ones. The supplement industry is booming, and many are leaning towards herbal ones, hoping they are safe, because they are 'natural'. But does natural mean they are safe for your health? Well, not really. People across the globe consume supplements, and a recent study found that many contain potentially harmful natural ingredients. A study by the researchers at the University of Michigan found that millions of people consume supplements that contain potentially hepatotoxic botanical ingredients. The findings are published in the journal JAMA . Herbal supplements and liver damage This study dug deeper into the breadth of consumption of herbal supplements, which were previously shown to be potentially toxic to the liver. They found that millions of Americans consume herbal supplements that are toxic to the liver. The researchers analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between 2017 and 2020. Over a 30-day period, 4.7% of surveyed U.S. adults reported taking supplements containing at least one of six botanicals of interest: turmeric green tea ashwagandha black cohosh garcinia cambogia red yeast rice Explaining the paper Estimated Exposure to 6 Potentially Hepatoxic Botanicals in US Adults , the lead author, Alisa Likhitsup, M.D., M.P.H., the clinical assistant professor of Medicine at U-M, said, 'Our interest started when we saw cases of liver toxicity from herbal and dietary supplement use in people enrolled in the ongoing NIH-funded DILIN study.' The number of people taking these supplements was shocking. 'But it was difficult to say how many people were using these supplements and why. The major finding here is the large number of Americans taking these products with an estimated 15 million adult Americans taking them on a regular basis,' Likhitsup added. Not all supplements are safe While supplementation is often used to compensate for the deficiency of nutrients in the body not all are safe. Previous studies have shown that certain botanicals can potentially cause liver damage. The lack of government regulation, insufficient attention to medical screenings, and frequent mislabeling are some other concerns related to supplements. 'In a previous study, we found that there was a great deal of mislabeling of some of these products,' Robert Fontana M.D., Michigan Medicine hepatologist, professor of medicine and the study's senior author, said. 'We performed analytical chemistry and found about a 50% mismatch between stated ingredients on the label and what they actually contained, which is quite alarming. If you buy a supplement and it says it has a certain ingredient, it's basically a coin flip if that's true or not,' Fontana added. The lack of regulation in the supplement industry leads to mislabeling. And since their effects are not well understood, clinicians often will not ask patients what supplements they are taking. 'We weren't aware that so many people were taking these supplements. So, when doctors see patients in the office, they don't necessarily ask about supplement use or take into consideration their effects,' Likhitsup, a transplant hepatologist stressed. What they found The researchers found that most of the people take supplements containing turmeric (3.46%), followed by green tea (1.01%), ashwagandha and black cohosh (0.38%), garcinia cambogia (0.27%), and red yeast rice products (0.19%), in the studied population. What's more concerning is that most of the participants of the study reported that they take these botanicals without the advice of a doctor. Most of the participants took the botanicals either to improve or maintain health. Of the turmeric users, 26.8% consumed the products specifically for supposed benefits for joint health or arthritis, while 27.2% of the green tea users were hoping to improve their energy levels. People who took garcinia cambogia hoped it would help them lose weight. Boom of herbal supplements The researchers also found that there is a boom in the supplement industry, particularly among herbal products. There are more than 80,000 unique supplement products available for purchase worldwide and that supplement sales surpassed $150 billion in the United States in 2023, a figure that rivals the combined sales of prescription drugs. Another study found a 70% increase in liver transplants due to injury caused by supplements from 2010 to 2020, compared to 1994-2009. This study was, however, not able to establish any kind of causal relationship between consumption of the six botanicals and liver injury since it was intended to assess supplement exposure in the general US population. 7 Ways to check for fatty liver at home Since these supplements are not well regulated, the researchers are hoping to make clinicians and patients aware of just how much is still unknown about these supplements. 'We're not trying to create an alarm. We're just trying to increase awareness that the over-the-counter supplements people are taking and buying have not been tested nor necessarily proven to be safe,' Fontana said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store