Gold dips as Treasury yields rise, with market waiting for Trump's Fed pick
Spot gold was down 0.5% at $3,362.54 per ounce by 1047 GMT, after hitting a nearly two-week high on Tuesday. U.S. gold futures also fell by 0.5% to $3,417.30.
Yields on benchmark 10-year Treasuries rose after four straight days of declines, reducing the appeal of non-yielding bullion.
"Investors will be keeping a close eye on developments regarding White House appointments to the Federal Reserve and any trade-related news, both of which have the potential to influence market sentiment," said Ricardo Evangelista, senior analyst at ActivTrades.
Trump said on Tuesday he will announce a nominee this week for an upcoming vacancy on the Fed's Board of Governors. He also confirmed that the shortlist of potential successors to Chair Jerome Powell has been narrowed to four candidates.
Markets anticipate an 87% chance of a September rate cut, CME FedWatch, opens new tab shows, after Friday's weak jobs report that prompted Trump to fire the commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, adding to policy uncertainty.
Trade tensions continue, with Trump renewing his threat to hike tariffs on Indian goods over the country's purchases of Russian oil.
Gold, long seen as a safe haven in times of political and economic uncertainty, typically performs well in a low-interest-rate environment.
Despite the day's pullback, Evangelista at ActivTrades said there was scope for further gains in gold, with a near-term target of $3,400, citing persistent demand driven by tariff frictions, concerns over growth and inflation, and sustained weakness in the dollar.
On the physical markets, Perth Mint reported that gold product sales in July dropped by 33% from the previous month and silver sales fell to a six-month low.
Spot silver prices eased 0.1% to $37.80 per ounce, platinum edged up 0.1% to $1,321.86 and palladium fell 0.3% to $1,171.47.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Will 2025 prove to be the 'year of misinterpretation'?
Even as these evidently profound events have come to pass, the catastrophic consequences once predicted have not followed. The Trump administration's initial tariff threats sent markets into a downward spiral, but they have since rocketed back, undeterred by tariffs imposed since. So far, companies have primarily absorbed the cost of tariffs, avoiding a large impact on consumers. Meanwhile, the threat of war between Israel and Iran, the spectre of which has animated decades of diplomacy, failed to generate more than mild short-term jitters in oil prices. Ultimately, oil markets fell back following a ceasefire agreement and traders shrugged off what could have precipitated regime change. The global economy marches onwards. In short, even as these risks have all materialised, none of these threats seem to have really moved the risk dials of investors and markets. As market observers, we must ask whether this was because those risks were overestimated, or if their true consequences simply have not yet been revealed. One camp might posit that 2025, so far, has proved the 'year of misinterpretation'. Ten years from now, will 2025 be seen as a minor blip in the global economy's pursuit of growth? Or, will it be perceived as the beginning of a fundamental shift in international trade and the forebearer of sustained economic decline? Depending on which path we take, the investment choices that we make today will be profoundly different. At Julius Baer, our diagnosis falls somewhere in the middle. We see a new era dawning of heightened uncertainty, limited globalisation, and fragile peace in the world's most incendiary regions. The end of the free trade consensus, the fracturing of decades-long alliances, the impact of climate change, and more, will inevitably lead to a more volatile world. That volatility has already arrived in-force this year, however, the world's largest companies have shown resilience, particularly after coming out of one of their most profitable years ever in 2024. As fundamental changes happen on a global scale, companies have so far successfully stayed nimble, adapting with the times and showing their ability to play a changing game is astonishingly robust. Read more: Of course, a discussion of the global economy cannot be separated from the American economy – after all, fears of recession have grown exponentially since Trump's re-election to the White House. Similar to the rest of the world, the US economy has slowed but ultimately pushed ahead into 2025, with the OECD predicting that it will experience GDP growth of 1.6% this year, compared to Europe's 1.0%. This 'American exceptionalism' is due in part to the strength of US companies – particularly in the tech sector, where confidence remains as to their ability to produce cash at a rate hitherto unseen in history. These enormous profits mean leading companies have not only been able to withstand the tariff storm, but have also temporarily limited the extent to which consumers have become victim. The US's corporate strength is complemented by its consumer base, which is forecast to increase its nominal spending levels by 3.7% in 2025 despite economic uncertainty. The President's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, controversial as it may be, will likely further boost spending, as the people to whom it gives the greatest benefit – the wealthiest 20% of American households – are responsible for 60% of the country's consumption. More broadly, the Act signals that the Trump administration will continue deficit spending to boost the US economy, moving away from Elon Musk's DOGE-driven cost-cutting overtures from earlier in the year. While the sustainability of this in the long-term remains in sharp focus, debt-powered cash infusions from the federal government will certainly promote US growth in the near term. So, what does all of this mean for the UK? Thus far, UK economic progress has proved uninspiring if resilient, with optimistic analysts projecting 1.2% GDP growth this year. The UK Government has been either lucky, skilful, or both to secure a trade deal with the US and avoid large-scale tariffs. But the reality is that the UK's economic destiny is largely out of the Government's control. Even as the IMF calls for the Bank of England to cut rates twice more this year, its ability to do so will be contingent both on how tariffs are rolled out and the strength of the UK labour market. Without guaranteed rate cuts or fiscal stimulus – an option equally unlikely given the Government's financial constraints – the UK will need a wave of global growth to see meaningful near-term change. Such growth will have to happen in a world that has doubtlessly become more volatile and will likely get worse. However, this does not mean that there are not plentiful attractive opportunities for investment and capital. As politics become more polarising and posturing more dramatic, it is the investor's job to look beyond the immediate uncertainty, to invest patiently, and to make decisions based off long-term trends, not short-term hysteria. Just as always, the calm, rational, long-view investor will win. Nick Lawson is an associate director at Julius Baer
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
China's July consumer prices flat, factory-gate prices miss forecast
BEIJING, Aug 9 (Reuters) - China's consumer prices were unchanged in July, while producer prices fell more than expected, underscoring the impact of sluggish domestic demand and persistent trade uncertainty on consumer and business sentiment. Factory-gate prices have been declining for more than two years, and Saturday's data suggest early-stage efforts to tackle price competition have yet to yield results. Deflationary pressures have prompted Chinese authorities to address overcapacity in key industries. However, the latest round of industrial restructuring appears to be a pared-down version of the sweeping supply-side reforms launched a decade ago that were pivotal in ending a deflationary spiral. The consumer price index (CPI) was flat year-on-year in July, compared with a 0.1% rise in June, National Bureau of Statistics data showed on Saturday, beating a Reuters poll forecast of a 0.1% slide. Food prices fell 1.6%, following a 0.3% decline in June. Extreme weather added to the economic strain, with sweltering heat gripping much of China's eastern seaboard last month and heavier-than-usual downpours lashing the country with the East Asian monsoon stalling over its north and south. On a monthly basis, the CPI edged up 0.4%, against a 0.1% drop in June and exceeding forecasts for a 0.3% rise. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and fuel prices, was 0.8% in July from a year earlier, quickening from June's 0.7%. A prolonged housing downturn and a fragile trade truce with the U.S. are weighing on consumer spending and factory activity. Policymakers are prioritising efforts to curb what they view as disorderly competition in the auto and other key industries, rather than rolling out immediate stimulus measures, but analysts see limited potential for the campaign to significantly boost final demand. The producer price index (PPI) fell 3.6% year on year in July, missing economists' forecast of a 3.3% slide. It fell 3.6% in June too, which was the lowest since July 2023.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump weighs reclassifying marijuana as less dangerous drug, WSJ reports
Aug 8 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump is considering reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. At a $1 million-a-plate fundraiser at his New Jersey golf club earlier this month, Trump told attendees he was interested in making such a change, the people, who declined to be named, told the newspaper. The guests at Trump's fundraiser included Kim Rivers, chief executive of Trulieve, one of the largest marijuana companies, who encouraged Trump to pursue the change and expand medical marijuana research, the report said.
