logo
2 new stealth fighter jets will expand who's in the world's top air forces

2 new stealth fighter jets will expand who's in the world's top air forces

Yahoo03-05-2025
Twelve countries operate one of the four models that can claim status as 5th-generation fighters.
Those elite ranks are set to grow with two new entrants: Turkey's Kaan and South Korea's KF-21.
The monopoly held by the world's superpowers on 5th-gen aircraft is likely nearing its end.
Ever since the introduction of the F-22 Raptor in 2005, 5th-generation fighters have been the undisputed kings of the skies.
These state-of-the-art fighter jets have characteristics like high maneuverability, advanced electronics, the ability to supercruise, and, most importantly, low observability to enemy radar detection. They are both feared and vaunted, and are at the top of the wish lists of the world's best air forces.
To date, twelve countries operate one of the four models that can claim 5th-gen status; the American F-22 and F-35 built by Lockheed Martin, China's J-20, and Russia's Su-57. That club could grow to twenty by 2030.
But it's not just the number of 5th-gen fighter operators that's set to grow. The even more exclusive club of 5th-gen fighter producers may get two new members by the 2030s: South Korea and Turkey.
While not traditionally global military powers, both countries are increasingly seen as rising powerhouses in the global defense industry and have been hard at work for over a decade on their own advanced fighter designs.
Developed by Korean Aerospace Industries (KAI) and officially unveiled on April 9, 2021, the KF-21 is South Korea's first domestically-made fighter jet, which officials aim to upgrade to a stealth fighter.
Also called the Boramae or 'fighting hawk' in Korean, the KF-21's origins stem as far back as 2001, when then-South Korean president Kim Dae-Jung declared his country's intent to replace South Korea's aging F-4 Phantom fighter-bombers and F-5 light fighters with a domestically made fighter.
The first prototype was rolled out and unveiled at KAI headquarters in 2021. On July 19, 2022, it made its maiden flight, and on January 17, 2023, it reached supersonic speeds for the first time.
The KF-21 program has since conducted over 1,000 sorties across six prototypes, including weapons separation tests and an air-to-air refueling exercise. Two of the prototypes feature a tandem seat arrangement.
The KF-21's specifications are just as impressive as its development speed. The jet can reach a speed of Mach 1.8 (or 1,400 miles per hour), has a ceiling of 50,000 feet, and can carry 17,000 pounds of ordnance.
The KF-21 also has an advanced suite of avionics and other electronics, like an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar; a cutting-edge system that uses thousands of tiny antennas to rapidly scan, track, and target multiple objects simultaneously. The two-seater variant is expected to be capable of teaming with South Korea's Low Observable Unmanned Wingman System (LOWUS), a collaborative combat aircraft under development.
Despite its impressive capabilities, the KF-21 is not a 5th-gen fighter, as it does not have the same stealth capabilities as its American, Chinese, and Russian counterparts.
While the jet does feature an angular design to reduce its radar cross section, it lacks radar-absorbent materials (RAM) across its entire body and does not have internal weapons bays, instead relying on ten external hardpoints.
Consequently, KAI and analysts often refer to the KF-21 as a "4.5 generation" fighter — in other words, an advanced 4th-gen fighter with some 5th-gen characteristics.
But that may not be the case for long. KAI has announced that it intends to upgrade a version of the KF-21 to a full stealth fighter. Dubbed the KF-21EX, these upgrades will include internal weapons bays, more advanced RAM coatings, conformal antennas (flat sensors embedded in the airframe's skin that replace protruding antennas), and possibly low-observable exhaust nozzles for engine exhaust and infrared signature reduction. Internal weapons bays are important for a 5th-generation fighter because external weapons produce sizable radar returns.
The KF-21EX may arrive by the late 2030s or early 2040s.
South Korea's air force signed its first contract for 20 KF-21s last year, with deliveries expected between the end of 2026 and summer of 2027. A second order of 20 more is expected to come by the end of this year. The country hopes to acquire 120 of the jets by 2032.
Turkey's entrant to the 5th-gen fighter club, the TAI TF Kaan, is claimed to be a fully fledged stealth fighter.
Turkey had planned to replace its fleet of F-16s with a mix of high-end/low-end 5th-gen fighters since 2010, with the Kaan intended to form the low-end portion and around 100 F-35s bought from the US forming the high end.
But Turkey's expulsion from the F-35 program in 2019 over its purchase of Russian air defense systems forced the Turks to commit to developing the Kaan as a fully fledged 5th-gen fighter.
In the summer of 2019, state-run Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) displayed a full-scale mockup at the Paris Air Show. Construction on the first parts finished in 2021, and in 2023, the jet was finally unveiled to the public and officially named the Kaan — Turkish for 'ruler.'
A little more than a year later, the Kaan conducted its maiden flight, which was followed in 2024 by a second test flight.
With a wingspan of 44 feet and a length of 66 feet, the Kaan is similar in size and appearance to the F-22. TAI officials have said that the Kaan can carry up to 20,000 pounds of ordnance, though it has been reported that it can only carry 1,000 pounds internally; Internal capacity is important for a 5th-generation fighter because external weapons produce sizable radar returns. It is also equipped with an AESA radar.
That Turkey has the capability to build a 5th-gen fighter is not far-fetched. Formerly a Tier 3 partner of the F-35 program, Turkish companies provided some 900 components for the F-35, including the air inlet ducts, exterior panels for the airframe, weapons bay doors, and other structural components and assemblies.
In fact, TAI was one of only two suppliers for the F-35's center fuselage — a critical structural core that connects the wings to the airframe and partially houses the jet's fuel tanks, weapon bays, and a portion of its avionics.
The degree of the Kaan's stealth, however, is unknown, especially since it has several features that make it difficult to maintain low observability. The Kaan's two F110-GE-129 engines (the same General Electric jet engines on F-15s and F-16s), for instance, were never designed for stealth aircraft and lack features like specially designed exhaust systems and nozzles, which would reduce both high infrared signatures and radar reflections.
More importantly, it is unknown if Turkey has radar-absorbent materials for the Kaan. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey has said that it is developing "Radar Absorbing Multilayered Thin Film Surface Coating" for the Kaan, and TAI and Turkish officials have said that the Kaan has advanced technologies that make it stealthy, but there have been no official statements on the status of the RAM's development or its quality, beyond general claims of stealth.
Two more Kaan prototypes are under construction, with three more to be built before serial production begins. TAI expects to deliver the first of 20 Kaans to the Turkish Air Force by 2028 or 2029.
The KF-21 and Kaan will almost certainly be flown by countries that previously had no real hope of obtaining stealth fighters.
Fifth-generation fighters are hard to acquire due to their cost-prohibitive prices (often in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars per unit) and complex procurement processes. Their advanced tech make countries hesitant to share them, fearing secrets could reach hostile powers, with sales typically limited to very close allies capable of fulfilling stringent assurances.
Cheaper fifth-generation fighters from producers with fewer geopolitical constraints and ambitions to expand influence through high-end arms sales could make acquisition more feasible.
As a development partner in the KF-21 program, Indonesia is slated to acquire 48 of the 4.5-gen KF-21 variant, though issues with funding and data theft may change that. Other countries have reportedly either expressed interest or been courted by KAI, including Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, the Philippines, the UAE, Poland, and Peru — though these countries would likely opt for the 4.5-gen variant.
The Kaan, meanwhile, has received a lot of interest. Close Turkish ally Azerbaijan became a partner of the Kaan program in 2023, which might make it the first foreign customer. In January, it was reported that Turkey and Pakistan may establish a joint factory for Kaan production, and that Saudi Arabia had expressed interest in acquiring 100 of the fighters. The UAE has also reportedly indicated interest in joining the program as well.
Ukraine, meanwhile, has expressed interest in both purchasing the Kaan and competing for a future contract that would see it be involved in the production of its future engines.
Even if the initial versions of the KF-21 and the Kaan do not prove to be as stealthy as their American, Chinese, or Russian counterparts, their development so far shows that the monopoly held by the world's superpowers on 5th-gen aircraft is likely approaching its end.
Moreover, it may also serve as something of a warning that more countries — including ones not seen as global or even regional powers — may field their own undetectable aircraft in the near future.
Benjamin Brimelow is a freelance journalist covering international military and defense issues. He holds a master's degree in Global Affairs with a concentration in international security from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. His work has appeared in Business Insider and the Modern War Institute at West Point.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Get rid of mail-in voting? Trump goal sparks debate, threatened lawsuits
Get rid of mail-in voting? Trump goal sparks debate, threatened lawsuits

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Get rid of mail-in voting? Trump goal sparks debate, threatened lawsuits

Trump has long railed against mail-in voting but experts say states and the Congress control election rules rather than the president. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's latest push to end absentee voting has ignited a firestorm of criticism and intense debate about the nation's election rules as the next midterm and presidential campaigns kick into gear. Election-law experts said a president has no role in governing elections. Advocacy groups threatened lawsuits aiming to block Trump. And Democrats braced for a political fight heading into the 2026 and 2028 election cycles as they look to rebound after a disastrous 2024 campaign. 'The Constitution gives states and Congress the power to run elections," said Michael Waldman, CEO of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. "Presidents have no lawful role.' But White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Aug. 19 that Trump would work with lawmakers to end mail-in voting because "this is a priority for the president." Here's what you need to know: How popular is mail-in voting? Mail-in voting is widespread and popular. Out of 155 million votes cast in 2024, nearly 47 million were mailed in, according to the Election Assistance Commission. Most states allow absentee voting for no reason, but some states require an excuse to avoid showing up in person. Eight states and Washington, DC, allow elections to be conducted entirely by mail, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington state mail ballots to all registered voters. Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read said vote-by-mail elections are secure, accurate and honest. 'If he actually understood or cared about the American people, he'd know mail-in-voting is the best way to protect everyone's right to vote, especially rural folks, elderly people and hourly workers,' Read said. 'Mail-in-voting meets citizens exactly where they are: in their living rooms and around their kitchen tables.' Trump seeks to end mail-in voting Trump said Aug. 18 he would sign an executive order to abolish mail-in voting, which he slammed as vulnerable to fraud. Trump has long complained about absentee voting, since before the COVID-19 pandemic that shut down many in-person events. 'We're going to end mail-in voting," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "It's a fraud." Trump's announcement came while special House races are pending in Arizona and Tennessee; New Jersey and Virginia will be choosing governors in November this year; and some big-city mayors will be chosen in New York and elsewhere. The whole country will be voting on House races and one-third of the Senate 2026, and for president in 2028. Despite Trump's claims, election experts said voting is the most secure in history. "As we have said repeatedly, our election infrastructure has never been more secure and the election community never better prepared to deliver safe, secure, free and fair elections for the American people," Jen Easterly, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said after the 2024 election. David Becker, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research, which works with election officials of both parties to ensure secure elections, said ballots are the most verifiable and recountable in history with only Louisiana not voting on paper. Audits confirm the results, he said. And Congress approved ID requirements to register to vote in the 2002 Help America Vote Act, which followed the razor-thin victory of President George W. Bush over Al Gore in 2000. Trump, Democrats expect political fight over mail-in ballots Trump argued the 2020 presidential result was rigged after what his aides called a "red mirage" of an Election Day lead disappeared as mail-in ballots were counted and Joe Biden won the White House. "I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS," Trump said in a social media post Aug. 18 advocating an end to mail-in voting. During the 2024 campaign, Republicans supported mail-in voting to avoid handing Democrats an advantage even as Trump occasionally criticized them. But the GOP sought an Election Day deadline for mailed ballots to be counted. Leavitt said the White House will work with lawmakers at federal and state levels to change the law. 'When the Congress comes back to Washington, I'm sure there will be many discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill and also our friends in state Legislatures across the country to ensure we're protecting the integrity of the vote for the American people," Leavitt said. But Democrats vowed to fight Trump efforts to undermine mail-in voting. While Republicans in the House could potentially approve a bill, it would face a steep challenge in the Senate, where 60 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster and where the GOP holds a 53-47 majority. 'Senate Democrats will make sure that any and every measure that would make it even more difficult for Americans to vote will be dead on arrival in the Senate and will continue to fight to protect our democracy," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York. Experts: States control election rules, not presidents The Constitution unambiguously says states regulate elections and only Congress can change that, Becker said. 'Getting rid of mail voting, which has been around since at least the U.S. Civil War, and which is offered by the vast majority of states, red and blue, is an incredibly bad idea that would make our elections much less secure and vulnerable to interference,' said Becker, a former election lawyer at the Justice Department. 'He has zero power to change election policy with the swipe of the pen, as the founders expressly stated.' Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said Trump "has no constitutional authority to end mail voting by executive order." "The Framers of the U.S. Constitution took care to keep the main responsibility for administering elections with the states and localities, which are in no way mere 'agents' of federal authorities," Olson said. Advocacy groups expect lawsuits if Trump moves against mail-in voting Federal courts have repeatedly recognized the state role in elections, including when a judge largley blocked Trump's March executive order dealing with elections. In Massachusetts, U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of President Barack Obama, blocked parts of Trump's order that sought to require voters to prove they are citizens and to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots after Election Day. Trump is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," Casper wrote. Advocacy groups said getting rid of mail-in voting could discourage millions of people who appreciate the flexiblity of avoiding voting in person on Election Day. "Many veterans, grappling with service-related disabilities like mobility impairments or PTSD, rely on this accessible method to vote independently and privately from home, avoiding the physical and emotional toll of in-person polling," said Naveed Shah, political director for Common Defense, a group representing military veterans and their families. Advocates from several groups expected lawsuits to challenge any Trump order seeking to abolish mail-in voting. 'We are prepared to protect mail-in voting in court against unfounded and unconstitutional attacks, as we have in Pennsylvania, Mississippi and other states,' said Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project. 'Access to mail-in voting is necessary to a fair and inclusive electoral process.'

Trump says he's ended 6 (or 7) wars. Here's some context.
Trump says he's ended 6 (or 7) wars. Here's some context.

Boston Globe

time26 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump says he's ended 6 (or 7) wars. Here's some context.

Every U.S. president has world conflicts land on his desk, and Trump has used the power of his office, including the threat of economic penalties, to intervene in several this year, leading to an end to fighting. In some cases, warring parties have credited him with advancing peace or calming hostilities. In others, his role is disputed or less clear — or fighting goes on. Asked for clarification, the White House provided a list of the six wars he says he has resolved. It did not respond to a subsequent question about the seventh. Advertisement Armenia and Azerbaijan Trump brought the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to the White House this month to sign a joint declaration aimed at bringing their long-running conflict closer to an end. It was not a peace deal, but it was the first commitment toward one since fighting broke out in the late 1980s when a weakening Soviet Union unleashed interethnic strife in the Caucasus. Advertisement Both leaders praised Trump, who stepped into a conflict that had long been mediated by Russia, until President Vladimir Putin's attention shifted after his 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As part of the agreement, Armenia said it would grant the United States rights to develop a major transit corridor through its territory, the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity. The project has been described as an economic game changer for the region that would better connect Europe with Azerbaijan and Central Asia. But it is not clear when the route will open and on what terms. And major barriers to a lasting peace remain. Azerbaijan continues to demand that Armenia change its constitution to remove mentions of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan took over in 2023. Azerbaijan also occupies small areas of Armenia, citing security concerns, and the countries have not agreed on a shared border. For now, the border between the two nations is closed, diplomatic ties remain broken. Congo and Rwanda In June, the top diplomats from Rwanda and Congo came to the Oval Office to sign a peace agreement aimed at ending a war that has raged for over three decades. Qatar also played a major role in the deal, which was intended to pave the way to a full peace agreement. Trump called the accord 'a glorious triumph.' But talks on a comprehensive agreement have since faltered and deadly fighting has continued. On Monday, the main rebel group in eastern Congo, known as M23 and backed by Rwanda, threatened to renege on the U.S.-backed deal, claiming that its primary foe, the Congolese army, had broken its terms. Advertisement India and Pakistan Trump has taken credit for mediating an end to a military escalation between the two nuclear powers that broke out after a terrorist attack in Kashmir this spring killed 26 civilians. India has acknowledged the American role in mediating but says it negotiated an end to the fighting directly with Pakistan. India claims that Pakistani officials asked for ceasefire talks under pressure from India's military assaults. Pakistan denies this and has thanked Trump for helping to end the hostilities. The differing accounts have contributed to a deterioration of relations between Washington and New Delhi, which is also playing out in Trump's trade war. Pakistan, which said it would nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his mediation, faces U.S. tariffs of 19%. India, on the other hand, faces a crippling 50% tariff, a rate that could crush the country's exporters. Israel and Iran After 12 days of strikes in June that included U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump abruptly announced a ceasefire agreement. He said the United States had mediated it and claimed that Israel had turned around its warplanes at his behest. 'It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!' he posted on Truth Social. Although neither side has disputed the American role in the truce, its durability remains in question. Talks have broken off between Iran and the United States on the future of Tehran's nuclear program, which Israel considers an existential threat. And while American intelligence assesses that the U.S. bombings badly damaged Iran's most advanced nuclear enrichment site, some experts believe Tehran could eventually resume enriching uranium, which is needed to build a nuclear weapon, at other sites. Advertisement Cambodia and Thailand The two Southeast Asian neighbors engaged this summer in days of fighting that killed at least 42 people and displaced more than 300,000, one of the bloodiest conflicts between them in decades. At the time, the Trump administration was discussing trade deals with a host of countries, and Trump said he had told the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia that he would stop trade talks unless they agreed to a ceasefire. Two days later, officials met in Malaysia for talks organized by Malaysian and U.S. officials and reached a deal to pause hostilities. 'They will hopefully get along for many years to come,' Trump said afterward. Critics of Trump's approach say his intervention did not address the underlying issues of the conflict, though fighting has stopped. Egypt and Ethiopia Egypt and Ethiopia face not a military conflict but a diplomatic dispute over Africa's largest hydroelectric dam. Still, there are fears that it might descend into fighting. (Trump said in 2020 that Egypt had threatened to 'blow up' the dam.) Trump's diplomacy has done little to resolve the dispute. Ethiopia recently announced that it had completed the dam, with an official opening scheduled for next month. Egypt and Sudan continue to oppose the project, fearing it will limit the flow of water from the Nile River to their countries. This article originally appeared in .

Trump says he has instructed lawyers to look into "woke" in Smithsonian museums
Trump says he has instructed lawyers to look into "woke" in Smithsonian museums

Axios

time26 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump says he has instructed lawyers to look into "woke" in Smithsonian museums

President Trump continued his crusade against the Smithsonian museum, on Tuesday saying he has instructed his attorneys to "go through the Museums" the same way that the administration has investigated universities nationwide. The big picture: Trump's latest announcement came at the backdrop of the White House's extensive reviews of Smithsonian's exhibitions to root out what the president said was "divisive or ideologically driven" language. Driving the news: Trump said in a Truth Social post that the Smithsonian museums are "OUT OF CONTROL" and that the museums in Washington are the last segment of "WOKE." "[E]verything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future," Trump said. "I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made." Zoom in: It is unclear if Trump was referring to White House officials who are leading the investigation into universities for antisemitism, or he's referring to U.S. Attorneys at the Justice Department. The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. Reality check: The Smithsonian is an independent entity and has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary, according to the institution. Flashback: Trump in March issued an Executive order targeting the Smithsonian museums for its "distorted narrative driven by ideology." Under Trump's order, Vice President Vance will work with the White House budget office to ensure Smithsonian's fundings won't be spent on programs that "degrade shared American values."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store