‘Bet On Youth' To Realise Africa's Digital Potential, UN Deputy Chief Says
This slow progress in digital integration and STEM education is impeding Africa's ability to reach the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, the report noted. The 'digital divide' hits marginalised groups hardest, including women and rural communities.
'Africa is a vast and populous continent, rich in natural endowments and talents. Yet much of that potential remains underutilised,' said Philémon Yang, the President of the General Assembly in a message to the meeting.
The potential of youth
Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed, told delegates that Africa must 'bet on youth.'
By 2050, there will be over 850 million young people in Africa.
'This is an incredible opportunity. Realising this potential means investing in STEM education now. It means building digital infrastructure that connects talent to
Opportunity,' Ms. Mohammed said.
But current systems do not sufficiently support young innovators – three-fourths of young Africans have insecure employment, lacking basic protections.
This lack of social protection is part of a wider labour rights gap, the report noted. In 2023, only 19 per cent of people in Africa had access to at least one form of social protection –such as social security or health insurance – compared to 53 per cent globally.
'Strong social protection is not just about safety nets. It is about creating the stability that allows societies to take risks, innovate and grow,' Ms. Mohammed said.
People-cantered approaches
The report calls on governments and partners to adopt a people-cantered approach that promotes digital and technological innovation while also decent work, rights and intellectual property.
'Resilience cannot be achieved without governance that places people at the centre of policy design and implementation,' the report said.
Speakers also stressed that African expertise must guide solutions.
'We reaffirm our collective determination to ensure that Africa's development is led by its own people, grounded in knowledge, innovation and social justice,' said Ahmadou Lamin Sameteh, Minister of Health of the Gambia, speaking for the African Group.
Power of partnerships
In his message, Mr. Yang said no single African country can achieve full digital integration alone; regional cooperation and multilateral support are essential.
'[Digital tools] can offer a way into the future… [but] no country can close these gaps alone…multilateral cooperation with the United Nations at its centre has secured eight decades of unprecedented human progress,' he said.
Ms. Mohammed emphasised the possibilities 'when we get this right.'
'The choice is ours — we can continue business-as-usual and watch the 2030 Agenda slip away or we can support systemic transformation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
a day ago
- Newsroom
Why NZ must resist the trashing of international law
Opinion: Last week, the foreign ministries of 30 countries, including New Zealand, belatedly issued a joint statement that acknowledged the 'suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths', demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire', and warned Netanyahu's government of 'further action' if this was not achieved. However, this statement highlights something even bigger than the escalation of an Israeli-Palestinian conflict which, since the Hamas terror attack of October 7, 2023, has led to the death of more than 61,000 people – around 59,500 Palestinians and 1710 Israelis – and cost the lives of hundreds of journalists, academics and humanitarian aid workers. The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is a symptom of the post-9/11 erosion of an international rules-based order, enshrined in institutions like the United Nations and norms like multilateralism. The US' illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, China's assertiveness in the South China Sea, Putin's annexation of Crimea and subsequent full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 as well as recent US trade protectionism are examples of an increasing trend that has weakened the importance of rules in global politics. During this period, the United Nations Security Council, the organ with formal responsibility for maintaining international peace and security, has repeatedly been paralysed by the veto powers of its five permanent members. The biggest offenders in this regard have been Russia, the US and China, three states imbued with a strong sense of national exceptionalism, that have not hesitated to cast a veto or act unilaterally to protect their perceived national concerns even if it undermines international law. It should be emphasised that most states including relatively small players like New Zealand and middle powers like Australia are dependent on an international-rules based order for their prosperity and security. While rules are often seen as an encumbrance by great powers, they are viewed by most small and middle powers as essential in order to conduct their international activities in a relatively safe, equitable and predictable fashion. Nevertheless some observers believe that smaller states like New Zealand are powerless to prevent the slide towards the 'law of the jungle' in the international arena. According to the so-called realist perspective, great powers do what great powers do and 'little' New Zealand has no choice but to quietly accept blatant violations of international law when they are committed by powerful traditional friends like the US or its close allies such as Israel. However, such a perspective exaggerates the role of great powers in the interconnected world of the 21st century. We should recall the founders of the UN in 1945 conferred the right of veto on five great powers of that time to ensure they remained in the organisation and helped solve the world's problems. This logic explains why the Labour New Zealand government, led by Prime Minister Peter Fraser, was prepared to reluctantly concede the necessity of the veto mechanism in the Security Council when the UN was established. Fast forward 80 years. In 2025, it is clear that superpowers such as the US or China cannot run the world – even if they want to – simply because key challenges such as climate change, pandemics, transnational terrorism and financial contagion do not respect borders and are simply too big to be resolved unilaterally or with the assistance of a few allies. This means, despite intensified geopolitical rivalries, small states and middle powers are not doomed to be fast followers and can, if they choose to act strategically in a multilateral fashion, exert some agency and influence on international issues where there is a void in great-power leadership. The precedent of the Christchurch Call in 2020, when New Zealand collaborated with France in a bid to curb online extremism which won the support of more than 55 states, including Biden's America, points to the potential for bottom-up multilateral initiatives in the contemporary era. Confronted with the steady decline of international rules in trade and security matters, smaller powers cannot rely on veto-wielding states in the UN Security Council to reverse this damaging trend. But the New Zealand government does have the option of reaching out to other members of the UN to build international support for a diplomatic initiative to reinvigorate the idea of an international rules-based order. This vision would involve reforming the Security Council to make it a more reliable barrier to war by curtailing the use of the veto by the permanent five states or at least pressing for a new arrangement whereby General Assembly resolutions with more than two-thirds' support become binding and not subject to a veto. Without curbing the use of the veto in the Security Council or significantly increasing the power of the UN General Assembly, certain states will continue to believe they are 'above the law' and the prospect of more barbaric conflicts like Gaza will remain an ever-present possibility in our world.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Cambodia calls for ceasefire amid deadly border clashes with Thailand
A pagoda damaged by Thai artillery is pictured in Oddar Meanchey province on July 25. Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai warned that cross-border clashes with Cambodia that have uprooted more than 130,000 people "could develop into war", as the countries traded deadly strikes for a second day. Photo / AFP Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. A pagoda damaged by Thai artillery is pictured in Oddar Meanchey province on July 25. Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai warned that cross-border clashes with Cambodia that have uprooted more than 130,000 people "could develop into war", as the countries traded deadly strikes for a second day. Photo / AFP Cambodia wants an 'immediate ceasefire' with Thailand, the country's envoy to the United Nations said on Friday, after the neighbours traded deadly strikes for a second day, with Bangkok also signalling an openness to talks. A long-running border dispute erupted into intense fighting with jets, artillery, tanks and ground troops on Thursday, prompting the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting on the crisis on Friday. 'Cambodia asked for an immediate ceasefire – unconditionally – and we also call for the peaceful solution of the dispute,' said Phnom Penh's UN ambassador Chhea Keo after a closed meeting of the council attended by Cambodia and Thailand. A steady thump of artillery strikes could be heard from the Cambodian side of the border on Friday, where the province of Oddar Meanchey reported one civilian – a 70-year-old man – had been killed and five more wounded. More than 138,000 people have been evacuated from Thailand's border regions, its health ministry said, reporting 15 fatalities – 14 civilians and a soldier – with a further 46 wounded, including 15 troops.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Councillor brushes off Israeli woman's hate crime accusation
Nandor Tanczos A Whakatāne district councillor says he was both surprised and amused to learn from police he had been accused of a hate crime by a woman in Tel Aviv, Israel. On July 13, Whakatāne-Ōhope ward councillor Nandor Tanczos shared a link on his personal Facebook page to an online petition calling for United Nations special rapporteur Francesca Albanese and the doctors of Gaza to be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. The United States imposed sanctions on Ms Albanese, an outspoken critic of Israel's military offensive in Gaza, this month. Mr Tanczos said the petition was created in the wake of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's nomination of US President Donald Trump for the prize. The prize is awarded annually to the person who has "done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses". Mr Tanczos said he had also posted some "anti-genocide stuff" about the war in Gaza. The councillor regularly shares news articles, opinion pieces and his own views on the conflict via his personal Facebook page. He said he was contacted through his Facebook page by a woman in Tel Aviv who accused him of anti-Semitism and said she had two children in the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) who were "good people". Mr Tanczos responded to her, explaining he had nothing against Jewish people, only against the current actions being taken in Gaza by the IDF. Three days later, he said he received a courtesy call from the Whakatāne police. "The woman rang them from Tel Aviv to complain about my social media posts." Mr Tanczos said he was surprised to learn that opposing what he believed to be genocide was a hate crime in her eyes. He said he was assured by the police officer that phoned him they had looked into his online activity and informed the complainant no crime had been committed. "The police were great. It was just a courtesy call to let me know what had happened. It actually made me laugh to think that someone from Tel Aviv would go as far as reporting me to the New Zealand Police about this." Mr Tanczos said the experience would not stop him from expressing his opinions on Facebook. "I don't have any hesitation in denouncing Israel's actions in Gaza. I'm not anti-Semitic." Police were not available to comment but a senior media adviser from police national headquarters said she did not think such complaints were common. - By Diane McCarthy ■LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
