Historic laundry given fresh coat
A historic Oamaru site has been given a fresh new look, thanks to a Heritage New Zealand grant awarded to longtime traders and residents Greg and Katy Waite.
The New Zealand Heritage Fund, administered by the Waitaki District Council, allocates $100,000 annually for historic site conservation as part of the council's Long-Term Plan.
In the funding round closing April 28, three grants were awarded to heritage building-owners Michael and Glenys Roche, Pascal Brosnahan and Greg and Katy Waite.
Of the $12,753 allocated, the Waites received $5253 for site repainting and restoration.
The Waites have spent over 50 years in the antiques and art industry and own 8 to 12 Tees St, their home, gallery and business all located in Oamaru's historic precinct.
The site is also home to their two boutique accommodation businesses, The Whitestone and The Whitfield, both of which operate at full occupancy from October through May.
The buildings, once home to New Zealand's first Chinese laundry, have undergone careful restoration by the Waites.
The final step in the couple's restoration was the paintwork, which began in early May.
Mr Waite said scaffolding was erected on May 1, with paintwork carried out over the following three weeks.
He said he applied for the funding but proceeded with the restoration at his own expense, uncertain if and when the grant would be approved.
As part of the application process, Mr Waite obtained multiple quotes from various contractors and included them with his submission.
This meant Mr Waite could begin painting the rear of the building with his preferred contractor immediately and complete the front work while awaiting the grant decision.
The grant was later approved and covered part of the project, an outcome Mr Waite described as "fabulous".
"It covered all the scaffolding," Mr Waite said.
"It's fantastic we're getting the support."
Mr Waite said he opted for a neutral light cream paint to complement the building's historic surroundings.
The next round of Heritage New Zealand funding opened for applications on July 7 and will close September 8.
— APL Student Reporter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
What's really going on with Rocket Lab shares?
Photo: RNZ/ Nate McKinnon Rocket Lab may be recording multi-million-dollar losses, but its share price keeps on going up. Shares in the New Zealand-founded space company have risen more than 800 percent in the past year, to just under US$50 each. In August last year, they were changing hands for less than US$5. In its 2024 financial year, the company recorded a loss of US$33 million to US$35m, from record annual revenue of US$436.2m. Greg Smith, head of retail at Devon Funds, said investors were looking past the lack of profitability, and there was a lot of momentum priced in to its shares. "But the company has been delivering. It is gaining huge credibility through deals with national space agencies and spending here has been ramping up. There's been the recent partnership agreed with the European Space Agency to launch satellites for constellation navigation before December. "And there has been a string of successful launches. A rocket is being produced every 15 days, and [it has] successfully launched its 66th, 67th and 68th Electron rockets." He said the company's upcoming, bigger Neutron medium-lift rocket was another driver of growth. If it was successful, it could unlock US$5.6 billion in National Security Space Launch contracts. "The company isn't profitable yet, so we can't really look at earnings multiples. Even to sales it is looking high at up to 10 times, but if it keeps delivering we might yet see more momentum." Gretjan Verdickt, a lecturer of finance at the University of Auckland, said a significant portion of Rocket Lab's current valuation was based on the promise of a future that was "both exciting and challenging to value". "How much will the space economy truly be worth in 10 or 20 years? How many applications will it lead to? It's difficult for anyone to grapple with. Because of that uncertainty, optimistic investors are willing to pay a very high price today for the potential of a massive payoff down the road. They see a leader in a burgeoning industry and don't want to miss out. "This part of the valuation is precarious. A narrative of explosive growth and future dominance sustains it. If that optimism fades, even slightly, you could see a significant drop. That said, for anyone who got in early, a drop would still leave them with an amazing return." He said the "hype-driven" component of the share price made it fragile. "If you think about it from a behavioural finance point of view, there is a lot of 'fear of missing out' going on too. If you missed the boat at 100 percent, 200 percent... and you jump in late, the prices - because you are willing to buy - the stock price increases more. This leads to a momentum effect." He said the other aspect of the share price was the company's cash flow. "There is a real, tangible business generating real cash flows behind the stock price. "Rocket Lab has already realised tremendous growth. Their revenue has increased significantly over the past few years, and they have a backlog of over $1 billion in signed contracts, providing a clear line of sight into future earnings. "They have two core pillars of growth. First, their proven Electron rocket is a workhorse for the small satellite market. Second, and more importantly for the future, is their upcoming Neutron rocket, which is designed to compete with larger players like SpaceX for much bigger, more lucrative contracts. "Additionally, they're not just a launch company. Their Space Systems division - which builds satellite components and platforms - is their biggest revenue driver. They are strategically building an end-to-end space company, and their pending acquisition of the company Mynaric is another step in that direction." When it came to whether the 800 percent increase was sustainable, the level of share price was probably not, he said. "Unless the company's growth potential is even better than what people are currently thinking. However, the underlying business growth is there. There is a very real and rapidly growing company here. The ultimate test will be whether its fundamental performance can grow fast enough to justify the market's sky-high expectations. That said, if the balloon pops, it can go real fast, real quick."
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
PSA takes legal action against MBIE over flexible working
PSA National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A union has filed legal action over what it says is the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment's disregard of existing flexible work arrangements protected under the union's collective agreement. MBIE has recently introduced a new flexible work policy intended to align with the government's directive to restrict flexible work arrangements for public service workers, including reducing days working from home. That directive is also subject to legal action by the Public Service Association (PSA). The union has filed proceedings with the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). "Cracking down on flexible work is the wrong approach from employers in 2025," said PSA National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons. She said the PSA originally raised objections to MBIE's flexible work guidance in June 2025, but attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation had failed. "MBIE hasn't been willing to backdown, leaving the PSA with no choice but to take this step to protect the rights of MBIE staff included in existing agreements," she said. She said MBIE could not just change existing agreements which were protected under the collective agreement. "The collective agreement binds MBIE to supporting flexible work, so its new policy is simply unlawful. We are seeking a determination from the ERA that MBIE is violating the 'flexible by default' approach which forms part of its collective agreement with members," she said. The PSA was hoping the ERA would allow the MBIE case to be joined to the broader case against the Public Service Commission. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Zealand not part of 'trifecta' with Cook Islands and China, Winston Peters says
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters, left, and Cook Islands Prime MinisterMark Brown. Photo: RNZ/Pacific Islands Forum/123RF Winston Peters says the Cook Islands has described its relationship with New Zealand as "part of a trifecta" when dealing with China. The comment from the New Zealand foreign minister comes at a time of increased tension between Cook Islands and New Zealand. At the heart of that tension is four agreements Cook Islands signed with China in February. Peters told Pacific Waves "there are things going wrong". He also rejected Cook Islands' Prime Minister Mark Brown's position that the two nations had a reciprocal relationship , therefore neither had to consult one another on foreign trade arrangements. "They were required under our arrangement and agreement to consult with us when these matters might affect more widely themselves but also other countries and our relationship," Peters said. "To describe us as part of a trifecta when we've got the special relationship for 60 years is utterly wrong." A spokesman for Peters clarified Peters was referring to the way New Zealand had effectively been described as a third-party by the Cook Islands in its agreements with China. Cook Islands is in free association with New Zealand. Under that arrangement, implemented in 1965, the country governed its own affairs, but New Zealand provided assistance with foreign affairs (upon request), disaster relief and defence. Despite that, the current diplomatic rift has resulted in a pause in funding of $18.2 million by the New Zealand government. That occurred last month. And while there have been ongoing discussions between the two nations, this week Prime Minister Mark Brown told a Cook Islands audience that if New Zealand could not afford to fund the country's national infrastructure investment plan - funding the development needs of the Cook Islands was a major motivator in signing the agreements with China. Peters' responded by challenging Brown to call a referendum - a position he doubled-down on when he spoke to Pacific Waves . "They can let us know whether they want the relationship or whether they want independence," he said. "Because if you behave like you want independence, then above all, that, should be up to the Cook Islands people to decide, not just a temporarily-empowered politician or government." The whole population of the Cook Islands should have a say, he said. "Politicians come and go, governments come and go, ministers come and go. But our purpose is to ensure the long-term, enduring relationship between the New Zealand people and the Cook Islands people." Peters also touched on previous disagreements with the Cook Islands over its sovereignty and foreign policy arrangements. "There were times in the past when this issue arose and we had agreements and pacts, declarations or statements … to give us the parameters of our future relationship, as we last did in [2001] under Helen Clark and [Terepai] Moate, who was then the prime minister of the Cook Islands. "And here we are, 24 years … on and that has been called into question. So we are saying… if it's going to change, then we are accountable to the Cook Islands people. Next month, the Cook Islands celebrates its 60th constitution anniversary. Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro was due to attend as the New Zealand government's representative. Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon have said they would not attend - a move that has been labelled a snub amidst the break-down in bilateral relations. Peters said Kiro was the appropriate representative from New Zealand. "We're sending the highest person constitutionally in our country to go… this is very fitting."
