logo
Australians open up about what life is actually like in 2025

Australians open up about what life is actually like in 2025

News.com.au05-05-2025

Australians have opened up about what their lives are really like, revealing their opinions on a range of topics and responding to the burning – and sometimes uncomfortable – questions that everyone wants answered.
Earlier this year, news.com.au launched The Great Aussie Debate, a wide-ranging, 50-question survey that has uncovered what Australians really think about all the hot topics of 2025.
Over two weeks, more than 54,000 Australians took part in the survey, revealing their thoughts on everything from the cost of living and homeownership, to electric vehicles and going shoeless in supermarkets.
Their answers have resulted in a snapshot of how the average Aussie thinks, feels and lives in 2025, with some results more surprising than others.
This is how Australia answered:
MONEY
Aussies are still in the thick of a cost-of-living crisis. People are still reeling from more than a year of rates being held and, prior to that, a period of prolonged, brutal rises.
On top of this, rent prices have skyrocketed, grocery prices are continuing to soar and wage prices aren't rising fast enough to keep up.
So, it's no wonder money is at the top of people's minds.
As part of the survey, we asked Australia's what salary you need to earn to be considered rich in 2025.
It turns out, that figure is anything over $250,000 a year, with 56 per cent choosing this option.
The highest salary range was the most selected option among all age groups, though the older generations were most likely to choose this answer.
We also asked people when they last received a pay rise they were happy with.
The most common response was two to four years ago, with 27.7 per cent choosing this option.
The second most popular option was between five and 10 years. Concerningly, a significant portion, 17.1 per cent, claimed they have never been satisfied by a pay increase.
WORK
The ongoing working from home debate has heated up significantly in the past few months. At the start of the year we saw a slew of companies rolling back flexible working arrangements and ordering staff back into the office, a move that has been widely unpopular with employees.
From our survey, it is clear the majority of Aussies prefer a hybrid approach to work, where possible, with 61.59 per cent favouring between one and four days at home.
View the full results below:
Australia's biggest argument finally settled
Of the respondents, 28.77 per cent believe full time office work is best. However, there is an interesting detail in the statistics.
The age group most likely to choose this option have hit retirement age. More than half (51.18 per cent) of the 70+ group want people in the office five days a week.
It is clear there are generational conflicts at play in workplaces across the country. When asked who is the hardest generation to work with, almost half nominated Gen Z.
Evey age group, apart from two, labelled Gen Z as the most difficult to work with.
However, those in the 18-29 age bracket believe Baby Boomers are the hardest to work with and those aged 70+ nominated Millennials.
SEX AND RELATIONSHIPS
Aussies have opened up about very private parts of their lives, revealing intimate details about their relationships and other romantic endeavours.
One of the questions how frequently they have sex, with the most common response being 1-2 times a month, with 21.6 per cent of people choosing this option.
When asked how often they would like to be having sex, just under half respondent, 'More than I currently do'. This was the most popular response across all age groups and was significantly higher for males (57.77 per cent) than females (35.43 per cent).
Aussies also gave insight into their boundaries when it comes to romantic relationships.
Asked if they would consider a partner subscribing to OnlyFans as cheating, 49.48 per cent said, 'Yes, definitely'.
A further 42.33 per cent said it depends on the type of interactions they are having with the creator and 8.19 per cent said no and that it was 'normal'.
Women are considerably more likely to view a partner's OnlyFans subscription as cheating, while male respondents believe it depends on the level of interaction taking place.
THE BIG ISSUES
The survey also addressed some of the more divisive topics that have been sparking ongoing debates across the country.
In relation to a question about Australia Day, 70.2 per cent said it was meaningful to them and it is important to have a day to celebrate our country.
A further 17.3 per cent said that, while they think we should have a day to celebrate Australia, they don't feel comfortable doing it on the current date.
Those in the younger age groups were more likely to state they didn't celebrate Australia Day or express discomfort with the current date, while those in older generations were more likely to support the day on it's current date.
When asked if Australia is a sexist country, the most common answer (38.6 per cent) was 'yes', but it is better than it was 10 years ago.
Women were more likely to believe it is sexist but improved (52.38 per cent), compared to 46.3 per cent of men who think Australia isn't sexist.
Many respondents believe the country has become 'too woke', with 78.39 per cent saying people are too sensitive and that cancel culture has gotten out of hand.
While people across all age categories agreed, the percentage of people who believe we have become too woke significantly increases with age.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trade talks rest on Anthony Albanese's meeting with Donald Trump in Canada
Trade talks rest on Anthony Albanese's meeting with Donald Trump in Canada

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

Trade talks rest on Anthony Albanese's meeting with Donald Trump in Canada

Australia's case for exemptions or relief from American tariffs will rest on Anthony Albanese's meeting next week with US President Donald Trump. Trade Minister Don Farrell had two conversations with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of OECD and World Trade Organisation meetings in Paris last week to press Australia's case, but says it's clear the leaders need to make the final call. Ministers and officials at all levels have consistently been arguing the US shouldn't impose tariffs on Australia because it has a trade surplus here, selling more to Australians than it buys each year. The Trump administration has so far imposed hefty tariffs on steel and aluminium imports, which have just risen to 50 per cent, and also slugged Australia with a 10 per cent so-called reciprocal tariff despite Australia not having tariffs on any US goods. Mr Albanese and Senator Farrell have repeatedly said the imposts are not the actions of a friend. Nevertheless, Senator Farrell said he'd had a 'friendly discussion' with Mr Greer but the final decision would be made at a higher level. 'He certainly made it clear that these are ultimately decisions that the President of the United States will make,' the minister told Sky News on Sunday. 'But I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States.' Mr Albanese has flagged he expects to meet Mr Trump for the first time on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada next weekend. The Government is in the final stages of a review of the rules around American beef imports, with Trump administration figures repeatedly raising Australia's 'ban' on US meat as one of their trade gripes. Australia has biosecurity restrictions on the import of Canadian and Mexican beef that is slaughtered in the US and Mr Albanese has insisted his Government will not risk the safety of local agriculture by relaxing rules. The UK has secured exemptions from some of the US tariffs by striking a new deal that in part allows greater market access for American beef. Shadow finance minister James Paterson pointed to the UK deal as a measure of the success of Mr Albanese's imminent meeting with Mr Trump. '(UK Prime Minister) Keir Starmer has now achieved a partial exemption from the steel and aluminium tariffs, and Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the Prime Minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption,' Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders. 'I'm just saying that Keir Starmer proves that it is possible to get an exemption. It is not an impossible task.' Senator Farrell said the main topic of discussions with counterparts at the WTO and OECD was ensuring other countries didn't increase their protectionism in the face of the US moves. He pointed out Australia hadn't his China with counter-imposts when it imposed trade barriers on goods such as wine, barley and lobster, and nor had it retaliate against the US. 'I think there's a move around the world to push the case for less protectionism and more free and fair trade,' he said. 'I'm hopeful that those countries around the world who do believe in free and fair trade can reach agreement to extend free trade agreements across the globe so that, irrespective of what the Americans might choose to do, we have a greater diversity of trading partners.'

‘No Boomers' Shares app now helping young Aussies crack the housing market'
‘No Boomers' Shares app now helping young Aussies crack the housing market'

West Australian

time5 hours ago

  • West Australian

‘No Boomers' Shares app now helping young Aussies crack the housing market'

A share trading app which famously had a blunt message for those born before 1970 is trying to get more Aussies into their own home through an unused government scheme. Pearler, a share trading app moving into the superannuation space, has launched a product they are calling 'HomeSoon' with the aim of simplifying the steps needed to take advantage of the government's first home savers scheme (FHSS). The company says it is also the first platform in Australia to allow customers to use open banking to track bank savings, FHSS savings, shares, and other assets in one place – regardless of whether those assets are held with Pearler. Pearler co-founder Nick Nicolaides said house price growth is outpacing savings, meaning it is no longer sustainable for the average person to park their money in a bank account while they are saving for a deposit. 'Bank savings are no longer sustainable for a seven-eight year journey, and with that it adds complexity,' Mr Nicolaides told NewsWire. 'I don't think people really have a choice but to have their house deposit spread across bank accounts, probably some shares and the FHSS. 'It is more of a case of getting to the end goal of being wealthy enough to buy into the housing market, you now need to not only understand savings and budgeting, you now need to understand investing and this scheme,' he said. NED-7083-Housing-price-changes Mr Nicolaides said ideation was simple – to help first home buyers get into the housing market by taking the complexity out of a current scheme. 'We've been talking to customers for a while with only a fraction of customers actually using the scheme,' he said. 'When we asked why, it was very clear that firstly the scheme was in super which people feel some nervousness about and if you then get your head around putting additional savings into super, tracking, knowing what you can withdraw and withdrawing it in time, it quickly layers up. 'So a combination of a complex superannuation system and a not very mainstream scheme really puts most people off.' The latest PropTrack Home Price Index shows it has never been more expensive for first home buyers to get into the market. National house prices hit a new peak in May, lifting by 0.39 per cent over the month for a 4.12 per cent year-on-year gain. All capital cities saw home prices grow in May, with Melbourne leading the way up 0.79 per cent, followed by Adelaide up 0.52 per cent and then Sydney up 0.39 per cent. Nationally, since the Covid falls starting in March 2020, house prices are up 50.1 per cent for a new median house price value of $809,000, while Australia's most expensive city, Sydney, will set the median buyer back $1,124,000. Pearler's latest superannuation move follows launching a fund in late March saying it caters for younger members with a simple slogan 'for people born after 1970 (sorry, Boomers)'. During the launch, Mr Nicolaides said the 'no Boomers' fund was more about solving a problem for younger Australians than a display of anti-Boomer rhetoric. 'If you take a casual interest in what is written about superannuation, most articles are written about how the superannuation industry can deal with retirement,' he said. 'It makes sense that it gets the most attention because it is an immediate problem now. 'But at the other end of the spectrum, the industry and the media recognise that engagement in super is lacking in younger people. If we don't fix that, then today's younger people will find themselves in the same boat in 20, 30 years time,' Mr Nicolaides said. The FHSS allows people to contribute and access up to $15,000 of their voluntary contributions into super each financial year (up to a total cap of $50,000) for a home deposit. The main benefit of saving for a home this way is super's lower tax rate – meaning Australians can potentially get to their deposit faster. The scheme currently has a relatively low take up, with Pearler saying just 13.7 per cent of home buyers bought through the FHSS. Mr Nicolaides said the onus was not on the government to market the product better but instead on the general financial advice sector to do a better job of educating people. 'The government got the ball rolling on a fantastic scheme but there is only so much that can be done,' Mr Nicolaides said. 'We have a situation in Australia where, whether generationally like it or not, most of our financial decisions are going to be self-directed for the average person on the average wage. 'It becomes our job as an industry to educate people by giving them the tools and the guidance in mediums people want to use.' Mr Nicolaides says he hopes over time three in four Australians trying to buy a house will do so through the FHSS.

‘No Boomers' super app tackles housing crisis
‘No Boomers' super app tackles housing crisis

Perth Now

time5 hours ago

  • Perth Now

‘No Boomers' super app tackles housing crisis

A share trading app which famously had a blunt message for those born before 1970 is trying to get more Aussies into their own home through an unused government scheme. Pearler, a share trading app moving into the superannuation space, has launched a product they are calling 'HomeSoon' with the aim of simplifying the steps needed to take advantage of the government's first home savers scheme (FHSS). The company says it is also the first platform in Australia to allow customers to use open banking to track bank savings, FHSS savings, shares, and other assets in one place – regardless of whether those assets are held with Pearler. Australians are not using the first home super saver scheme. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire Pearler co-founder Nick Nicolaides said house price growth is outpacing savings, meaning it is no longer sustainable for the average person to park their money in a bank account while they are saving for a deposit. 'Bank savings are no longer sustainable for a seven-eight year journey, and with that it adds complexity,' Mr Nicolaides told NewsWire. 'I don't think people really have a choice but to have their house deposit spread across bank accounts, probably some shares and the FHSS. 'It is more of a case of getting to the end goal of being wealthy enough to buy into the housing market, you now need to not only understand savings and budgeting, you now need to understand investing and this scheme,' he said. NED-7083-Housing-price-changes Mr Nicolaides said ideation was simple – to help first home buyers get into the housing market by taking the complexity out of a current scheme. 'We've been talking to customers for a while with only a fraction of customers actually using the scheme,' he said. 'When we asked why, it was very clear that firstly the scheme was in super which people feel some nervousness about and if you then get your head around putting additional savings into super, tracking, knowing what you can withdraw and withdrawing it in time, it quickly layers up. 'So a combination of a complex superannuation system and a not very mainstream scheme really puts most people off.' The latest PropTrack Home Price Index shows it has never been more expensive for first home buyers to get into the market. National house prices hit a new peak in May, lifting by 0.39 per cent over the month for a 4.12 per cent year-on-year gain. All capital cities saw home prices grow in May, with Melbourne leading the way up 0.79 per cent, followed by Adelaide up 0.52 per cent and then Sydney up 0.39 per cent. Nationally, since the Covid falls starting in March 2020, house prices are up 50.1 per cent for a new median house price value of $809,000, while Australia's most expensive city, Sydney, will set the median buyer back $1,124,000. House prices continue to outpace saving deposit rates. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia Pearler's latest superannuation move follows launching a fund in late March saying it caters for younger members with a simple slogan 'for people born after 1970 (sorry, Boomers)'. During the launch, Mr Nicolaides said the 'no Boomers' fund was more about solving a problem for younger Australians than a display of anti-Boomer rhetoric. 'If you take a casual interest in what is written about superannuation, most articles are written about how the superannuation industry can deal with retirement,' he said. 'It makes sense that it gets the most attention because it is an immediate problem now. 'But at the other end of the spectrum, the industry and the media recognise that engagement in super is lacking in younger people. If we don't fix that, then today's younger people will find themselves in the same boat in 20, 30 years time,' Mr Nicolaides said. The FHSS allows people to contribute and access up to $15,000 of their voluntary contributions into super each financial year (up to a total cap of $50,000) for a home deposit. The main benefit of saving for a home this way is super's lower tax rate – meaning Australians can potentially get to their deposit faster. The scheme currently has a relatively low take up, with Pearler saying just 13.7 per cent of home buyers bought through the FHSS. Mr Nicolaides said the onus was not on the government to market the product better but instead on the general financial advice sector to do a better job of educating people. 'The government got the ball rolling on a fantastic scheme but there is only so much that can be done,' Mr Nicolaides said. 'We have a situation in Australia where, whether generationally like it or not, most of our financial decisions are going to be self-directed for the average person on the average wage. 'It becomes our job as an industry to educate people by giving them the tools and the guidance in mediums people want to use.' Mr Nicolaides says he hopes over time three in four Australians trying to buy a house will do so through the FHSS.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store