logo
US Chip-Gear Maker Sued in China Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft

US Chip-Gear Maker Sued in China Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft

Mint21 hours ago
Top US chip-equipment supplier Applied Materials Inc. was sued by a rival in China over what that company characterized as trade secret theft, a further escalation in the technology war between the world's two largest economies.
Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technology Co. filed a lawsuit with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court against Applied Materials, according to a company statement to the Shanghai Stock Exchange.
The Chinese chip-gear maker alleged that the Santa Clara, California-based company illegally obtained, used and revealed its core technologies related to the application of plasma source in treating the surface of wafers, the statement said. The court has filed the case but has not begun a trial, E-Town added.
Applied Materials earlier hired two employees from E-Town's fully owned US subsidiary, Mattson, and they were privy to the Beijing company's proprietary plasma technologies, the filing said. Applied Materials filed a patent application crediting the duo as inventors with the National Intellectual Property Administration in China after the two joined the Santa Clara company, the Beijing firm said, alleging that the content revealed trade secrets co-owned by E-Town and Mattson.
'The patent application violated the rules of China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law, and it infringes on trade secrets, and has caused significant damage to the plaintiff's intellectual property and economic interests,' E-Town said in the filing, adding that Applied Materials is also suspected of marketing and selling the technologies involved in the case to Chinese customers.
E-Town is asking the court to demand that Applied Materials stop using its trade secrets and destroy related materials. It's also seeking about 100 million yuan in recompense for damage.
The Beijing Intellectual Property Court didn't answer multiple calls outside of regular hours. Applied Materials didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Chip-gear technology is a focal point in the prolonged technology war between the US and China. To date, the semiconductor manufacturing equipment space is still dominated by the US, the Netherlands and Japan.
A yearslong US-led campaign has prevented Chinese companies from securing Dutch supplier ASML Holding NV's state-of-the-art extreme ultraviolet lithography systems, which are required to make the most cutting-edge chips for developing artificial intelligence algorithms. ASML's technologies also don't work at a chipmaking plant without support from US equipment suppliers, including Applied Materials and Lam Research Corp.
While E-Town's move might be seen as part of China's efforts to retaliate against the US, the two companies have their own existing dispute. In 2022, Applied Materials sued Mattson over alleged corporate espionage. Mattson denied any wrongdoing at the time.
With assistance from Peter Blumberg and Brody Ford.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is aiming for Pakistan-style compliance from India, but his plan is not working
Trump is aiming for Pakistan-style compliance from India, but his plan is not working

Economic Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump is aiming for Pakistan-style compliance from India, but his plan is not working

Synopsis Amidst rising tensions, the US-India trade relationship faces turbulence as Trump's administration imposes tariffs, allegedly to pressure India on geopolitical issues like Russian oil imports. India views these actions as an infringement on its sovereignty, resisting demands to compromise on agriculture, patent laws and military sourcing. India's refusal to play a compliant role, unlike Pakistan, frustrates Trump. "Trump wants a vessel like Pakistan. India refuses to behave like one." That blunt assessment from Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), captures the essence of the US-India trade saga: it's less about economics than geopolitics. While headlines focus on tariffs and trade deficits, the underlying story is about power, leverage and sovereignty. Speaking to Economic Times, Srivastava explains, "Washington expects compliance, and India is not yielding." Trump, who is set to meet Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, has long framed tariffs as a tool to 'fix trade deficits,' but India's case suggests a different motive. On August 7, the US announced it would raise tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 50%, citing Delhi's purchase of Russian oil. India called the move 'unfair' and 'unjustified,' with the new rate set to take effect on August 27. The White House framed the tariffs as a way to cut Russia's energy revenues and pressure Vladimir Putin toward a ceasefire. With this increase, India becomes the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia, joining Brazil which faces similar steep tariffs amid tense bilateral relations. The economic stakes for India are high. In 2024, India exported $87 billion worth of goods to the US. According to US Census Bureau data for May 2025, imports from India stood at $9.43 billion, while US exports to India were $3.82 billion, resulting in a US goods trade deficit, or an Indian surplus, of roughly $5.6 billion. If the 50% tariffs remain in place, nearly all of India's annual exports to the US could become commercially unviable. Meanwhile, the US continues to run a $45.7 billion goods trade deficit with India, yet these tariffs disproportionately affect Indian exports compared with goods from other Srivastava, the message is clear: 'Trade deficit is just for the namesake. It's about forcing countries to fall in line with a geopolitical agenda.' India imports roughly 20% of its GDP in goods, spanning petroleum, machinery and electronics, yet Washington appears less concerned with trade imbalances than with pressuring India to compromise on and dairy have emerged as key sticking points in India-US trade talks, which collapsed earlier this month. On August 7, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared, 'India will never compromise on the well-being of its farmers, dairy producers and fishermen.' New Delhi has consistently resisted US pressure to open these sectors, arguing that doing so would threaten millions of small farmers. Historically, India has kept agriculture largely off the table in trade agreements to safeguard domestic to Srivastava, US demands extend far beyond tariffs: opening government procurement, diluting patent laws that could make medicines costlier, limiting future digital taxes, and shifting military sourcing to the US. 'Even if we open agri and dairy, no trade deal will happen with this. Not a trade issue. They want you to open your government procurement, dilute patent laws, commit to never charge digital tax in future, buy military from the US, the list is endless,' he adds, 'Trump imposed 50% tariffs on Brazil partly over politics and partly because Brazil asked Twitter to remove anti-Brazil content. Records show India generates even more such requests, so he could use that as an excuse too. He can conjure unlimited reasons to impose tariffs if he's unhappy. My sense is he doesn't want a partner in India, he wants a vassal. India refuses to play that role; it insists on an equal partnership. That's the basic problem.'The US approach to Russian oil imports is uneven. China, Russia's largest crude buyer, faces no comparable tariff threats, while India is under heavy pressure. 'Even if the US demanded zero imports from Russia, India's imports would fall anyway due to economic circumstances,' notes Srivastava. European and US bans on petroleum products derived from Russian crude are already reducing India's imports, independent of Washington's selective approach reflects a broader pattern in US trade policy. Brazil, for example, faced a 50% tariff despite running a surplus with the US, largely over political disagreements including its stance on Venezuela and former President Bolsonaro. Venezuela itself is under secondary sanctions for buyers of its oil, though some firms, like Chevron, have received exemptions. These cases suggest that political alignment often outweighs economic between Russia and the US has dropped roughly 90% since the Kremlin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, though last year the US still imported $3 billion worth of Russian goods, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau. Meanwhile, the European Union, a partner in sanctions against Russia, imported $41.9 billion (36 billion euros) of Russian goods in 2024, Eurostat data the US pressures India to cut Russian oil imports, market forces and global regulations are already reshaping trade flows. Europe and US bans on petroleum products ensure India's imports will decline regardless of Washington's actions. Srivastava cautions, however, that the US may find new reasons for tariffs, keeping India under continuous has built a buffer against such pressures. Exports constitute roughly 20% of GDP, compared with 90% for Vietnam, a country far more vulnerable to US-imposed shocks. 'Vietnam will suffer more. We will suffer, but we will absorb it properly. Country will bounce back. All we need to do is not to surrender,' Srivastava US consumers will also feel the impact of tariffs. About 90% of prescriptions in the US rely on generics imported from India. While the total trade value may be under $10 billion, disruption affects the majority of prescriptions, potentially raising prices significantly. Companies may eventually source alternatives over three to four months, but the immediate effect is inflationary.'Indian exports will suffer, but we need to consider whether it's better to endure this and use it to push delayed reforms, like diversifying exports, rather than falling into a bad deal. This isn't really about trade; it's about surrendering sovereignty,' Srivastava Srivastava, Trump's broader strategy is political theatre. 'Basically, he wanted to hit China. He couldn't, so he has to show his domestic voters that he is a big man, that a bully can show strength by hitting someone. He couldn't hit China, so let's hit India, that's the only thing.'With China, Trump launched a trade war over the large trade deficit, but Beijing hit back by restricting supplies of critical materials, he noted. 'India hasn't used those levers, which is why Washington expected Delhi to yield immediately.'India's refusal to play a compliant role, unlike Pakistan, frustrates Trump. At the same time, India maintains strategic autonomy, engaging with Russia on defence, limiting deep Chinese investment to marketing and distribution, and managing relations with the US on equal footing. 'We are a big country, big economy, and so we have to have workable, good relations with everyone, without being in anybody's camp,' Srivastava pre-Galwan, Chinese investment has been superficial. 'China doesn't invest in deep manufacturing. They will not supply any technology. They will invest in marketing of cars, garments, two, $5 billion here and there, but we don't want that. So we have to evaluate very carefully,' he says.'We can have targeted strategic relationships, like with Russia for defence, but moving closer to China is complicated. There's the border dispute and a $100 billion trade deficit,' he export-oriented economy, diversified supply chains and robust domestic market allow it to absorb short-term shocks while resisting long-term concessions. 'All we need to do is not enter into any relationship that costs us the medium or long term,' Srivastava takeaway is clear: Trump's tariffs are less about trade and more about leverage. Every tweet, every tariff threat, every demand is a political signal designed to demonstrate strength to domestic voters. 'Every day he abuses us on Twitter. That shows India has entered his mind,' Srivastava response emphasises sovereignty, resilience and strategic foresight. "Trade deal is not a trade deal. It's about bargaining for your sovereignty. And India is not bargaining."

No service for instant e-PAN to be available on these two days: ITR E-filing portal
No service for instant e-PAN to be available on these two days: ITR E-filing portal

Economic Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

No service for instant e-PAN to be available on these two days: ITR E-filing portal

ET Online Instant Electronic PAN service on the e-filing ITR portal will not be available for two days due to scheduled maintenance activity; Check details The Income Tax Department has announced that instant e-PAN services will not be available for two days due to scheduled maintenance activity. For those who don't know what an e-PAN is, the Instant e-PAN service is available to all Individual taxpayers, who have not been allotted a Permanent Account Number (PAN) but possess Aadhaar. This is a pre-login service, where you can: Obtain digitally signed PAN in electronic format, free of cost, with the help of Aadhaar and your mobile number linked with Aadhaar, Update PAN details as per Aadhaar e-KYC, Create e-Filing account based on e-KYC details after allotment / updation of PAN, and Check status of pending e-PAN request / Download e-PAN either before or after logging in to the e-Filing portal. The Income Tax Department said on the e-filing ITR portal: 'Due to scheduled maintenance activity, Instant E-PAN services will not be available from 12:00AM, 17th August 2025 to 12:00AM,19th August 2025. Please plan your activities accordingly.' Also read: ITR filing deadline needs to be extended due to discrepancies in Form 26AS, AIS, system error while ITR uploading, and other issues, says GCCI Chartered Accountant Himank Singla, partner, SBHS & Associates, says: 'An e-PAN (Electronic Permanent Account Number) is a digitally signed PAN card issued in PDF format. It is generated instantly for eligible applicants using their Aadhaar details, without requiring submission of physical documents. This facility is particularly useful for individuals who need a PAN urgently for opening bank accounts, investing in securities, conducting high-value transactions, or complying with income tax rules.' Also read: Section 87A tax rebate can be claimed for short term capital gains income under new tax regime, rules ITAT Ahmedabad FAQs on e-PAN Question 1: I have a PAN but I have lost it. Can I get a new e-PAN through Aadhaar? Answer: service can only be used if you do not have a PAN, but have a valid Aadhaar and your KYC details are updated. Question 2: Are there any charges / fee for e-PAN? Answer: No. It is completely free of cost. Question 3: What are the pre-requisites for availing an instant e-PAN? Answer: The pre-requisite for obtaining instant e-PAN are: Individual who has not been allotted a PAN Valid Aadhaar and mobile number linked to Aadhaar User not a minor as on date of request; and User not covered under the definition of Representative Assessee u/s 160 of the Income Tax Act. Question 4: What documents do I require for obtaining a new e-PAN? Answer: You only require a valid Aadhaar with updated KYC details, and a valid mobile number linked with your Aadhaar. Question 5: Why do I need to generate an e-PAN? Answer: It is mandatory to quote your Permanent Account Number (PAN) while filing your Income Tax Return. If you have not been allotted a PAN, you can generate your e-PAN with the help of your Aadhaar and a mobile number registered with your Aadhaar. Generating e-PAN is free of cost, online process and does not require you to fill up any forms. Question 6: The current status of my PAN allotment request status is updated as 'PAN allotment request has failed'. What should I do? Answer: In case of failure of e-PAN allotment, you can apply for PAN through NSDL or UTITSL. Question 7: How will I know that my e-PAN generation request is submitted successfully? Answer: A success message will be displayed along with an Acknowledgement ID. Please keep a note of the Acknowledgement ID for future reference. Additionally, you will receive a copy of the Acknowledgement ID on your mobile number registered with Aadhaar. Question 8: I am not able to update my Date of Birth in my e-PAN. What should I do? Answer: If only the year of birth is available in your Aadhaar, you will have to update the date of birth in your Aadhaar and try again. Question 9: Can foreign citizens apply for PAN through e-KYC mode? Answer: No. Question 10: If my Aadhaar authentication gets rejected during e-KYC, what should I do? Answer: Aadhaar authentication may get rejected due to using the wrong OTP. The problem can be resolved by entering the correct OTP. If it still gets rejected, you have to contact UIDAI. N.R. Narayana Murthy Founder, Infosys Watch Now Harsh Mariwala Chairman & Founder, Marico Watch Now Adar Poonawalla CEO, Serum Institute of India Watch Now Ronnie Screwvala Chairperson & Co-founder, upGrad Watch Now Puneet Dalmia Managing Director, Dalmia Bharat group Watch Now Martin Schwenk Former President & CEO, Mercedes-Benz, Thailand Watch Now Nadir Godrej Managing Director, of Godrej Industries Watch Now Manu Jain Former- Global Vice President, Xiaomi Watch Now Nithin Kamath Founder, CEO, Zerodha Watch Now Anil Agarwal Executive Chairman, Vedanta Resources Watch Now Dr. Prathap C. Reddy Founder Chairman, Apollo Hospitals Watch Now Vikram Kirloskar Former Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Watch Now Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Executive Chairperson, Biocon Limited Watch Now Shashi Kiran Shetty Chairman of Allcargo Logistics, ECU Worldwide and Gati Ltd Watch Now Samir K Modi Managing Director, Modi Enterprises Watch Now R Gopalakrishnan Former Director Tata Sons, Former Vice Chairman, HUL Watch Now Sanjiv Mehta Former Chairman / CEO, Hindustan Unilever Watch Now Dr Ajai Chowdhry Co-Founder, HCL, Chairman EPIC Foundation, Author, Just Aspire Watch Now Shiv Khera Author, Business Consultant, Motivational Speaker Watch Now Nakul Anand Executive Director, ITC Limited Watch Now RS Sodhi Former MD, Amul & President, Indian Dairy Association Watch Now Anil Rai Gupta Managing Director & Chairman, Havells Watch Now Zia Mody Co-Founder & Managing Partner, AZB & Partners Watch Now Arundhati Bhattacharya Chairperson & CEO, Salesforce India Watch Now

Modi heads to China — a delicate step in the dragon-elephant tango
Modi heads to China — a delicate step in the dragon-elephant tango

Economic Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Modi heads to China — a delicate step in the dragon-elephant tango

Synopsis Amidst fragile relations and border tensions, Prime Minister Modi's upcoming visit to China signals a calculated step in geopolitics. Facilitated by a pact at the BRICS summit, the visit, tied to the SCO summit, aims to foster regional stability and address trade imbalances. India navigates complex relationships, balancing engagement with China and continued collaboration with the US. Just a year ago, the idea of Prime Minister Narendra Modi visiting China would have seemed far-fetched. Relations between the two nations were fragile. The border in eastern Ladakh was quiet but tense, with troop disengagement at key friction points still incomplete. Fast forward to 2025, and Modi's upcoming trip to Tianjin feels less like a gamble and more like a calculated step in a complex geopolitical dance. The foundation for this cautious reset was laid last October, when Modi and President Xi Jinping agreed at the BRICS summit that 'disputes and differences would not be allowed to disturb border peace.' That pact has held firm, setting the stage for Modi's visit, official confirmation aside. Meanwhile, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is scheduled to visit India next week to meet NSA Ajit Doval and External Affairs Minister S. visit is officially tied to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, a 10-member Eurasian security grouping led by China and Russia, often seen as a counterweight to NATO. Modi's last trip to China, in 2018, was also SCO-related. India's position in the SCO is unique, it refrains from endorsing projects like the Belt and Road Initiative and keeps its distance from China-centric economic roadmaps. Yet the SCO serves India's interests, from counterterrorism in Afghanistan to promoting connectivity that respects sovereignty and strengthening ties with Central Asia. Modi has used the SCO Heads of State Council meetings to spotlight cross-border terrorism, without directly naming Pakistan. The forum has also become a neutral space for India and China to engage after tensions spiked in 2020's Galwan clash. The so-called 'Moscow Consensus,' reached months after Galwan during an SCO foreign ministers' meeting, is a clear example. President Xi's participation in the 2023 SCO summit Modi hosted virtually further cemented the platform's hasn't attended every SCO summit. He skipped the Kazakhstan meeting last year. This trip signals recognition of the Tianjin summit's importance to China and the global stage. It's not just about bilateral ties, it's about maintaining a steady hand in regional geopolitics and securing support for India's upcoming BRICS policy has occasionally complicated India's external engagements, but the India-China thaw started long before trade tensions hit. Agreements to end the military standoff in eastern Ladakh were reached before the US elections. Modi's China visit conveys a clear message: India is ready for a functional relationship with Beijing, as long as border stability is preserved.'When NSA Doval visited China last December, both sides agreed to maintain peace on the ground so that 'issues on the border do not hold back the normal development of bilateral relations,'' the reports note. India has maintained this balance despite China's military ties with Pakistan or tensions in the South China Modi-Xi meeting could include announcements like resuming direct flights and rebuilding trust in trade, investment, and technology. India hopes China will ease trade restrictions and increase imports to reduce the $100 billion trade deficit. China, for its part, seeks a transparent, non-discriminatory environment for its companies.'The dragon-elephant tango may have just started, but in these circumstances, it will remain accident-prone,' analysts say, recalling highs and lows, from the early Modi years to Doklam, informal summits, and Galwan. Modi's recent remark, endorsed by Beijing, that 'competition should not be allowed to turn into conflict,' signals the cautious approach both sides are aiming visit doesn't mean India is abandoning the US. Modi has met Xi at previous SCO summits without affecting India's strategic autonomy. Today, attention is heightened because of US-India trade tensions, including tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia. Yet India continues to pursue defence, technology, and energy collaboration with the China visit asserts India's position against unilateralism while keeping the door open with America. A potential resolution in Ukraine could also ease some tariff will closely monitor three issues: The US's continued commitment to the Indo-Pacific amid potential trade concessions with China, particularly as India hosts the upcoming Quad summit in November. Counterterrorism cooperation, which may be affected by the US recalibrating its Pakistan policy. The proposed H-1B visa overhaul, which could impact Indian professionals in IT and healthcare, potentially straining people-to-people and economic ties. These challenges will test India's diplomatic finesse and its ability to balance competing global priorities. With inputs from TOI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store