
Mining companies are pumping seawater into the driest place on Earth. But has the damage been done?
Cubillos and his fellow activists believe that the mining industry is helping to degrade the region's meagre water resources, as Chile continues to be ravaged by a mega-drought that has plagued the country for 15 years. They also fear that the use of desalinated seawater cannot make up for the devastation of the northern Atacama region's sensitive water ecosystem and local livelihoods.
Water extraction has caused water table levels to drop, endangering springs, wetlands and surface water sources that support biodiversity and are vital for local crops and livestock. 'Several wetlands have dried up completely, and the vegetation has diminished considerably,' says Cubillos. The community of Peine lies within a salt flat, where a delicate ecological balance makes the region highly vulnerable to any changes in climate. Cubillos says mining has exacerbated the effects of the climate crisis, severely depleting the community's groundwater reserves. 'The mining activity has made the area unsuitable for cattle grazing.'
The mega-drought is considered the most prolonged and widespread in a century, and the local population and mining companies are fighting for the right to water in the Atacama desert, the driest place on Earth, where the world's largest copper and lithium deposits are located.
The lack of rainfall has had profound effects on Chile's water resources, agriculture and ecosystems and is severely depleting its freshwater reserves in the Atacama region. Even mining operations have occasionally been forced to stop due to water shortages.
In December, Escondida's majority owner, the Australian mining firm BHP, the US-based Albemarle and Chilean firm Zaldívar were ordered to pay an unprecedented $47m fine (£34.5m) for depleting the Monturaqui-Negrillar-Tilopozo aquifer and damaging surrounding vegetation.
The environmental court of Antofagasta ruled that the damage caused by the three companies 'negatively affects the Indigenous community of Peine, altering their systems of life and traditions'. It ruled that the companies had exceeded the legally permitted limits on groundwater extraction, resulting in a decline of the water table by more than 25cm – an unsustainable amount for the salt flat ecosystem, according to the court.
Chile's water authority had already raised concerns in 2018 over Escondida's water extraction. In 2022 Escondida appealed an $8.4m fine for non-compliance over this issue, but it was rejected.
The environmental court's decision came after a negotiated agreement between the Indigenous community, the Chilean government and the companies involved. The fines are earmarked for environmental remediation, which in some cases includes investment in desalination.
The mining sector is increasingly turning to the sea. About 30% of the water used by Chile's mines now comes from seawater – desalinated or untreated – according to the national mining association. BHP says it has invested $4bn (£2.94bn) in desalination infrastructure in recent years. As a result, the company says, it ceased extracting water from the Peine wetland in 2019.
Its desalination plant in the coastal city of Coloso, about 170km (105 miles) from the mine, is the largest in Chile by capacity. 'The company's first desalination plant opened in 2006, underscoring our pioneering role in the mining sector,' BHP says.
Albemarle has also told the Guardian that it no longer uses groundwater from the reserve in its operations. 'While our company has never been a major water user in the area, this step is part of our long-term sustainability efforts on the Atacama salt flat,' the company's communications manager says.
Albemarle has further clarified that the use of seawater to remediate environmental damage is not included in the formal agreement by the court, though its website highlights ongoing investments in desalination.
Zaldívar has declined to comment.
Sign up to Global Dispatch
Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team
after newsletter promotion
Cubillos, who took part in the negotiations, acknowledges the shift. 'It's positive that companies have stopped exploiting groundwater reserves,' he says. 'However, the desalinated water does not reach our lands.'
The three companies that the court found responsible for depleting Peine's groundwater produce roughly half of Chile's copper and a third of its lithium.
Mining accounts for about a fifth of Chile's gross domestic product, and minerals – particularly copper and lithium, which are essential for the global green transition – are the country's main exports. Chile supplies about 13% of the copper and 80% of the lithium carbonate and refined lithium imported into the EU.
Lithium is critical for electric vehicle batteries, while copper underpins most renewable energy technologies and infrastructure. The global green transition is projected to substantially increase demand for copper and lithium. For Chile, this implies escalating water requirements for mining operations.
Despite advances in desalination, mining remains a major consumer of fresh water, accounting for about 50% of regional reserves in the north. Chile's ministry of mining projects that total consumption of water will go up by about 20% by 2034.
Desalination and transporting seawater inland also come with environmental costs. These are energy-intensive processes, and studies forecast that CO2 emissions from Chile's desalination plants could reach up to about 700,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent annually by 2030 – about the same as Antigua and Barbuda.
Only a small share of these plants operate on renewable energy, according to Sebastián Herrera-León, an assistant professor at the University of O'Higgins. 'Currently, desalination plants in Chile are powered by the national grid, which draws from both fossil fuels and renewables,' he says.
He identifies two ways forward: either desalination plants must integrate dedicated renewable energy sources, or the national energy grid must complete its transition to renewables.
Desalination may also transfer environmental risks from the desert to the ocean. In Antofagasta, a coastal town in northern Chile near where Escondida's desalination plant and port are located, local fishers have already noticed changes.
'Fish populations are dying. Escondida's port has long polluted the sea, and the desalination plant makes things worse,' says fisher Nelson Fornerod Gutiérrez, 82.
Marine biologist Elizabeth Soto of the NGO Terram says that brine discharge from desalination poses a threat to aquatic biodiversity. 'Improved spatial planning is essential for desalination plant siting. Constructing facilities along the entire coastline without accounting for environmental impacts is unsustainable,' she says.
Mining companies own 17 of Chile's 24 operational desalination plants, with more planned along the Pacific coast. About 75% of the country's desalination capacity serves the mining sector.
While desalinated seawater has eased pressure on dwindling inland sources, the Indigenous community of Peine remains wary. The damage may already be irreversible, they fear, damaging the salt flats and their waters, which are as vital as they are sacred to the Lickanantay people.
'We continue to resist mining companies,' says Cubillos, 'to assert that our Indigenous culture and worldview remain alive.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Why is it so difficult to build new reservoirs?
After the country's warmest and driest spring for more than 50 years, Yorkshire's reservoirs are now almost half Water, which manages 120 reservoirs, said water stocks were around 55% after England's warmest June on record, compared to a summer average of 81%.Reservoirs help protect against water shortages during droughts by collecting excess rainfall during wet the current drought, questions have been asked about why we cannot build more of them to future-proof supplies for a growing population. There were major reservoir building projects in Yorkshire in the 1960s, when Thruscross near Harrogate was constructed, and 40 years ago, when Grimwith in the Dales was expanded - although the original reservoir on the site dated back to year the government announced proposals to build nine new reservoirs by 2050, but none are likely to be operational for at least 10 major reservoirs have been completed in England since 1992, shortly after the water sector was privatised. UK's first 2025 hosepipe ban declared in Yorkshire Many of the largest sites were developed during the Victorian era, when the country rapidly industrialised and the urban population increased. City corporations - the forerunner to modern councils - purchased land in rural areas to flood, often displacing entire villages whose residents were forced to near Pateley Bridge, was one of 11 reservoirs built by the Bradford Corporation to supply the growing city, and Leeds Waterworks Company invested in labour-intensive projects in the Washburn Valley, where Swinsty, Fewston and Lindley Wood were built in the South Yorkshire, Langsett Reservoir, completed in 1904, supplies Sheffield and Barnsley, and the Sheffield Waterworks Company also built a group of four reservoirs in the Bradfield area in the late 19th Century. Ownership of these sites eventually passed to Yorkshire Kevin Grecksch, associate professor of water science, policy and management at the University of Oxford, said the idea of "locking" water in storage areas was ancient and had been practised since agriculture first would manage their own small-scale reservoirs before large public works commenced during the Industrial Revolution."A lot of this happened in the Midlands and Yorkshire, where the textile mills, steel and coal mining and pottery industries all needed enormous amounts of water," he World War Two, there was a second wave of reservoir construction."Cities like Liverpool and Manchester had growing populations and needed water." Why don't we build reservoirs anymore? Building new reservoirs could be "challenging", said a Yorkshire Water spokesperson, in terms of cost, finding suitable sites, planning constraints and the environmental and community impact."It is more complicated to build reservoirs now because they will inevitably face a lot of opposition", said Dr Grecksch."In the 1950s, big environmental protest groups didn't exist, so there wasn't the big opposition we'd see today."They are all controversial, because they're massive, imposing pieces of infrastructure."The government has already said that plans for seven of the proposed new reservoirs around the country would be designated as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP), meaning decisions would be made above local authority level. But Dr Grecksch said this process could exclude the public."We're in a situation in 2025 where we need to discuss these things with people, and explain why we need it," he are normally built using acts of Parliament, including the Reservoirs Act 1975, which regulates their safety. But the case of the Tryweryn reservoir in Wales, said Dr Grecksch, showed what could happen when the local planning system was demand for water was growing in Liverpool in 1995, the Welsh village of Capel Celyn was earmarked as the site for a new reservoir to serve the city.A decade later, the village was flooded and 75 people had to leave their homes, which were submerged along with farms, a school, chapel and post most appropriate locations for reservoirs are often in upland areas where an existing river valley can be flooded. The Peak District National Park proved ideal for many of them, as they were close enough to supply cities such as Sheffield, Manchester, Nottingham and water from a more remote area to a population centre can add significant the mid-1990s, Yorkshire Water built a new ring main pipe system designed to help supplies flow from the east of the region to the more landlocked and drought-stricken western half of the network moves both raw water and treated drinking water, according to the company. But while that measure has apparently been successful, the building of new major reservoirs has stalled. Do we need any new reservoirs? We need more water in the UK because we do not have enough, said Dr Grecksch – but reservoirs, he added, were only part of the advocates for water reuse schemes, where waste water can be redeployed for agriculture."We all need water – it's not about restricting it. We need measures to simply save a little bit of water," he Megan Klaar, associate professor of hydrology at The University of Leeds, agreed that building reservoirs "is one tool in the toolbox"."We need to build reservoirs to capture water when it does rain, but we also need to think about reusing water much more smartly," she Klaar, who grew up with water rationing in her native California, said she did not think such restrictions would be in place in the UK "in the near future". But she added: "We need to start preserving the resources we do have, so we don't transition into that reality." As an alternative to building new reservoirs, Yorkshire Water has looked at other options, including increasing the use of ground and surface water collection."We have been looking at all options for additional water and ways in which we can reduce demand together over the longer term," said a company firm was building two new boreholes - large wells dug deep into the ground to access water - the spokesperson said the company was also building "new water treatment works to support our grid network so we're able to add resilience into our water supply network". However, they added, these were only short-term measures."In the longer term, we're reflecting on the rapid effects of climate change, data centres (which use huge amounts of water), and customer demand increases."We'll be thinking and planning for how we can meet the future needs of our customers. One of the options that we will be considering if whether additional reservoirs are needed."With additional reporting from Spencer Stokes. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
Mining companies are pumping seawater into the driest place on Earth. But has the damage been done?
Vast pipelines cross the endless dunes of northern Chile, pumping seawater up to an altitude of more than 3,000 metres in the Andes mountains to the Escondida mine, the world's largest copper producer. The mine's owners say sourcing water directly from the sea, instead of relying on local reservoirs, could help preserve regional water resources. Yet, this is not the perception of Sergio Cubillos, leader of the Indigenous community Lickanantay de Peine. Cubillos and his fellow activists believe that the mining industry is helping to degrade the region's meagre water resources, as Chile continues to be ravaged by a mega-drought that has plagued the country for 15 years. They also fear that the use of desalinated seawater cannot make up for the devastation of the northern Atacama region's sensitive water ecosystem and local livelihoods. Water extraction has caused water table levels to drop, endangering springs, wetlands and surface water sources that support biodiversity and are vital for local crops and livestock. 'Several wetlands have dried up completely, and the vegetation has diminished considerably,' says Cubillos. The community of Peine lies within a salt flat, where a delicate ecological balance makes the region highly vulnerable to any changes in climate. Cubillos says mining has exacerbated the effects of the climate crisis, severely depleting the community's groundwater reserves. 'The mining activity has made the area unsuitable for cattle grazing.' The mega-drought is considered the most prolonged and widespread in a century, and the local population and mining companies are fighting for the right to water in the Atacama desert, the driest place on Earth, where the world's largest copper and lithium deposits are located. The lack of rainfall has had profound effects on Chile's water resources, agriculture and ecosystems and is severely depleting its freshwater reserves in the Atacama region. Even mining operations have occasionally been forced to stop due to water shortages. In December, Escondida's majority owner, the Australian mining firm BHP, the US-based Albemarle and Chilean firm Zaldívar were ordered to pay an unprecedented $47m fine (£34.5m) for depleting the Monturaqui-Negrillar-Tilopozo aquifer and damaging surrounding vegetation. The environmental court of Antofagasta ruled that the damage caused by the three companies 'negatively affects the Indigenous community of Peine, altering their systems of life and traditions'. It ruled that the companies had exceeded the legally permitted limits on groundwater extraction, resulting in a decline of the water table by more than 25cm – an unsustainable amount for the salt flat ecosystem, according to the court. Chile's water authority had already raised concerns in 2018 over Escondida's water extraction. In 2022 Escondida appealed an $8.4m fine for non-compliance over this issue, but it was rejected. The environmental court's decision came after a negotiated agreement between the Indigenous community, the Chilean government and the companies involved. The fines are earmarked for environmental remediation, which in some cases includes investment in desalination. The mining sector is increasingly turning to the sea. About 30% of the water used by Chile's mines now comes from seawater – desalinated or untreated – according to the national mining association. BHP says it has invested $4bn (£2.94bn) in desalination infrastructure in recent years. As a result, the company says, it ceased extracting water from the Peine wetland in 2019. Its desalination plant in the coastal city of Coloso, about 170km (105 miles) from the mine, is the largest in Chile by capacity. 'The company's first desalination plant opened in 2006, underscoring our pioneering role in the mining sector,' BHP says. Albemarle has also told the Guardian that it no longer uses groundwater from the reserve in its operations. 'While our company has never been a major water user in the area, this step is part of our long-term sustainability efforts on the Atacama salt flat,' the company's communications manager says. Albemarle has further clarified that the use of seawater to remediate environmental damage is not included in the formal agreement by the court, though its website highlights ongoing investments in desalination. Zaldívar has declined to comment. Sign up to Global Dispatch Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team after newsletter promotion Cubillos, who took part in the negotiations, acknowledges the shift. 'It's positive that companies have stopped exploiting groundwater reserves,' he says. 'However, the desalinated water does not reach our lands.' The three companies that the court found responsible for depleting Peine's groundwater produce roughly half of Chile's copper and a third of its lithium. Mining accounts for about a fifth of Chile's gross domestic product, and minerals – particularly copper and lithium, which are essential for the global green transition – are the country's main exports. Chile supplies about 13% of the copper and 80% of the lithium carbonate and refined lithium imported into the EU. Lithium is critical for electric vehicle batteries, while copper underpins most renewable energy technologies and infrastructure. The global green transition is projected to substantially increase demand for copper and lithium. For Chile, this implies escalating water requirements for mining operations. Despite advances in desalination, mining remains a major consumer of fresh water, accounting for about 50% of regional reserves in the north. Chile's ministry of mining projects that total consumption of water will go up by about 20% by 2034. Desalination and transporting seawater inland also come with environmental costs. These are energy-intensive processes, and studies forecast that CO2 emissions from Chile's desalination plants could reach up to about 700,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent annually by 2030 – about the same as Antigua and Barbuda. Only a small share of these plants operate on renewable energy, according to Sebastián Herrera-León, an assistant professor at the University of O'Higgins. 'Currently, desalination plants in Chile are powered by the national grid, which draws from both fossil fuels and renewables,' he says. He identifies two ways forward: either desalination plants must integrate dedicated renewable energy sources, or the national energy grid must complete its transition to renewables. Desalination may also transfer environmental risks from the desert to the ocean. In Antofagasta, a coastal town in northern Chile near where Escondida's desalination plant and port are located, local fishers have already noticed changes. 'Fish populations are dying. Escondida's port has long polluted the sea, and the desalination plant makes things worse,' says fisher Nelson Fornerod Gutiérrez, 82. Marine biologist Elizabeth Soto of the NGO Terram says that brine discharge from desalination poses a threat to aquatic biodiversity. 'Improved spatial planning is essential for desalination plant siting. Constructing facilities along the entire coastline without accounting for environmental impacts is unsustainable,' she says. Mining companies own 17 of Chile's 24 operational desalination plants, with more planned along the Pacific coast. About 75% of the country's desalination capacity serves the mining sector. While desalinated seawater has eased pressure on dwindling inland sources, the Indigenous community of Peine remains wary. The damage may already be irreversible, they fear, damaging the salt flats and their waters, which are as vital as they are sacred to the Lickanantay people. 'We continue to resist mining companies,' says Cubillos, 'to assert that our Indigenous culture and worldview remain alive.'


The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
Mining companies are pumping seawater into the driest place on Earth. But has the damage been done?
Vast pipelines cross the endless dunes of northern Chile, pumping seawater up to an altitude of more than 3,000 metres in the Andes mountains to the Escondida mine, the world's largest copper producer. The mine's owners say sourcing water directly from the sea, instead of relying on local reservoirs, could help preserve regional water resources. Yet, this is not the perception of Sergio Cubillos, leader of the Indigenous community Lickanantay de Peine. Cubillos and his fellow activists believe that the mining industry is helping to degrade the region's meagre water resources, as Chile continues to be ravaged by a mega-drought that has plagued the country for 15 years. They also fear that the use of desalinated seawater cannot make up for the devastation of the northern Atacama region's sensitive water ecosystem and local livelihoods. Water extraction has caused water table levels to drop, endangering springs, wetlands and surface water sources that support biodiversity and are vital for local crops and livestock. 'Several wetlands have dried up completely, and the vegetation has diminished considerably,' says Cubillos. The community of Peine lies within a salt flat, where a delicate ecological balance makes the region highly vulnerable to any changes in climate. Cubillos says mining has exacerbated the effects of the climate crisis, severely depleting the community's groundwater reserves. 'The mining activity has made the area unsuitable for cattle grazing.' The mega-drought is considered the most prolonged and widespread in a century, and the local population and mining companies are fighting for the right to water in the Atacama desert, the driest place on Earth, where the world's largest copper and lithium deposits are located. The lack of rainfall has had profound effects on Chile's water resources, agriculture and ecosystems and is severely depleting its freshwater reserves in the Atacama region. Even mining operations have occasionally been forced to stop due to water shortages. In December, Escondida's majority owner, the Australian mining firm BHP, the US-based Albemarle and Chilean firm Zaldívar were ordered to pay an unprecedented $47m fine (£34.5m) for depleting the Monturaqui-Negrillar-Tilopozo aquifer and damaging surrounding vegetation. The environmental court of Antofagasta ruled that the damage caused by the three companies 'negatively affects the Indigenous community of Peine, altering their systems of life and traditions'. It ruled that the companies had exceeded the legally permitted limits on groundwater extraction, resulting in a decline of the water table by more than 25cm – an unsustainable amount for the salt flat ecosystem, according to the court. Chile's water authority had already raised concerns in 2018 over Escondida's water extraction. In 2022 Escondida appealed an $8.4m fine for non-compliance over this issue, but it was rejected. The environmental court's decision came after a negotiated agreement between the Indigenous community, the Chilean government and the companies involved. The fines are earmarked for environmental remediation, which in some cases includes investment in desalination. The mining sector is increasingly turning to the sea. About 30% of the water used by Chile's mines now comes from seawater – desalinated or untreated – according to the national mining association. BHP says it has invested $4bn (£2.94bn) in desalination infrastructure in recent years. As a result, the company says, it ceased extracting water from the Peine wetland in 2019. Its desalination plant in the coastal city of Coloso, about 170km (105 miles) from the mine, is the largest in Chile by capacity. 'The company's first desalination plant opened in 2006, underscoring our pioneering role in the mining sector,' BHP says. Albemarle has also told the Guardian that it no longer uses groundwater from the reserve in its operations. 'While our company has never been a major water user in the area, this step is part of our long-term sustainability efforts on the Atacama salt flat,' the company's communications manager says. Albemarle has further clarified that the use of seawater to remediate environmental damage is not included in the formal agreement by the court, though its website highlights ongoing investments in desalination. Zaldívar has declined to comment. Sign up to Global Dispatch Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team after newsletter promotion Cubillos, who took part in the negotiations, acknowledges the shift. 'It's positive that companies have stopped exploiting groundwater reserves,' he says. 'However, the desalinated water does not reach our lands.' The three companies that the court found responsible for depleting Peine's groundwater produce roughly half of Chile's copper and a third of its lithium. Mining accounts for about a fifth of Chile's gross domestic product, and minerals – particularly copper and lithium, which are essential for the global green transition – are the country's main exports. Chile supplies about 13% of the copper and 80% of the lithium carbonate and refined lithium imported into the EU. Lithium is critical for electric vehicle batteries, while copper underpins most renewable energy technologies and infrastructure. The global green transition is projected to substantially increase demand for copper and lithium. For Chile, this implies escalating water requirements for mining operations. Despite advances in desalination, mining remains a major consumer of fresh water, accounting for about 50% of regional reserves in the north. Chile's ministry of mining projects that total consumption of water will go up by about 20% by 2034. Desalination and transporting seawater inland also come with environmental costs. These are energy-intensive processes, and studies forecast that CO2 emissions from Chile's desalination plants could reach up to about 700,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent annually by 2030 – about the same as Antigua and Barbuda. Only a small share of these plants operate on renewable energy, according to Sebastián Herrera-León, an assistant professor at the University of O'Higgins. 'Currently, desalination plants in Chile are powered by the national grid, which draws from both fossil fuels and renewables,' he says. He identifies two ways forward: either desalination plants must integrate dedicated renewable energy sources, or the national energy grid must complete its transition to renewables. Desalination may also transfer environmental risks from the desert to the ocean. In Antofagasta, a coastal town in northern Chile near where Escondida's desalination plant and port are located, local fishers have already noticed changes. 'Fish populations are dying. Escondida's port has long polluted the sea, and the desalination plant makes things worse,' says fisher Nelson Fornedod Gutiérrez, 82. Marine biologist Elizabeth Soto of the NGO Terram says that brine discharge from desalination poses a threat to aquatic biodiversity. 'Improved spatial planning is essential for desalination plant siting. Constructing facilities along the entire coastline without accounting for environmental impacts is unsustainable,' she says. Mining companies own 17 of Chile's 24 operational desalination plants, with more planned along the Pacific coast. About 75% of the country's desalination capacity serves the mining sector. While desalinated seawater has eased pressure on dwindling inland sources, the Indigenous community of Peine remains wary. The damage may already be irreversible, they fear, damaging the salt flats and their waters, which are as vital as they are sacred to the Lickanantay people. 'We continue to resist mining companies,' says Cubillos, 'to assert that our Indigenous culture and worldview remain alive.'