logo
Salem pulls key word from levy going to voter in May election: Here's why

Salem pulls key word from levy going to voter in May election: Here's why

Yahoo25-03-2025
One of the most significant issues facing Salem voters in the May election — the livability levy to support the city's parks, libraries and Center 50+ — hit a road bump when the Oregon Secretary of State advised the city against using the word "livability" on its website and in information about the levy.
The city isn't using the word because the Oregon Secretary of State's office determined it was too subjective for the city to use to participate in its "Safe Harbor" program. Under the program, a public agency can request the Elections Division review materials to ensure compliance with Oregon law.
State law prevents public employees from supporting or opposing ballot measures during working hours.
"If Safe Harbor is granted, and we later receive a complaint about the material, the division will not investigate or issue civil penalties so long as the material doesn't deviate from the approved version," Oregon Secretary of State spokeswoman Laura Kerns said in response to inquiries about the determination.
She said safe harbor is a voluntary, optional process.
Up until March 18, most city information and campaign support refer to the local option levy as the "livability levy."
The word had since been scrubbed from the city's webpage about the levy, with the note "this information was reviewed by the Oregon Elections Division for compliance with ORS 260.432."
"In this case, the City of Salem requested we review the language, which is how we got involved," Kerns said. "The review process is meant to be collaborative in which we'll work with the agency to find acceptable language under statutes, but the agency can choose to disregard our edits or use different language."
City officials said they submitted web content, an informational flyer, a presentation and talking points for review. On review of the web content, the State Elections Division removed the reference to "Livability Levy" and replaced it with "Local Option Levy."
"We can't advocate for or against any ballot measure, particularly one that involves a city," City Attorney Dan Atchison said during Monday's City Council meeting. "When we have this material (approved by the Elections Division), it allows staff to answer questions and not get fined or not get a potential complaint filed against them for advocating while on the job."
When city leadership followed up for clarification on the term "livability," the Elections Division said it's a subjective term, and they don't allow it, Atchison added.
The Elections Division's restrictions manual advises public agencies to "avoid language that would be considered persuasive, emotional or vague."
"In our view, a word like 'livability' veers a little too closely to being part of a persuasion effort to encourage a 'yes' or 'no' vote, so we would edit it out," Kerns said. "At that point, it's up to the entity to decide whether to accept our edits or keep the language."
The word "livability" has been used in other local elections without controversy, including the 2022 Safety and Livability infrastructure bond passed by Salem voters. The city's website for the 2022 bond still uses the word livability.
Supporters of the levy for Salem's parks, library and Center 50+ highlighted a five-year operating level and renewal in Corvallis in 2023 as a model. Corvallis used the word "livability" multiple times in city information.
The 'safe harbor' rules are new and were not in place in 2022 and 2023. But that doesn't change the fact the change was a terrible decision, former Oregon State Librarian and library advocate Jim Scheppke said at Monday's City Council meeting.
Scheppke urged the city to continue to use the phrase "livability" or the phrase 'livability levy' in informational messaging. He said the phrase does not promote the adoption of the measure.
"Their decision to disallow the use of the word 'livability' in connection with information from the City about the May 20th election is wrong," he said. "It will definitely color the City's information campaign in a negative way. This election is about livability. But you can't say that. Now you can only talk about a tax increase."
He also pointed out that the Spanish version of the information continued to use the word "habitabilidad," which translated to habitability.
"For more than a year, Salem voters have been hearing about a 'livability levy' at public meetings and in the media," Scheppke said. "It is what it is. It's the brand."
He added that livability is just shorthand for libraries, parks, and recreation, and the Center 50+, just as public safety is shorthand for police, fire, and emergency services, he said.
"My request to you tonight is to not take the bad advice from the Elections Division," Scheppke told the council. "Why? Because it will definitely color the city's information campaign in a negative way."
For questions, comments and news tips, email reporter Whitney Woodworth at wmwoodworth@statesmanjournal.com, call 503-910-6616 or follow on X at @wmwoodworth
This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Salem drops livability language from levy in May election
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iowa City finalizes housing-focused revenue for proposed local option sales tax
Iowa City finalizes housing-focused revenue for proposed local option sales tax

Yahoo

time11-08-2025

  • Yahoo

Iowa City finalizes housing-focused revenue for proposed local option sales tax

Iowa City is asking residents to vote on a possible local option sales tax in November, producing revenue that will address the city's housing needs while funding additional road and sidewalk repairs. The vote is part of an area-wide push to establish a local option sales tax and provide additional budgetary flexibility in Iowa City, Coralville and North Liberty. A simple majority of voters is needed to approve the ballot measure. If approved, the Iowa City's 1% tax will take effect on July 1, 2026. More: Coralville follows North Liberty's lead by drafting broad local option sales tax language Here's what to know: What does Iowa City's local option sales tax ballot language say? Iowa law requires 50% of local option sales tax revenue to be used for "property tax relief." Cities are free to use the remaining 50% in revenue as they see fit. Iowa City's ballot language reads: "The specific purposes for which the revenues shall otherwise be expended are: 25% to preserve existing affordable housing stock, increase shelter, transitional, and permanent housing supports, and increase access to and the supply of affordable housing for households with low incomes. 10% for maintenance and construction of public streets, sidewalks, trails, parks, and facilities as designated by City Council. 15% for community partnerships, including, but not limited to, partnerships that support intergovernmental, economic development, arts and culture, and social service priorities as designated by City Council." Does a local option sales tax apply to every purchase? No. "Life necessities" including groceries, rent or mortgages, utilities, vehicle purchases, gas, motels or hotels, prescription drugs and other health products would be exempt from the 1% surcharge. How much revenue would a sales tax create for Iowa City? City staff estimate that Iowa City generates between $800 million and $1 billion in eligible purchases each year, which would equate to between $8-10 million in revenue. Since state law requires the city to use half on property tax relief, the remaining 50% would equal $4-5 million. Iowa City's adopted Fiscal 2026 budget includes about $76.3 million in revenues, meaning the additional cash flow from a local option sales tax would add an estimated 5-6.5% to the city's budget. More: Prosecutors say ex-UI student would have killed woman, awaits attempted murder verdict Based on staff estimates, the sales tax would annually create an additional $2-2.5 million for housing, $1.2-1.5 million for community partnerships and $800,000 to $1 million for public infrastructure improvements. Iowa City City Council supports LOST with a bit of pause The seven-member Iowa City City Council unanimously approved the LOST ballot language despite a bit of concern. Mayor Pro Tempore Mazahir Salih and several of her colleagues acknowledged that the local option sales tax is "regressive," meaning it creates a greater burden for lower-income people. "I think this is going to affect the most vulnerable people in the community if we add the sales tax," Salih said, though she voted in favor of the proposed ballot language. "We cannot just tax the poor to fix property." Salih has been largely against the tax since it was first discussed in early summer. More: Regents encourage 'free flow of ideas' by removing references to DEI, CRT in new course policy Councilor Megan Alter referenced University of Iowa gamedays, festivals and other events that bring in large crowds from outside of Iowa City. "We will be able to benefit from outside dollars that will stay in our community," Alter said. Mayor Bruce Teague also said the council should "call it like it is," acknowledging the regressive nature of the tax, but referenced the city's "increasingly tight" budget as a possible concern. "It does have large benefits for the most vulnerable in our community," Teague said. "And let's face it, funding is being reduced all around and this is one way that we can help to keep the services that we currently have, as well as enhance opportunities for more services for those most in need." Ryan Hansen covers local government and crime for the Press-Citizen. He can be reached at rhansen@ or on X, formerly known as Twitter, @ryanhansen01. This article originally appeared on Iowa City Press-Citizen: What to know about Iowa City's local option sales tax propsal Solve the daily Crossword

States face hard choices as budgets expected to tighten
States face hard choices as budgets expected to tighten

Yahoo

time01-07-2025

  • Yahoo

States face hard choices as budgets expected to tighten

Washington Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson, center, met with several statewide elected officials in June to discuss how federal funding cuts under discussion in Congress and by the Trump administration could impact the state. (Photo courtesy of Washington governor's office) Slow revenue growth continues to pinch state budgets across the country, leading governors to propose spending cuts, hiring freezes and some tax increases. In its spring survey of states, the National Association of State Budget Officers found that general fund spending will hold steady in fiscal 2026 as states expect limited revenue growth but increased costs. Though most states are meeting or exceeding 2025 revenue projections, a growing number are downgrading their revenue expectations for the next fiscal year, Shelby Kerns, executive director of the national association, said in a news release. 'In a number of states, we're seeing expenditure projections outpacing revenue growth, forcing policymakers to make hard choices in order to balance their budgets,' Kerns said. Cutting services or raising taxes: State lawmakers weigh how to fill big budget gaps States typically wrap up budget work by the end of June, with the next fiscal year beginning July 1. Kerns said the organization anticipates states may need to make mid-year budget adjustments depending on upcoming federal changes in tax policy and spending. In recent years, many states have been flush with an influx of federal pandemic aid and strong tax revenues from a booming national economy. But with the end of pandemic aid, an uncertain economic future and deep cuts to state taxes, many lawmakers this year confronted major budget challenges in statehouses. Just weeks after signing a budget that required deep spending cuts and increased taxes, Washington Democratic state Gov. Bob Ferguson told state agencies to prepare for even more belt tightening. 'We will very likely continue to face a challenging state budget environment in the coming year and anticipate increasing caseloads and ongoing uncertainty in the economy and federal funding,' said a June 4 memo from the governor's budget director to agency leaders, according to the Washington State Standard. Still, many states continue to tout major levels of reserve funds. The National Association of State Budget Officers found at least 30 states expect to maintain a rainy-day fund balance exceeding 10% of their general fund expenditures. This year, 29 states grew their reserve funds, with the majority of states expected to continue to grow their savings next fiscal year. In Tennessee, general fund revenue growth is slowing, but state leaders were able to rely on $1.5 billion in unspent state funds and $700 million in interest earnings from federal pandemic funds, the Tennessee Lookout reported. 'Despite tighter fiscal conditions, states overall remain in a solid fiscal position with rainy day funds at near all-time highs, low debt levels, and strong credit ratings,' David Thurman, Tennessee's budget director and current association president, said in the group's news release. Stateline reporter Kevin Hardy can be reached at khardy@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Two Mercer County towns among Tuesday elections
Two Mercer County towns among Tuesday elections

Yahoo

time07-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Two Mercer County towns among Tuesday elections

bramwell — Voters will decide two town elections next week in Mercer County. The elections are set for Tuesday, June 10, in Bramwell and Athens. They are among 77 towns and cities across the Mountain State that hold an election Tuesday. In the town of Athens, the races are uncontested with two candidates vying for two seats on town council, according to Athens Town Clerk Debra Shorter. The candidates are incumbent council member Travis Pace and candidate James Blankenship. Incumbent Athens Mayor Timothy Peak also is running unopposed for re-election. The situation is different in Bramwell where the races for mayor, recorder and town council are all contested. Grant Bennett, the current mayor of Bramwell, is being challenged by former Mayor Louise Stoker and candidate Rodney Holcomb. Susan Lance Troutner, a current town council member, and Lathe Ellis are running for town recorder. Eight candidates are vying for four seats on the Bramwell Town Council, according to Bennett, who was answering the phone Friday at town hall. They include incumbents Jackie Shahan, Dennis Marcello, Charles Hawthorne and Kelley Murphy Eller and candidates Don Thompson, Perry Love, Elizabeth Brown Tillery and Sharon Workman, according to a legal advertisement copy of the ballot published in the Daily Telegraph. In all, 77 towns across West Virginia will hold an election Tuesday, according to West Virginia Secretary of State Kris Warner. Warner said some municipalities with contested races will receive a compliance visit on Election Day from an authorized representative of the Secretary of State's Office. 'My office will have more than a dozen individuals visiting municipal elections throughout the state on Election Day, June 10th,' Warner said in a statement Friday. 'These compliance visits are intended to ensure that polling locations are safe, secure and following the protocols in place to help every interested and eligible voter cast a ballot.' Warner said the visits are educational in nature to assist the clerks or recorders in charge of the elections, as well as the poll workers at each location. Trained members of the Elections Division, the WVSOS Field Team, or the Investigations Division will conduct the compliance visits, according to the Secretary of State's office. Contact Charles Owens at cowens@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store