logo
Huddersfield hospice cuts staff and beds to save its future

Huddersfield hospice cuts staff and beds to save its future

BBC News23-05-2025
A hospice in Huddersfield has announced it has made 19 staff redundant and reduced the number of inpatient beds in order to save its future.The Kirkwood provides end-of-life care to about 2,000 patients each year but its chief executive Michael Crowther said it had faced a "perfect storm" of rising operational costs over the past few years.Mr Crowther said wages for its 250-strong workforce made up most of its £11m annual budget and the recent rise in employers' National Insurance contributions (NICs) had "further deepened these financial pressures".He said: "This has been the single hardest decision we have ever had to make."
Another nine staff members have agreed to cut their hours and several others have decided to retire to help reduce the annual costs by £1.7m, the hospice added.Mr Crowther said: "As you can imagine, this has been one of the most difficult periods in The Kirkwood's history."Having to make any of our highly skilled colleagues redundant is not something we ever thought we would have to do."I would like to acknowledge all those who have left the charity during this really difficult time for their dedication and commitment."
The hospice receives only 25% of its funding from the NHS with the rest coming from donations.Bosses said the scale of the funding crisis meant they had had to make some "difficult decisions" about clinical services including cutting the number of beds in its inpatient unit from 16 to 12.As a result of the widespread changes, the hospice said there would be a reduction in the number of patients it could care for from around 2,100 last year to around 1,300 in the future.The hospice said it would continue to provide specialist palliative support at home and in care homes across Kirklees but would be working in a reduced capacity and would therefore "need to prioritise those with the most urgent and unmet needs".Mr Crowther added: "The truth is, without increased support, it simply isn't possible to maintain the full range of care we have provided over the past few years."The government has previously said the rise in National Insurance contributions was necessary to fund public services.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eli Lilly ramps up UK price of weight loss jab Mounjaro after Trump demands
Eli Lilly ramps up UK price of weight loss jab Mounjaro after Trump demands

The Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Eli Lilly ramps up UK price of weight loss jab Mounjaro after Trump demands

The price of the weight loss jab Mounjaro will rise by up to 170% in the UK, its US manufacturer has said, as Donald Trump ramps up pressure on drugmakers to increase their prices for Europeans so that they can make them more affordable for Americans. Eli Lilly has said it will increase the price of the drug from September, with a month's supply of the highest dose rising from £122 to £330. Mounjaro contains tirzepatide and is self-administered in once-a-week injections. When it launched in Britain in February 2024, Eli Lilly agreed to a list price 'significantly below' its other European markets to stop delays in availability of the medicine through the NHS. The increase in the list price will align it 'more consistently', the company said, although it added the NHS would not pay the new higher price to ensure continued access for the people with obesity and type 2 diabetes receiving it through the health service. Eli Lilly said it was working with private healthcare providers, which could negotiate their own confidential discounts with the company. Trump has threatened to use 'every tool in our arsenal' to crack down on pharmaceutical companies charging higher prices in the US compared with other nations. The US pays about three times more for drugs compared with other developed countries, according to the Rand Corporation thinktank. On 31 July, Trump sent letters to 17 of the world's biggest drugmakers, including Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, demanding cuts to drug prices for Americans within 60 days. 'Make no mistake: a collaborative effort towards achieving global pricing parity would be the most effective path for companies, the government and American patients,' Trump wrote. 'But if you refuse to step up we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices. 'Americans are demanding lower drug prices, and they need them today.' In May, Trump told reporters that a friend in London had told him he had bought the 'fat shot drug' for $88, compared with $1,300 in New York. Pharmaceutical companies have cashed in on huge demand for weight loss treatments. Denmark's Novo Nordisk has become one of the most prominent names in the field, launching Wegovy in the UK in September 2023, turning it into one of the most valuable companies in Europe. While the jabs have increased profits at big pharmaceutical companies, they are racing to develop an equivalent pill, which would be a more convenient and cheaper alternative for patients and healthcare authorities. Eli Lilly said this month that a pill in early trial stages showed that participants on their highest dose lost an average of 12.4% of their body weight, compared with 0.9% of the control group. Novo Nordisk has submitted its oral weight loss drug for approval in the US. Its trial results showed that participants could lose about 15% of their body weight.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review: I ran and hiked 100 miles to test this new smartwatch
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review: I ran and hiked 100 miles to test this new smartwatch

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review: I ran and hiked 100 miles to test this new smartwatch

The products or services listed have been independently tested by our journalists. We earn a commission from the affiliate links in this article. Read more > What is the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8? The Galaxy Watch 8 is a health and fitness tracker that connects to Samsung and other Android smartphones. Think Apple Watch, but for the people who don't own Apple products. This new model is the latest smartwatch from Samsung and at £319 it's at the upper end of the market. It has a brighter display than previous models with a simple, slim design, but the battery needs recharging regularly. It's also the first from Samsung to integrate Google Gemini AI smart assistance and can handle complex tasks with a single voice command, such as: 'Find my next nearest parkrun and save it to my calendar'. The new running coach feature also includes 160 tailored training plans, a new antioxidant level estimate and sleep apnea detection, too. That's on top of traditional functions like showing incoming calls, notifications and music playback, and health fitness features like tracking your sleep and heart rate, and an integrated GPS. JUMP TO: How we test fitness trackers When I test smartwatches and fitness trackers I wear them non-stop, night and day, and only take them off to charge. I test their general day-to-day performance, trialling unique features, testing the battery life and getting a feel for how easy they are to set up, interact with and use. I assess how they handle intense exercise like a cycling workout or a run, more casual exercise like a morning walk, and how they manage notifications coming through from a connected smartphone. I also wear them to bed as many health features rely on data like your heart rate and respiratory rate when you're asleep. I compare all of this combined health, sleep and fitness data against the readings on a Garmin Forerunner 970 high-end running watch, an Eight Sleep Pod 4 mattress and a Garmin HRM 600 chest strap heart rate monitor. Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended Our tech experts continuously conduct in-depth, independent, real-world tests, scoring devices against pre-set testing metrics and industry benchmarks, so we can deliver definitive and comprehensive buying advice. Telegraph Recommended reviews are never shared with product manufacturers before publication, we don't accept payment in exchange for positive reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more Ease of use Score: 8/10 The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was easy to set up and simple to use with my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 smartphone. There are some extra hurdles to jump setup if you're not using a Samsung phone, however, and this smartwatch isn't compatible with an iPhone. The touchscreen and two-button controls on the side of the display let you tap and swipe through the screens. The set up of the display means its easy to navigation though the tools and health insights the smartwatch tracks, while manually tracking runs, cycles and swims is quick and easy. I found the automatic workout detection was swift to detect when I was on a walk and I the Google Gemini AI assistant was genuinely helpful when I wanted to track my progress or navigate a route. The smartwatch seamlessly synchronises your data within Samsung's connected health apps, making it easier to dig deeper into you daily health stats. Comfort and wearability Score: 8/10 This is a fashionable design that I found comfortable to wear 24/7, even at night. It comes in 40mm and 44mm wrist sizes with a graphite or silver finish. I tested the grey silicone sport band but you can swap it out for a pop of colour. It felt comfortable against my skin and I had no rubbing or irritation (some Garmin straps can cause silicone burn). My only complaint was the tuck-under fastening, which requires an awkward pinch to attach. This smartwatch adopts the Galaxy Watch Ultra's 'squircle' design (Samsung's words, not mine), putting a brilliantly bright, vibrant and responsive circular touchscreen on top of a square 'cushion' design, with a low-profile optical heart rate sensor that helps improve the overall comfort. The result is a smartwatch that I found comparatively thin, light and more comfortable on my wrist compared to bigger Garmin watches. Activity and movement metrics Score: 8/10 The Galaxy Watch 8 tracks more than 100 sports with a focus on running, cycling, swimming and walking or hiking. It has a 'health heart' monitor that challenges you to log enough steps, active minutes and calories to complete your 'heart'. I ran and hiked over 100 miles over multiple workouts and was impressed by the accuracy of its tracking when I compared it to other devices. The GPS was often slow to link up, but it mainly matched my Garmin Forerunner 970 for overall distances. It clocked 13.2 miles when I ran a half-marathon, while my Garmin measured 13.13 miles. The heart rate data was proved reliable. My Garmin HRM 600 chest strap logged a 105bpm average and 159bpm max, while Samsung's optical sensor clocked 106bpm and 159bpm, respectively on the same run. Step tracking was a bit more topsy-turvy, not quite catching my different stages, while Samsung's step counts were often more than 2,000 steps higher or lower than the Forerunner 970. Sleep and recovery tracking Score: 7/10 Sleep tracking gives you a nightly sleep score, sleep duration information and a breakdown of your sleep stages. It also monitors blood oxygen levels, skin temperature and nightly heart rate. I tested this against the Garmin Forerunner 970 and an EightSleep Pod mattress. Samsung's sleep quality readings and durations sometimes matched the Garmin and smart mattress, but were sometimes an hour off. The Watch 8 was often more optimistic with my sleep quality score, too. I also found Samsung's blood oxygen ranges sometimes provided readings from 78 to 100 per cent, which is incredibly broad. The recovery scores were hit and miss, too. One morning, Samsung gave me a 68 Energy Score because of an 'elevated overnight heart rate', while Garmin suggested I had hit '100 prime readiness'. My own perceptions had me closer to Garmin than Samsung and my tests did little to alleviate my scepticism when it comes to the reliability of these scores. Lifestyle and wellness features Score: 9/10 The Watch 8 gives you electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate and blood pressure readings, though you'll need some calibration using a regular blood pressure cuff and you need to have a Samsung phone to hand. There's a body composition analysis to estimate how much fat and muscle you're carrying, monthly cycle tracking, plus a vascular load readout that monitors blood vessel strain over time. You can also measure stress, do journal-style mood check-ins and manually track food and water intake. One intriguing new tool is the antioxidant index. This uses sensors to reveal if you're getting your recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables to help boost your antioxidant levels. These are molecules that can help fight off health conditions like cancer and diabetes. But in practice (and despite eating a lot of fruit and veg) my readings regularly came up 'low' even when I significantly upped my intake. Technical specifications The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was launched alongside the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. If you're looking for a more traditional style of smartwatch with a similar suite of features, it's definitely an alternative to consider. Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is a highly capable smartwatch with a mixture of simple and serious health and fitness tools. Runners, cyclists and swimmers will find it a competent sports tracker, though it lacks the advanced tools you get from Garmin and Coros. The one-and-a-half-day battery life also falls short of the month-long staying power of some dedicated sports watches. If you already own a Samsung phone and want a fashionable smartwatch that's comfortable to wear, is a comprehensive health and fitness tracker, the Galaxy Watch 8 is one of the best options available. Yes, if: You need an easy-to-use fitness companion for your smartphone You're a Samsung or Android phone user You're a runner or a hiker No, if: You use an iPhone You want a smartwatch or fitness tracker with a week-long battery life You want advanced training metrics for running, cycling and other sports Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 FAQs What are the biggest new health and AI features of the Galaxy Watch 8? The standout new health features include a readiness-style energy score that crunches sleep, activity, heart rate and other metrics to reflect how prepared your body is for activity or recovery. There's an antioxidant index that uses sensors to estimate oxidative stress levels in your body. Those same sensors serve up body composition insights for body fat and muscle. A vascular load tool monitors blood vessel strain over time. Is the Galaxy Watch 8 waterproof? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is waterproof. It carries a water rating of 5ATM, which means it can handle being submerged up to 50 metres. What are the differences between the Galaxy Watch 8 and the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was released alongside a new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. The Classic model has a more traditional look with a physical rotating watch face bezel and stainless steel case. The Watch 8 is aluminium, and the Classic comes in large sizes with 43mm and 47mm options. When was the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 released? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was released in July 2025, alongside a new Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and a pair of foldable smartphones: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and Fold 7.

Teenage girl left alone on mental health ward was killed unlawfully
Teenage girl left alone on mental health ward was killed unlawfully

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Teenage girl left alone on mental health ward was killed unlawfully

A coroner and jurors had tears in their eyes as they ruled that a teenage girl was killed unlawfully after she was left alone on a mental health ward by an agency worker using a fake name on his first shift. Ruth Szymankiewicz, 14, was meant to be under strict observation at the psychiatric intensive care unit of Huntercombe Hospital in Berkshire while being treated for a severe eating disorder when she was left on her own by the worker on February 12, 2022. The inquest had heard that the agency worker, who went by the name of Ebo Acheampong, had applied for the role under a false name and had never worked in a psychiatric hospital, the police later discovered. He never returned to work after the teenager's death and fled the UK for Ghana. Ian Wade KC, the coroner, and the jurors were clearly upset when they delivered the conclusion of unlawful killing at the inquest at Buckinghamshire coroner's court in Beaconsfield. Addressing Ruth's parents, Mark and Kate Szymankiewicz, Wade said with tears in his eyes: 'I hope you will treasure all the good memories of your lovely daughter.' The inquest had been told that she shut herself in her bedroom, where she self-harmed. She died two days later at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. Jurors were told that the ward was missing at least half of its staff on the day Ruth was left unsupervised. Acheampong was asked to join the intensive care psychiatrist team because they were so short-staffed that nurses could not go on breaks. Michelle Hancey, a support worker with 18 years' experience at Huntercombe, raised concerns that day that the team would 'fail to monitor patients on prescribed special observation because of staff shortage'. Acheampong was assigned to watch over Ruth on his first shift at the hospital. He repeatedly left the girl alone while she was watching TV, one time for a couple of minutes, which prompted her to walk alone to her bedroom. She had been on an observation plan which meant that she had to be kept within eyesight at all times after earlier incidents of self-harm. About 15 minutes passed before a nurse discovered the teenage girl and raised the alarm. 'Ruth was not prevented from accessing the restricted material which could be used to self-harm,' the jury foreman told the hearing. 'Ruth was not prevented from accessing harmful material on the internet. Ruth's care pathway … was insufficient to allow improvement for discharge. 'From Ruth's admission to Thames ward, her responsible clinician deemed the ward to be neither suitable nor conducive to her recovery. Ruth's parents were not given adequate information about the appeal process, and refusal rights.' Ruth's parents, who are both doctors, read an emotional statement outside the court after the verdict. They said: 'There is an empty space at our table, a silent bedroom in our home, a gaping hole in our family that will never be filled … Ruth was an incredible, bright, friendly, loving and adventurous girl with a whole life of joy ahead of her. 'When, at our most vulnerable as a family, we reached out for help, we ultimately found ourselves trapped in a system that was meant to care for her, to help her, to keep her safe, but instead locked her away and harmed her.' Huntercombe Hospital was rated 'overall inadequate' by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in February 2021, and has since been closed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store