logo
From a gilded perch, Trump tries to retain the common touch

From a gilded perch, Trump tries to retain the common touch

CNBCa day ago

WASHINGTON — Back in Donald Trump's first term, his staff decided they'd tuck into his briefing book a few letters from ordinary Americans who'd written to the White House.
Only certain letters made the cut, though.
Aides made a point of sending Trump the flattering mail while holding back the letters panning his work, a White House official in the last term said.
"Someone quite rightly thought that if we wanted to have any chance of him reading them consistently, it would be good if they were positive and praise-worthy," the person said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
All presidents say they want to keep in touch with typical Americans; few succeed. Everything about the job conspires against unscripted encounters that can enlighten a president about what's truly on peoples' minds.
Armed guards shadow him while protective aides may shield him from bad reviews. Even the few souls who pierce the bubblewrap and get an audience with the president may find themselves too intimidated by the trappings of power to blurt out an unvarnished truth.
"When you are president, you are in a space where everyone comes to you, and most of them are people you've selected to come to you," said Fred Ryan, who oversaw appointments and scheduling in Ronald Reagan's White House. "And most people want to bring you good news rather than bad news."
This time around, Trump is looking and sounding insulated from the voters who put him back in the White House. That's a problem even for a second-term president who may have run his last campaign. Trump's political strength flows from an emotional connection to a loyal base. If he's perceived as oblivious to people's day-to-day concerns, he's at risk of losing a vital grassroots connection that is a source of Republican fealty.
Trump's travels suggest a homebody on a gilded perch.
By the end of May, he had spent 14 of his 18 weekends at one of his golf clubs or other properties. Over and over, he has returned to his Mar-a-Lago residence, a private club in Palm Beach where the membership fee is $1 million and guests applaud when he enters the restaurant.
Rallies have long been a way for Trump to connect with the "Front Row Joes" and other hardcore voters who travel hundreds of miles and camp out overnight to see him speak live and maybe grab a selfie with him on the rope line. Not having to worry about reelection, he's cut back on rallies, holding just one since the day he was sworn in, versus four in the opening months of his last term.
"He needs to talk to more regular people and listen to them," said Christopher Malick, 28, who works at a roofing company in Cleveland, Ohio and said he voted for Trump in the last three elections. "He needs to be talking to people who aren't just his inner circle."
Billionaires run major parts of Trump's government, and the well-connected get access.
Last month found the president at his golf club outside Washington, D.C. hosting a dinner for 220 crypto investors who'd bought into his meme coin, $TRUMP. The event was advertised as "the most exclusive invitation in the world."
With some of the guests clutching their phones to trade on any market-moving news Trump might make, the audience dined on filet mignon and pan-seared halibut as protesters stood outside.
The coin was launched just a few days before Trump was sworn in. One of the guests at the event, Morten Christensen, who lives in Mexico, came away feeling the demonstrators had a point.
"If I was in his [Trump's] position, I personally would not have done that," Christensen, founder of the crypto company Airdrop Alert, said of the coin's timing. "It's just a bad look — right before you become the most powerful man in the world."
Asked how he reaches the working people who elected him, Trump told NBC News' "Meet the Press" last month: "I think I get out quite a bit."
He mentioned a commencement speech he had given at the University of Alabama, hastening to add that he won the state handily in 2024.
"The president since entering politics has showcased a unique way of having his finger on the pulse of the American public," Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman, said in an interview. "He stays connected through multiple public appearances in middle America, reading correspondence, being a consumer of the news, and inviting everyday Americans to the White House and to campaign events."
"While most presidents are driven by staged and stuffy political events, this president has preferred a more organic and authentic approach to connecting with the American people," Fields added.
Still, Trump is surrounded by wealth.
The world's richest man, Elon Musk, carried out Trump's plan to slash the the government workforce. A billionaire Wall Street executive, Howard Lutnick, is negotiating Trumps' trade deals; a billionaire hedge fund manager, Scott Bessent, is presiding over the U.S. economy; a billionaire real estate magnate, Steven Witkoff, is conducting high-level diplomacy.
Economic policies coming out of the Trump administration skew in favor of the rich, budget analysts say. The "Big, Beautiful Bill" that Trump is trying to push through Congress mixes tax and spending cuts in ways that would shave income for the bottom tenth of the U.S. population by 2% in 2027, and raise it for the top tenth by 4% that year, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.
At the same time, retailers like Walmart have cautioned that Trump's tariffs will drive up prices, squeezing some of the low-and middle-class voters he peeled away from Democrats. Exit polls showed that in the 2024 election, those with family incomes under $50,000 favored Trump over Democrat Kamala Harris by 50%-48%.
Trump's speaking style — raw and unrestrained — has proved a reliable political asset over the years. In this moment, his language may be widening the gulf between the nation and its leader. Defending his tariffs, Trump said that children may have to make do with "two dolls instead of 30," a remark that some saw as insensitive.
In a focus group, a Wisconsin swing voter who supported Trump in the last election told the research company Engagious that Trump's comment about dolls reminded him of Marie Antoinette, the 18th century French queen associated with the comment, "Let them eat cake."
"It rubbed me the wrong way when he said that," the 49-year-old Wisconsin man said. "It just seemed like a disconnect with the average American person."
Trump's fascination with the word "groceries" may be another disconnect. "It's such an old-fashioned term, but a beautiful term: groceries," he said at his Rose Garden event at which he announced a series of steep foreign tariffs, later postponed. "It sort of says a bag with different things in it."
For most Americans who shop for the stuff, there's nothing old-fashioned or particularly beautiful about groceries; they're a necessity.
Same with a stroller. But Trump failed to summon the word when talking about prices last month on Air Force One: "The thing that you carry the babies around in," he called it.
Various presidents used different methods to avoid being cocooned.
Joe Biden's religious faith proved a blessing in every sense. A practicing Catholic, Biden regularly attended Mass, sitting in the pews and patiently waiting his turn for communion with fellow parishioners.
Barack Obama routinely read letters culled by his White House staff.
"Some of them are funny; some of them are angry," Obama said during his first term. "A lot of them are sad or frustrated about their current situation."
"These letters, I think, do more to keep me in touch with what's happening around the country than just about anything else."
Jimmy Carter once invited Americans to call in to him with questions as he sat in the White House with the moderator of the radio show, CBS's Walter Cronkite.
At the end, Carter told the famed network anchor that he appreciated fielding questions that the White House press corps would never have asked, Barry Jagoda, a Carter White House aide who helped arrange the forum, said in an interview.
Technology has changed the game. Phone in hand, a president can now scroll through social media and soak in all the candid commentary he can stomach.
Trump posts regularly on his own site, Truth Social and often amplifies other users who've applauded his efforts. He reposted one person with fewer than 900 followers who questioned why former FBI director and Trump nemesis James Comey hasn't been arrested.
Trump signals in various ways that despite his personal wealth, he sees and identifies with people of ordinary means. He gives off an accessible vibe.
"The American media loves to downplay or outright ignore how much President Trump enjoys being around normal, everyday people, and he listens to them," Vice President JD Vance said in a prepared statement.
In February, Trump attended the Daytona 500 race and took laps around the track in his limousine, "The Beast." The following month he went to see the college wrestling championship in Philadelphia and in April, he was on hand for a UFC fight in Miami.
"For all the Mar-a-Lago posh and polish, he also shows that he's more of a regular guy than Biden was," said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian.
Or, perhaps, George H.W. Bush. Running for president in 1988, Bush was ridiculed for telling a waitress at a New Hampshire truck stop he wanted "a splash" more coffee, feeding perceptions that he was an out-of-touch patrician.
Some voters may recoil at Trump's intemperate language, by contrast, but his epithets may come off as human and relatable, allies say.
"He's one of the most in-touch modern presidents," said Ari Fleischer, White House press secretary for President George W. Bush. "He has an amazing intuitive feel of what working people think and want. It's one of the reasons he can be so rude. He uses [the word] 'scum' in his Truth Social statements, which I find to be inappropriate but for a huge swath of the country it reinforces he's not a politician."
"He doesn't do the things that everyone else in Washington who has lost touch with the country does," Fleischer added. "He doesn't pretend — he lets it rip."
When he does escape the bubble and meet everyday Americans, he shows he's willing to listen, some who've met him say.
Brian Pannebecker is a retired auto worker from Michigan who's become a campaign surrogate, bringing fellow blue-collar workers to Trump campaign events.
Pannebecker, 65, recalled a moment during the 2024 campaign when he was invited to meet Trump backstage at a rally. Trump asked his opinion of Biden's electric vehicle mandates and after hearing his critique, Trump shared it with the audience when he gave his speech, the former autoworker recalled.
"He'll ask a question and then actually stand back and listen to you while you're talking, even if you go on for a minute or two," Pannebecker said in an interview. "He's listening to you and trying to understand what your concerns are."
Try as he might, a president's best-intentioned efforts to get honest feedback from the public can fall flat. Take Ronald Reagan.
In 1982, he read a letter from an Arkansas woman who told him that her family's excavation business was foundering and she and her husband were "starving slowly to death."
Reagan drafted a handwritten reply saying he had kept her letter on his desk and "read it more than once."
"I know no words of mine can make you feel any better about the situation in which you find yourselves," Reagan wrote. He added that he had asked the Small Business Administration (SBA) to "check out your situation."
The agency followed through. That's when the story took an odd twist. A SBA official drove more than 100 miles and found the woman's husband, who said the family was in fact financially stable and that his wife "gets needlessly excited from time to time." He had no idea she had written to Reagan and he didn't want a loan.
The government official later drove by the family's home to see it for himself. He concluded it was "fairly expensive" with a boat in the yard worth about $6,000.
At that, the agency closed the file.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections
Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

On Thursday, Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) signed Assembly Bill 197 into law, prohibiting state agencies from demanding or releasing personal information of nonprofit supporters—actions that could potentially chill speech or violate the right to privacy. With the bill's passage, Nevada becomes the 21st state to strengthen First Amendment protections for donors, volunteers, and members of nonprofit organizations. The A.B. 197, which was cosponsored by Assemblymembers Shea Backus (D–Las Vegas) and Gregory Hafen (R–Pahrump), clarifies that state governmental entities cannot require nonprofit organizations that have applied for or received a 501(c) tax-exempt status from the IRS to disclose personal information of their supporters, including names, addresses, phone numbers, and donation details. Only certain exceptions apply, such as when such information is required under federal law or a court order, in which case the state must keep the individuals' personal information confidential. Anyone harmed by a violation of this law may bring a civil action against the state and seek damages. Nonprofit donor privacy is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment, as was first determined in the Supreme Court's unanimous National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Patterson ruling. The 1958 decision blocked the Alabama state government from forcing civil rights organizations to release personal, identifying information of supporters, thereby preventing threats, harassment, and intimidation of individuals for their beliefs. The right was reaffirmed and further clarified in the Court's 2021 Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta opinion, which struck down a mandate from former California Attorney General Kamala Harris requiring nonprofits to provide certain donor information to remain registered with the state. The Nevada bill passed through both chambers of the Legislature with an overwhelming majority and only one vote against it. Even more strikingly, nonprofits from across the political spectrum, such as the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, Americans for Prosperity, Nevada Right to Life, and Planned Parenthood Votes Nevada, supported the measure. "Americans are fed up with the abuse of their privacy and First Amendment rights. No one should face threats, doxing, or retaliation simply for supporting a nonprofit organization," said Heather Lauer, CEO of People United for Privacy Foundation, a national privacy rights organization, in a press release. With the passage of A.B. 197, Nevada joins 20 other states across the political spectrum that have passed similar legislation since 2018. In a time of hyper-partisanship and regular free speech violations—especially from the federal government—it's encouraging to see some state governments still honoring the constitutional protections enshrined in the First Amendment. The post Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections appeared first on

Senate Republicans divided over ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate Republicans divided over ‘big, beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republicans divided over ‘big, beautiful bill'

WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – Lawmakers return to Washington this week and Republicans are gearing up to pass the president's 'big, beautiful bill' which include sweeping tax cuts and a roll back of social services, like Medicaid. A handful of Senate Republicans have expressed concerns about the bill's proposed cuts. This week will be a test to see if the party will band together in the end. 'The math doesn't really add up,' said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul threw cold water on the plan. He argues the proposed spending cuts and tax breaks in the massive bill will only balloon the federal deficit. ' I don't want to raise the debt ceiling $5 trillion,' said Paul. On Truth Social President Donald Trump went after Paul, arguing if he joins Democrats to block the bill the great people of Kentucky will never forgive him. On Monday Senate Majority Leader John Thune pledged to get to work. 'Our biggest focus this month will be completing this tax relief legislation with the goal of getting the final bill to the president before the Fourth of July,' said Thune. Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley says he will not support the bill's $800 billion cut to Medicaid. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates $7.6 million Americans would lose health care as a result. 'It's a nonstarter in this form,' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). Democrats are united against the bill. They say it will also slash food assistance for millions. 'This Republican budget bill is an absolute disaster for the country in particular for middle class in poor people,' said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). Senate Republicans are all but certain to make changes to the bill which will tee up another showdown among conservative and moderate Republicans in the House before it ever makes it to the president's desk. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies
Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dems mostly pleased, GOP ‘shocked' as state budget deal solidifies

State legislators clashed Monday over the final version of the state's two-year budget that was hailed by Democrats for providing additional money for Medicaid, nonprofit organizations, special education, and the working poor. The plan calls for sending checks of $250 to about 85,000 lower-income households who already qualify for the earned income tax credit for the working poor. The money will be directed to the neediest families with children; budget negotiators dropped a previous Democratic plan that would have provided a child tax credit for families earning as much as $200,000 per year. The massive, 693-page document pays for everything from dental care for prison inmates to pay raises of 3.5% for Superior Court judges and others whose salaries are tied to the judges. Lawmakers were preparing to vote as early as Monday night on the two-year, $55.8 billion package. The debate did not start until 4:45 p.m. and was continuing Monday night. House Speaker Matt Ritter of Hartford said Democrats are broadly pleased with the final compromises made in recent days with Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont. 'People are very happy to make the investments in child care that we're making, to have the child tax credit through the EITC program … to do the massive amounts of Medicaid funding we're doing, $20 million [in the first year] and $45 million,' Ritter said. 'People are really, really happy. A lot of people never thought we'd get to this point. It's a reminder that if you just keep going, if you keep negotiating, if you keep coming up with ideas, you can solve even the most difficult of problems. But Republicans had a sharply different view, blasting the budget as a bloated document that did not closely follow the fiscal guardrails that were adopted in 2017 by the legislature and have been credited with restoring the state's fiscal health in recent years. House Republican leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford quoted the phrase, traditionally credited to the French philosopher Voltaire, that the perfect should not be the enemy of the good. 'This budget is neither perfect nor good for the state of Connecticut,' Candelora told reporters Monday. 'This budget eviscerates all of our fiscal guardrails. They are destroying the volatility cap. It is creating a gimmick in the first year to get around the spending cap. Finally, we are devoting the surplus and the revenue cap permanently to an off-budget early childhood account. … In the long run, it is setting up the state of Connecticut for failure and tax increases. … I am shocked that the governor would agree to this budget.' Democrats, though, said flatly that the budget remains under the spending cap in both years, as required by state law. Candelora said Democrats are not setting aside enough money to pay down pension liabilities because some of the money will be earmarked for other programs like the early childhood endowment fund that is expected to receive $200 million this year. 'They are acting as if we are never going to see another recession for the rest of our lives,' Candelora told reporters at the state Capitol. Rep. Tammy Nuccio of Tolland, the ranking House Republican on the budget committee, said the state is coming off the 'sugar high' of billions in federal money from the coronavirus pandemic and is now finding it difficult to pay for multiple programs. Even with the spending cap, the state is able to increase spending by about $1 billion next year to $27 billion, up from $26 billion. A longtime accountant and financial analyst for large insurance companies like Cigna and Aetna, Nuccio said the breakneck pace of the legislative session, where staff members literally work through the night to cobble together documents at the last minute, is not common outside the Capitol building. 'In the real world, this doesn't happen,' Nuccio said on the House floor. 'They dropped a 700-page document at 4 o'clock in the morning. … We've gotta read it in less than 12 hours.' Republicans and the Connecticut Business and Industry Association were also concerned that the budget includes Lamont's proposed change to the 'unitary' tax that they said would lead to tax increases for large, multi-state corporations like Electric Boat, Wal-Mart, Raytheon, Amazon, Home Depot, Lowe's, AT&T, Verizon, and the parent company of Sikorsky helicopters, among others. Amazon is now the fifth-largest employer in the state, and the unitary tax would hit about 20 major corporations, officials said. The tax has not been mentioned much at the state Capitol in recent years, but Fairfield-based General Electric Co. cited the tax among the reasons that the company decided to move its headquarters to Boston during the tenure of then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. But Lamont and his team are in frequent contact with top business leaders, and he said after the initial proposal was released that the leaders had not raised major objections. Despite criticisms, Lamont's chief spokesman, Rob Blanchard, said Connecticut is in much better fiscal shape than some other states. 'This biennium budget makes smart investments in our future, our communities and schools, all while prioritizing affordability, holding the line on taxes, and keeping us on a sound fiscal path,' Blanchard said. 'More importantly, it averts the mistakes of the past by making significant payments on our pension liabilities, preserves the strength of our fiscal guardrails and continues to grow our historic $4.1 billion Rainy Day fund—all of which will guard against economic headwinds. While other states are cutting services, raising taxes or wishing for a Rainy Day fund as robust as our fund, Connecticut has worked hard to turn things around economically and maintain the progress that avoids those tough choices.' Rep. Maria Horn, a Litchfield County Democrat who represents multiple towns, said the state is operating under various constraints that make budgeting difficult. 'We cannot do everything,' Horn said, adding that choices were made to help the most vulnerable citizens. Republicans and hospitals were also concerned about an increase in the hospital tax that is designed to raise an additional $375 million in the first year and $400 million in the second year. They argued that the money is dependent on Connecticut receiving a waiver from the federal government, but the state has not received the waiver yet. 'It's really a hope and a prayer,' Candelora said. The Connecticut Hospital Association, whose lobbyists testify on multiple bills, said the budget would not be good for hospitals. 'The tax increase on hospitals and proposed cuts to healthcare providers contained in this budget will be devastating for hospitals, their workforce, and their patients,' the association said. 'This tax increase is far greater than what Governor Lamont proposed earlier this year. It will leave hospitals facing a staggering cut of hundreds of millions of dollars, while the state uses federal dollars to balance its budget without any action to increase Medicaid reimbursement for care provided to patients in hospitals. These policies will move Connecticut backward in our collaborative efforts to make healthcare more affordable and accessible.' Lawmakers were also concerned about a narrowly written provision that they believe could benefit only one company in the state. In order to obtain tax credits for research and development, the company must be 'a single member limited liability company that has more than three thousand employees in this state and is engaged in manufacturing, with expertise in mechatronics, alignment and sensor technology and optical fabrication.' Chris DiPentima, the president of CBIA, said the provision was designed to help ASML Wilton, a major company in Fairfield County. The company's website says it specializes 'in mechatronics, alignment and sensor technology,' which is exactly the language mentioned in the budget. DiPentima, though, says the research and development tax credits need to be expanded to much smaller companies like in Massachusetts, where companies with as few as five employees can earn the credits. Despite statements by various leaders that they had crafted a 'no-tax-increase budget,' DiPentima said that characterization is incorrect. 'There are business tax increases,' he told The Courant on Monday. 'We're losing sight of the importance of the business community to Connecticut's economy. … I've got major concerns with the work-around on the spending cap.' He added, 'This is the first time in five years where we've had business tax increases and a changing of the guardrails. … Is Connecticut losing its fiscal discipline again? That's this question mark. Are we going to get back to fiscal discipline?' Democrats have been pushing for years for a child tax credit, and their latest proposal called for a permanent, refundable credit of $150 per child for a maximum of three children, or $450 per year. That represented a sharp drop from an original proposal of $600 per child for an overall total of $1,800 per year. With various pressing needs on the tax and spending sides of the complicated state budget, lawmakers say they are often unable to award as much tax relief as they would like. The overall plan would have saved families a combined $82.7 million per year, but the idea was dropped as being too expensive and helping too many families at higher income levels. Lawmakers also dropped Lamont's proposal for an increase in the popular property tax credit to $350, up from $300, per tax filer. Lamont's proposal was expected to help 800,000 tax filers, officials said, as the income eligibility would have increased, an issue that had restricted the credit in the past. Nonprofit organizations, including those who hold contracts to perform various services that otherwise would be performed by state employees, were pleased with a funding increase in the second year. 'The budget is not everything we requested, but in the context of this year's discussions about budget restrictions, we are grateful for their choice to support programs that will improve thousands of lives and even save some,' said Gian Carl Casa, a former top state budget official who now leads the statewide nonprofit alliance. 'Rank-and-file lawmakers, including progressives, moderates and members of the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, responded by making it clear that the people served by community nonprofits are a priority.' The nonprofits are expecting to receive $76 million in the second year, plus an additional $30 million for non-developmental disability providers. The deal also calls for an additional $66 million union settlement for providers and an additional $15 million for Medicaid rates above the appropriations committee total, officials said. 'Is this a perfect budget? No,' said Rep. Toni Walker, a longtime New Haven Democrat who co-chairs the legislature's budget committee. 'But we have a situation where we have a spending cap problem and a revenue problem.' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store