
As Trump's tariffs roil stock market, investment advisors urge caution. Some analysts fear ‘economic armageddon.'
Financial advisors urge caution, noting that many of the effects are yet to be seen.
Advertisement
'Right now, there are so many questions,' Catherine Valega, a wealth manager at Burlington-based Green Bee Advisory. 'We're talking about US exceptionalism — is that over? Maybe.'
One analyst worries about a more dire outcome.
'The only positive is you have to believe this will not stay in its current form,' said Dan Ives, a research analyst at Wedbush Securities, based in Los Angeles. 'Because if it stays in its current form, it would be economic armageddon.'
Ives, who specializes in the technology sector on Wall Street, said the tariffs are 'the most absurd thing I've ever seen, period' in his 25-year career. Other investors are just as spooked, he added.
'I'd say it's a panic, it's a crisis, and if this stays in its current form, it guarantees a recession,' Ives said. 'So you have to take the other side and say they can't be that crazy.'
Advertisement
The 'glass-half-full view,' he said, is that the steep tariffs are just leverage, designed to bring other countries to the negotiating table.
Trump administration officials have stressed, publicly and privately,
Related
:
Valega said that the larger investment management firms she works with are still cautious to avoid a panic.
'In theory, things will calm down and and kind of work their way through the system,' she said. 'We're not yet predicting an all-out recession. But the specter is looming.'
Most of Green Bee's clients are young enough that they are willing to weather extended periods of volatility. But the older clients, especially those at or nearing retirement age, are the ones who 'feel the most jitters about this,' she said.
'That's kind of what financial planning tells you,' she said 'You thought you could retire at 62, but the reality is we just took a big hit to our retirement portfolio, so [you're] going to have to work till you're 65 or 67.'
Many of those clients checking their retirement accounts have expressed shock — and bewilderment.
'People don't understand why this needs to happen,' said Alex Burke, an associate at Dedham-based Financial Solutions. 'Not that tariffs came out of the blue; Trump has been talking about them for a while. But it's [more] like, everything was going okay for my clients. And now, it's not.'
Burke said he's been busy assuring clients that, if they've taken the appropriate steps — putting aside an emergency fund, investing in securities with less market exposure, etc. — they should be able to weather the storm.
Advertisement
'Most of my clients feel that way,' he said. 'It's just kind of scary watching it happen. And frustrating, knowing that it doesn't feel like there's any real reason for this.'
Related
:
Nicholas Conaltuono, a financial planner at Needham-based Johnson Brunetti, said those best poised to weather the storm are those who have limited their exposure to market volatility.
'If all your money's in the market, and the market's going up and down, who's in control?' he said. 'Is it you or is it the market? If the success of your plan is predicated on the success of the market, that's not a plan. That's rolling the dice.'
John Ingram, the chief investment officer at Boston-based Crestwood Advisors, said his firm had been fielding constant phone calls from clients all morning.
His advice to the 'nervous types' rattled by plunging tickers? Stay the course.
'It's very hard to trade around this type of news,' he said. 'You didn't know what was happening yesterday when the markets closed, and this morning, it's like a whole new world out there. It's hard to get out beforehand.'
Ingram said that any potential announcements, such as renegotiation of the highest tariffs or a stimulus package for domestic industry, could blunt the worst of the impacts.
'We understand the volatility, we know it's painful, but the main thing is to stay invested,' he said. 'We've taken steps to reduce portfolio volatility, and those seem to be holding up okay. I mean, as well as can be expected.'
That view is somewhat rosier than the alternative, which is full-blown economic meltdown. But Valega said the financial planning industry is, in a way, one that 'warrants optimism.'
Advertisement
'We help people build long term wealth, and so we sort of have to support our clients in a way that that gives them hope,' Valega said. 'So I'm not there [worrying about a recession] yet.'
'But again, I don't know,' she added. 'I might wake up tomorrow and be like, 'Oh God, now we're off the cliff.''
Camilo Fonseca can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Sugar Creek motel rooms are being turned into $1,000/month apartments
Two budget motels in the West Sugar Creek area are being converted into studio apartments with rents starting at about $1,000 — a rarity in Charlotte. Why it matters: The conversions replace crime-linked motels with much-needed, organically affordable housing in northeast Charlotte, a roughly 20-minute drive to Uptown. The latest: This is Washington-based Sage Investment Group's first adaptive reuse conversion project in Charlotte. The Charlie Apartments is beginning leasing at the end of September. Construction began at the former Rodeway Inn and Speedway Inn in January and is expected to be completed by the end of the year. By the numbers: The floor plans range from 298 to 673 square feet and rent for $1,070 to $1,299, plus fees for pest control, cable and internet. Units under $1,000 a month are disappearing in America, declining by around 30% over the past decade, per a Harvard report. Between the lines: Converting motels into housing is a fast and relatively low-cost process, making it an attractive investment. The motels already come with amenities like pools and gyms. Yes, but: During a construction tour, Sage's team told Axios they often uncover unforeseen issues once they're inside the walls. It's also a significant effort to rework all the mechanical wiring. Typically, people are living in these hotels, providing another challenge. With the help of Crisis Assistance Ministry, Sage rehoused about 60 people who were living in the motels during the acquisition. The big picture: Charlotte is actively trying to revitalize the Sugar Creek and I-85 intersection, a high-crime area. The city even bought a motel itself to tear down and is partnering with a private developer to build affordable townhomes on the site. The Charlie Apartments will be a gated community with a full security camera system. The city's Corridors of Opportunity program provided $50,000 for local artists Jen Hill and Liz Haywood to paint murals on the property. Sage is gathering feedback on what the community wants to see. What's next: Sage is already eyeing two other properties for conversions in the Charlotte market — another in Sugar Creek and one off Tuckaseegee Road. Tour the construction. Sage is converting the old hotel lobby into a temporary leasing office. Later, it will become bike storage. This area between the two motels will become an amenity called "The Porch" with grilling stations, rocking chairs, dining tables and yard games. The second hotel was in poorer condition and required more structural repairs to address water damage and stabilize the building. It will open after the first building. The pool is being renovated and brought up to code. There will be another amenity space close by with a fireplace and seating. This is the entrance to the future clubhouse, with a fitness center, leasing office, coworking space and restrooms.


Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Mega-landlord settles with DOJ for Mass. price fixing claims
The U.S. Department of Justice and the landlord Greystar Management Services reached a deal to settle their legal fight over claims that the company used an algorithmic software to fix rental prices. Why it matters: Greystar, the nation's largest landlord, runs apartment complexes across Massachusetts, including in Brighton, Revere and East Boston. The big picture: The price fixing allegations come as the state grapples with a worsening housing crisis, partly due to limited housing supply. Catch up quick: Six states and the DOJ sued the company behind the rent-setting software, Texas-based RealPage, last year, accusing the company of illegal price fixing and monopolization. Massachusetts and Illinois then joined an amended version of the lawsuit that named South Carolina-based Greystar and five other landlords. They accused the six landlords of colluding to raise rents across their properties, relying on RealPage's software. State of play: Greystar agreed in the settlement to stop using any "anticompetitive algorithm" that sets rental prices using competitors' sensitive pricing data, per the settlement. The company also agreed to stop sharing its own sensitive information with competitors, stop attending RealPage's meetings convening competing landlords, accept a court-appointed monitor and cooperate with part of the federal legal fight against RealPage. By the numbers: A White House report estimates that renters whose landlords used RealPage's algorithm paid an additional $70 a month on average in 2023. For Boston-area renters, the cost was $79 a month, per the analysis. The report happened independently of the multi-state lawsuit. That lawsuit didn't specify which Greystar properties used the algorithm. What they're saying: Greystar didn't admit any wrongdoing as part of the settlement. The company said in a statement that it "firmly believes that its use of RealPage's revenue management software complies with all applicable laws." "We entered into these settlements to make clear the government's interpretation of the law and to ensure we continue to do things the right way," the company wrote. Flashback: A 2022 ProPublica story revealed that RealPage worked with landlords to set rents nationwide in what legal experts said "may be artificially inflating rents and stifling competition." When the multi-state lawsuit began, RealPage refuted the allegations about its software with a six-page statement, saying landlords set their own prices and that RealPage "helps ensure that prospective residents have access to the best pricing available." One other landlord, Cortland, agreed to a settlement after being named in the amended lawsuit earlier this year.


Vox
2 minutes ago
- Vox
The serious trend behind MSNBC's silly new name
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. Goodbye MSBNC, and hello 'MS NOW.' In an announcement that has triggered widespread befuddlement and mockery, the progressive cable news network is getting rebranded. The new name isn't meant to call to mind Microsoft or the honorific 'Ms.' Instead, in the style of congressional bill-naming, MS NOW is purportedly an acronym for the following mouthful: 'My Source for News, Opinion, and the World.' Underneath this seemingly silly story, though, are currents of major change — and fear — in the mainstream media. Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer, plus the most compelling stories of the day. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Because both MSNBC and its fellow political news network CNN are meeting the same fate; they're being jettisoned by the big corporate bethemoths that currently own them. Those corporate behemoths — Comcast owns MSNBC, while Warner Bros. owns CNN — have legitimate business reasons for making this change. Each is offloading these political news channels, as well as various other cable networks, to a new separate company, called by some a 'SpinCo' (spin-off company) and by others a 'ShitCo' (no explanation needed). This is because cable news is viewed as a declining business. Yet there's another clear implication. President Donald Trump loathes both MSNBC and CNN, and his administration has been willing and eager to wage personal and political vendettas against their corporate owners. Take, for instance, how Paramount had to grovel before Trump because he was annoyed at Paramount-owned CBS. The Federal Communications Commission held up Paramount's merger deal until the company agreed to pay a $16 million settlement in a bogus lawsuit Trump had brought against 60 Minutes. So now, with these spinoffs, Comcast and Warner Bros. will no longer have to worry about being punished by the federal government for MSNBC and CNN's coverage. To be clear: Comcast's spin-off of MSNBC and other cable properties was already in the works before Trump won his second term. And there's obviously no political motivation behind Comcast ditching its other cable properties, like the USA Network, SYFY, Oxygen, the Golf Channel, CNBC, and E! (Comcast is keeping NBC News and Universal Studios.) But since Trump began his second term, the company's thinking has apparently evolved on one point: whether MSNBC can keep its name. Back in January, the new CEO of MSNBC's SpinCo, Mark Lazarus, said that MSNBC would keep its name after the spin-off. So the announcement Monday of the new MS NOW name was a change of plan. This would, of course, create more obvious distance between whatever 'MS NOW' is up to and the existing NBC media empire. CNBC, in contrast, will get to keep its name despite being spun off. We don't know whether that's because they're less likely to displease Trump, less likely to cause problems for NBC's brand, or some other reason. What we do know is that, this year, Trump has normalized the weaponization of the government against corporations who have displeased him with shocking speed. For now, at least, this has to be part of companies' strategic calculations. Placating the president is the new cost of doing business in the United States of America.