
Indigenous people in Canada challenge fast-track mine and energy projects
The tensions between the government and Indigenous communities reflect longstanding concerns over consultation and the environmental impact of mining projects in Canada.
Canada's political leaders say the challenge of U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods means the country should fast-track economic development in order to cope with potential economic shocks.
But a group of Canada's First Nations this week launched a constitutional challenge to laws passed in June, one in the province of Ontario and one at the federal level.
A notice filed in Ontario Superior Court said the laws "represent a clear and present danger to the Applicant First Nations' self-determination rights".
Canada's parliament last month passed a law to accelerate approval for projects deemed to be in the national interest, including mines and oil pipelines, and also eliminate some trade barriers between provinces.
A similar measure in Ontario gives the province's cabinet broader powers, and the province of British Columbia last month also passed an act to fast-track infrastructure projects.
Sol Mamakwa, the only Indigenous member of Ontario's provincial parliament, was ejected from the Toronto assembly after accusing the province's premier of telling "untruths to First Nations" about the legislation, known as 'Bill 5'.
After Indigenous protests in Toronto, Ontario Premier Doug Ford added a last-minute clause to the law to ensure consultation with First Nation groups before development and mining projects begin.
But the details of the plan and how First Nations will be consulted and are not yet clear.
"At the 11th hour, after the law has already been passed, to ask us whether or not we think that this law should be in place, is completely inappropriate and unethical," said Dean Sayers, former chief of the Batchewana First Nation.
Demonstrators take part in a protest in front of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario against the federal government's Bill C-5, on Canada Day, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on July 1. |
REUTERS
Ontario's new law allows the government to declare "special economic zones" that make some projects exempt from other provincial laws.
This would make it easier for infrastructure and mining companies to bypass provincial laws and environmental restrictions in the state and speed up development projects in a country that is the world's fourth biggest oil exporter and a mining powerhouse.
"The power to name a piece of Ontario a special economic zone will turn it into a Wild West without rules and regulations," said Gord Miller, former environmental commissioner of Ontario and current chair of Earthroots, a Toronto-based conservation organization.
"Although the designated zones right now are sparsely populated, what's to stop them from using this bill to impact more densely populated areas in the south of Ontario?" he asked.
Canadian law states the government has a duty to consult First Nations on projects that could impact their rights and the environment.
But Sayers is skeptical about the government's promise of consultation. Indigenous groups argue fast-tracking project approval sidesteps that obligation and denies them a real say.
"Consultation does not cut the mustard. Consultation is their version of asking us what we think, and coming in and doing it anyways, regardless of what we say," Sayers said.
"We reserve the right to say yes or no to developments. You don't get the right to say yes or no to developments in our backyards," he said.
Ford has said U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods meant it "can no longer be business as usual".
"We are cutting red tape to unlock our critical minerals and unleash our economy to create new jobs and opportunities in the north and across the province," Ford said in a statement.
But Indigenous leaders and environmentalists say U.S. tariffs are an excuse. Trump said last week the United States would impose a 35% tariff on imports from Canada next month.
"Relating Bill 5 to Trump's tariffs is nonsense. American companies pay the tariffs to the American Government, we Canadians don't pay them," said Miller.
Chief Taynar Simpson of Alderville First Nation said governments "no matter what stripes or colors have always wanted to bypass and undermine environmental protection laws".
"Citing Trump as the reason for the bill is self-serving, and a cover up for the real reasons and causes," Simpson said.
Some Indigenous leaders have said they will push back with blockades, strikes and protests reminiscent of the Idle no More Movement that saw national demonstrations in 2012 against a federal bill aimed at making it easier for corporations to extract resources on Indigenous lands.
More recently, in 2020 Indigenous protesters shut down key railways and roads across Canada for weeks to show solidarity with an Indigenous group in British Columbia that was trying to stop a gas pipeline being built across its land.
This time around, Indigenous and environmental groups have threatened protests, alongside their legal action.
Sayer said Indigenous peoples were "looking at as many options as necessary to compel the government to back down."
"We will no longer be thrown in jail like in the past. We can get educated now. We can hire lawyers now," Sayer said.
"We hope that Canadians will also be on the right side of history, because it's their life and environment that will go through degradation, and they will end up having a lower quality of life. It's not fair to the future generation."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
21-07-2025
- Japan Times
Indigenous people in Canada challenge fast-track mine and energy projects
Canadian Indigenous groups say new laws passed to fast-track energy and mining projects undermine their constitutional rights and violate the government's obligations to Indigenous people. The tensions between the government and Indigenous communities reflect longstanding concerns over consultation and the environmental impact of mining projects in Canada. Canada's political leaders say the challenge of U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods means the country should fast-track economic development in order to cope with potential economic shocks. But a group of Canada's First Nations this week launched a constitutional challenge to laws passed in June, one in the province of Ontario and one at the federal level. A notice filed in Ontario Superior Court said the laws "represent a clear and present danger to the Applicant First Nations' self-determination rights". Canada's parliament last month passed a law to accelerate approval for projects deemed to be in the national interest, including mines and oil pipelines, and also eliminate some trade barriers between provinces. A similar measure in Ontario gives the province's cabinet broader powers, and the province of British Columbia last month also passed an act to fast-track infrastructure projects. Sol Mamakwa, the only Indigenous member of Ontario's provincial parliament, was ejected from the Toronto assembly after accusing the province's premier of telling "untruths to First Nations" about the legislation, known as 'Bill 5'. After Indigenous protests in Toronto, Ontario Premier Doug Ford added a last-minute clause to the law to ensure consultation with First Nation groups before development and mining projects begin. But the details of the plan and how First Nations will be consulted and are not yet clear. "At the 11th hour, after the law has already been passed, to ask us whether or not we think that this law should be in place, is completely inappropriate and unethical," said Dean Sayers, former chief of the Batchewana First Nation. Demonstrators take part in a protest in front of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario against the federal government's Bill C-5, on Canada Day, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on July 1. | REUTERS Ontario's new law allows the government to declare "special economic zones" that make some projects exempt from other provincial laws. This would make it easier for infrastructure and mining companies to bypass provincial laws and environmental restrictions in the state and speed up development projects in a country that is the world's fourth biggest oil exporter and a mining powerhouse. "The power to name a piece of Ontario a special economic zone will turn it into a Wild West without rules and regulations," said Gord Miller, former environmental commissioner of Ontario and current chair of Earthroots, a Toronto-based conservation organization. "Although the designated zones right now are sparsely populated, what's to stop them from using this bill to impact more densely populated areas in the south of Ontario?" he asked. Canadian law states the government has a duty to consult First Nations on projects that could impact their rights and the environment. But Sayers is skeptical about the government's promise of consultation. Indigenous groups argue fast-tracking project approval sidesteps that obligation and denies them a real say. "Consultation does not cut the mustard. Consultation is their version of asking us what we think, and coming in and doing it anyways, regardless of what we say," Sayers said. "We reserve the right to say yes or no to developments. You don't get the right to say yes or no to developments in our backyards," he said. Ford has said U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods meant it "can no longer be business as usual". "We are cutting red tape to unlock our critical minerals and unleash our economy to create new jobs and opportunities in the north and across the province," Ford said in a statement. But Indigenous leaders and environmentalists say U.S. tariffs are an excuse. Trump said last week the United States would impose a 35% tariff on imports from Canada next month. "Relating Bill 5 to Trump's tariffs is nonsense. American companies pay the tariffs to the American Government, we Canadians don't pay them," said Miller. Chief Taynar Simpson of Alderville First Nation said governments "no matter what stripes or colors have always wanted to bypass and undermine environmental protection laws". "Citing Trump as the reason for the bill is self-serving, and a cover up for the real reasons and causes," Simpson said. Some Indigenous leaders have said they will push back with blockades, strikes and protests reminiscent of the Idle no More Movement that saw national demonstrations in 2012 against a federal bill aimed at making it easier for corporations to extract resources on Indigenous lands. More recently, in 2020 Indigenous protesters shut down key railways and roads across Canada for weeks to show solidarity with an Indigenous group in British Columbia that was trying to stop a gas pipeline being built across its land. This time around, Indigenous and environmental groups have threatened protests, alongside their legal action. Sayer said Indigenous peoples were "looking at as many options as necessary to compel the government to back down." "We will no longer be thrown in jail like in the past. We can get educated now. We can hire lawyers now," Sayer said. "We hope that Canadians will also be on the right side of history, because it's their life and environment that will go through degradation, and they will end up having a lower quality of life. It's not fair to the future generation."


NHK
16-07-2025
- NHK
Nissan, Mazda halt US production of vehicles for Canada
Japanese automakers Nissan and Mazda will continue suspending US production of vehicles destined for Canada. This may last until the outcome of tariff talks between the two nations is known. Canada imposed a 25-percent tariff on automobile imports from the US. This is in retaliation for the same-rate tariffs slapped on by the Trump administration. Since May, Nissan has halted production of three models for Canada at plants in the US states of Tennessee and Mississippi. This includes large SUVs. Mazda has also paused production of some models for Canada at its Alabama plant since May. In addition, it has switched production lines to making vehicles for the US domestic market. The automakers say they are taking these measures to hold down the tariff burden when exporting products from the US to Canada. Nissan officials said they hoped the US and Canada would reach a tariff agreement. Mazda officials have said they will consider flexible and appropriate measures while carefully assessing tariff negotiations.


Japan Times
14-07-2025
- Japan Times
EU to engage more with other nations hit by U.S. tariffs — including Japan
The EU is preparing to step up its engagement with other countries hit by U.s. President Donald Trump's tariffs following a slew of new threats to the bloc and other American trading partners, according to people familiar with the matter. Contacts will take place with nations, including Canada and Japan, and could include the potential for coordination, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The move comes as talks between the EU and the U.S. have dragged on and continue to be stuck on several issues, including cars and tariff rates on agriculture. Member states were briefed on the status of talks on Sunday. Earlier in the day, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said the bloc will extend the suspension of trade countermeasures against the U.S. until Aug. 1 to allow for further talks. The measures had been adopted in response to tariffs imposed earlier by Trump on steel and aluminum before being paused a first time, and were due to snap back into place at midnight on Tuesday. "At the same time, we will continue to prepare further countermeasures so we are fully prepared,' von der Leyen told reporters in Brussels on Sunday, while reiterating the EU's preference for a "negotiated solution.' The current list of countermeasures would hit about €21 billion ($24.5 billion) of U.S. goods, while the EU has another one ready of about €72 billion, as well as some export controls, that will be presented to member states as early as Monday, said the people. Von der Leyen also said that the EU's anti-coercion instrument (ACI), the bloc's most powerful trade tool, won't be used at this point. "The ACI is created for extraordinary situations,' she said. "We are not there yet.' In a social media post responding to Trump's announcement, French President Emmanuel Macron called for the speeding-up of preparations for credible countermeasures, including the anti-coercion tool, if no agreement is reached by Aug. 1. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Sunday evening said 30% tariffs would hit exporters in Europe's largest economy "to the core' if a negotiated solution in the trade conflict can't be found. Merz said he was coordinating closely with other leaders to ensure tariffs of such magnitude don't come into force. "That requires two things: unity in the European Union and good lines of communication with the American president,' the conservative leader told ARD in an interview. Trump has sent letters to a slew of trading partners, tweaking tariff levels proposed in April and inviting them to further talks. In a letter published Saturday, the U.S. president warned the EU it would face a 30% rate from next month if better terms can't be negotiated. The EU had sought to conclude a tentative deal with the U.S. to stave off higher tariffs, but Trump's letter punctured recent optimism in Brussels over the prospects for an 11th-hour agreement. Other countries like Mexico, which has also been negotiating with the U.S., were surprised to receive similar letters. The EU is seeking a tariff no higher than 10% on agricultural exports. An offset mechanism that some carmakers had pushed as a way to grant tariff relief to companies in return for investments in the U.S. isn't under consideration for now, amid worries from the EU that it could shift production across the Atlantic. The bloc's negotiators are focusing talks on car tariffs instead, according to people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. Negotiations between the U.S. and EU are expected to continue this week, the people said. The U.S. and the EU have been discussing an initial deal that would see most EU exports hit with a 10% tariff, with limited exemptions for some industries such as aviation and medical devices. The EU has also been arguing for lower rates on spirits and wines, as well as mitigating through quotas the 50% tariffs that Trump has imposed on steel and aluminum. The U.S. has proposed a 17% tariff on agricultural products. Any initial agreement would also cover nontariff barriers, economic security cooperation and strategic purchases. In addition to a universal levy now due in August, Trump has also introduced 25% levies on cars and parts, as well as double that on metals. The president is working to introduce sectoral levies in other areas, including pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, and recently announced a 50% duty on copper. Any deal at this stage wouldn't automatically shield the EU from those sectoral measures, but the bloc continues to seek preferential treatment in the potentially affected industries.