
Court upholds acquittal of Selangor DAP Women's Secretary over police station incident
Deputy public prosecutor Noor Dayana Mohamad informed the court that the prosecution was withdrawing its appeal against the lower court's decision on Aug 10, 2023, which had freed Nalina.
Nalina's lawyer, Farida Mohamad, informed the court that the defence had no objections to the prosecution's decision to withdraw the appeal.
Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin then dismissed the prosecution's appeal.
On Aug 21, 2021, Nalina, together with an activist, claimed trial when they were accused of committing the offence when they were detained for participating in a candlelight vigil at Dataran Merdeka.
On Aug 10, 2023, the magistrate's court discharged and acquitted the duo without calling for their defence, after finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case at the end of the prosecution's case.
Nalina was accused of committing the offence at the lobby of the Dang Wangi district police headquarters here at 9pm on Aug19, 2021.
She was charged under Section 90 of the Police Act 1967 and punishable under Section 94 of the same Act, which carries a maximum fine of RM500, imprisonment of up to six months, or both, upon conviction.
Speaking to reporters after the proceedings, Nalina expressed her gratitude to her legal team, describing them as extraordinary in their committed and courageous defence of her case.
She said the decision was a result of their tireless efforts and belonged to everyone who continues to uphold human rights and civil liberties.
On Aug 19, 31 individuals were detained for participating in a candlelight vigil at Dataran Merdeka in honouring those who died from Covid-19.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
a few seconds ago
- The Star
MCMC calls up man claiming to be pathologist who conducted Zara Qairina's autopsy
PUTRAJAYA: The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has identified the individual behind who claimed on TikTok that he was a pathologist and involved in the post-mortem examination of Zara Qairina Mahathir. MCMC said the Health Ministry confirmed that the suspect was not a pathologist. "The individual was located near Kota Damansara late Monday (Aug 18) night based on information from two people who joined a TikTok Live session. "The suspect was then taken to the Dang Wangi police headquarters to have his statement recorded and his communication devices were also seized for further investigation and analysis," MCMC said in a statement on Tuesday (Aug 19). The case is being investigated under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. If convicted, the offender may face a maximum fine of RM500,000, up to two years' imprisonment, or both. Police are also investigating the case under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 505(b) of the Penal Code for circulating statements with the intent to cause fear or alarm to the public. – Bernama Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!


The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
MCMC identifies fake pathologist in Zara Qairina case on TikTok
PUTRAJAYA: The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission has uncovered the identity of a TikTok user who posed as a pathologist while falsely claiming involvement in the post-mortem of student Zara Qairina Mahathir. The Ministry of Health verified that the individual behind the account 'Dato' Prof Dr Tunku Iskandar' was not a qualified pathologist. 'The individual was traced near Kota Damansara late last night based on information from the statements of two people who had also joined the account's 'TikTok Live' session,' MCMC stated. Authorities took the suspect to the Dang Wangi district police headquarters for questioning and confiscated his communication devices for forensic analysis. MCMC emphasised that spreading false information about sensitive matters like deaths or accidents constitutes a serious offence that can distress families and mislead the public. The case is being probed under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, which carries penalties of up to RM500,000 or two years' imprisonment. Police are also investigating potential violations under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 505(b) of the Penal Code. Investigators will submit their findings to the Deputy Public Prosecutor for further legal action. – Bernama


Sinar Daily
a few seconds ago
- Sinar Daily
Zara Qairina case: MCMC identifies fake pathologist on TikTok
The Health Ministry confirmed that the suspect was not a pathologist. 19 Aug 2025 04:13pm Photo: FACEBOOK / MCMC PUTRAJAYA - The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has identified the individual behind the TikTok account "Dato' Prof Dr Tunku Iskandar", who was found impersonating a pathologist and claiming to have been involved in the post-mortem of Form One student Zara Qairina Mahathir. The Health Ministry confirmed that the suspect was not a pathologist, MCMC said in a statement today. "The individual was traced near Kota Damansara late last night based on information from the statements of two people who had also joined the account's 'TikTok Live' session. "The suspect was then taken to the Dang Wangi district police headquarters to have his statement recorded, while his communication devices were also seized for further investigation and analysis,' the statement said. MCMC said the dissemination of false information, particularly involving sensitive issues such as deaths, tragedies or accident victims, is a serious offence that can hurt the feelings of families, mislead the public and disrupt investigations by the authorities. The case is being investigated under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (Act 588). The investigation paper will be referred to the Deputy Public Prosecutor for further instruction. If convicted, the offender may face a maximum fine of RM500,000 or up to two years' imprisonment, or both. In addition, police are also investigating the case under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 505(b) of the Penal Code. - BERNAMA More Like This