Uber's Middle East Unit Careem To Suspend Decade-Old Service In Pakistan
Islamabad:
Careem, Uber's ride-hailing arm in the Middle East, will suspend its Pakistan service on July 18, citing economic challenges, rising competition, and capital constraints, ending its core business in a country where it helped pioneer app-based transport nearly a decade ago.
The move underscores strain on Pakistan's digital economy, as tech firms scale back amid high inflation, weak consumer demand, and tighter global capital flows. It ends a nearly decade-long run for Careem, which launched in 2015 and became a dominant player in app-based mobility.
"This was an incredibly difficult decision," Mudassir Sheikha, co-founder and CEO of Careem, said in a LinkedIn post on Wednesday. "The challenging macroeconomic reality, intensifying competition, and global capital allocation made it hard to justify the investment levels required to deliver a safe and dependable service in the country."
Careem helped normalize digital payments, app-based bookings, and female ridership in Pakistan.
Newer entrants such as Russia-backed Yango and Latin America's inDrive have expanded in major cities, offering low-cost models.
The decision follows Uber's exit from Pakistan in 2022.
Pakistan's startup ecosystem has come under pressure since 2022 as venture funding dried up, inflation surged to a record 38% before falling to 3.5%, and consumption weakened. Startups including Airlift, Swvl, VavaCars and Truck It In have shut down or scaled back.
Globally, firms like Uber, Lyft and Grab have exited unprofitable markets, narrowed focus, or expanded into adjacent services such as deliveries and payments. Rising costs, regulation, and thin margins in emerging markets have added to the strain.
Uber still operates in parts of the Middle East and North Africa but has pulled back where profitability remains elusive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
IITian still regrets leaving Bengaluru 8 years ago: 'We didn't just leave a city, but ...
While many online discussions focus on the reasons why people abandon Bengaluru—whether it's unbearable traffic, inadequate infrastructure, or the city's escalating cost of living—one entrepreneur decided to highlight something deeper. Instead of dwelling on what made him leave, he reflected on the intangible sacrifices that came with walking away. Eight years after parting ways with the startup capital of India , this founder shared his realization about what the distance from Bengaluru truly cost him: the irreplaceable proximity to innovation, vibrant exchanges of ideas, and a front-row seat to India's growing entrepreneurial wave. Taking to X, startup founder Shubham Bansal wrote how, years ago, driven by frustration over Bengaluru's poor roads and exhausting commute, he and his wife made the decision to relocate from the city to their hometown. On the surface, the move was practical—trading chaos for calm and stress for stability. However, what seemed like a smart escape from urban disorder gradually revealed hidden emotional and professional consequences. With their departure, they didn't just change geographies. They distanced themselves from their close-knit network of college friends and drifted away from the startup ecosystem's energetic buzz. The constant exchange of groundbreaking ideas, the spontaneous meetups that often sparked new ventures, and the contagious spirit of ambition—all of it was lost. In the process, they also missed out on once-in-a-lifetime professional openings that could have altered the course of their careers. One of the more profound effects of leaving Bengaluru was how delayed their exposure to emerging technologies became. In the past, they were among the first to dive into new tools, platforms, or innovations. Now, without immediate access to early adopters and trendsetters, they found themselves trailing behind, hearing about revolutionary changes like AI only after they had already disrupted industries. Their identity shifted from pioneers to followers—showing up late to the revolution rather than shaping it from the start. — BakarBansal (@BakarBansal) Though life in their hometown was undeniably peaceful and comfortable, something vital always felt missing. It wasn't material—it was an emotional and intellectual longing to stay in touch with the rapidly evolving world of technology and entrepreneurship. A persistent sense of missing out, driven by an innate curiosity and hunger to learn, constantly lingered beneath the surface. To cope with this gap, Bansal took conscious steps to rebuild his connection to the startup universe. He became an active member of online communities that focused on personal and professional growth, started sharing insights on social platforms like LinkedIn and Twitter, and engaged with people from varied industries to keep learning. He also made it a point to return to Bengaluru every six to eight months. These short but meaningful visits helped him stay attuned to the dynamic landscape of startups, ideas, and innovation that continued to flourish in the city. Shubham Bansal, an IIT Bombay graduate, may have physically stepped away from Bengaluru, but he continues to find ways to keep his spirit tethered to the city that remains at the heart of India's tech evolution.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Vi partners with AST SpaceMobile for direct-to-cell satcom in India
Debt-ridden telecom operator Vodafone Idea (Vi) on Wednesday announced that it has joined hands with US-based AST SpaceMobile in a partnership aimed at delivering space-based mobile broadband services to smartphones across the country. Under the agreement, Vi will oversee terrestrial network integration, operating spectrum, and market access, while AST SpaceMobile will develop, manufacture, and manage the satellite constellation powering the system. 'This collaboration is poised to be the frontier of global space technology and both companies will use data and applications to connect. Together, Vi and AST SpaceMobile will explore and implement commercial offerings for diverse sectors,' Vi said in a stock exchange filing. The latest tie-up marks the third and final private sector telecom company to officially enter the unfolding satcom race. In March, Bharti Airtel and Reliance Jio announced separate deals with Elon Musk's Starlink to distribute Starlink equipment and services in India. Vi expects the collaboration to unlock new possibilities for emergency response, disaster management, agriculture, and other sectors. AST SpaceMobile first launched five satellites into space as part of a mission called BlueBird 1–5 in July last year. It has since reportedly revealed plans to deploy up to 60 more satellites over the next six to nine months, through five launches. The company currently provides nationwide non-continuous service across the US, with over 5,600 cells in premium low-band spectrum and a planned tenfold increase in processing bandwidth. Vi's latest venture will, however, require a Global Mobile Personal Communication by Satellite (GMPCS) services license to offer satellite-based broadband in India. Earlier this month, Starlink received the license after two-and-a-half years of processing, joining Airtel-backed Eutelsat OneWeb and Jio Satellite Communications Ltd as licensed satcom providers in the country. Vi said the partnership will enable direct-to-device satellite connectivity, allowing users to access mobile broadband services in areas where traditional cellular networks are unavailable. 'This will enable direct-to-device satellite connectivity, which means that users will be able to access mobile broadband services in areas where traditional cellular networks are not available. This will be particularly beneficial for people living in remote and rural areas, as well as for emergency response and disaster management. The partnership will also support the government's Digital India vision, which aims to provide universal access to mobile broadband services across the country,' the company added.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Google Veo 3: Creative Breakthrough or Crisis for Journalism?
Published : Jun 18, 2025 18:51 IST - 5 MINS READ Launched in May 2025 at Google's annual I/O developer conference, Google Veo 3 is the tech giant's direct challenge to Microsoft-backed OpenAI's video generation model, Sora. Developed by Google DeepMind, the advanced model marks a major leap in generative AI, promising high-quality, realistic video creation from text or image prompts. But in an age flooded with misinformation and deepfakes, a tool like Veo 3—with its ability to produce lifelike video and synchronised audio—raises pressing questions for journalism. It opens new creative possibilities, yes, but also invites serious challenges around credibility, misuse, and editorial control. What is Google Veo? Veo 3 touts itself as a 'cutting-edge tool' offering 'unmatched realism, audio integration, and creative control'. It comes at a high price—$249.99/month under the AI Ultra plan—and is currently available in the US and 71 other countries, excluding India, the EU, and the UK. Ethical concerns loom, but Google pitches Veo as a powerful resource for filmmakers, marketers, and developers. According to Google, Veo 3 can generate 4K videos with realistic physics, human expressions, and cinematic style. Unlike many competitors, it also produces synchronised audio—dialogue, ambient noise, background music—adding to the illusion of realism. Also Read | When AI breaks the law, who gets arrested—the bot or its maker? The model is designed to follow complex prompts with precision, capturing detailed scenes, moods, and camera movements. Users can specify cinematic techniques like drone shots or close-ups, and control framing, transitions, and object movement. A feature called 'Ingredients' allows users to generate individual elements—like characters or props—and combine them into coherent scenes. Veo can also extend scenes beyond the frame, modify objects, and maintain visual consistency with shadows and spatial logic. Google's website features examples of Veo in action, including projects in marketing, social media, and enterprise applications. The Oscar-nominated filmmaker Darren Aronofsky used it to create a short film, Primordial Soup. On social media, AI artists have released viral Veo clips like Influenders, a satire featuring influencers at the end of the world. Veo 3 is integrated into Google's AI filmmaking tool Flow, which allows intuitive prompting. Enterprise access is available via Vertex AI, while general users in supported countries can use it through Google's Gemini chatbot. The journalism dilemma Veo's features raise alarms about potential misuse. It could facilitate the creation of deepfakes and false narratives, further eroding trust in online content. There are also broader concerns about its economic impact on creators, legal liabilities, and the need for stronger regulation. The risks are not theoretical. As highlighted in a June 2025 TIME article, titled 'Google's Veo 3 Can Make Deepfakes of Riots, Election Fraud, Conflict', Veo was used to generate realistic footage of fabricated events—like a mob torching a temple or an election official shredding ballots—paired with false captions designed to incite unrest. Such videos could spread rapidly, with real-world consequences. Cybersecurity threats—like impersonating executives to steal data—are also plausible, alongside looming copyright issues. TIME reported that Veo may have been trained on copyrighted material, exposing Google to lawsuits. Meanwhile, Reddit forums cite personal harms, such as a student jailed after AI-generated images were falsely attributed to them. There is also the threat to livelihoods. AI-generated content could displace human creators, particularly YouTubers and freelance editors, accelerating what some call the 'dead internet'—a space overrun by AI-generated junk media. To mitigate risk, Google claims that all Veo content includes an invisible SynthID watermark, with a visible one in most videos (though it can be cropped or altered). A detection tool for SynthID is in testing. Harmful or misleading prompts are blocked, but troubling content has still emerged, highlighting the limits of guardrails. What should newsrooms do? Despite the risks, Veo presents compelling opportunities for journalism—particularly for data visualisation, explainer videos, recreating historical events, or reporting on under-documented stories. It can help small newsrooms produce professional-quality videos quickly and affordably, even for breaking news. Used responsibly, Veo could improve storytelling—turning eyewitness accounts of a disaster into a visual narrative, for instance, or transforming dry data into cinematic sequences. Prototyping ideas before committing to full production becomes more feasible, especially for digital-first outlets. But Veo's strengths are also its dangers. Its ability to produce convincing footage of events that never happened could destabilise the information ecosystem. If deepfakes flood the news cycle, real footage may lose credibility. The visible watermark is easily removed, and Google's SynthID Detector remains limited in scope, giving malicious actors room to operate undetected. To maintain public trust, newsrooms must clearly disclose when content is AI-generated. Yet the temptation to pass off fabricated visuals as real—especially in competitive, high-pressure news environments—will be strong. And because AI outputs reflect their training data, biases could sneak in, requiring rigorous editorial scrutiny. There is also the human cost. Veo's automation could eliminate roles for video editors, animators, and field videographers, especially in resource-strapped newsrooms. Journalists may need to learn prompt engineering and AI verification just to stay afloat. Also Read | AI is changing work, privacy, and power—what comes next? The legal landscape is murky. If an outlet publishes an AI-generated video that causes harm, accountability is unclear. Ownership of Veo-generated content also remains opaque, raising potential copyright disputes. And then there is the burden of verification. Fact-checkers will face a deluge of synthetic content, while reporters may find their own footage treated with suspicion. As the Pew Research Center reported in 2024, three in five American adults were already uneasy about AI in the newsroom. A critical juncture As Veo and tools like it become cheaper and more widely available, their impact on journalism will deepen. The challenge is not simply to resist the tide but to adapt—ethically, strategically, and urgently. According to experts, newsrooms must invest in training, transparency, and detection tools to reap the creative rewards of AI while safeguarding credibility. Innovation and trust must evolve together. If journalism is to survive this next phase of disruption, it must do so with eyes wide open, they say. (Research by Abhinav Chakraborty)
