Nobody knows what Trump is talking about anymore and no one seems to care
During President Donald Trump's announcement that he's sending the National Guard to Washington, DC, to fight a crime wave that isn't real, it became clear he has caught Sleepy Joe Biden's much-ballyhooed cognitive decline.
I'm not sure how it happened. I imagine the liberals figured out a way to make a concerning lack of mental acuity contagious.
But whatever the cause, hearing the president ramble incoherently during a nationally televised press conference left no doubt: The man's brain has turned to oatmeal.
Trump thinks he's meeting Putin in Russia. It will actually happen in Alaska.
For starters, on two separate occasions Trump told reporters he will be meeting later this week with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Russia. The meeting will be held in Alaska, which, unless Trump has given away one of America's states to Putin, is very much not in Russia.
Take our poll: In the wake of Trump's federal DC takeover, are you worried about crime? | Opinion Forum
A mistake like that from Biden would have prompted Republicans to launch a congressional investigation into his competency and CNN's Jake Tapper to pen a book on the presidential competency scandal of a generation. Two mistakes like that from Biden would have effectively spun the U.S. media into a months-long cyclone of speculation and hysteria.
Remember how important mental decline was when Biden was president
So I'm sure all Americans who have displayed deep concern about the importance of world-leader lucidity will meet the moment with an appropriate number of gasps, pearl clutches and calls for an immediate mental-fitness exam.
Because the 'I'm going to Russia!' confusion was just a part of Trump's troubling Aug. 11 performance.
Opinion: I'm glad Trump is focused on nonexistent DC crime wave, not his campaign promises
Trump's word salad answers are getting more concerning
Asked a specific question about whether other cities like Chicago and Los Angeles might expect 'similar action' involving the use of the National Guard to combat 'crime,' Trump said, in part, this:
'But when I look at Chicago and I look at L.A., if we didn't go to L.A. three months ago, L.A. would be burning like the part that didn't burn. If you would've allowed the water come down, which I told them about in my first term, I said, 'you're going to have problems, let it come down'. We actually sent in our military to have the water come down into L.A. They still didn't want it to come down after the fires. But that was it, we have it coming down. But hopefully L.A. is watching. That mayor also, the city is burning, they lost like 25,000 homes. I went there the day after the fire, you were there, and I saw people standing in front of a burned-down home. Their homes were incinerated, they weren't like, even the steel, literally it was all warped, literally disintegrated because of the wind and the flames like a blow torch. They were standing on this beautiful day, maybe a couple of days after, we gave it a little time because of what they had suffered. Almost 25,000 homes. And you see what's happening now, they didn't give their permits. I went to a town hall meeting I said we're going to get you the federal permit, which are much harder.'
That's the sort of thing you hear before having to make a difficult decision about grandpa's future. That it came from a sitting president waging domestic war against a crime emergency in a city that currently does not have a crime emergency seems, at best, troubling.
Opinion: Trump's mental decline is on vivid display as he rages about Epstein, windmills
Time for the 'Biden is incompetent' folks to perk up
I wish a reporter had asked Trump what 'L.A. would be burning like the part that didn't burn' means. I wish a reporter had asked the president if the DC crime wave he kept referring to was in the room with them as they spoke.
But there was no pushback.
The Fox News folks and the right-wing radio squawkers and the Republicans who called the former president a dithering old fool need to start worrying about the competency of the current president.
You know, the one who's going to Alaska and thinks he's going to Russia. The one who answers a question about sending the National Guard to U.S. cities by babbling about water, fires and federal building permits. The one who has clearly gone, as critics of Biden's mental acuity would call it, 'full Sleepy Joe.'
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors are frogs in a Trumpian pot
Markets are bending the knee to Donald Trump, opening up the possibility of a new level of recklessness in the US president's economic Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
South Korean president will meet Japanese leader ahead of summit with Trump
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will meet Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in Tokyo next week before flying to Washington for a summit with President Donald Trump, underscoring how Trump's push to reset global trade is drawing the often-feuding neighbors closer. Lee's two-day visit to Japan Aug. 23–24 will be an opportunity to deepen personal ties with Ishiba and put bilateral relations on firmer ground. Their talks will center on strengthening trilateral cooperation with Washington, promoting 'regional peace and stability,' and addressing other international issues, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said Wednesday. Their meeting will come weeks after South Korea and Japan secured trade deals with Washington that shielded their trade-dependent economies from Trump's highest tariffs. The separate agreements negotiated their rates of reciprocal duties down to 15% from the originally proposed 25%, but only after pledging hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. investments. Lee and Ishiba previously met on the sidelines of the June G7 meetings in Canada, where they called for building a future-oriented relationship and agreed to cooperate closely on various issues including trade and countering North Korea's nuclear and missile programs. Relations between the two U.S. allies often have been strained in recent years over grievances stemming from Japan's brutal colonization of the Korean Peninsula before the end of World War II. South Korea's previous conservative president, Yoon Suk Yeol, made active efforts to repair ties with Tokyo, including a major compromise on compensation issues related to Korean victims of Japanese wartime slavery, aiming to bolster trilateral security cooperation with Washington against North Korean threats. But Yoon's presidency was cut short by his brief imposition of martial law in December, which led to his ouster and imprisonment, leaving uncertainty over Seoul-Tokyo relations under Lee, who has long accused Japan of clinging to its imperialist past and hindering cooperation. Since taking office in June after winning the early presidential election, Lee has avoided thorny remarks about Japan, instead promoting pragmatism in foreign policy and pledging to strengthen Seoul's alliance with Washington and trilateral cooperation with Tokyo. There also have been calls in South Korea to boost collaboration with Japan in responding to Trump, who has unsettled allies and partners with tariff hikes and demands they reduce reliance on the U.S. while paying more for their own defense. Following his meeting with Ishiba, Lee will travel to Washington for an Aug. 25 summit with Trump, which his office said will focus on trade and defense cooperation. His meeting with Trump comes with concerns in Seoul that the Trump administration could shake up the decades-old alliance by demanding higher payments for the U.S. troop presence in South Korea and possibly move to reduce it as Washington shifts more focus on China.
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
European powers threaten 'snapback sanctions' if Iran doesn't return to nuclear talks
France, the U.K. and Germany have told the United Nations they support reinstating snapback sanctions on Iran, if it doesn't re-enter dialogue with the West over its nuclear program, according to reporting by the Financial Times. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," ministers of the three countries — using an acronym that describes the European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal — said in a letter obtained by the FT. The reported letter was delivered to the U.N. Security Council and U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres two months after Israel and the U.S. bombed Iran's nuclear facilities over the course of a 12-day conflict that set regional tensions and energy prices soaring. CNBC was not able to immediately verify the report and has contacted the Iranian foreign ministry and mission to the UN for comment. 'Snapback' sanctions are part of a mechanism that was built into the original 2015 Iranian nuclear deal — formally titled the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or the JCPOA. The deal removed a number of sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs to its nuclear program. They were designed to act as a guardrail: if Iran commits a "significant non-performance" of the deal, any of the JCPOA signatory countries can trigger the automatic reimposition of U.N. sanctions lifted under the agreement, and no other permanent member can veto it. The EU said in mid-July that it would start the process of reinstating UN sanctions on Tehran from Aug. 29 if it does not make sufficient progress on limiting its nuclear program. Those sanctions are set to expire on October 18 unless one of the remaining parties of the deal — Russia, China, or a member of the E3 — triggers the snapback option. "'Snapback' looks set to be the word of the summer in European negotiations with Iran," Ellie Geranmayeh, Deputy Director, Middle East and North Africa program at the European Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in a July report. The consequences for Iran could be dire and could once more spike tensions and the possibility of conflict. Iranian officials have suggested the country could withdraw from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) if those sanctions are reimposed. For its part, Tehran has said that it remains open to direct talks with the U.S. once more, but stopped short of accepting the terms to abandon its uranium enrichment program. The sixth round of talks with the U.S. was dropped after Israel and the U.S. began bombing Iran's nuclear facilities in mid-June. Iran's economy has deteriorated dramatically in the years since Trump in 2018 withdrew the U.S. from the JCPOA. Trump has made is abundantly clear that he will not accept a nuclear-armed Iran. The stakes have been raised in recent years: in the time since Trump withdrew from the deal, Iran has been enriching and stockpiling uranium at its highest levels ever, prompting the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, to issue numerous warnings. Tehran insists that its program is for civilian energy purposes only, but Iran's nuclear enrichment has reached 60% purity, according to the IAEA — dramatically higher than the enrichment limit posited in the 2015 nuclear deal, and a short technical step from the weapons-grade purity level of 90%.
