US placed on rights watchlist over health of its civil society under Trump
On Wednesday, a new report released by the non-profit Civicus placed the US on its watchlist following 'sustained attacks on civic freedoms' across the country, according to the group.
Civicus pointed to three major issues including the deployment of military to quell protests, growing restrictions placed on journalists and civil society, as well as the aggressive targeting of anti-war advocates surrounding Palestine.
At Civicus, countries are assigned a rating over their civic space conditions. The ratings include 'open', 'narrowed', 'obstructed', 'repressed' and 'closed'. The group has declared the US's civic space as 'narrowed'.
According to the group, the 'narrowed' rating is for countries that still allow individuals and civil society organizations to exercise their rights to freedom of association, peaceful assembly and expression but where violations of these rights still take place.
'People can form associations to pursue a wide range of interests, but full enjoyment of this right is impeded by occasional harassment, arrest or assault of people deemed critical of those in power,' the rating description says, adding: 'Protests are conducted peacefully, although authorities sometimes deny permission, citing security concerns, and excessive force, which may include tear gas and rubber bullets, are sometimes used against peaceful demonstrators.'
With regard to the media, countries with a 'narrowed' rating allow media to 'disseminate a wide range of information, although the state undermines complete press freedom either through strict regulation or by exerting political pressure on media owners'.
Related: In Donald Trump, the morality of civil society has been abandoned
'The United States appears to be sliding deeper into the quicksands of authoritarianism. Peaceful protests are confronted with military force, critics are treated as criminals, journalists are targeted, and support for civil society and international cooperation have been cut back,' Mandeep Tiwana, Civicus's secretary general, said in a statement.
'Six months into Donald Trump's second term, a bizarre assault on fundamental freedoms and constitutional safeguards has become the new normal,' he added.
Pointing to Trump's deployment of marines and national guard troops to California in June in response to the widespread protests against immigration raids, Tiwana said: 'This level of militarisation sets a dangerous precedent. It's a line that democratically elected leaders aren't meant to cross.'
Tiwana also pointed to the Trump administration's latest attacks against media networks, including funding restrictions on public broadcast stations including PBS and NPR.
'What they're trying to do is actually defund critical news sources and deny American people the ability to receive truthful non-partisan reporting by pulling their funding,' Tiwana told the Guardian.
In its report, Civicus also warned of the growing criminalisation of peaceful advocacy, adding that 'authorities have continued reprisals against activists expressing solidarity with Palestinian rights.'
Citing the Trump administration's clampdown on foreign-born student activists including Mahmoud Khalil, Mohsen Mahdawi and Rümeysa Öztürk, as well as the sanctioning of Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, Tiwana said: 'We are seeing a wide-ranging attack on civic space in the US by the federal and some state governments. Authorities in the US should reverse course from the present undemocratic path by guaranteeing everyone's first amendment right to organise and dissent legitimately.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Court Lets Trump Block Billions of Dollars in Foreign Aid
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration can cut billions of dollars in foreign assistance funds approved by Congress for this year, a US appeals court ruled. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets In a 2-1 decision on Wednesday, the appellate panel reversed a Washington federal judge who found that US officials were violating the Constitution's separation of powers principles by failing to authorize the money to be paid in line with what the legislative branch directed. The ruling is a significant win for President Donald Trump's efforts to dissolve the US Agency for International Development and broadly withhold funding from programs that have fallen out of favor with his administration, regardless of how Congress exercised its authority over spending. Trump's critics have assailed what they've described as a far-reaching power grab by the executive branch. The nonprofits and business that sued could ask all of the active judges on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to reconsider the three-member panel's decision. If the panel's decision stands, it wasn't immediately clear how much it would affect other lawsuits contesting a range of Trump administration funding freezes and cuts besides foreign aid. Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson wrote in the majority opinion that the challengers lacked valid legal grounds to sue over the Trump administration's decision to withhold the funds, also known as impoundment. The US Comptroller General — who leads an accountability arm of Congress — could sue under a specific law related to impoundment decisions, Henderson wrote, but the challengers couldn't bring a 'freestanding' constitutional claim or claim violations of a different law related to agency actions. Henderson, appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, was joined by Judge Greg Katsas, a Trump appointee. The court didn't reach the core question of whether the administration's unilateral decision to refuse to spend money appropriated by Congress is constitutional. Judge Florence Pan, nominated by former President Joe Biden, dissented, writing that her colleagues had turned 'a blind eye to the 'serious implications' of this case for the rule of law and the very structure of our government.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement that the appeals court 'has affirmed what we already knew – President Trump has the executive authority to execute his own foreign policy, which includes ensuring that all foreign assistance aligns with the America First agenda.' A lead attorney for the grant recipients did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two consolidated cases before the appeals court only deal with money that Congress approved for the 2024 fiscal year, which ends on Sept. 30. Grantees are poised to lose access to funds if they haven't yet been approved to be spent by federal officials — a precursor to actual payouts — or unless a court order is in place. The administration lost one of its few battles before the US Supreme Court earlier this year in the foreign aid fight. In March, a majority of justices refused to immediately stop US District Judge Amir Ali's injunction taking effect while the legal fight went forward. Since then, however, the challengers have filed complaints with Ali that the administration is failing to obligate or pay out the funds. They've rebuffed the government's position that the delay is part of a legitimate effort to 'evaluate the appropriate next steps' and accused officials of angling to use a novel tactic to go around Congress in order to cut appropriated money. The Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the US government's humanitarian work overseas, slashing spending and personnel and merging the USAID into the State Department. The challengers say the foreign aid freeze has created a global crisis, and that the money is critical for malaria prevention, to address child malnutrition and provide postnatal care for newborns. The groups argued that the president and agency leaders couldn't defy Congress' spending mandates and didn't have discretion to decide that only some, let alone none, of the money appropriated by lawmakers should be paid. The president can ask Congress to withdraw appropriations but can't do it on his own, the challengers argued. The Justice Department argued Ali's order was an 'improper judicial intrusion into matters left to the political branches' and that the judge wrongly interfered in the 'particularly sensitive area of foreign relations.' The government also said that the Impoundment Control Act, which restricts the president from overruling Congress' spending decisions, wasn't a law that the nonprofits and business could sue to enforce. The challengers countered that Ali's order blocking the funding freeze was rooted in their constitutional separation-of-powers claim, not the impoundment law. The cases are Global Health Council v. Trump, 25-5097, and AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. US Department of State, 25-5098, US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit. (Updated with White House comment.) Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
News24
an hour ago
- News24
SA human rights ‘worsened', US claims; Stormers' new logo: Today's top 7 stories in 7 minutes
News24 brings you the top 7 stories of the day. Graphic: Sharlene Rood News24 brings you the top stories of the day, summarised into neat little packages. Read through quickly or listen to the articles via our customised text-to-speech feature. US State Department claims human rights have 'worsened' in SA - Dirco criticised the US State Department's human rights report, calling it inaccurate and a misrepresentation of South Africa's constitutional democracy, particularly regarding land reform and racial issues. - The US report claimed there was a worsening human rights situation in South Africa, citing the Expropriation Act, alleged abuses against racial minorities, and government inaction on human rights abuses. - Dirco highlighted UN support for South Africa's land reforms and plans to release documents to counter the US report's distortions, emphasising South Africa's commitment to democratic processes and human rights protection. X/@DonaldDavhie Anti-colonial allies: South Africa deepens ties with Iran amid strained US relations - The SANDF chief's visit to Tehran aimed to strengthen ties and discuss shared anti-colonial and justice-driven goals. - General Rudzani Maphwanya emphasised deepening defence ties, mutual respect, and solidarity with oppressed people, including Palestinians. - The visit occurred amid escalating tensions between Washington and Pretoria over South Africa's relationships with nations the US designates as adversaries. Guptas unhappy being called 'infamous', tell ConCourt Nulane retrial won't be fair - Accused in the Gupta-linked Nulane scam are appealing the Supreme Court of Appeal's (SCA) decision to overturn their acquittals and order a retrial, arguing it prejudices their right to a fair trial. - The appellants claim the SCA made factual findings and improperly referenced the Zondo Commission's findings, which they argue are not binding and inadmissible. - The Nulane prosecutor argues the SCA only assessed errors of law and that its finding of a prima facie case doesn't equate to a finding of guilt. The Constitutional Court has yet to decide whether to hear the appeals. There's snow place like home: Meet SA's 18-year-old ski sensation going to Winter Olympics - Lara Markthaler, an 18-year-old skier with German-South African heritage, has qualified to represent South Africa in Alpine skiing at the 2026 Winter Olympics. - Markthaler, who has lived and trained in various countries, expresses pride in representing South Africa and enjoys standing out among traditional ski nations. - She trains extensively, balancing on-snow practice with gym sessions, and looks forward to carrying the South African flag and inspiring other South African athletes. Lotto licence saga: ANC-linked group led before Sizekhaya win, court papers show - Minister Parks Tau revealed that Ringeta Consortium, linked to an ANC donor, initially scored highest in the bid for SA's new lotto operator but was later surpassed by Sizekhaya Consortium due to better financial projections. - Questions arose about Deputy President Paul Mashatile's sister-in-law's stake in Sizekhaya, but Tau stated that evaluators found no concerns regarding political influence within the consortium. - Tau defended his decision to award the license to Sizekhaya, citing a reassessment process that prioritised maximising profits, and addressed concerns about political involvement in Ringeta's bid. Supplied/Shoprite Holdings How two women bought a failing cookie company for one rand... and triumphed - In 2013, Adri Williams and Eunice Nyobole bought the failing Khayelitsha Cookie Company for R1 and transformed it into a successful women-led social enterprise. - The company now employs 70 women, produces 80 000 cookies daily, and supports approximately 500 dependents through its workers' incomes. - Khayelitsha Cookies has expanded into the retail market through private label partnerships and developed a healthier cookie range inspired by the need to combat malnutrition in children. Shaun Roy/Gallo Images Stormers unveil new logo replacing iconic 26-year-old 'lightning bolt' - The Stormers have unveiled a new logo, replacing their 26-year-old design, to symbolise unity, progress, and a commitment to community connections. - The rebrand reflects the team's financial stability and new leadership, aiming for growth, player development, and inspiring their fanbase. - The new logo incorporates elements like the Stormers jersey hoops, a subtle lightning bolt, and the shape of Cape Town Stadium, emphasising unity and heritage.
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
America Needs a Bitcoin Reserve — Here's Why
The U.S. has released its most comprehensive digital-asset policy yet, the 160-page Crypto Playbook. The initiative holds promise and invites further discussion in the world of digital assets. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. On July 30, the U.S. released its most sweeping digital-asset policy framework to date: a 160‑page U.S. Crypto Playbook. While the report steers clear of new promises regarding a federal Bitcoin acquisition program, it renews attention on the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, first announced in March — an initiative that could reshape America's financial posture. The newly published Crypto Playbook is the most comprehensive digital asset policy guide the U.S. has ever produced. The report outlines strategic goals around stablecoin regulations, DeFi innovation, digital infrastructure, consumer protections and financial literacy. Highlights include endorsement of the bipartisan GENIUS Act, laying regulatory ground rules for crypto exchanges; clarification of jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC via the proposed Clarity Act; and recommendations for tax treatment of staking income, mining equipment depreciation, and wash-sale exemptions. But the most headline-grabbing omission? No fresh policy announcement regarding the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Despite speculation, the Playbook simply restates the administration's March 6 directive to consolidate all seized Bitcoin into a national reserve, while remaining silent on future acquisitions. For many in the crypto community, the message is clear: the idea isn't dead, but it's still taking shape. Related: Why Not Owning Bitcoin is Making You Poor What we know about the reserve so far In March, an executive order directed U.S. agencies to begin aggregating all federally seized Bitcoin into a single account under the Department of the Treasury. The U.S. currently controls an estimated 200,000 BTC, mostly obtained through forfeitures linked to cybercrime and darknet operations. Rather than liquidating these holdings at auction (as has been common practice for years), the White House policy marks a significant pivot: treat Bitcoin like a sovereign asset, not a liability. While today's Playbook did not mention any direct purchases or operational updates, the crypto industry remains optimistic. As one policy advisor put it, "They've already laid the foundation. We're just waiting for them to build the house." According to a reporter present at the event, the Treasury Secretary emphasized the growing role of digital assets in global finance and outlined the administration's commitment to regulatory modernization. A key theme from his speech was the need to "reinforce dollar dominance through stablecoins and modernize banking regulations for digital assets." His comments reflect the administration's broader strategy, as outlined in the newly released U.S. Crypto Playbook, to position the United States as a global leader in blockchain innovation while safeguarding national financial stability. The event drew senior policymakers, industry leaders, and regulatory officials, many of whom welcomed the remarks as a turning point in the federal government's tone toward crypto. This affirmation of support marks a pivotal moment, suggesting that Washington sees the maturation of Bitcoin and stablecoins not as a threat to the dollar but as a tool to strengthen its role in a rapidly digitizing global economy. Related: Exploring Bitcoin As a Retirement Investment Avenue Why America needs a Bitcoin reserve At a time of rising geopolitical friction, debt uncertainty and de-dollarization efforts by global rivals, a Bitcoin strategic reserve offers the U.S. several vital advantages. Just as gold once anchored the monetary system, Bitcoin now serves as a decentralized, censorship-resistant store of value. A sovereign reserve positions the U.S. to weather inflation, monetary dilution and foreign central bank diversification. Nations like China and Russia have been quietly offloading U.S. Treasuries and accumulating gold. If a currency crisis or dollar liquidity shock ever emerged, a Bitcoin buffer could serve as a geopolitical hedge with instant global liquidity. America's dominance in technology is already being challenged by decentralized finance and token-based commerce. A strategic reserve signals leadership in digital capital formation, making the U.S. more attractive for Web3 entrepreneurs and fintech investment. While U.S. sanctions have long used the dollar as a weapon, adversaries are actively seeking alternatives. A Bitcoin reserve gives the U.S. a tool of resilience, rather than dependence on legacy systems vulnerable to fragmentation. By leveraging forfeited BTC from criminal seizures, the reserve grows without costing taxpayers a cent — a rare bipartisan win with massive asymmetric upside. In short, a Bitcoin reserve isn't about speculative gain. It's about future-proofing national strength. Related: A Bitcoin Hot Girl Summer — Will Bitcoin's Success Continue? Skepticism — and strategy — remain Of course, not everyone is on board. Economists have voiced concern that Bitcoin's volatility makes it an unstable strategic asset. A recent University of Chicago poll found that over 70% of economists do not believe such a reserve would reduce national economic risk. Global reaction has also been cautious. European and Asian officials have warned that a U.S. crypto reserve could destabilize existing foreign exchange reserves and provoke retaliatory monetary policies. And then there are the technical and ethical questions: Who controls the keys? Can sovereign actors manipulate Bitcoin? Should the reserve be disclosed in real time? The answers remain murky. What happens next Under the March order, agencies have until late September to deliver implementation frameworks to the Treasury. Legislative allies in Congress have already floated the BITCOIN Act, which would authorize a broader reserve and explore alternative funding strategies, potentially including gold-for-BTC swaps. Until then, the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will remain more symbol than substance. But for crypto advocates, that symbol is growing heavier by the day.
