Tony Blair thinktank worked with project developing ‘Trump Riviera' Gaza plan
The project, led by Israeli business people and using financial models developed by the US consulting firm Boston Consulting Group (BCG), was developed against the backdrop of Donald Trump's vision of taking over the Palestinian territory and transforming it into a resort.
While the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (TBI) said it was not involved in the authorship of the plan, two staff took part in calls as the project evolved.
The staff also took part in a message group used for the project, along with figures from BCG and the Israeli business people, while a TBI document titled 'Gaza Economic Blueprint' was shared within it, the Financial Times reported.
The report prompted an angry reaction from the institute, which Blair set up after he left Downing Street. It has more than 900 staff in more than 45 countries.
The former UK prime minister has been involved in the region and worked for nearly eight years as special representative of the Quartet of international powers seeking a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. He resigned in 2015.
The institute denied it was involved in the preparation of a slide deck, which the FT reported had been developed by the Israeli business people using BCG's financial models and was said to have proposed paying half a million Palestinians to leave the area.
The slides reportedly outlined a plan called the 'Great Trust' and was shared with the Trump administration. It envisaged that private investors would have been attracted to Gaza once many of the inhabitants had been paid to leave.
The plan outlined in the slides was reported to have been created to attract Trump's attention and that of wealthy Gulf rulers. Among 10 'mega projects', the document includes the 'MBS Ring' and 'MBZ Central' highways — named after the leaders of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and an 'Elon Musk smart manufacturing zone'
In February, Trump retweeted an AI-generated video and said: 'We have an opportunity to do something that could be phenomenal … the Riviera of the Middle East, it could be so magnificent.'
Blair's institute said it was not involved in the preparation of the slide deck, which it described as 'a BCG deck', and added that it had no input into its contents.
'Tony Blair himself has neither spoken to the people who prepared this deck nor commented on it. The TBI team speaks to many different groups and organisations with postwar 'plans' for Gaza, but had nothing to do with the authorship of this plan,' a spokesperson said.
'TBI staff participated in two calls, as they have done with many other people with 'Gaza plans' and interacting with them doesn't mean endorsement. But we were not involved in drawing up the deck, it is emphatically not TBI work or 'joint' work so it would be completely wrong to suggest it is.
'Of course we're opposed to any plan which tries to make Gazans leave Gaza. We want them to be able to stay and live in Gaza.'
'The TBI document referred to is an internal TBI document looking at proposals being made by various parties covering all the different aspects of what a postwar Gaza could look like, though it is one of many such internal documents.'
The spokesperson said that TBI's work in the region has always been dedicated to building a better Gaza for Gazans, adding: 'Tony Blair has worked for this since leaving office. It has never been about relocating Gazans, which is a proposal TBI has never authored, developed or endorsed.'
The TBI, which describes itself as a 'not-for-profit, non-partisan organisation helping governments and leaders turn bold ideas into reality'.
BCG has been embroiled in a separate controversy over its connection to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the controversial Israeli- and US-backed delivery group.
The consulting company said last month that it had cancelled its contract with the GHF amid growing media scrutiny into the group's work and sources of funding.
BCG has sought to disassociate itself from the work in Gaza and has reportedly fired two partners who it said had mislead senior management. TheFT reported last week that the BCG team had been involved in modelling of the potential reconstruction of Gaza.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Drivers will get taxpayer-funded grants to buy electric cars under £650m scheme
Labour has announced a big push to boost the sale of electric cars with a new £650million grant scheme - the industry has been calling for incentives for private buyers to take the plunge Drivers will be able to get up to £3,750 off an electric car under a new government scheme. The Department for Transport announced £650million worth of grants to encourage motorists to switch to electric. The automotive industry has been calling for incentives for private buyers to take the plunge ever since the Tories scrapped a plug-in grant worth up to £1,500 in 2022. Labour has a manifesto commitment to phase out the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030. However, the high price tag for electric cars - plus a lack of public charging points - has seen sales go backwards. That was despite manufacturers pumping £4.5billion last year into discounts on incentives as they tried to meet government targets. The market has picked-up, with one in four new cars sold last month electric. Drivers can already benefit from generous tax breaks but only if an electric car is bought on a company scheme. The new Electric Car Grant will apply to new vehicles with a price tag of £37,000 or less. The threshold will exclude expensive models, including Elon Musk's Tesla. According to website Autotrader, the average price of a new electric car from a volume manufacturer is £35,865, with 44% of the 153 EV models less than £37,000. That still means most models won't qualify. The grant money will go not direct to buyers direct but manufacturers. To qualify, car makers will need to show they have reached the 'highest manufacturing sustainability standards'. It is unclear at this stage which manufacturers will be included but it is believed it will exclude cars assembled in China. Those car firms deemed to have the greenest manufacturing will be able to apply for the maximum £3,750 per vehicle grant, but those in band two will get a much lower amount of up to £1,500. Funding available until the 2028/29 financial year. Buyers won't need to fill in any additional paperwork to receive the grant as all administration is handled between the manufacturers, dealerships, and the government. Whether the money will be enough to persuade a rush of new buyers, only time will tell. And it comes as another incentive for going electric - lower road tax - was scaled back. From this April, electric owners will pay £10 for the first year, but then £195 per year after that. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'This EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money - it'll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century. And with over 82,000 public charge points now available across the UK, we've built the infrastructure families need to make the switch with confidence. This is our Plan for Change in action. We're backing British drivers, British jobs and British growth.' Mike Hawes, chief executive at trade body the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said, 'Today's announcement of the return of government support for the purchase of electric vehicles is a clear signal to consumers that now is the time to switch. 'Rapid deployment and availability of this grant over the next few years will help provide the momentum that is essential to take the EV market from just one in four today, to four in five by the end of the decade. This announcement is a welcome response to consistent calls from the industry for more support, which will be in addition to the substantive subsidies already provided by manufacturers.' The price difference between an electric and a petrol or diesel car is still around 22%, although that is down from 36% a year ago. Ian Plummer, commercial director at AutoTrader, said: 'We saw tax rises in April that have made it more expensive for people to drive electric vehicles, so any incentives to help people buy one are welcome. 'Although more consumers than ever are looking to make the switch, many are still put off by the high upfront cost. 'There are now more EV models available than ever, varying in size and cost, so consumer choice is there. And as charging gets easier and with potential incentives for those without driveways, this should help reduce any lifestyle barriers people might have, providing even more peace of mind to make the switch.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Israeli government and military clash over proposed camp for Palestinians
A feud has broken between the Israeli government and the military over the cost and impact of a planned camp for Palestinians in southern Gaza, as politicians criticised the former prime minister Ehud Olmert for warning that the project would create a 'concentration camp' if it goes ahead. The 'humanitarian city' project has become a sticking point in ceasefire talks with Hamas. Israel wants to keep troops stationed across significant parts of Gaza, including the ruins of Rafah city in the south, where the defence minister, Israel Katz, says the camp will be built. Hamas is pushing for a more comprehensive withdrawal. Husam Badran, a senior member of the group, said the camp plans were a 'deliberatively obstructive demand' that would complicate talks, the New York Times reported. 'This would be an isolated city that resembles a ghetto,' he said in a message to the paper. 'This is utterly unacceptable and no Palestinian would agree to this.' Katz revealed last week that he had ordered the army to draw up plans for a camp. It is envisaged that Palestinians would be crammed into an area between the Egyptian border and the Israeli military's 'Morag corridor', which cuts across the strip. Katz said initially 600,000 people would move there, and eventually Gaza's entire population. Those inside would only be allowed to leave for another country, he told Israeli journalists at a briefing. The plan was unveiled while the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was in Washington DC for an official visit, but it was understood to have his backing. The plan caused immediate alarm among Israel's allies, including the UK, and domestically. Olmert, who led Israel from 2006 to 2009, has been the most high-profile domestic critic of the project. He said that if Palestinians were forced to move to the camp, it would constitute ethnic cleansing. His comments evoking comparisons with Nazi-era Germany were fiercely attacked inside Israel. The heritage minister, Amichai Eliyahu, in effect called for Olmert to be jailed over the comments, with a barely veiled reference to time he served for corruption offences after leaving office. '[Olmert] already knows prison very well,' Eliyahu said. 'There is no other way to shut him down from the hatred and antisemitism he spreads around the world.' The military has also opposed the project, even as it has followed orders to draw up plans to implement it. In a security cabinet meeting on Sunday night, tensions broke out into the open as the IDF chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, clashed with Netanyahu, Israeli media reported. Zamir reportedly said the project would divert funds and other resources from the military, sapping its ability to fight and undermining efforts to rescue hostages. His office had previously argued that moving and 'concentrating' civilians was not a goal of the war, in response to a legal petition brought by reservists concerned they would face illegal orders to commit war crimes. Netanyahu reportedly lashed out at Zamir, saying the plans he had presented – which estimated several months of construction work, and perhaps up to a year – were 'too expensive and too slow', Israel's Channel 12 reported, citing official sources. 'I asked for a realistic plan,' the prime minister reportedly said, demanding that a cheaper, faster timeline for construction be delivered by Tuesday. Finance ministry officials raised other practical objections to the 'humanitarian city' plan, the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported. They said an estimated 15bn shekels (£3.3bn) annual cost would be a huge drain on the state's budget. That cost would probably fall on the Israeli taxpayer, taking money away from schools, hospitals and welfare, the paper added. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. Senior Israeli officials estimate that constructing a proposed 'humanitarian city' in the Rafah area would cost between $2.7bn and $4bn, Ynet reported. They added that if the plan proceeds, Israel would initially bear nearly the entire cost. The row came as Israeli strikes across Gaza killed at least 31 people, according to local hospitals. Twelve people were killed by strikes in southern Gaza, including three who were waiting at an aid distribution point, according to Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, which received the bodies. Shifa hospital in Gaza City received 12 bodies, including three children and two women, after a series of strikes in the north, according to the hospital's director, Dr Mohammed Abu Selmia. Al-Awda hospital reported seven killed and 11 wounded in strikes in central Gaza. UN agencies, including those providing food and health care, reiterated a warning made at the weekend that without adequate fuel they would probably be forced to stop their operations entirely. In a joint statement, they said hospitals were already going dark and ambulances could no longer move. Transport, water production, sanitation and telecommunications would shut down and bakeries and community kitchens could not operate without fuel, they said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Tesla's Autopilot system is in the spotlight at a Miami trial over a student killed while stargazing
A rare trial against Elon Musk 's car company began Monday in Miami where a jury will decide if it is partly to blame for the death of a stargazing university student after a runaway Tesla sent her flying 75 feet through the air and severely injured her boyfriend. Lawyers for the plaintiff argue that Tesla's driver-assistance feature called Autopilot should have warned the driver and braked when his Model S sedan blew through flashing red lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at nearly 70 miles an hour in the April 2019 crash. Tesla lays the blame solely on the driver, who was reaching for a dropped cell phone. 'The evidence clearly shows that this crash had nothing to do with Tesla's Autopilot technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'Instead, like so many unfortunate accidents since cellphones were invented, this was caused by a distracted driver.' The driver, George McGee, was sued separately by the plaintiffs. That case was settled. A judgement against Tesla could be especially damaging as the company works to convince the public its self-driving technology is safe during a planned rollout of hundreds of thousands of Tesla robotaxis on U.S. roads by the end of next year. A jury trial is rare for the company, which often settles lawsuits, and this one is rarer yet because a judge recently ruled that the family of the stricken Naibel Benavides Leon can argue for punitive damages. The judge, Beth Bloom of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, issued a partial summary judgement last month, throwing out charges of defective manufacturing and negligent misrepresentation against Tesla. But she also ruled plaintiffs could argue other claims that would make the company liable and ask for punitive damages, which could prove costly. 'A reasonable jury could find that Tesla acted in reckless disregard of human life for the sake of developing their product and maximizing profit,' Bloom said in a filing. The 2021 lawsuit alleges the driver relied on Autopilot to reduce speed or come to a stop when it detected objects in its way, including a parked Chevrolet Tahoe that Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, had gotten out of near Key West, Florida, to look up at the sky. The Tesla rammed the Tahoe at highway speeds, causing it to rotate and slam into Benavides, tossing her into a wooded area and killing her. In legal documents, Tesla denied nearly all of the lawsuit's allegations and said it expects that consumers will follow warnings in the vehicle and instructions in the owners' manual, as well as comply with driving laws. Tesla warns owners in manuals that its cars cannot drive themselves and they need to be ready to intervene at all times. —— Former AP auto writer Krisher reported from Detroit.
