
US journalist sues Indian government after losing his overseas citizenship
A US journalist has taken the Indian government to court after his Indian overseas citizenship was unilaterally cancelled, following the publication of a story critical of a prominent Indian businessman.
Raphael Satter, who covers cybersecurity for Reuters news agency in the US, received a letter from India's ministry of home affairs in early December 2023, accusing him of producing work that 'maliciously' tarnished India's reputation and informing him that his Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card had been cancelled.
OCI status is given to foreign citizens of Indian origin, or those married to Indian nationals, and allows for visa-free travel, residency and employment in India. Satter received his OCI through marriage. The cancellation of his OCI status means he is no longer able to travel to India where members of his family live.
In recent years, the ruling Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) government, led by the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, has been accused of revoking OCI privileges for those it has deemed critical, part of what Human Rights Watch has called a campaign of 'politically motivated repression'.
Journalists, academics and activists have been a particular target, with several high-profile journalists forced to leave the country after their OCI cards were revoked and academics turned away at the Indian border.
According to the letter sent to Satter by India's ministry of home affairs in December 2023, his OCI status was revoked for his alleged 'practising [of] journalism without proper permission' and for work that had been 'maliciously creating adverse and biased opinion against Indian institutions in the international arena'.
Satter, who works in Washington DC, denies ever conducting journalism in India and has only travelled to the country to visit family.
The Indian government provided no specifics to Satter's lawyers on how his journalistic work had been deemed a national security threat to India. However, Satter's lawyers noted that the cancellation of his OCI came at exactly the same time that a defamation case had been filed against him in India for a story he had written on the Indian cybersecurity company Appin and its co-founder Rajat Khare.
Satter's investigation for Reuters, titled 'How an Indian startup hacked the world', exposed the workings of Appin, alleging it had become 'a hack-for-hire powerhouse that stole secrets from executives, politicians, military officials and wealthy elites around the globe'.
Rajat Khare's US representative, the lawfirm Clare Locke, rejected any association between its client and the cyber-mercenary business, telling Reuters that Khare 'has never operated or supported, and certainly did not create, any illegal 'hack for hire' industry in India or anywhere else'.
During the course of his inquiries into Appin and Khare, Satter said that he had received a series of threats made by individuals associated with the company, 'one of whom alluded to potential 'diplomatic action' unless I abandoned my reporting'.
'The Petitioner and his employer, Reuters, began receiving threats from individuals linked to a company called Appin, which has hacked organizations in India and abroad,' Satter's court petition says.
On the same day that Satter received the notice of the OCI cancellation, a Delhi judge granted an injunction against the story, forcing it to be temporarily taken down. It was restored 10 months later. Karuna Nundy, the lawyer representing Satter, said the timing clearly 'linked' the two events. She emphasised that, under Indian law, defamation is not grounds for OCI cancellation.
Khare has been highly proactive in pursuing news organisations that have published articles on the activities of Appin. According to an investigation by Reporters Without Borders, at least 15 media outlets investigating Appin received legal notices and five have been subjected to legal proceedings.
The New Yorker and the Sunday Times are among those who have faced legal action by entities representing Khare, who also has initiated legal proceedings in Switzerland against a story that mentioned his name. Reporters Without Borders described the magnitude of these gag lawsuits as 'unprecedented'.
The first court hearing for Satter's case was heard in Delhi this week. In a statement sent to the Guardian, Satter said the Indian government's decision to cancel his OCI had 'effectively cut me off from members of my family and a country I hold in great affection and respect'.
Satter was insistent that the decision was a 'mistake or on a misunderstanding' by the ministry of home affairs and that he had only decided to go to court after not receiving any response on his appeal to the government for over a year.
'I am confident that, once the integrity of my journalism is demonstrated before the Indian courts and the true and correct facts are brought to the fore, the ministry of home affairs will see fit to restore my OCI card,' he said. The ministry of home affairs did not respond to requests for comment about Satter's case.
The Indian government now have until the next hearing on 22 May to respond to the petition and give legal justification for Satter's OCI cancellation.
The Modi government has cancelled more than 100 OCI cards while in power for the last decade. Among them was the journalist Aatish Taseer, after he wrote a cover article for Time magazine criticising the BJP leader.
'The Indian authorities should not be attempting to silence critics by revoking residency rights or other means' said Meenakshi Ganguly, the deputy director of the Asia division of Human Rights Watch. 'Instead, the authorities should have the maturity to accept legitimate criticism and work on reforms.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Six members of Russian spy ring to have ‘too lenient' jail sentences reviewed
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SIX members of a Russian spy ring are to have their jail sentences reviewed for being too lenient, we can reveal. The Bulgarians — who lived and worked in the UK — plotted sex stings, and targeted Russian dissidents and journalists critical of President Vladimir Putin's war effort against Ukraine. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Russian Spy Vanya Gaberova was sentenced to eight years in jail Credit: Reuters 7 The operations was run out of a Great Yarmouth guesthouse Credit: PA The ring included lab worker Katrin Ivanova, 33, and beauty shop owner Vanya Gaberova, 30 — dubbed 'killer sexy brunettes' by cell leaders. Ivanova got nine years and eight months and Gaberova eight years. They were both found guilty in March of breaching the Official Secrets Act by conspiring to provide information useful to an enemy between August 2020 and February 2023. Ivanova also got a concurrent sentence of 15 months for forged ID documents. read more on russia BRAND OF EVIL Ukrainian PoW released in swap left with 'Glory to Russia' burned on his body All six got a total of more than 50 years last month. The Attorney General's Office has been asked to consider the sentences under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme. The ULS scheme allows anyone to ask for a Crown Court sentence to be assessed by the Attorney General's office if they think it is too lenient. Law officers have 28 days from sentencing to make a decision. 7 Katrin Ivanova was sentenced to nine years and eight months Credit: Central News 7 Orlin Roussev ran the spy ring Credit: PA 7 Ivan Iliev Stoyanov was convicted of carrying out surveillance for Putin 7 Tihomir Ivanov Ivanchev was also jailed for his part in the spy ring Credit: PA 7 Biser Dzhambazov was convicted as part of the ring Credit: PA Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.


Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
US military dependents allowed to depart Bahrain due to regional tensions, US official says
WASHINGTON, June 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. military is set to allow families of service members in Bahrain to temporarily depart the country because of heightened tensions in the region, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday. The official was speaking on condition of anonymity.


Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
IMF, Serbia reach staff-level agreement on 36-month deal
BELGRADE, June 11 (Reuters) - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Serbia have reached staff-level agreement on the first review under a 36-month arrangement to help support economic reforms, the fund said in a statement on Wednesday. The so-called Policy Coordination Instrument (PCI) was signed in October to make it easier for the Balkan country to secure lending from other sources. Under the arrangement, Serbian authorities are committed to a fiscal deficit limit of 3% of gross domestic product over three years. The review will be subject to approval by the IMF Executive Board, the fund said in the statement which was issued after its two-week trip to Serbia. It also warned that downside risks for the economy were elevated. The IMF said political tensions over anti-government protests and blockades of state universities launched last November "may weigh on confidence". Serbia has seen months of anti-government rallies after 16 deaths from a railway station roof collapse triggered accusations of widespread corruption and negligence. The IMF warned that a global growth slowdown and increasing "geoeconomic fragmentation could negatively affect exports and foreign direct investment". However, it expects Serbia's economy to grow 3% this year and 4% in 2026. "Serbia has built up substantial buffers to respond to shocks — foreign exchange reserves and government deposits are high, public debt is declining, and banks are well-capitalised and liquid," the IMF said.