
The Apple Watch Turns 10. Here's How Far It's Come
Apr 24, 2025 10:02 AM When the Apple Watch launched, it was unclear if smartwatches would pan out. Ten years later, Apple has a $100-billion hit that reshaped the watch industry and ushered in a new age of fitness tracking. Photograph: Apple; Getty Images
April 24, 2025, marks 10 years since the Apple Watch first went on sale. It was actually announced during a special event on September 9, 2014, but only became available to buy over seven months later, on April 24, 2015.
While it seems hard now to recall a time when the Apple Watch, or something similar, did not exist, the market hasn't always been so obvious. It was only 10 years ago that we were still wondering if Pebble would actually pan out, and all anyone wanted a Fitbit for was to get in their 10,000 steps (an entirely arbitrary number, but I digress).
Customers in Sydney, Australia, queueing for a look at the first Apple Watch in April 2015. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images
When it debuted, the first Apple Watch was glitchy and expensive. Battery life sucked. Many publications, including mine, spent significant time and space wondering why anyone even wanted a smartwatch. Today, it is an Apple success story. 'Since 2015 til the end of 2024, we estimate that 281.2 million Apple watches have been shipped,' Jitesh Ubrani, a device research manager at IDC tells WIRED. That's at an estimated value of $127 billion. No wonder it has spawned a flotilla of imitators.
However, on its tenth anniversary (or perhaps more appropriately its aluminum anniversary), the Apple Watch Series 10 faces a tumultuous global market. Even before the Trump administration announced tariffs, global smartwatch sales were slumping. As innovation slows (or is blocked in patent disputes), people are now holding onto their Apple devices for longer, while newer smartwatches, such as the Galaxy Watch are also coming for Apple's lunch. Sleeping Beauty
Check Reddit's r/AppleWatch and you'll find people who still own—and use—the original Series 0. It's a reminder that Apple's Jony Ive poured years of work into a tiny design that was originally intended to be a piece of jewelry, before reportedly clashing with executives over what the watch's eventual function would be.
Potential buyers look at the various options offered by the first Apple Watch. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images
Initial unfortunate nomenclature aside—Tim Cook casually called it 'the iWatch', before that horrible name was kiboshed due to patent squabbles—it was beguiling, and Ive had his wish. Walking into an Apple Store and picking out your case and accessories was the closest many might have come to a luxury watch purchasing experience.
Because the Watch is not just a simple timepiece—you can change it to suit your needs, or mood. When you buy an Apple Watch, you can also pick or change your bands, from the now-classic Milanese loop to the company's successful collaboration with Hermès. You can change your watch face to suit your outfit, to check if Snoopy has a cute new cartoon for the day, to go sailing, or map your way back off the trail. Those two ingenious buttons on the case's back that let you easily switch out your straps at a whim with no tools are now copied by almost all manufacturers in the watch industry, not just smartwatch manufacturers.
'Apple showed that [the strap] was a critical part of the design language, but also laid down the gauntlet in engineering secure, easy-to-use quick-release systems that didn't require tools. Brands have put a lot of R&D into this,' said Tim Barber, WIRED's watch expert.
While the $10,000 Apple Watch was certainly a folly—you still have to update an Apple Watch, even when it's pure gold (except when you no longer can)—the watch itself is to my eyes both beautiful and declaratory: wearing one signifies that you're a serious person who cares about fitness and getting work done. It's the only watch that has ever outsold the entire Swiss watch industry, and actually, Barber notes, in part, reinvigorated the luxury watch industry.
The $10,000 Apple Watch Edition launched in 2015 and had an 18K gold case with sapphire crystal glass. Photograph: Apple
'Rather than wipe out mechanical watches, as some thought it would—hence the folly of TAG Heuer, Montblanc and others getting into ultimately inferior smart watches—Apple Watch reinvigorated them as a prestige item specifically apart, and in opposition to, digital culture,' says Barber. 'That undoubtedly benefitted watchmakers. It's almost certainly been a net positive.'
Ive and the Apple Watch design team hit upon a key concept when it comes to digital wearables: It's a form of self-expression that you wear on your wrist, and it must actually look good for you to want to wear it. It was a health tracker that wasn't as overtly health-coded as a Fitbit or a Garmin. In fact, when the Series 0 first launched, it had only a few simple health features—the now-iconic Activity Rings, the workout app, an optical heart sensor, and the heart app.
Ten years on, Activity Rings remains one of the best examples yet of fitness gamification. (Today is also Global Close Your Rings Day; if you close them today, you get a limited-edition award.) Every fitness tracker has a step counter, but the visual demonstration of how little you have left to do to close the Move ring has launched a thousand memes, and even a couple T-shirts. A Wellness Story
Prior to the Apple Watch, smartwatches were conceived as a kind of wrist-based mini smartphone, to ping you with notifications or to take calls off your wrist. David Naranjo, associate director of Counterpoint Research, noted in a phone call with WIRED that Apple's success in this category was largely due to completely changing the watch's use case—from being a smartwatch, to being a smartwatch with a dedicated health and fitness aspect.
'Fitbit and others had [an ecosystem and apps], but there were other things they were not able to do,' Naranjo said. 'Apple built out the ecosystem and made the healthcare story very strong. Not only did [the company] focus on fitness and heart rate, it went beyond fitness and looked at a much deeper level of healthcare. That's where Apple excelled.'
Apple's ECG sensor launched on the Apple Watch Series 4. Photograph: Apple
Every year, Apple launches one standout health feature, from measuring VO2 Max on the Series 3 to the ECG sensor on the Series 4, all the way to sleep apnea notifications on the Series 10. 'If you zoom out way into the future, and you look back and ask what Apple's biggest contribution was, it will be in the health area,' Cook said in an interview with WIRED last year.
This is a bold thing to say, especially given that the Series 10 and Watch Ultra 2 don't even have blood oxygen measuring, due to a patent dispute with the medtech company Masimo. For a while, Apple has been doing research into features that would transform the Apple Watch for people with chronic conditions, like adding noninvasive blood glucose monitoring for diabetics, or adding blood pressure measuring for people with hypertension. Alas, despite promising advances, these features have yet to materialize.
Apple's latest project, an AI-assisted comprehensive health service, is far behind other health manufacturers such as Oura, Whoop, or even Garmin. Imagine, for example, being able to take a picture of your meal with the Watch Ultra and uploading it to the (still rudimentary) Health app, the way you already can with the Meals feature on an Oura Ring 4. You have to imagine it for now, of course, because the Apple Watch doesn't currently have a camera, and Apple's Visual Intelligence is still limited to the iPhone 16. But it seems within reach.
Still, the Watch's wearability and seeming ubiquity does mean that it has a track record of saving peoples' lives, whether that's by notifying users of an irregular heart rhythm via the ECG feature or calling the emergency services if it recognizes the user has fallen or been in a serious crash. I also have a personal anecdote to report—before the blood oxygen feature was removed, I had pneumonia. How did I know? My blood oxygen level, as measured by the watch, was at 84 percent. I went to urgent care and got antibiotics, stat.
While Apple has not historically always been first to market with a new health feature, it's a fast follower, and the features nearly always work. 'Apple owners are very patient when it comes to Apple,' Naranjo says. 'They've come to believe that Apple doesn't rush to market with something that isn't almost perfect.' Why You Wear It
That point seems to bear out with the research. In 2022, nearly 80 percent of Apple iPhone owners also owned an Apple Watch, and it accounted for 56 percent of smartwatch sales in the North American market. Most importantly, research suggests most people who own an Apple Watch are pretty satisfied with their device.
As most of them are likely Apple users already, it helps that the Watch—like all Apple devices—integrates seamlessly with Apple's ecosystem. It's intuitive, easy to use, and has an interface that is pleasing to experience—both for the first time, and 10 years on. I still twirl and push every day the tiny digital crown every day, and find it a great way for navigating the device's smaller menus without obscuring text with your fingers.
The Taptic Engine that gently buzzes on your wrist has now been adapted to dozens of uses, from waking you up in the morning to gently pointing you in the right direction while you're walking or biking around and using Apple Maps. There is no way to count just how many tourists have not gotten robbed because they did not need to pull out their phone to figure out how to get back to the hotel from the bagel shop, but the number I imagine must be considerable. Whether you're pausing a podcast or doing a couple toe touches in the middle of the day, life seems a little easier with an Apple Watch.
The Apple Watch Series 10 and its many strap options. Photograph: Apple
I took a brief and stunningly informal essay of WIRED Gear team members who also wear Apple Watches on why they bought or wear one. Notifications, integration with the Apple ecosystem, and fitness tracking were the most common answers. 'Waterllama also helps me keep track of my hydration,' product reviewer Ryan Waniata says.
'Can I confess that … the only thing I use my Apple Watch for is to ding my iPhone and find out where I lost it at home?' asked senior writer Zeyi Yang. Yes! I use it to find my AirPods Pro, too. The UWB chip that debuted in the Series 9 has saved countless minutes every morning, even if you're just finding AirTags and your phone with it, but sadly not using it to unlock your self-driving Apple car.
It's so easy to use, we're still willing to forgive its most annoying flaws, most notably the battery life. Charging your Apple Watch every day is the bane of my existence, and despite years of efforts to improve it, the closest that Apple has come is to launch … fast charging? Loading media onto the watch, even basic offline maps, is such a hassle that even Apple has resigned itself to the fact that most people will end up carrying their phone instead. Apple Watch will even still buzz you to stand up when you're driving on a freeway.
But most of all, there is the unfashionably-late arrival of Apple Intelligence, which launched on iPhone last October. So far, the only Apple Intelligence features that you can use on the Watch (if you have not disabled it due to privacy concerns, or the fact that it's just kind of annoying or inaccurate) are notification summaries and the Reduce Notifications focus. This is underwhelming, to say the least. The only consolation is that Apple Watch users are not the only Apple customers waiting for Apple Intelligence to become useful.
In 2022, I wrote that Apple's wearables seem designed for an increasingly terrifying world. While I made fun of the marketing at the time, the world has gotten more uncertain and scary. I'm glad that I talked my husband into wearing an Apple Watch Ultra, and, thanks to Crash Detection, I will now know if he gets into a car accident on the way home. My aging parent now wears an Apple Watch with Fall Detection (and moved two blocks away from me, but that's another thing), which gives me peace of mind. Since I've gotten older, I'm glad that there are more cardio health features on the watch, particularly now that I know that nearly half of all adults in the United States have high blood pressure.
So despite the slowing market, I am still waiting to see what new features—health or otherwise—will be announced at this year's WWDC, and later on this year. 'I would never count Apple out in terms of what they're able to do,' said Naranjo. 'They've proven time and time again that they can create a new category and make that category grow.'
I can be patient and wait in Apple's sticky ecosystem biding time until blood glucose monitoring shows up. Ten years ago, we all asked if we could even find a use for Jony Ive's piece of glittery, buzzing jewelry; not even Apple knew the future success that it had on its hands (or its wrists). The Apple Watch is ubiquitous, and we're still waiting for more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Column: Is this the beginning of the end for Tesla?
It was always difficult to understand the odd-couple relationship of U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Trump has made it clear that he wants to cut support for electric vehicles, if not generally reduce environmental protections, and Musk owns a company that builds electric cars. Someday, those opposing forces would come to a head, and the only loser would be Tesla. Business and politics mix like oil and water. They eventually separate, and in the Trump-Musk scenario, rather dramatically. Sign up for Automotive News Canada's weekly podcast newsletter for a lively and in-depth discussion of the biggest stories. While Musk was busy angering his liberal customer base by aligning with Trump in the most visible manner possible as the chainsaw-wielding head of the Department of Government Efficiency, the leaders of other auto companies were largely out of the news and focused on battling Trump's tariffs. What they were not doing was making their brands unpopular. Tesla gained a cult-like following partly because Musk was seen as a rebel, but, as we've witnessed, the potential volatility cuts both ways. Interest in Tesla among Canadians with intentions of buying an electric vehicle has fallen to 13 per cent from 29 a year ago, according to the J.D. Power 2025 Canada Electric Vehicle Consideration Study, released May 29. The survey, detailed in a separate story, doesn't get into the reasons Canadians are turning their backs on Tesla, but Musk's politics — and saying Canada isn't a real country — are likely the key driver. In one fell swoop, Musk became a pariah, and Tesla is paying the price. Aside from public protests, several provinces removed Tesla from their EV rebate programs, and Ottawa froze Incentives for Zero Emission Vehicle (iZEV) payments as it investigated the validity of a large number of last-minute Tesla rebate claims. Before the Musk-Trump bromance, people would buy Teslas, seemingly no matter how good or bad the vehicle was, because of Musk. Now, no matter how good or bad the vehicle is, they're less likely to buy because of Musk. It's all so unnecessary. The lesson, which most people in business know, is don't mix in politics. Regardless of whether that's seen as commonplace or even expected in the Trump orbit, the obvious problem is that sharply divisive politics can make permanent enemies out of customers. Musk, in aligning with Trump, had everything to lose and little to gain. Trump for years has openly berated EVs, so it's not like his supporters would be suddenly swayed by the tacky and now-infamous Tesla sales pitch on the White House lawn. And since the Trump-Musk relationship has soured, reports that Trump will sell his Tesla are bound to undo any inroads made. (Not to mention Musk's vilification of Trump on X, formerly Twitter.) So all Musk managed to do was alienate droves of customers and potential customers who feel, well, wronged. The danger for Tesla is that customers don't need the drama or misery (what will Musk do next?) when there are excellent EV alternatives, whether the Chevrolet Equinox EV, Kia EV6 or Hyundai Ioniq 5. According to the J.D. Power survey, Hyundai was the top brand, with 36 per cent of Canadian EV shoppers interested, while Kia, Toyota, Ford and Chevrolet rounded out the top five. It's hard to fathom how Musk, an intelligent individual, did not see this coming. Perhaps he was too disconnected from the car business or that, in his mind, he could do no wrong. Regardless, damage control seems impossible, raising the question of whether Tesla can be pulled from the fire. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump approves US Steel-Nippon merger
This story was originally published on Manufacturing Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Manufacturing Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday approving Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel, with the companies promising $11 billion in new investments by 2028. The deal includes an initial investment in a new site that would be completed after 2028, according to U.S. Steel's June 13 press release. The companies have completed the Department of Justice's review process. With all regulatory approvals finished, they said the deal is 'expected to be finalized promptly.' As part of the regulatory approval, the two companies have agreed to sign a national security agreement with the federal government. U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding what the new project will entail or its value. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come,' Nippon and U.S. Steel said in a joint statement. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The merger would retain and create more than 100,000 jobs, according to a study by Parker Strategy Group commissioned by U.S. Steel. Additionally, the agreement involves other commitments related to domestic production commitments, trade and the granting of veto power to the U.S. government in the form of 'golden shares.' The veto power will allow the U.S. government to oversee key decisions to any changes to the company. Nippon initially announced plans to acquire U.S. Steel for $14.9 billion in December 2023, but faced opposition from the Biden administration. Then-President Joe Biden blocked the deal in January, citing national security concerns and a negative impact on domestic steel production. Trump previously opposed the acquisition, saying he would block the deal. The president, however, revived talk of the deal in April, when he ordered the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review the proposal. Last month, Trump announced he supported the deal, calling it a 'planned partnership.' The United Steelworkers have also voiced their opposition to the merger. The labor union said Sunday it had not received a copy of the agreement between U.S. Steel, Nippon and the federal government. USW said it's disappointed that Trump reversed course, saying the merger could jeopardize 'the future of American steelmaking.' The union added that Nippon refused to promise USW to not transfer production from any of U.S. Steel's facilities in the country. 'It is left to be seen whether the president's 'golden share' and stated 51 percent control prevents Nippon from doing what has been clear it would do since December of 2023.' USW said in a statement. 'Those that ignore the threat, do so at their own peril. The focus of the International union has always been about protecting the members' job security and employment.' USW's labor agreement with U.S. Steel expires Sept. 1, 2026. The union said it's prepared to engage with Nippon to obtain 'a fair contract, one that maintains our existing facilities and recognizes the decades of contributions to the profitability of the company by USW members.' Recommended Reading Trump to increase steel, aluminum tariffs to 50% Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Digital Trends
20 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
This might be the coolest way to charge an Apple Watch
If you love a touch of nostalgia and have an Apple Watch, then this new charger from Spigen may well appeal. Joining Spigen's C1 collection featuring accessories inspired by the design of classic Apple products, the Apple Watch Classic C1 charger sports the familiar look of Apple's iconic iMac G3, which shook up the PC market when it launched in 1998. Recommended Videos The $35 device is designed to house your Apple Watch charging puck, which fits snugly in the G3's 'display' after you've fed the wire through the back. It even features the computer's slightly slanted display angle for a comfortable view of the watch face. The charger comes in four different colors that match some of the options offered by the original iMac G3, namely Tangerine, Graphite, Ruby, and the original Bondi Blue. The Apple Watch Classic C1 charger is compatible with the Apple Watch Ultra (49mm), Apple Watch series 10/9/8/SE2/7/6/SE/5/4, AirPods 4 (ANC), and AirPods Pro 2, but just to be clear, the actual charging puck is not part of the package. Apple's iMac G3 arrived at a time when PCs came in one flavor — beige and boring. Indeed, its colorful design signaled that it was more than a computer. It was a promise that tech could be, well, joyful. The all-in-one iMac G3 proved popular with customers looking for something a little different, and its subsequent success played a pivotal role in Apple's resurgence after years of financial struggles. Recognizing its iconic status and keen to highlight its significance in design and technology history, the Smithsonian Institution added the iMac G3 to its collection. The computer sold more than six million units between 1998 and 2003, cementing the foundations of the iMac, which continues as a product line today — albeit with a starkly different look. And now it's inspired the design of an Apple Watch charger, too.