
‘They need to do better': Mark Carney to meet with Indigenous leaders amid criticism of rapid-development law
Mark Carney's
legislative agenda: a controversial effort to accelerate approvals for mega projects deemed to be in the national interest.
The One Canadian Economy Act, or Bill C-5, as the law continues to be known, received royal assent in late June, a scant 20 days after the Liberals first tabled the legislation.
When it passed, the prime minister made a promise to take part in three, daylong summits with First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders to hash out 'joint expectations' around the law.
The first of those meetings — with First Nations chiefs, regional chiefs, modern treaty and self-governing First Nations, and tribal councils — is slated to kick off at the Canadian Museum of History on Wednesday, before a full day of discussions with Carney gets underway on Thursday.
'I know it's a new, young government, but at the same time, they should have had this discussion … before the passing of this bill,' Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, told the Star.
'I think the government made a mistake on that. I think that they need to do better.'
That's a sentiment echoed by many who wonder why the Carney government was open to meeting face-to-face with a range of Indigenous rights holders, but only after the contentious law was safely passed.
The part of the law dealing with major resource and infrastructure initiatives was designed to address challenges on two fronts: long-simmering frustrations with the lengthy approval processes associated with the projects, but also the trade crisis prompted by U.S. President Donald Trump's tumultuous return to the White House.
At issue is how the law grants Ottawa temporary powers to bypass existing environmental laws and regulations to fast-track 'nation-building' projects, which could include pipelines, ports and mines, and how it was rammed through Parliament without robust scrutiny.
While some changes were made to the bill after a compressed period of debate, some critics were left concerned that the government was running roughshod over Indigenous rights and environmental protections.
'In terms of the way things have unfolded, I think, the fact that this (summit) is taking place post all of those steps … meeting for the sake of meeting is not meaningful consultation,' said Deliah Bernard, a partner at Roots Strategies and former senior Indigenous affairs adviser for former prime minister Justin Trudeau.
Bernard said proper consultation leads to the success of future projects, but that not ensuring that was the case here may be 'setting everyone up for failure.'
The Carney government has repeatedly insisted that Indigenous rights and environmental concerns were central to its drafting of the legislation, and that the law was crafted to prioritize the consultation process as projects are identified.
Last month, the Privy Council Office told the Star that 66 letters were sent to Indigenous groups to discuss the proposed law, that 15 meetings were held between the end of May and the beginning of June, and that as of late June, more than 125 groups had 'engaged' with Ottawa about the bill. The Privy Council Office did not provide a list of those groups, despite a request to do so.
Alvin Fiddler, Grand Chief of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN), said on his way to Ottawa on Tuesday that the 'very last minute' nature of the summit has been complicated by a number of chiefs currently experiencing emergencies, including Pikangikum First Nation, which is grappling with a power outage and a wildfire-induced evacuation.
'They're worried about just trying to meet the basic needs of their membership, including food and water … and at the same time, trying to prep the rest of the leaders for the meetings that will happen this week,' Fiddler said.
Fiddler represents 49 First Nations in northern Ontario, including those near the Ring of Fire, a region rich in critical minerals like chromite, cobalt and copper.
It's a region Premier Doug Ford wants to swiftly declare a 'special economic zone' after his government passed a similar law last month.
On Tuesday, nine First Nations in Ontario launched a legal challenge over both the federal and provincial laws, seeking an injunction that would prohibit Ottawa from naming national interest projects and Ontario from implementing the zones.
'This is not about a battle between development and not,' Todd Cornelius, chief of Oneida Nation of the Thames, said in a press release. 'It is about doing things recklessly and doing things right.'
This week's hybrid summit will take place against the backdrop of such tensions, where across the Ottawa River from Parliament Hill, Carney, his ministers, and government officials will speak to and hear from chiefs and moderate a series of discussions.
In promising to host the summits last month, Carney said the goal was not to leave the gatherings with a list of confirmed projects, but to develop a 'shared understanding' of how projects can proceed.
While Woodhouse Nepinak said she appreciated the prime minister's willingness to ultimately come to the table, the national chief also said a single day of face time is not enough.
'We will be asking the prime minister to commit to another meeting one year from now,' she said.
With files from Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Australia bans YouTube accounts for children under 16 in reversal of previous stance
The Australian government announced that YouTube will be among the social media platforms that must ensure account holders are at least 16 years old from December, reversing a position taken months ago on the popular video-sharing service. YouTube was listed as an exemption in November last year when the Parliament passed world-first laws that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X. Communications Minister Anika Wells released rules Wednesday that decide which online services are defined as 'age-restricted social media platforms' and which avoid the age limit. 4 The Australian government announced that YouTube will be among the social media platforms that must ensure account holders are at least 16 years old from December. AP The age restrictions take effect Dec. 10, and platforms will face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for 'failing to take responsible steps' to exclude underage account holders, a government statement said. The steps are not defined. Wells defended applying the restrictions to YouTube and said the government would not be intimidated by threats of legal action from the platform's U.S. owner, Alphabet Inc. 'The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of 10 Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube,' Wells told reporters, referring to government research. 'We will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids.' Children will be able to access YouTube but will not be allowed to have their own YouTube accounts. 4 YouTube was listed as an exemption in November last year when the Parliament passed world-first laws that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from social media platforms. AP YouTube said the government's decision 'reverses a clear, public commitment to exclude YouTube from this ban.' 'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' a YouTube statement said, noting it will consider next steps and engage with the government. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would campaign at a United Nations forum in New York in September for international support for banning children from social media. 'I know from the discussions I've had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations,' Albanese said. 'It is a common experience. This is not an Australian experience.' Last year, the government commissioned an evaluation of age assurance technologies that was to report last month on how young children could be excluded from social media. The government had yet to receive that evaluation's final recommendations, Wells said. But she added that the platform users won't have to upload documents such as passports and driver's licenses to prove their age. 'Platforms have to provide an alternative to providing your own personal identification documents to satisfy themselves of age,' Wells said. 'These platforms know with deadly accuracy who we are, what we do and when we do it. And they know that you've had a Facebook account since 2009, so they know that you are over 16.' 4 Children will be able to access YouTube but will not be allowed to have their own YouTube accounts. AP 4 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (pictured) said Australia would campaign at a United Nations forum in New York in September for international support for banning children from social media. REUTERS Exempt services include online gaming, messaging, education, and health apps. They are excluded because they are considered less harmful to children. The minimum age is intended to address harmful impacts on children, including addictive behaviors caused by persuasive or manipulative platform design features, social isolation, sleep interference, poor mental and physical health, low life-satisfaction, and exposure to inappropriate and harmful content, government documents say.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Police, MPs meet behind closed doors to discuss bail reform in St. Thomas
Local police chiefs had a closed-door meeting to discuss bail reform with two Conservative Members of Parliament who sit on Canada's House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights in St. Thomas on July 24. The 'Round Table on Crime and Justice', organized by St. Thomas Police Chief Marc Roskamp and held at that station, included Deputy Chief Steve Bogart; Aylmer's Police Chief Kyle Johnstone and Deputy Chief Chris Johnson; and MPs Andrew Lawton (Elgin–St. Thomas–London South) and Larry Brock (Brantford-Brant South-Six Nations). Journalists were not permitted to attend the round table session, but were allowed a 20-minute interview afterwards. MP Lawton said the police leaders at the meeting linked current bail policies to repeat offending and expressed concern about the impact of what he described as 'revolving‑door bail.' 'One thing that was pointed out from the Aylmer context is that problems that they used to see as big-city problems are in every community of every size in Canada: rampant property crimes, just the feeling of not being safe in your own community,' he added. 'This is what police were telling us consistently this morning, that they're getting a small number of people that they're re-arresting over and over and that they're causing all of the problems, taking up almost all of their police time, and accounting for all their interactions,' explained MP Lawton. He said that information from the police underlined the importance of bail reform, stating, 'When the justice committee reconvenes hopefully soon, we'll be able start moving some tangible action on that.' Chief Roskamp said in a statement after the round table meeting, 'This isn't just a policing issue, it's a community issue. 'When a small number of individuals are responsible for a high volume of crime, we must take a coordinated approach that spans the justice system, health care, and social supports.' Chief Roskamp said the meeting with local Members of Parliament 'recognized the multi-sectoral nature of the challenge, involving not only police and the courts, but also corrections, mental health services, and community organizations. 'Leaders (MPs Lawton and Brock) reaffirmed their commitment to working collaboratively to protect the public and support a justice system that balances accountability with rehabilitation,' Chief Roskamp's statement added. 'The meeting reflects ongoing efforts to ensure that legislative, enforcement, and support frameworks are equipped to address chronic criminality and its ripple effects on safety and well-being in communities of all sizes.' MP Brock, MP Lawton's Conservative caucus colleague and standing committee vice-chair, said he plans to present a bail reform petition when Parliament reconvenes on Sept. 15. The standing committee studies bills, policies, programs and spending of the Department of Justice and six related federal agencies. A former Crown prosecutor with 20 years of experience in Brantford, MP Brock said he believes a small number of repeat offenders are responsible for a disproportionate share of crime. 'Too many prolific repeat offenders who represent a very small percentage of the overall number of people who get involved in the criminal justice system are largely responsible for 80 percent of all crimes being committed in this country,' he said. He criticized a 2019 amendment to the Criminal Code introducing the 'principle of restraint,' which directs judges to release accused parties 'at the earliest opportunity on the least restrictive conditions.' MP Brock said this has contributed to what he called a 'catch‑and‑release system.' 'Don't get me wrong,' he said. 'People are still being detained. Not everybody who commits a criminal offense in this country today is being released … but I'm telling you the vast majority of people who should be detained – off our streets to protect our communities and our victims – are laughing at police enforcement right now because they know, 'arrest me, I'm going to be out of there in a couple of hours because of the principle of restraint'.' Given anecdotal evidence and references to non-specific numbers, the Express inquired about statistics and sources to support this call for reform were directed to Statistics Canada. 2020 Government of Canada research on recidivism in the criminal justice system states: 'The prevalence of recidivism varies from nine percent to 90 percent … this is largely due to differences in how recidivism is defined,' the research paper continues. 'Recidivism rates are not available at a national level since there is no national consensus on the operational definition of recidivism and there are significant variations in how recidivism is defined and counted in different jurisdictions: re-contact, re-arrest, re-incarceration, or reconviction.' Statistics Canada reported that the volume and severity of police‑reported crime in Canada, as measured by the Crime Severity Index (CSI), decreased four percent in 2024, following three consecutive years of increases. The 2024 CSI was just over one‑third lower than its peak in 1998. As well, in 2024, crime trend highlights over 2023 included, 'Rates of breaking and entering (-11%) and motor vehicle theft (-17%) decline, while rate of shoplifting rises (+14%).' A 2020 Department of Justice report titled, 'Recidivism in the Criminal Justice System' included the following: 'A 2019 study by Statistics Canada 12 examined re-contact 13 with the Ontario CJS. The study used a population of 53,003 individuals who came into contact at least once with the police because they were accused of a crime in 2008/2009. The study found that of the 53,003 individuals, 46% had at least one re-contact with the police, proportionally higher among men (48%) than women (39%). Of those that came in contact with police, 10% were chronic offenders.' Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a law-and-order action plan on April 10. Among a series of far-reaching initiatives slated for implementation this fall, PM Carney's plan includes strengthening bail laws for violent and organized crime, home invasions, car thefts, and human trafficking, 'including and especially for repeat offenders.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage under investigation by parliamentary standards commissioner
Nigel Farage is under investigation by the parliamentary standards watchdog over a potential breach of the MP's code of conduct. The Reform UK leader is being investigated over a possible break of rule five, which relates to registration of an interest. The parliamentary commissioner for standards, Daniel Greenberg, opened an investigation on Monday, according to the Parliament website. A spokesperson for Mr Farage said: 'Following a complaint from a member of the House of Lords, the Commissioner for Standards is doing his job.' According to the MP's code of conduct, rule five requires that new members should register their interests and and benefits they received in the 12 months before entering Parliament within one month of being elected. It also says that MPs must register any changes to their interests. It says: 'Members must fulfil conscientiously the requirements of the House in respect of the registration of interests in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. 'New Members must register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election within one month of their election, and Members must register any change in those registrable interests within 28 days.'