
‘They need to do better': Mark Carney to meet with Indigenous leaders amid criticism of rapid-development law
Mark Carney's
legislative agenda: a controversial effort to accelerate approvals for mega projects deemed to be in the national interest.
The One Canadian Economy Act, or Bill C-5, as the law continues to be known, received royal assent in late June, a scant 20 days after the Liberals first tabled the legislation.
When it passed, the prime minister made a promise to take part in three, daylong summits with First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders to hash out 'joint expectations' around the law.
The first of those meetings — with First Nations chiefs, regional chiefs, modern treaty and self-governing First Nations, and tribal councils — is slated to kick off at the Canadian Museum of History on Wednesday, before a full day of discussions with Carney gets underway on Thursday.
'I know it's a new, young government, but at the same time, they should have had this discussion … before the passing of this bill,' Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, told the Star.
'I think the government made a mistake on that. I think that they need to do better.'
That's a sentiment echoed by many who wonder why the Carney government was open to meeting face-to-face with a range of Indigenous rights holders, but only after the contentious law was safely passed.
The part of the law dealing with major resource and infrastructure initiatives was designed to address challenges on two fronts: long-simmering frustrations with the lengthy approval processes associated with the projects, but also the trade crisis prompted by U.S. President Donald Trump's tumultuous return to the White House.
At issue is how the law grants Ottawa temporary powers to bypass existing environmental laws and regulations to fast-track 'nation-building' projects, which could include pipelines, ports and mines, and how it was rammed through Parliament without robust scrutiny.
While some changes were made to the bill after a compressed period of debate, some critics were left concerned that the government was running roughshod over Indigenous rights and environmental protections.
'In terms of the way things have unfolded, I think, the fact that this (summit) is taking place post all of those steps … meeting for the sake of meeting is not meaningful consultation,' said Deliah Bernard, a partner at Roots Strategies and former senior Indigenous affairs adviser for former prime minister Justin Trudeau.
Bernard said proper consultation leads to the success of future projects, but that not ensuring that was the case here may be 'setting everyone up for failure.'
The Carney government has repeatedly insisted that Indigenous rights and environmental concerns were central to its drafting of the legislation, and that the law was crafted to prioritize the consultation process as projects are identified.
Last month, the Privy Council Office told the Star that 66 letters were sent to Indigenous groups to discuss the proposed law, that 15 meetings were held between the end of May and the beginning of June, and that as of late June, more than 125 groups had 'engaged' with Ottawa about the bill. The Privy Council Office did not provide a list of those groups, despite a request to do so.
Alvin Fiddler, Grand Chief of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN), said on his way to Ottawa on Tuesday that the 'very last minute' nature of the summit has been complicated by a number of chiefs currently experiencing emergencies, including Pikangikum First Nation, which is grappling with a power outage and a wildfire-induced evacuation.
'They're worried about just trying to meet the basic needs of their membership, including food and water … and at the same time, trying to prep the rest of the leaders for the meetings that will happen this week,' Fiddler said.
Fiddler represents 49 First Nations in northern Ontario, including those near the Ring of Fire, a region rich in critical minerals like chromite, cobalt and copper.
It's a region Premier Doug Ford wants to swiftly declare a 'special economic zone' after his government passed a similar law last month.
On Tuesday, nine First Nations in Ontario launched a legal challenge over both the federal and provincial laws, seeking an injunction that would prohibit Ottawa from naming national interest projects and Ontario from implementing the zones.
'This is not about a battle between development and not,' Todd Cornelius, chief of Oneida Nation of the Thames, said in a press release. 'It is about doing things recklessly and doing things right.'
This week's hybrid summit will take place against the backdrop of such tensions, where across the Ottawa River from Parliament Hill, Carney, his ministers, and government officials will speak to and hear from chiefs and moderate a series of discussions.
In promising to host the summits last month, Carney said the goal was not to leave the gatherings with a list of confirmed projects, but to develop a 'shared understanding' of how projects can proceed.
While Woodhouse Nepinak said she appreciated the prime minister's willingness to ultimately come to the table, the national chief also said a single day of face time is not enough.
'We will be asking the prime minister to commit to another meeting one year from now,' she said.
With files from Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
LMT Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Lockheed Martin Corporation Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Lockheed Martin Corporation ('Lockheed Martin' or 'the Company') (NYSE: LMT) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), are encouraged to contact the firm before September 26, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Lockheed Martin failed to maintain appropriate internal controls over risk adjusted contracts and the reporting of its risk adjusted profit booking rate. The Company proved incapable of maintaining effective procedures to perform comprehensive reviews of programs including technical complexities and risks. The Company overstated its ability to effectively deliver contractual commitments at high quality on time and under budget. The Company was therefore likely to report significant losses. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Lockheed Martin, investors suffered damages. Join the case to recover your losses. The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Four reasons for MLB's glacial trade market — and why it's likely to change soon
It's been almost a week since the Arizona Diamondbacks declared themselves sellers, sending their first baseman, Josh Naylor, to the Seattle Mariners. It was an opening salvo — a pretty big one at that — and in that instant it seemed as if anything could happen at any moment leading up to the 2025 trade deadline. Advertisement In all the days since … very little has happened. Thursday's 6 p.m. ET deadline is less than 48 hours away, and the Naylor deal remains the biggest trade of the week. The Baltimore Orioles have traded a couple of relievers, and the Detroit Tigers have acquired a new fourth starter, and the Tampa Bay Rays have played musical chairs behind the plate. But entering as of Tuesday night, Naylor is so far the highest ranked player (No. 17) from The Athletic's Big Board to change teams. using @baseball_ref transaction data, here's a look at how many trades have been made on each day leading up to the trade deadline over the past 25 years quantity of trades has soared recently, so we're basically guaranteed to have a flurry of activity over the final 48 hours — Céspedes Family BBQ (@CespedesBBQ) July 29, 2025 Some of the slower pace is surely in our heads. Every year, the bulk of the action comes in the last two days before the deadline. Some of it is the usual haggling over the cost of a trade chip. For example, we heard the Pittsburgh Pirates initially were asking for one of a team's Top 5 prospects for closer David Bednar, who at one point this year was demoted to Triple A. But there do seem to be some quirks of this particular deadline that might be slowing the pace. At least for now. The deadline is fast approaching and executives want to make moves. It's only a matter of time before this glacial market heats up and starts to really flow. Until then, here are some of the factors that seem to be gumming up the works. Chicago White Sox center fielder Luis Robert Jr. is the poster boy for this. The White Sox want to sell him as a 27-year-old superstar who's definitely worth a $20-million team option next year. Interested buyers surely point out that he's been a below average hitter two years in a row and will be lucky to be a 1.0 fWAR player at the end this season. Advertisement How do two sides come up with a fair value for a guy like that? Since last month, the White Sox have deployed scouts across minor-league homes of several contenders, including the San Diego Padres and New York Mets. Both clubs along with the Philadelphia Phillies and possibly others remain in play for Robert. Evaluators from multiple clubs say Robert presents the most upside among the group of center-field trade candidates, but he also carries risk. He was an All-Star in 2023 when he hit 38 home runs and stole 20 bases. However, he has struggled since then while dealing with injuries. This trade market is littered with similar resumes: high-end talent producing low-end results. Sandy Alcantara is a 29-year-old Cy Young winner. He also had a 6.66 ERA entering Tuesday's start against the Cardinals. Zac Gallen is also 29, nearly won a Cy Young award of his own, and his ERA is 5.60. Ozzie Albies is a 28-year-old three-time All-Star having the worst season of his career. Marcell Ozuna was an MVP candidate this year, and now he's a bench player for a fourth-place team. The Rays' Taj Bradley was just demoted to Triple A. The Rangers' Adolis Garcia doesn't hit like he used to. The Pirates' Bryan Reynolds hasn't hit much either. On the South Side, Adrian Houser has been a good big league starter for all of two months, while Cleveland's Shane Bieber hasn't been a big league starter at all since 2023 and just finished his fourth minor league rehab start since last year's Tommy John surgery. In particular, Houser is a great example. His market is strong with a few teams indicating serious interest, league sources said. But as of Tuesday afternoon, people with knowledge of the situation said nothing was close. It's hard to blame teams — both buyers and sellers — for having a hard time knowing what to make of some of these guys. The Tampa Bay Rays have been one of the busiest teams on the trade market, yet even they seem unsure which direction they're going. Two weeks ago, the Rays made a minor trade for reliever Bryan Baker. Then they made an even smaller deal for utility man Tristan Gray. Their next move was to deal away starting catcher Danny Jansen to the Brewers, after which they immediately acquired a new catcher from the Marlins, Nick Fortes. Advertisement The Rays have been busy, but they've been busy threading the needle in a way that does little to define the trade market as a whole. The San Diego Padres also seem to be considering moves that blur the line between buying and selling. They could trade away closer Robert Suarez or starter Dylan Cease, but seem to want big league bats in return. Consider the level of talent that those two teams alone have left in questionable trade status: Suarez could be the best closer available, Brandon Lowe would almost certainly be the best second baseman, Cease would have some of the highest rotation upside in a market that lacks a can't-miss ace, and Yandy Diaz would be one of the best right-handed bats in a market that leans heavily toward the left-handed batters box. Last week, executives from contending teams pointed to the weekend as a key turning point for other clubs facing hard decisions. It came and went. Then they suggested Monday as the tipping point. And yet? Ken Rosenthal wrote on Tuesday that the San Francisco Giants, Los Angeles Angels and Texas Rangers have also been slow to pick a lane. Earlier in the week, multiple rival executives simply referred to the Angels' situation as 'weird' because they don't want to sell but need to. Unlike the Giants and Rangers, the Angels (52-55) have a losing record. The Minnesota Twins have already started selling. The Atlanta Braves and Baltimore Orioles are obvious sellers. But do any of those three teams think they'll still be rebuilding next year? Probably not, and that complicates each team's approach at the deadline. The Twins stand out as a wild card. But rival executives say it's hard to know where things stand with them. One executive said that in return for their players, they were asking for the sky. It's one thing for the Twins to trade Chris Paddack two months before free agency. It would be another thing for them to trade ace Joe Ryan or closer Jhoan Duran, each of whom could be a key piece toward contention in 2026. The Braves and Orioles clearly feel they have cores that will be in the thick of the playoff race in 2026. Advertisement The St. Louis Cardinals have signaled an intention to sell, though that's likely only to a certain extent. They can easily trade closer Ryan Helsley or another reliever on an expiring contract, but All-Star Brendan Donovan, 23-year-old Jordan Walker and emerging slugger Ivan Herrera aren't so easy to move. The Washington Nationals also are obvious sellers — to a point. They seem unwilling to move their top young players, knowing most of their older players have limited trade value. Even the Pittsburgh Pirates, who are going on a full decade without a postseason appearance, are reportedly conflicted about whether to fully sell. Mitch Keller could be one of the best starting pitchers and David Bednar one of the best closers on the market, but the Pirates would also like to build a winner around Paul Skenes. Do they need those guys to do it? When the market's sellers aren't fully committed to selling, there's only so much the buyers can do to drive the market. The most shocking news of the past week wasn't an out-of-nowhere trade or a multi-team blockbuster, it was the league's announcement that Cleveland Guardians closer Emmanuel Clase has been placed on paid leave amid a sports gambling investigation. And just like that, a trade market fascination was officially off the table — Clase's availability was one of the true wild cards of this lead-up to the deadline — and an on-the-fence team was forced to think differently about its short-term and long-term future. How do the Guardians see their next three years potentially without their mainstay in the ninth inning? Is Steven Kwan more readily available than he was before Clase vanished indefinitely? There are unusual trade deadline circumstances happening all over the sport. The Twins and Rays on the verge of changing ownership. The Cardinals have a new head of baseball operations ready to take over in the Los Angeles Dodgers could get Max Muncy, Blake Snell, Roki Sasaki, Tanner Scott and Michael Kopech back from the injured list within the next months. Are those the reinforcements they need, or should they trade prospect capital for more? Every team faces difficult decisions this time of year, but this trade deadline has some X factors that go beyond the usual player evaluations and roster analysis. (Top photo of Luis Robert Jr.: Alex Slitz / Getty Images)
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Star Entertainment posts wider loss as regulatory squeeze, carded play weigh
(Reuters) -Australia's Star Entertainment on Wednesday reported a deeper quarterly loss sequentially, underscoring the prolonged pressure on the casino operator from regulatory crackdowns and the shift to mandatory carded play. The embattled gaming group posted a fourth-quarter loss before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of A$27 million ($17.58 million), compared with a loss of A$24 million in the prior quarter. Star has been reeling from a series of regulatory inquiries into alleged breaches of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism laws, coupled with a broader downturn in gaming revenue. A recent move by the New South Wales government to ban cash transactions in casinos — though not in pubs and clubs — has further impacted the company's earnings potential. The broader casino sector in Australia has yet to recover from the lasting effects of COVID-era lockdowns, border closures and now rising interest costs. Star, in particular, has endured years of instability — marked by two Bell inquiries, the departure of its CEO and chairman, and a near-collapse that required urgent capital support. On Wednesday, the company confirmed that its Sydney casino licence remains suspended. It plans to make a formal submission to the New South Wales Independent Casino Commission on August 31 as part of efforts to regain regulatory approval. ($1 = 1.5356 Australian dollars) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data