
‘I was watching osprey for five hours a day': how the world fell in love with nature live streams
In 2012 Dianne Hoffman, a retired consultant, became a peeping Tom. For five hours a day she watched the antics of a couple, Harriet and Ozzie, who lived on Dunrovin ranch in Montana.
The pair were nesting ospreys, being streamed live as they incubated their clutch of eggs. The eggs never hatched, but the ospreys sat on them for months before finally kicking them out of the nest.
'I do think they experienced grief,' says Hoffman, now 81, who watched the birds from 2,000 miles (3,000km) away in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania.
Hoffman was processing her own grief after the loss of her husband, brother and father, and watching the live streams was how she 'rejoined the world'.
'It was a very black time,' she says. Although Ozzie died in 2014, she still watches the nest and its current occupants for an hour a day. 'I can't think of anything the internet has done better for me than these cams.'
Nature-focused live streams, set up near nests, water holes, dens or landscapes to provide a live, constant feed of the natural world, have proliferated over the past two decades, helped by cheap cameras and remote internet connections. The drama of nature – or sometimes the lack of it – is what draws people in.
The seventh season of the TV series The Great Moose Migration from the Swedish broadcaster SVT involved 20 days of continuous live footage, drawing in millions of viewers. Norway's NRK has aired 18 hours of salmon swimming upstream and 12 hours of firewood burning. A viral fish doorbell allows viewers to watch migrating fish in a lock in Utrecht.
In an increasingly urbanised society, as people spend more time on screens they are less connected with nature. 'While technology can draw us away from the natural world, we have also learned that technology can connect us with nature in unique ways,' researchers wrote in a paper published in March.
It came after another study that found nature live streams could 'improve the lives of those who cannot leave their homes or live far from natural environments'.
Researchers from the University of Montana first put up a camera focused on Harriet and Ozzie's nest in 2012. At the end of the breeding season, the owner, SuzAnne Miller, turned it off but scores of people contacted her. '[They said] please don't do that. We want to watch your ranch,' Miller says. As well as the birds, they could see what was going on behind the nest, she says, and wanted to keep watching.
Initially, Miller did not understand why someone would livestream her doing mundane tasks such as scooping up horse dung. 'I did at first find that very odd,' she says. But she added three more live streams of the river, paddock and a bird feeder. It was only when she became ill and was not able to leave the house for six months that she understood the value of it – she too got hooked on live streams of the farm.
If someone leaves a gate open, within minutes a viewer will contact the ranch to warn them. Members watched a vet put down a horse after it slid on ice and broke its neck. The horse's head lay in Miller's lap as it died. 'Many of these people are older and facing death themselves,' she says. 'It got them talking about death.'
The stream has 275 paying subscribers, most of whom have never been to the farm. It cost $8 a month to be a member, and most are older people or those with reduced mobility. Several members have had their ashes scattered there despite never having set foot on the farm, because it became their favourite place in their final years.
Many of these sites allow viewers to message one another or post messages on discussion boards. Established in 1994, FogCam is often billed as the oldest continuously operating webcam in the world. It is a single livestreaming camera that posts an image every 20 seconds, capturing the fog rolling in to San Francisco.
'If you can imagine it, there is probably a live stream about it,' says Rebecca Mauldin, assistant professor at the University of Texas at Arlington. 'It is a new area for research, but it's not a new area; millions of people watch nature live streams.'
But they are not just another form of entertainment – research suggests they could also be good for wellbeing. A new study awaiting publication shows that playing nature-focused live streams increased the wellbeing of some of the older residents in a care home, improving their mood, levels of relaxation, and sleep. A previous study has also found Dunrovin webcams have a 'significant positive change' for care-home residents, and could be an 'innovative and effective way' to improve wellbeing more broadly.
'I've realised it is not just for older adults – there are all sorts of reasons why you might not have full access to nature,' says Mauldin.
There are hundreds of webcams across 35 of the US's national parks. The Giant Panda Cam captures activities of animals at Smithsonian National Zoo, and Africam looks at wildlife using cameras across Africa. In the UK, the Wildlife Trusts have 25 live webcams. One of the most popular is the peregrine falcon cam on top of the town hall in Leamington Spa, which had 160,000 views in 2024.
In more remote locations, webcams provide an alternative for people who are unable to visit in person. In Skomer Island off the Welsh coast, the island's 42,000 puffins are captured on a live stream that had 120,000 views in 2024.
They are also a way of learning more about animal behaviour. Conservationists are using a live cam to study grey seals at South Walney nature reserve, which is free from human disturbance as there is no public access to the beach. 'One of our trainees spotted the first-ever seal pup born on the reserve via the camera – a small, white, fluffy pup nestled among the adults,' says Georgia de Jong Cleyndert, head of marine at Cumbria Wildlife Trust.
For some birds such as the ospreys, permanent cameras double up as CCTV. 'The osprey cam is primarily for security, to ensure that these protected birds and their nests are safe, and to act as a deterrent to anyone who would wish to harm them,' says Paul Waterhouse, reserves officer for Cumbria Wildlife Trust.
Mauldin says her research shows nature live streams relax people and help them put their own concerns into perspective.
'It also tells a lot about human curiosity – we like to learn, we like a sense of surprise – sometimes it's nothing, sometimes it's something amazing. It's yearning for connection with the world around us,' she says.
Keen to start watching nature online? Here are six of the most popular live streams to get you started:
Bears going fishing: From late June and throughout July, bears flock to Brooks Falls in Alaska to catch migrating salmon. At times up to 25 bears can be seen onscreen at once (if you can't wait until June, here are two hours of footage as a taster)
Bats on the move: In the daytime, all is quiet on the live stream of Bracken Cave, Texas in the US – but in the evening, you can catch its 20 million resident Mexican free-tailed bats streaming out of the cave to go on the hunt.
Baby storks: Knepp Estate in Sussex in the UK is home to a growing population of white storks which bred for the first time in 2020 after an absence of hundreds of years. A livestream shows the nest currently playing host to four fledged offspring: Isla, Ivy, Issy and Ivan. At the time of writing they are tearing up a small dead rabbit.
Love Island for osprey: This has been like a series of the hit reality show, with four osprey couples battling for space in one nest at the Loch of the Lowes wildlife reserve in Scotland. After weeks of grafting and being mugged off, two birds have claimed top spot and appear to be putting their eggs in one basket.
Going for a drink: This live stream spies on a watering hole in Tembe elephant park at the border of South Africa and Mozambique, and you can watch a steady stream of elephants, lions, rhinos and buffalo stopping by for a sip. After dark, the cam's night vision lights up a calming, spinning world of moths and fireflies.
Live jelly cam: Monterey Bay Aquarium's jellyfish cam offers a hypnotic experience, immersing you in the serene world of sea nettles, native to the eastern Pacific Ocean. Jellyfish can be seen drifting through, gently pulsating their tentacles as they go.
And if you're already an avid watcher, share your favourite live stream in the comments below.
Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE MAUREEN CALLAHAN: An insider has revealed the Royal verdict on THAT Meghan twerking video. It's so devastatingly cutting, she may never recover
It's the twerk seen round the world — and regrettably, there is no unseeing it. Truly: what's more royal, more regal — more befitting an American woman who married into her title and never lets us forget that she is a duchess — than releasing a home movie of yourself lifting up your dress, spreading your legs and gyrating while on the verge of giving birth?


The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Online ‘guru girlies' promise a better life, but is it too good to be true?
About two years ago, a self-professed 'goddess coach' called Jaelyn posted an eight hour-long 'sleep affirmation' video which, according to many a satisfied viewer, has worked wonders for them. In a somewhat sultry, meditative voice she repeats mantras and welcomes her listeners to attract 'the kind of men and people who will always treat you like a goddess'. The video, boldly titled Attract Men Who Spend Money, Provide and Love You! is one of many in a genre of content that is booming on YouTube and social media. I call them 'guru girlies', and they are proving a force to be reckoned with. In their rather austere imparting of wisdom, guru girlies have become many young women's go-to guide for all manner of modern conundrums. The spectrum of gurus is vast, but their advice is mainly focused on the idea of 'levelling up'. From your diet to dressing better to your choice in friends or men, if you want to live your dream life, self-improvement is the prerequisite; the comprehensive physical, financial and spiritual sine qua non that any woman needs to become her best and dream self. When it comes to the physical, gurus give detailed insight on how to glow up and rebrand your life, often using themselves as examples of how, given the right mindset and Pinterest boards, they were able to lose weight, reduce acne, stay on trend and become a modern standard of beauty that social media sits before in awe. Spiritually, guru girlies are invariably enamoured with manifestation techniques, subliminal messaging and the universe's seeming interest in giving us every abundance if only we'd ask it to. If you are feeling unfulfilled, it's time to access your divine feminine energy. One guru describes this energy as 'self-prioritisation', performing ritualistic (and often costly) tasks of feminine self-care such as gratitude journaling, healthy eating and skincare routines, all in a bid to get back from the world what you put into it. How conveniently straightforward this all seems, and yet how odd that these young guru girlies are lauded as bringers of divine secrets in all matters feminine. Financially, gurus typically see men as a means to a life of wealth and abundance. Creators such as Leticia Padua, known by her devoted following as SheraSeven, claims that because all men cheat ('it's just a matter of time'), it's important for women to find the cheater with the most money. This financial levelling up – a mindset that involves distinguishing between high-value, provider men and what Shera calls 'dusties' – has proved highly popular. And that's because at the root of all this content is a brewing disappointment that many a young woman, scrolling through her social media and navigating a rapidly changing modern world, is bound to feel. A disappointment with modern love and prospects, with our unfiltered face and appearance, and with the fact that real life isn't nearly as ideal as it is online. Guru girlies are there to bridge the gap between your disappointing reality and the ideal they purport to embody, right before you onscreen. This is done by submitting to the system, not as an act of defeat but as empowerment. Arguably the most well-known guru, Thewizardliz (known as Liz) is a case in point. 'Start expecting good treatment, start expecting to be spoiled, start expecting him to give you money,' she instructs in a video. 'Princess treatment' isn't so much seen as infantilising or disempowering as it is heralded by many guru girlies as a righteous investment in becoming your highest, most feminine self, courtesy of a provider man. However just last week, a four-months pregnant Liz accused her 'provider' husband, YouTuber and software CEO Landon Nickerson of messaging another woman. In all of this, there is no doubt an addictive nature to self-improvement that explains why a new guru, delivering the same old message, seems to blow up every other week. In an age where ever-changing trends dictate our dreams and ideals, where there is always some undiscovered aspect of ourselves to improve on, we are conveniently primed to keep going back to these gurus in a vain attempt to change who we fundamentally are. 'The internet is making us feel like there is always something we could be improving, and there's a sense that we feel no choice but to try and keep up sometimes,' says former guru follower Just a Girl in Paris in a video critique. What's fortunate for these gurus is that, because the onus of failing to self-improve is always placed on you, your misery and dissatisfaction perfectly places you to keep returning to her either for advice or, increasingly it would seem, for comfort. Because the truth is, much of what makes these guru girlies convincing isn't the success rate of their advice, it is the parasocial relationship they bring to the already toxic world of self-improvement and wellness culture. Audiences see their favourite influencer less as a guru than as a kind of ideal friend: the pretty, rich, self-confident and inaccessible woman who, in real life, would never actually be our friend. Many gurus have fostered a false intimacy with their audience that has become a given. 'She's literally like every girl's older sister,' says one of Thewizardliz's followers. 'Sometimes I forget she is a famous influencer and not my best friend who gives me advice on FaceTime,' reads another of the countless adoring comments. Viewers find comfort and ease in a superficial albeit meaningful relationship that isn't rooted in the messy ups and downs of a real friendship. Their guru friend tells them everything they want to hear about creating their dream life, which only requires intangibles such as affirmations, cutting off disappointing people or a mindset shift. So even if taking all these steps proves to be joyless and wanting, at least your guru, ready with her next upload, will be there to be your ideal friend, all over again. Zandile Powell is a video essayist and writer. A version of this essay first appeared on her YouTube channel Kidology


The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Beth: Channel 4's first ‘digital drama' is so snoozy that no young people will watch it
In 1964, Andy Warhol shot the Empire State Building then turned it into an art film called Empire, which is more than eight hours long. I was reminded of this last Christmas when I let my nine-year-old niece choose what to watch on TV. She went straight to the YouTube app and pressed play on a video comparing US and UK chocolate bars. It went into such a tremendous amount of detail that I was mesmerised, not by the content but by how brazenly boring it was. It went on for what felt like hours. It might still be going on now. I wonder if this is what television natives get wrong about YouTube. In all the discussions about disappearing attention spans and 'second screen' viewing – ie scrolling on your phone while leaving a single brain cell free to drool at whatever product placement Emily in Paris has just dropped into the 'plot' – there is an assumption that online content has to be short and snappy. That might be more true of TikTok or Reels, but YouTube is a place that chews up time then swallows it. Do I know this because I have watched lengthy self-produced documentaries about complete strangers' walking holidays? Look, in the 60s, it would have been art. This is what Beth, Channel 4's 'digital original drama', is trying to contend with. TV has long been worried about the internet coming for its audience, and it's true that you are about as likely to get a young person watching live terrestrial TV as you are to get them to pick up the phone and have a conversation with you. How can old-fashioned television begin to compete? Should it even bother trying? Channel 4 is giving it a go. It has already made Hollyoaks a 'streaming-first' soap, sticking episodes online a day before they appear on E4. Now it is trying a new approach with drama. Beth will appear on YouTube in three 15-minute chunks from Monday 9 June, and on the actual telly as a single 45-minute episode, making it the skorts of the screen: why be one thing when you can be two? Beth is about a glamorous couple called Joe and Molly, played by Nicholas Pinnock and Abbey Lee, who are going through IVF treatment. We see the buildup to a much desired pregnancy, skip forward to the birth, then jump to a few years later, for reasons that would definitely spoil it if they were to be revealed here. This is a family drama. There are brief fantasy sequences, of the children the couple might have, and discussions about what it means for Joe, a Black man, and Molly, a white woman, to have a child who resembles them both. It is also a low-key thriller. There are tensions between the couple, both obvious and implied. Their IVF doctor is overfamiliar and too tactile. Molly's mother is disproportionately rattled by a child's simple drawing. To add to the genre pile-on, Beth is being billed as science fiction, but knowing this doesn't do it any favours, because without that knowledge, it looks like a straightforward, if slightly stagey, drama for almost the entire duration. If you do know that it is science fiction, you're left to constantly anticipate exactly when the science fiction will kick in. For me, that undermines the more weighty emotional scenes, because as Joe and Molly endure both hope and devastation, a nagging voice in my head is wondering if they are going to turn out to be aliens. It's good that it doesn't patronise viewers by assuming they won't have more than five seconds of focus to spare. In fact, it's so far from giddy that it is almost sedate. Nor does it go for the endless stretch that can afflict online content, where the time restrictions of traditional TV mean nothing, and you watch a man chew a Curly Wurly for what seems like many days. But that does mean that, ultimately, Beth feels like a one-off television drama, albeit one with an eyebrow-raising pivot towards the end. I can't see what makes it so specifically digital. If one of the existential issues facing TV is how to get young people to pay attention to it, then a meditative drama about IVF, identity and parenthood isn't necessarily going to solve the problem. But if the idea is to win back some of the older eyeballs who have been distracted by, let's say (just plucking this out of thin air) an in-depth documentary about a niche ultramarathon, then it might be on to something.